Escort Reports

[Literal2]

Last month I saw Vicky at a Tampa hotel. She's reviewed on ter, so you can see that for explicit stuff if you want it. Her scheduler is easy to work with. She has a screening process which takes a few days because she checks references, but says as a result, she has never had a problem. I don't think she'll see people without a reference. My experience with her was excellent. First of all, she is elegant to look at with her clothes on. You could sit next to her in Church or a business meeting, if that's your thing, and you'd never know. She was dressed like an upscale business woman, classy jewelry etc., and underneath were the prettiest bra and thong panties I've ever seen. Cute lacey little things. She is very pretty, better than her web photos, fit, tan all over, shaved, nicely done implants (though I prefer natural). Fun to talk to, very passionate. A complete gfe. Not for everyone, because she is about 30, but I think she's great. Not a clock watcher. She's European. I'd love to take her for a weekend at a high class beach resort. Prices, etc. are on her website: http://vicky30.escortwww.com.

[The Chronic]

I clearly understand the point RDD is trying to make, using an obsurdity. Of course no one could do a room at the HRC and a mainstream p4p for $350.

Everyone has their "choice set" for their decision making process. Part of it-in my case, anyway-is evolution. I've run a bunch of laps around the p4p track in the last 30-something years.

Once upon a time, I'd do $300 girls, usually scheduling 2 hours at $500. No more. Besides, I refuse to give out personal data to a pro-I do NOT trust them, and if you do you're painfully naive if you think your personal info is destroyed.

I now have a few UTR's I've developed that come to my home for no more than $200-300 for 2-3 hours-even overnighters when there is too much wine or ganja consumed. And no one considers it a "professional" experience. We go as long as I have "needs", no clocks anywhere, no drivers, next appointments, bullshit, etc. Maybe the occasional babysitter.

'Course developing UTR's is a tough, long process that not all can do. It takes networking, some game, and an ear for understanding what a gal needs. CL is a good source for some, but not the Erotic Services area. I use the "regular" areas, and sometimes the "Casual Encounters" area. There are a TON of gals with too many credit card bills, going through a divorce, unemployed, underemployed, etc. These factors often create self-esteem issues and keep their social life at a minimum. So you find girls who hbave financial needs who aren't getting any dick-the Perfect Storm for mutual exploitation. I advertise using three different scenarios, not all at the same time. I express a lot of empathy for their situation, and try to position myself as a benign answer to their needs. I use several personas and email addresses.

Make no mistake-this strategy is difficult and not everyone can do it. I'm unattached, have a few $$$, live in a nice home, am somewhat attractive and ht/wt proportionate, and think quickly on my feet (or on a keyboard). But it CAN be done.

And make no mistake about it: my "close ratio" is single digits, and of those who I actually close (and "do"), maybe 1/2 I won't ask back for a variety of reasons, often looks, weight, and inhibition reasons. But those who are keepers are definitely keepers: uninhibited Girl Next Door sluts who happily do about anything I want (bbbjtcnqns is a baseline requirement, as is bbfs after exchanging health bona fides-remember, these are mainstream girls who get very little, not hookers getting 4 dicks a day). I've even set up a couple to come over at the same time with enjoyable results-but only after getting to know them and finding they'd be into it-no surprises, not cool, step by step.

BTW-I only share with guys who also share, quid pro quo, set up with the gals in advance. I DO have one gal with MASSIVE tits who is leaving the area in a couple of weeks, and needs some $$$ if anyone is in the "sharing" mode...

[Chase Star]

Mike,
Interesting math. It occurred to me that the room alone could cost that much, but even if you had to pay for a room yourself somewhere, $350 for 3 hours with a super hot looking GFE (in the US at least) would be an incredible deal. However I'm not one to pay $350 for an hour either even though I think Harley Cruise qualifies as an extremely hot looking chick in her own right, so despite RDD's hyperbole, I can still see his basic point. To each their own however. There are guys that have no problem paying $350 for super hot chicks and then there are guys who prefer to bargain shop among the skanky trailer park crack-******. We each operate at the level we find comfortable.

[Mike Wazowski]

RDD,
I'm with Literal on that one. If you know of a chick hotter than her that you can get a 3 hr date with for less than $350 anywhere in the US I sure would love to get that phone number. How about the number of even just one chick like that?

.

You know, I've been finding most of RDD's reports to seem a bit, shall we say, exagerated, as far as his alleged great deals seem to be.

Don't forget he said that he could get a girl, hotter than Harley Cruise, for three hours AND pay for a room at the Hollywood Hard Rock Hotel and Casino for under $350.

Well, I know that the rooms at the Tampa Hard Rock are pretty pricey (worth it, though, especially if you're taking a woman there that isn't going to require a direct cash transaction to get in bed) and having spent more than a couple of nights at the Hollywood location, for some of their high dollar poker tournaments, I know that I've dropped a pretty penny on the rooms with my player discount.

That said, a quick look at their website tells us that any night this month will run more than $300 for a room. A couple of weekend nights are over $400. College spring break month in Florida isn't cheap when it comes to hotels.

But, come April, the rates go down... To $279 weekday, $399 weekend. So in April, RDD must be planning to find a girl who charges less than $71 for three hours or, on the weekends, pays the guy at least $50 to get to his "less than $350" deal.

Okay, maybe I'm being harsh. The rates are even lower in May and June. On the weekdays, maybe he can find a "hotter than Harley" girl for under $161 for three hours. That would get him at his "under $350" deal since the rooms are $189. May and June he won't get paid by the girl on the weekends but will have to pony up something less than $21 because the weekend rate is $329.

Sorry, I just had to laugh when I saw the typical RDD posturing. No one's getting a room at a hotel that any decent escort is going to show up to for less than $150 in the off season in Miami. Nore is he going to find an escort in Miami charging so little for three hours that his hotel room and escort fee combine for under $350.

Preposterous.

[Chase Star]

RDD,
I'm with Literal on that one. If you know of a chick hotter than her that you can get a 3 hr date with for less than $350 anywhere in the US I sure would love to get that phone number. How about the number of even just one chick like that?

As for what constitutes a GFE, my understanding of what commonly qualifies as the basic requirements is BBBJ, DFK and non-rush. Multiple cups is usually considered a nice plus, but certainly at least not rushing out the door as soon as you come even if the hour is not up. You may have higher demands. Some people have fewer. I can appreciate Literal wanting to be discrete but if he is using laxer standards than the norm, then he is being misleading and should come right out and say it, otherwise I think it is acceptable for him to just let us read between the lines.

[Amale9999]

http://openadultdirectory.com/sites/harleycruise/

$$$.5 is too steep for my blood hot or not.

The place across from the dog track and slightly west is only $.5 and it's great.

[Literal2]

Re your question RDD: I don't know. There are lots of reviews on ter which probably have the answer though.

Hollywood sounds like a good deal.

[Richie Sambora]

your not going to say any ????????? Literal2 prefer not to publicize explicit details with any lady, but Harley is a complete gfe. Friendly, considerate, passionate. I had a wonderful and completely satisfying time with her."""quote""" Just give us this little bit of info?
Did she provide multiple cups and if so, How many would she allow? Cause for $350 that will get a room at the hard rock in HOLLYWOOD with a 3 hr date with a chic hotter than her with non stop action......RDD

[Literal2]

Prices are as quoted on the website. She is scrupulous about doing what she says she will do. No upselling. She's a nice person.

[Drew Park]

Also, do you have a link to how to find her?

http://openadultdirectory.com/sites/harleycruise/

[Amale9999]

I am a sucker for tall blondes anyway but the pix of this girl on her website are 10/10. In the flesh she is as advertised. She is somewhere around 19 or 20, all natural 36C I think, shaved, pefect butt, not an ounce of fat, and coming in at something over 6 feet tall in heels, maybe 5'11" shoeless. Great skin, eyes, hair. A tall, shapely stunner. She showed up at my hotel on time, her appointments screened painlessly and scheduled by her friend Tasha. I prefer not to publicize explicit details with any lady, but Harley is a complete gfe. Friendly, considerate, passionate. I had a wonderful and completely satisfying time with her.

How much might one expect to spend with Harley?

Also, do you have a link to how to find her?

Thanks

[Literal2]

I am a sucker for tall blondes anyway but the pix of this girl on her website are 10/10. In the flesh she is as advertised. She is somewhere around 19 or 20, all natural 36C I think, shaved, pefect butt, not an ounce of fat, and coming in at something over 6 feet tall in heels, maybe 5'11" shoeless. Great skin, eyes, hair. A tall, shapely stunner. She showed up at my hotel on time, her appointments screened painlessly and scheduled by her friend Tasha. I prefer not to publicize explicit details with any lady, but Harley is a complete gfe. Friendly, considerate, passionate. I had a wonderful and completely satisfying time with her.

[Literal2]

Despite intentions, I'm not going to do Monica. She's in a running gunfight on CL and I don't want to get involved.

[Chase Star]

Since then I have found a good review of her on TER, but thats still not enough for me to take the plunge...anyway good catch Chase!

And, come to think of it, what does THAT say about TER? I've used TER, but there are a lot of false postings on that site too, which I'd place as only a couple of notches above CL in terms of reliability. Providers post fake reviews to improve their ratings, Clients pump up reviews to curry favor with their providers. Guys make up reviews to gain membership. In one case someone plagiarized a review that I wrote on another site and posted it on TER as his own. At least in that case the review was "real". Well, except for the small fact that it happened to someone else. I'm sorry that I can't suggest any better alternatives (aside from USG of course ) for getting reliable intel before choosing a provider. Unfortunately, I fear this hobby is always going to be inherently risky.

[Ledhed]

Last weekend I was a nanosecond away from Alissa coming over for an hour...she sounded great on the phone, but I couldn't find any reviews and talked myself out of it. Looks like my instincts were right cause they are definately the same chic.

Since then I have found a good review of her on TER, but thats still not enough for me to take the plunge...anyway good catch Chase!

This is getting redundant. More often than not CL providers are not what they say, not worth what they say or are outright scammers. Sure there are a few legitimate providers that also try to advertise and secure business through CL but they're tarred by association. Do you really want to take that chance that you'll find one of those rare exceptions.

In this case, the provider looks really hot and the price is really good if that is really what you get, but it ends there. Now she is going by the name Alissa, last month it was Lexus and the month before that it was Kylie. Plus her cell phone is constantly changing. Those definitely aren't good signs. Unfortunately, most of those old ads (and the negative reviews associated with them that occurred around the same time) are gone. But you can still read my post from here at USG:
http://www.usasexguide.info/forum/sh...5&page=2&pp=14
and this CL ad for "Lexus" from last month (you be the judge if they're for the same girl):
http://tampa.craigslist.org/ers/265847390.html

To be honest, I haven't tried this one personally and, if anyone else has, nothing would make me happier to learn that she's really on the up and up, but until then there are way too many red flags on this for me to take that chance myself.