Thread: Seeking Arrangements
+
Add Report
Results 6,976 to 6,990 of 10989
-
11-19-20 21:21 #4014Senior Member

Posts: 702Totally agree. Like it or not if you find a girl on SA who actually wants to meet, its 300 MINIMUM. We're talking girls who have never been paid for it, or have tried it once or twice. The best ones on SA are the slightly older (later 20's to early 30's) who are in it for the kink and because they love sex / sex addicts even. They are there. But they know the numbers and maybe 300 will do it, maybe a little more.
Originally Posted by Joe1223
[View Original Post]
-
11-19-20 17:53 #4013Senior Member

Posts: 650Seriously for the 200 range you should be on STG. The girls on SA are not pros for the most part and expect to be treated different no matter what a few guys want to think. You may find a pro or an older lady that may be OK with the 200 but it depends on your standards I guess. I have found 300 is the minimum and barely flies but I've been able to do ok at that rate however a miss out on a lot also.
Originally Posted by Davio
[View Original Post]
I am meeting two girls this week I got from FB and we haven't talked money yet because they have said they have never done this before. I like these newbie girls but they may have read that 50-1000 is standard so I will see where we end up. It is Christmas season so I'm hoping they will work out. Unfortunately neither can host so 250 will be my limit plus hotel.
-
11-19-20 17:14 #4012Senior Member

Posts: 702If she asks for 6 or 7, and over the course of hours you "talk her down to 2," here's what's going to happen. You're going to get ghosted / stood up / etc. They re-think it, and you're toast. If your number is 2, and they start at 6 or 7, just block and move on. You're fooling yourself if you think you can talk them down by that much and have it actually work out.
Originally Posted by Davio
[View Original Post]
-
11-19-20 16:36 #4011Senior Member

Posts: 50Seekingcompanionship
Hello Men.
Ran across this one on SA. Exchanged a few chats got offline and talked. Asked what it would take to meet and was told and I quote:
"It ranges from 300-1000 with fetishes 500-5000".
WTF talk about GPS. These youngsters all think they are Julia Roberts and this is Pretty Woman.
https://www.seeking.com/member/a1739...0-0cfa97ba2795
-
11-19-20 12:50 #4010Senior Member

Posts: 203Tis the Season
Yep, I have had about four UTRs from the past who all disappeared over time hit me up this week out of the blue.
Originally Posted by Bran001
[View Original Post]
-
11-19-20 10:14 #4009Senior Member

Posts: 64Posted about her on the providence forum. There were conflicting discussion there that she may be a provider with a shady past who may have robbed people. Nevertheless I was willing to take one for the team as she looked pretty good in the photos (if real). Texted for days back and forth. Talked her down to $$ from 6 or 7 for couple of hours. She insisted she could and would host. Finally scheduled a firm date and time. Then when asked for address and directions she got nasty and went on about how she wouldn't let a stranger into her house without meeting first. Actually became pretty nasty. I wished her well, blocked her and moved on.
Originally Posted by Bran001
[View Original Post]
Something off about her. I don't think she was a total scam artist and trying to set me up to rob as she wouldn't have walked away from meeting.
-
11-19-20 08:25 #4008Senior Member

Posts: 702Holiday season 2020 updates
Lots of new profiles. Lots of HOT looking 19-21 yr olds. Pretty much without exception they do not want to meet in person. Most are straight-up offering online or pics / vids only and the rest try the 'start online and see where it progresses' scam. I have the same message back every time. "I do not transfer funds to anyone I've not yet met in person. ".
I have messaged and then blocked so many of these new profiles in the past few days.
-
11-19-20 07:53 #4007Senior Member

Posts: 702Profile says she's 24; photo puts here somewhere between 34 and 44. Profile reads more like GPS than as if a guy wrote it. Based on the profile, a meetup for sex on the first date doesn't sound like what she wants; she wants to be paid for a first platonic date. And probably a second.
Originally Posted by SpicyPrince
[View Original Post]
-
11-18-20 16:01 #4006Senior Member

Posts: 35Therealnikkishow
Unable to post her link as she blocked me. Chatted online for 1 day. After that texted me almost every day for 3 days. Made plans to meet. Said she can host so I asked her to pick a place of her choice close to her so that we can plan accordingly. Blocks me later on after I asked to meet up. Kinda curious if anyone here has actually met her?
I feel it's a guy just posing as a girl to fulfill some weird kinks. Or maybe I am wrong. Any info is appreciated.
-
11-18-20 01:01 #4005Senior Member

Posts: 50They have been talked about on here. See post #3928 and by numerous others.
Originally Posted by ARegularGuy
[View Original Post]
-
11-17-20 17:57 #4004Senior Member

Posts: 157Wasn't serious. Just wants to be paid for dinner and drinks when I talked with her last.
Originally Posted by PaulRew
[View Original Post]
-
11-17-20 17:20 #4003Senior Member

Posts: 602BlairrBabyy
Love her look but not sure I am ready to jump back in for premium just yet. Ant info on her to get me off the fence?
https://www.seeking.com/member/4bf8c...5-64b70002729c
-
11-17-20 15:57 #4002Senior Member

Posts: 1272SeductiveGoddess24
https://www.seeking.com/member/a123f...a-16b4b5c159e4
Its two girls, they can't host and they want $600. They went quiet when I tried to talk them down. Not my cup of tea anyhow but at least they were quick to respond originally.
ARG.
-
11-17-20 15:26 #4001Senior Member

Posts: 702Funny, the one who flaked on me at the hotel room has 'snobunni' in her username too. I think its BOSSNOBUNNI or something. I sense a pattern.
Originally Posted by JDeller
[View Original Post]
-
11-17-20 13:52 #4000Senior Member

Posts: 266Beware
Beware of massnowbunni. See Worcester forum.










Reply With Quote





