CookyJar's Streetwalker Photos

[CookyJar]

Even the Supreme Court had trouble with this definition, but two components seem to jump out in the above arguments:

1) Multiple photos of the same woman, which might imply they are intended for sexual gratification rather than identification.

2) Nude photos of women's body parts.

I am not suggesting that I have the answer. Something has to be said about intent and the eye of the beholder. I don't see my pictures as being porn (well, at least not hard porn). Porn is not my intention. There are guys out there that beat off to the Mona Lisa. If the Supreme Court cannot decide, what makes anyone think that a decision can be determined on this site?

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Any good professional photographer will tell you that it is better to take as many shots, in as many poses as necessary to insure that you got the best possible picture. Often a pro photographer will bracket a pose, taking three different exposures of the same model in one position. This is done in accordance with the belief that it is better to take more and get the shot you want then to chance missing it by taking not enough pictures. I am not claiming to be a professional photographer, or even a good one. I do have a back ground as an amateur, and old habits die hard. So I tend to take to many pictures. I try to limit it to ten, however; I often go overboard, especially if my subject is interesting. What to do with the extra pics? Post them? Why not?

I know somebody is going to comment that 10 or 20 pictures of the same girl are too much. Why? After all no one is obligated to look at all of the pictures. There isn’t a charge for having them appear in here (and there seems to be an infinite amount of room).

This second set of pictures was taken in Jackie’s house. I wouldn’t recommend that anyone make it a habit of going to a SWs location. I still have enough ghetto in me to believe that I can hang out where I shouldn’t. Going to any location with a known SW is risky; going to her home is a big risk.

Again, let me state that Jackie is a good one, in my book. But, YMMV.

CookyJar

[CookyJar]

I am pretty comfortable on the streets around K ave but I would not recommend hitting the back streets on foot at night too often.

I went for a second round with Jackie. She is a slim red head who I have seen before mostly south of Lehigh. She has a cute face and a nice body but her fingers look like she has been smoking for a few years. She has some tattoos on her neck. I did not bother to read what they said. I have seen her out before anytime between 11am and 11pm. I told her that I do not do anything in the car or on the street so she called one of her girl friends with a house. I know some of you would never go into a house down here but I have never had a problem as long as I go with my instinct.

Runnow,

Small world isn’t it. It seems like we have a mutual friend. She doesn’t know it, let’s keep it that way. Hope you don’t mine my borrowing your review of Jackie.

Cool! I don’t have to do a review on Jackie. I’ll just ditto Runnows’ review. My two encounters with Jackie were nearly the same as Runnows’. Right down to the hands.

Runnow, did you get to meet her roomie? Unfortunate that she was too out of it to be included in Jackie and my plans. I do believe Jackie has received mixed reviews on this forum. However, my time with Jackie was pleasant and rewarding. This only goes to prove that YMMV. Would I see Jackie a second time? I already have.

Hey Runnow, the last time I attempted to contact Jackie her roomie said she was not there. I was park right down the street and observed a nice looking, thin, fairly nicely dressed Black girl enter the building. She had the look of a SW. You wouldn’t know her, would you? A nice looking BSW is rare on the K.

Anyway I had to warn you to stay away from red-haired Jackie. She is about a 13 on a SW scale but the personality is -6. It really sucks that bad, it was just terrible. Shes thin about 110 pounds, if that, cute face, hot body, walks with her best freind between lehigh and york on K. As the saying goes all that glitters isn't gold. I have never seen her beofre but she kept smiling at me so I decided to give it a shot. So she gets in and is nice at first, she says she has a room for 10 like most girls do. We get the small talk over with she says she's 23, and she looks every bit of it. So we get there and ofcourse she wants the money up front telling me she always gets the money up front, and I'm like I never give all the money up front. Well she kept fussing and carrying on about we can't do anything unless she has all of it upfront. So I already paid for the room and I was tired so I gave in and paid her upfront. I now realize my biggest mistake. Well after all this fuussing and her getting an attitude with me I am totally turned off from her so ofcourse I'm soft as cotton now. I try getting it up and nothing works, she then says after about 30 seconds (you would think 2 hours had passed) "If you can't get it up no refunds your loss" so I'm like you gotta be kidding me, she then gets up and puts her clothes back on and at the point so do I after being that disgusted with her and her terrible attitude. So it was a perfectly fine waste of 50 bucks. Don't make the same mistake I did, eventhough I'm sure your experienced vets won't, but for any other newbies on here like myself watch out for Jackie and never pay everything up front.

Jasman84,

Is this the same girl? As always, YMMV

CookyJar

[Admin]

Thread Starter.