Thread: Korean Agency BB
+
Add Report
Results 34,321 to 34,335 of 51267
-
01-06-21 03:12 #16947Senior Member

Posts: 1190Clearing the confusion
Wow this is a mess. Let me clear up 90 percent of the confusion.
There were two popular Mini in 2019. Mini of M and Mini of KPC. There was a brief moment that Mini of M jumped ship to KPC and became Mina of KPC. Then she went right back to M and reinstated her name, Mini of M. There two girls are back in Korea and no longer in the US. This is fact, when they return we will all know I'm sure but they are definitely not here.
No looking at Gray site.
This new Mina was originally working in SJ as Eunji. She got a lot of so so review, definitely not service queen like the rest at her SJ org. You can likely search boards and find some reviews about her as Eunji of LSC in SJ. Even today one trust SJ monger said she was terrible.
Ok and now on to Tess. Tess is formerly Jasmina of LovelyAngels in SJ. I was excited about her because I heard she has a nice booty but everyone kept telling me she is not even worth that. I figured she would pop up at Sexyangels and I would have tried her there but she went up charge at KTE and SAG before winding up now at Gray / candygirls. Now, she is way off my list. Another monger today told me she wasn't worth their Bay Area rate.
They both are on the younger side I hear but both just meh service. I hate to just drop this bomb but I only speak from trusted info. Again this is not my opinion or my own accounts. Maybe YMMV or others have positive experience but I'm simply clearing this up from all I have gathered and know about them.
I'll let any of the SJ guys on here add more detailed accounts but that is what I gathered from my NorCal bros. Their intel is trusted imo.
-
01-06-21 02:42 #16946Senior Member

Posts: 235Week off seeking recommendation
I got this week off and was looking for a recommendation from booker gray or candygirls site (I don't mind uncharge). Seems to have so many options I'm having such a hard time choosing. Appreciate it.
-
01-06-21 00:26 #16945Banned Member

Posts: 770Oh yeah Rebecca was already looking like Sophia too.
Originally Posted by BonerAppetitty
[View Original Post]
I hate the practice because imo it's predatory to newbies. Most people here do the research and know what's up. The noobs are the ones getting screwed. One org here (in the bay) does this often and one guy who recently got in aamps told me the PO didn't him it's the same girl after he scheduled again. He didn't want to see the girl once he realized it's her, but saw her anyway because he was scared to anger the PO.
And don't get me wrong, I really like Sophia. She was one of my favorites here and I miss her. Great rimmer, nice spiritusl cg, dfk the crap (no pun intended) out of my lips, good BJ. Older MILF and her grill is a bit cooked if you care abou that, but she's really good to me. Nice chemistry too. I'd take her over Allie, for example, any time.
So I do recommend her to anyone looking for service. Just hate the double listing by the same damn org.
If of course Helen isn't her. Then good! .
-
01-05-21 23:18 #16944Senior Member

Posts: 2569Pretty sure Tess is Jasmina from Lovely Angels in the Bay. Was there up until September.
Originally Posted by BonerAppetitty
[View Original Post]
-
01-05-21 23:06 #16943Senior Member

Posts: 2569Mini 2 (KPC / KTownGFE) was advertised as 90 lbs using the pics below.
Originally Posted by AriG
[View Original Post]
Mini / Mina (M) reportedly will be returning to M this year, so I doubt she'd end up with Grey.
-
01-05-21 22:31 #16942Senior Member

Posts: 3574Mina and Tess at Gray
Did you see both of them and confirmed Mina and Tess are not the same girl?
Originally Posted by AriG
[View Original Post]
-
01-05-21 22:29
Senior Member
-
01-05-21 22:29 #16941Senior Member

Posts: 56Tess and Mina are not same
https://bookergray.com/bbs/board.php?bo_table=tt_mw
Originally Posted by BonerAppetitty
[View Original Post]
Agreed on other points.
-
01-05-21 22:15 #16940Senior Member

Posts: 3574Triple listing same girl?
I thought Sophia was already double listed as Rebecca. It's too funny if she is also Helen, who's her duo partner then?
I managed to avoid being fooled so far. I don't hate it just sad they do this because they can't get new girls. If you guys hate all the rebranding and double listing, you should voice your complaint here and I may try to help out.
Originally Posted by RocketManP
[View Original Post]
-
01-05-21 22:11 #16939Senior Member

Posts: 792Ace / Diva
Looks like Ace / Diva is back to OC.
Hope she makes her way back to LA.
-
01-05-21 22:09 #16938Senior Member

Posts: 3574Mina Mini1 Mini2
I don't think Mina was either Mini. Isn't Mina also Tess at Gray?
The upsell really helps me saving money by not seeing those girls. Although I don't mind paying extra once to CIP a young cute girl. No way will I pay extra for an MILF.
Originally Posted by AriG
[View Original Post]
-
01-05-21 21:31 #16937Senior Member

Posts: 56Mina at Grey vs Mini at KTGFE (former)
There was a lot of discussion in the past about Mini with M and Mini 2 with KTGFE. Only saw one of the two and can't remember which one. Anyone remember if Mina with Grey was Mini 1 or Mini 2?
$420 seems to be where MSOG BBFS is going these days. Crazy.
-
01-05-21 21:03 #16936Senior Member

Posts: 56Hazel back on Friday
M said Friday.
Originally Posted by Fantic5916
[View Original Post]
-
01-05-21 18:58 #16935Senior Member

Posts: 100Hazel
I saw Hazel listed on M site for a few days. Anyone knows when she is coming back?
-
01-05-21 18:30 #16934Banned Member

Posts: 1333Semi
Semi is Orange from Candygirlsla-She is Asian Blonde.
Originally Posted by Toungsten
[View Original Post]
-
01-05-21 18:26 #16933Senior Member

Posts: 103Been a while since I pinged Sunny, but I noticed sometimes her responses are slow. Also, while I haven't seen Lyn for a really long time now, I know she works extremely limited hours so she can book up fast so it's either possible she's already booked or for whatever reason Lyn's not taking new visitors.
Originally Posted by AlexisDavis
[View Original Post]








Reply With Quote



