Thread: Korean Agency BB
+
Add Report
Results 38,851 to 38,865 of 51586
-
06-11-20 17:37 #12736Senior Member

Posts: 29Any info on the BBFS girls?
Anyone try any of the BBFS girls from these orgs?
http://secretkgarden.escorts.biz/companions/
https://acektownla.com/
https://www.candygirlla.com/
http://january.escorts.biz/home
If tried around what age they look like?
-
06-11-20 16:57 #12735

Posts: 904No point in withholding info on the ddg girl for exchange of M's contact when M's number can be found on TER if you look up the girls she books. It's up to her whether she wants to accept you as a new client and 95% of the time you won't get a reply unless she already knows you. Want to still keep holding out info on the one you found?
Originally Posted by BoneRanger22
[View Original Post]
-
06-11-20 15:25 #12734Senior Member

Posts: 3480Thursday June 11
M.
Allie, Cona.
Sunny.
Lyn.
Newtopasian.
LA Sera, Ruby.
Sexy Angels.
Dana.
Sexyfunkgirls.
Viki.
-
06-11-20 14:44 #12733Senior Member

Posts: 273Is your DDG PSE?
Originally Posted by BoneRanger22
[View Original Post]
-
06-11-20 14:02 #12732Senior Member

Posts: 181M booker
Does the M booker have a website or HX handle. It's like M is Keyser Soze from usual suspects. Any one can direct me in DM.
I ll share a Dime DDG girl I found in the OC. Best one yet.
-
06-11-20 11:12 #12731Senior Member

Posts: 553I agree, Ruby was borderline buff. Really takes care of her body, considering she is probably mid-to-upper 40's. If not older. Face and lack of BBFS were deal breakers for me. That said, even though she was a no on BBFS. For me. She gave me a great BBBJCIM for the finale. Was nice, but I likes me the younger ones.
Originally Posted by HitNQuit805
[View Original Post]
-
06-11-20 06:09 #12730Regular Member

Posts: 15Henna at mykupcake
Anyone got a chance to see Henna (Love from M)? Anyone mind sharing a link that has their phone number on it?
-
06-11-20 00:30 #12729Senior Member

Posts: 235Photoshopped
Like all girls pics these are obviously photoshopped but I would say Ruby's ass is similar to that pic. I saw her once, I didn't find her attractive at all. Too muscular for me and I could see her extensions pretty darn bad maybe the Monger before me tugged at her hair too hard I don't know. Did not repeat, although she does have a very nice set up with tons of mirror. Also service was above average compared to what I've gotten.
Originally Posted by TWill182
[View Original Post]
-
06-10-20 21:50 #12728Senior Member

Posts: 90Are pics accurate for ruby and sera?
Originally Posted by HapaBoy86
[View Original Post]
-
06-10-20 20:57 #12727Senior Member

Posts: 56Min from SS (sixshop)
Anyone? Has anyone seen her? Claims to be 24, with DDs and BBFS.
Looks great in the pics but we all know that the pics are rarely ever the ladies we're supposed to see.
-
06-10-20 20:38 #12726

Posts: 904Ruby
Same here, although I've seen her more than 3 times.
Originally Posted by HapaBoy86
[View Original Post]
-
06-10-20 19:33 #12725Senior Member

Posts: 7249I saw Ruby three times during the cv and got BBFS all three times. YMMV.
Originally Posted by KingNoctis
[View Original Post]
-
06-10-20 18:07 #12724Senior Member

Posts: 209I was able to BBFS Ruby maybe 2 or 3 times out of 15 visits. She was particularly horny on those visits and just ripped off the condom lmao. We also text once in a while and had failed dinner out attempts in the past.
Originally Posted by CharlieMonger3
[View Original Post]
I saw her last month and was denied BBFS die to covid LOL!
-
06-10-20 17:41 #12723Senior Member

Posts: 553I posted something similar a couple months ago. Not sure why New Too is even included in the listings, consistently. I saw Ruby and it was HARD no on bb. Ask booker afterwards, also confirmed no BBFS for both girls. Must be YMMV I guess.
Originally Posted by CharlieMonger3
[View Original Post]
-
06-10-20 17:04 #12722Senior Member

Posts: 31Bonnie at CandyGirls. CFS Only
Bonnie is still one of my two LA ATFs, but she's no longer offering BBFS, only CFS. Disappointing, but by no means a deal breaker. Just FYI.










Reply With Quote


