Find Your New Baby
rubmaps
LoveHUB Escorts Directory
Top Escorts
Best Escorts
This blog is moderated by Admin
  1. #17041
    Quote Originally Posted by Veni1  [View Original Post]
    I was contacted this week via text by a booker who indicated a new agency was available. Booker indicated that gals were BBFS and msog with no up charge. Quoted fees were 220 half hr and 280 hr. Location in MW. I haven't tried it out yet since MW is a bit of a trip for me. Anyway the website is:

    https://kgirlsinla.Wordpress.com/home/
    Got that too. Piper looks like someone else. Don't know who.

  2. #17040
    Quote Originally Posted by PussyDestroyr  [View Original Post]
    Wait. Hami is BBFS?!
    Just posting availabilities at the agencies. Not the service.

  3. #17039
    Quote Originally Posted by Toungsten  [View Original Post]
    M. Annie, Hana, Hazel.

    Sunny. Lyn, Semi, Joy.

    Sexy Angels. Hami, Sophia, Helen, Jenny.

    PKL. Ara, Moni.
    Wait. Hami is BBFS?!

  4. #17038
    Senior Member


    Posts: 415

    New Agency in LA

    I was contacted this week via text by a booker who indicated a new agency was available. Booker indicated that gals were BBFS and msog with no up charge. Quoted fees were 220 half hr and 280 hr. Location in MW. I haven't tried it out yet since MW is a bit of a trip for me. Anyway the website is:

    https://kgirlsinla.Wordpress.com/home/

  5. #17037
    Why is the post put up with 2 different user IDs? Doubt many here would know what an abg is unless you grew up around sgv area and certain parts of oc. LOL.

    Quote Originally Posted by Daiyutabc  [View Original Post]
    Been adventuring around for months and trying out a lot of the new talent. Figured I'd share my 2 cents for people with similar preferences since it seems the group of guys with similar tastes is small. Just to give you a background, I'm in my mid 30's and prefer them skinny (any slight pudge or happy weight kills it for me), cute / sexy face (sharp and seductive features, not into cutesy or innocent looking), big chest (real or fake is okay with me); imagine an ABG, IG model, or Vietnamese coffee shop girl look.

    FAVORITES: Lyn (Sunny) / Chanel (SA** believe she's with M now?

    J:

    Wynnie** (she might have moved): Looks - 7 / Performance - 7. 75 / Repeat. No / Notes: She has a definite ABG look and gives you that PSE, however she look to be in her mid 30's and had a little stomach pooch. DATY and BBBJ was enjoyable, but she has one of the worst DFK; it's like she was licking the inside of a yogurt cup. She's definitely fiesty / freaky and fun to some extent but not memorable. CFS but I decided to CIM.

    Mio: Looks - 7 / Performance - 8 / Repeat. No / Notes: She has a cute-ish looking face but her teeth could use some work. Very shy but will slowly open up. Skinny with natural C / D but they kinda droop. Doesn't do DFK. Her BBBJ and CIM is good, but sadly not worth a 2nd try.

    Sunny:

    Lyn: Looks - 8 / Performance - 8. 75 / Repeat. Yes / Notes: This is my go to and definitely takes care of you with that GFE. She's tall (around 5'5" skinny with little to no body fat (you can see some ribs but not starving skinny, athletic skinny), C / D fake but round and perky, cute / sexy face (can definitely imagine her having RBF or be intimidating to others if she doesn't smile), young / mid 30's. DATY, BBBJ (one of the best), CIM, CFS, GFE, and absolutely loves nonstop DFK. I usually go for a while and she's a trooper and can definitely keep up..

  6. #17036
    Agree with you on booker being the weak link and not doing proper screening. In addition it also doesn't help when there's blabber mouths here that divulge too much info out to newbs by telling how to get past screening or who's easiest on screening.

    Quote Originally Posted by JHeezy  [View Original Post]
    Not sure why ya'll think it's a location issue with this bust that supposedly took place at Norton. As shady and well-known as that spot is.

    It's clearly the booker's fault for not putting in the work to make sure the girls are safe. It's not like these vice are randomly kicking down doors in a apartment complex looking for these establishments, they were clearly given a room number by the booker. This could have happened at literally any spot.

    Nothing on the news means the vice didn't find anything useful and the girl ended up with a warning. Or had to give up a free session. Either way, I'd be careful using the booker associated with the girl that got busted. They're clearly not into keeping things as tight as other bookers. I'd hate to be that guy that's balls deep in the roommate while vice is kicking down the doors.

  7. #17035
    Quote Originally Posted by JHeezy  [View Original Post]
    Either way, I'd be careful using the booker associated with (Aiyou/Eye). They're clearly not into keeping things as tight as other bookers. I'd hate to be that guy that's balls deep in the roommate while vice is kicking down the doors.
    So the question is: Was it Candygirl or Gray that booked the appointment?

  8. #17034
    Quote Originally Posted by Daiyutabc  [View Original Post]
    Been adventuring around for months and trying out a lot of the new talent. Figured I'd share my 2 cents for people with similar preferences since it seems the group of guys with similar tastes is small. Just to give you a background, I'm in my mid 30's and prefer them skinny (any slight pudge or happy weight kills it for me), cute / sexy face (sharp and seductive features, not into cutesy or innocent looking), big chest (real or fake is okay with me); imagine an ABG, IG model, or Vietnamese coffee shop girl look.

    FAVORITES: Lyn (Sunny) / Chanel (SA** believe she's with M now?

    J:

    Wynnie** (she might have moved): Looks - 7 / Performance - 7. 75 / Repeat. No / Notes: She has a definite ABG look and gives you that PSE, however she look to be in her mid 30's and had a little stomach pooch. DATY and BBBJ was enjoyable, but she has one of the worst DFK; it's like she was licking the inside of a yogurt cup. She's definitely fiesty / freaky and fun to some extent but not memorable. CFS but I decided to CIM.

    Mio: Looks - 7 / Performance - 8 / Repeat. No / Notes: She has a cute-ish looking face but her teeth could use some work. Very shy but will slowly open up. Skinny with natural C / D but they kinda droop. Doesn't do DFK. Her BBBJ and CIM is good, but sadly not worth a 2nd try..
    Chanel (formerly of SA) isn't the Chanel with M. Lyn has been a superstar for years. You may have seen Viki on a bad day. Her service is as good as it gets but as I always say YMMV. Joy is the former Poppy. Nothing special and moves around a lot. Probably from lack of business. Niya is CFS. Saw Bella once and never went back. Overrated IMHO.

  9. #17033

    Multiple Reviews

    Been adventuring around for months and trying out a lot of the new talent. Figured I'd share my 2 cents for people with similar preferences since it seems the group of guys with similar tastes is small. Just to give you a background, I'm in my mid 30's and prefer them skinny (any slight pudge or happy weight kills it for me), cute / sexy face (sharp and seductive features, not into cutesy or innocent looking), big chest (real or fake is okay with me); imagine an ABG, IG model, or Vietnamese coffee shop girl look.

    FAVORITES: Lyn (Sunny) / Chanel (SA** believe she's with M now?

    J:

    Wynnie** (she might have moved): Looks - 7 / Performance - 7. 75 / Repeat. No / Notes: She has a definite ABG look and gives you that PSE, however she look to be in her mid 30's and had a little stomach pooch. DATY and BBBJ was enjoyable, but she has one of the worst DFK; it's like she was licking the inside of a yogurt cup. She's definitely fiesty / freaky and fun to some extent but not memorable. CFS but I decided to CIM.

    Mio: Looks - 7 / Performance - 8 / Repeat. No / Notes: She has a cute-ish looking face but her teeth could use some work. Very shy but will slowly open up. Skinny with natural C / D but they kinda droop. Doesn't do DFK. Her BBBJ and CIM is good, but sadly not worth a 2nd try.

    Sunny:

    Lyn: Looks - 8 / Performance - 8. 75 / Repeat. Yes / Notes: This is my go to and definitely takes care of you with that GFE. She's tall (around 5'5" skinny with little to no body fat (you can see some ribs but not starving skinny, athletic skinny), C / D fake but round and perky, cute / sexy face (can definitely imagine her having RBF or be intimidating to others if she doesn't smile), young / mid 30's. DATY, BBBJ (one of the best), CIM, CFS, GFE, and absolutely loves nonstop DFK. I usually go for a while and she's a trooper and can definitely keep up.

    Joy: Looks - 6. 5 / Performance - 6. 5 / Repeat. No / Notes: To be honest, I can't remember much on her because it was that unexciting. She definitely wasn't into it and was very delicate. I'm average size and she wouldn't DT, about 75%. Not a fan of LFK / DFK and was just trying to get it over with in a passive / aggressive approach.

    Niya** (might be on break): Looks - 7. 5 / Performance - 9 / Repeat. Yes / Notes: Jumps between here and norcal. Face is good but not great, a little on the fobbier side. She's definitely a little more on the meaty side, but not fat, just curvy. Real DDD, perky, and doesn't sag. Performance was probably one of the best I've had as she's really into it and wants to make sure you loving every moment of it. DATY, BBBJ (good but not great), rimming, CIM. She'll also do a nuru massage (did it without any oil) and it's not like Bangkok but pretty good to me. I don't repeat many but she definitely earned it.

    M:

    Bella: Looks - 7 / Performance - 5. 5 / Repeat. No / Notes: Has a cute-ish face but has some happy weight. Very soft spoken, shy, and more the sensual type. LFK but no much. BBBJ but won't DT and doesn't like her head being touched. Just like Joy (see above), she's very delicate and you can't be rough so I had to dial it back. I don't pump very hard and she was low key complaining when doggy so had to finish in missionary. I wasn't thrilled but at least now I know she's not worth a 2nd visit.

    SFK:

    Viki: Looks - 6. 5 / Performance - 6. 5 / Repeat. No / Notes: I saw her back in June so my memory is hazy but what I remember most what her looks. Her photos are her but probably what she looked like 7 - 10 years ago. She's definitely in her late 30's, more likely in her 40's. She's got happy weight and a little pooch in the front. She still looked cute but definitely not my taste.

    SA:

    Chanel** (Think she's with M): Looks - 8. 5 / Performance - 8. 5 / Repeat. Yes / Notes: She was my first experience in the LA market and she definitely set the bar high. I've been hearing that she's back with M / Gray but her personality and performance has definitely changed. I can't remember the exact details but she did BBFS, CIM, DFK, GFE, and was definitely a pleaser. Had a great conversation with her and she was really into it. Sadly I'm hearing a different story, can anyone confirm where she is now? Would love to revisit.

    If you've read this far, I applaud you. My reviews aren't great at the moment only because it's late and most of these visits were a while back. For future experiences I'll share more details, I have a couple new appointments for this upcoming week. I'm the type that's willing to try anything so if any of you have a request, I'm more than happy to TOFTT and report back. Just keep in mind, my taste may be different from yours; for example I can tell Toungsten and I have opposites tastes, nothing wrong with that, just enjoy different flavors. With that said, can anyone recommend others similar to Lyn or Chanal (from SA)? Thank you everyone!

  10. #17032

    Multiple Reviews

    Been adventuring around for months and trying out a lot of the new talent. Figured I'd share my 2 cents for people with similar preferences since it seems the group of guys with similar tastes is small. Just to give you a background, I'm in my mid 30's and prefer them skinny (any slight pudge or happy weight kills it for me), cute / sexy face (sharp and seductive features, not into cutesy or innocent looking), big chest (real or fake is okay with me); imagine an ABG, IG model, or Vietnamese coffee shop girl look.

    FAVORITES: Lyn (Sunny) / Chanel (SA** believe she's with M now?

    J:

    Wynnie** (she might have moved): Looks - 7 / Performance - 7. 75 / Repeat. No / Notes: She has a definite ABG look and gives you that PSE, however she look to be in her mid 30's and had a little stomach pooch. DATY and BBBJ was enjoyable, but she has one of the worst DFK; it's like she was licking the inside of a yogurt cup. She's definitely fiesty / freaky and fun to some extent but not memorable. CFS but I decided to CIM.

    Mio: Looks - 7 / Performance - 8 / Repeat. No / Notes: She has a cute-ish looking face but her teeth could use some work. Very shy but will slowly open up. Skinny with natural C / D but they kinda droop. Doesn't do DFK. Her BBBJ and CIM is good, but sadly not worth a 2nd try.

    Sunny:

    Lyn: Looks - 8 / Performance - 8. 75 / Repeat. Yes / Notes: This is my go to and definitely takes care of you with that GFE. She's tall (around 5'5" skinny with little to no body fat (you can see some ribs but not starving skinny, athletic skinny), C / D fake but round and perky, cute / sexy face (can definitely imagine her having RBF or be intimidating to others if she doesn't smile), young / mid 30's. DATY, BBBJ (one of the best), CIM, CFS, GFE, and absolutely loves nonstop DFK. I usually go for a while and she's a trooper and can definitely keep up.

    Joy: Looks - 6. 5 / Performance - 6. 5 / Repeat. No / Notes: To be honest, I can't remember much on her because it was that unexciting. She definitely wasn't into it and was very delicate. I'm average size and she wouldn't DT, about 75%. Not a fan of LFK / DFK and was just trying to get it over with in a passive / aggressive approach.

    Niya** (might be on break): Looks - 7. 5 / Performance - 9 / Repeat. Yes / Notes: Jumps between here and norcal. Face is good but not great, a little on the fobbier side. She's definitely a little more on the meaty side, but not fat, just curvy. Real DDD, perky, and doesn't sag. Performance was probably one of the best I've had as she's really into it and wants to make sure you loving every moment of it. DATY, BBBJ (good but not great), rimming, CIM. She'll also do a nuru massage (did it without any oil) and it's not like Bangkok but pretty good to me. I don't repeat many but she definitely earned it.

    M:

    Bella: Looks - 7 / Performance - 5. 5 / Repeat. No / Notes: Has a cute-ish face but has some happy weight. Very soft spoken, shy, and more the sensual type. LFK but no much. BBBJ but won't DT and doesn't like her head being touched. Just like Joy (see above), she's very delicate and you can't be rough so I had to dial it back. I don't pump very hard and she was low key complaining when doggy so had to finish in missionary. I wasn't thrilled but at least now I know she's not worth a 2nd visit.

    SFK:

    Viki: Looks - 6. 5 / Performance - 6. 5 / Repeat. No / Notes: I saw her back in June so my memory is hazy but what I remember most what her looks. Her photos are her but probably what she looked like 7 - 10 years ago. She's definitely in her late 30's, more likely in her 40's. She's got happy weight and a little pooch in the front. She still looked cute but definitely not my taste.

    SA:

    Chanel** (Think she's with M): Looks - 8. 5 / Performance - 8. 5 / Repeat. Yes / Notes: She was my first experience in the LA market and she definitely set the bar high. I've been hearing that she's back with M / Gray but her personality and performance has definitely changed. I can't remember the exact details but she did BBFS, CIM, DFK, GFE, and was definitely a pleaser. Had a great conversation with her and she was really into it. Sadly I'm hearing a different story, can anyone confirm where she is now? Would love to revisit.

    If you've read this far, I applaud you. My reviews aren't great at the moment only because it's late and most of these visits were a while back. For future experiences I'll share more details, I have a couple new appointments for this upcoming week. I'm the type that's willing to try anything so if any of you have a request, I'm more than happy to TOFTT and report back. Just keep in mind, my taste may be different from yours; for example I can tell Toungsten and I have opposites tastes, nothing wrong with that, just enjoy different flavors. With that said, can anyone recommend others similar to Lyn or Chanal (from SA)? Thank you everyone!

  11. #17031
    Not sure why ya'll think it's a location issue with this bust that supposedly took place at Norton. As shady and well-known as that spot is.

    It's clearly the booker's fault for not putting in the work to make sure the girls are safe. It's not like these vice are randomly kicking down doors in a apartment complex looking for these establishments, they were clearly given a room number by the booker. This could have happened at literally any spot.

    Nothing on the news means the vice didn't find anything useful and the girl ended up with a warning. Or had to give up a free session. Either way, I'd be careful using the booker associated with the girl that got busted. They're clearly not into keeping things as tight as other bookers. I'd hate to be that guy that's balls deep in the roommate while vice is kicking down the doors.

  12. #17030

    Other consequences for K Girls

    Quote Originally Posted by GoldDust58  [View Original Post]
    Really any bust are targeted towards scaring the girl to stop working. Same deal to America providers. Taken for basic questioning and released back into the game. Told better not see you doing this anymore. Change name or move cities and that's it.
    I generally agree with the above, but an added consequence for the K-Girls or any foreign provider is that sometimes ICE can get involved depending on their VISA and or citizenship status. It's not alway a catch and release situation. Long time ago, I knew two K-girls in Vegas that were part of a big bust and they were immediately turned over to ICE and detained for more than 35 days in jail before they were sent home to Korea, plus they got a 10 year ban from returning to the US. Engaging in prostitution is one of the activities that are specifically included in the criteria that impacts much of the immigration law.

    I am really bummed about the rumors of the latest bust as that provider is one of my faves. Maybe with Gascon as the, charges will not be pursued.

  13. #17029
    Banned Member


    Posts: 1333

    Norton Location

    Quote Originally Posted by BonerAppetitty  [View Original Post]
    When you schedule an appointment, preface by telling booker that you don't want to go to Norton but you can see a girl at another place instead.

    Problem is some bookers are too easy for newbies. I am not worried yet. I don't like Norton because it's too obvious there. I will still go there anyway.
    We shall change the building name for location to "Lust Palace" or "Fuck Palace". .

    I smile every time I look at that BLDG.

  14. #17028

    CandyGirl Victoria / MyKupCake Lexy

    I only want to see hot young girls who look under 30. I know she is not under 30 but I wasn't disappointed with her looks, attitude, and service. Sometimes I will be curious about an attractive older than 30 girl.

    Notice I didn't call her an MILF although she may be at that age LOL. I only recommend girls I liked or found attractive. You were spot on about her. I like slim petite girls and tall athletic girls. Her face was just OK but I still thought she was attractive in her own right. It was her tall body that got me hot. Her service and attitude were a plus too.

    Quote Originally Posted by IAmGib1  [View Original Post]
    IMHO. Victoria's body and face are not older...

    Older is a relative term. I don't think she is in her 20's. I personally don't care about chronological age. I care about her actual looks, body shape, fitness, attitude and service.

    I like a pretty face but GND with a firm shapely bodies on women with great attitudes and service is fine for me...

  15. #17027
    When you schedule an appointment, preface by telling booker that you don't want to go to Norton but you can see a girl at another place instead.

    Problem is some bookers are too easy for newbies. I am not worried yet. I don't like Norton because it's too obvious there. I will still go there anyway.

    Quote Originally Posted by ChickenHawk88  [View Original Post]
    So we should ask if the girl is at Norton or not and then decide to see the girl? Personally I like the sawtelle location that some places use.

Posting Limitations

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
The Velvet Rooms
Top Tier Escorts
Live Escorts
High Class Companions

Protected by Copyscape