Thread: Asian PLEASER discussion forum (please post reviews in the review forum)
+
Add Report
Results 4,981 to 4,995 of 6272
-
06-10-20 19:35 #1292Senior Member

Posts: 99I think of agencies like a big business. They want to protect their name / reputation so they all follow similar standards to promote safety / discretion / quality*. The incall location will not be at a motel / hotel but will be in a nice residential zone. The apartments are nicely decorated / clean for a sexy environment (mirrors, lighting, etc). The women are attractive and all receive training and they all follow a basic structure / routine with a set menu. They want you to keep coming back so they can afford to have multiple kgirls available for selection, and rotate new girls in / out. I have enjoyed the agencies thus far as I can go to different agencies, see different kgirls within each agency, and I know what to basically expect. They also promote GFE, which I really enjoy.
Originally Posted by DonCarleom
[View Original Post]
For screening, I think you can call the agency but they will ask for certain information to be sent to them. I am not sure if different agencies required different forms of information to be submitted. You could also do HX if you have ratings and contact them there as well. If you have ratings from providers then you don't need to give any additional information. Hope this helps.
-
06-10-20 19:32 #1291Senior Member

Posts: 7250Join hx its the easiest way to get into a asian agency. Need to establish a network first but no personal info needs to be given. Yes, they're are a few that do require more info like a few korgs that require refs on top of hx handle.
Originally Posted by DonCarleom
[View Original Post]
-
06-10-20 19:11 #1290Senior Member

Posts: 90Agency vs others
Hey sorry if this is a dumb question. Wanted to know the perceived differences in the agencies discussed here versus the asians listed on sites such as city x guide. Hope I didn't break rules citing that. Waiting to pull trigger on agencies due to the verification process. I'm scared shitless of being exposed. I mean you guys are all still here so what am I afraid of LOL. Love the idea of a warm up in the shower and better quality than AMP.
Also any way to bypass that verification? Or agencies with lower standards of verification? Pm if you wish.
-
06-10-20 17:05 #1289Senior Member

Posts: 99Jemma
Jemma is now back at AW.
-
06-08-20 18:16 #1288Senior Member

Posts: 576LOL they might have recycle those pictures? Lulu is slimmer and smaller racks than chanel. Chanel is more vocal and more active, can speak some english while lulu is very quiet, not a lick of English.
Originally Posted by PsuGuy911
[View Original Post]
-
06-08-20 17:16 #1287Senior Member

Posts: 72Juju at Asianworld
Anyone got any info on Juju from Asianworld?
I've seen Flynn and Yoji, but never heard of Juju.
-
06-06-20 12:55 #1286Senior Member

Posts: 163Lulu and channel from sa
That's funny because when I saw lulu from sa afterwards I told booker the lulu I saw sure looks a lot like channels pictures he then told me lulu and channel are the same girl?
Originally Posted by NoClue02
[View Original Post]
-
06-06-20 10:31 #1285Senior Member

Posts: 553Iriz is my ATF. Booker still communicated with her, she may come back one day. Never tried Loren. Is she retired for sure?
Originally Posted by Humyiy
[View Original Post]
-
06-06-20 00:51 #1284Senior Member

Posts: 294Yes, they definitely aren't the same girl. And before I saw the booker provided photos #1. I didn't notice pics #2 until after I saw her, because #1 obliviously ain't her.
Originally Posted by SkippedWords
[View Original Post]
Bookers are weird or just do things they are used to. I would bet easily over 50% of the girls photos are fake for this booker. So the booker is used to just using fakes, rather than her pics, even though original photos are great / attractive. I doubt it was Velvet's decision to use the fake pics. It's not like she needs re-branding, to me she was attractive and she was solid, I would repeat for sure. It would be smarter to use #2. As fake photos can be a let down even though you're satisfied by the girl's looks.
Other things I noticed is using "new in town" when the girl has already visited. Awhile back, I had to confirm with OC-Cadolls if Estee was the same Estee as they also used different fake photos, and she was great, had the best natural body.
The bad thing with fake photos, is getting if you get the wrong provider you have no clue, unless they are dramatically different. I booked Chanel (with J) and at the door greets me is Vivian, even though Vivian attractive, I was like WTF is going on here, as no blonde hair, taller, skinnier and not the big ass I was looking for. Luckily Vivian was very professional and cool, and I was able to switch to Chanel she was great too, but also like WTF was the other dude doing. I did noticed him when was walking into the apartment and elevator, and knew he was going up there, kept my distance and took the next elevator. It is definitely funny the things you notice from mongering.
The other let down that it's not same provider.
-
06-05-20 22:55 #1283Senior Member

Posts: 31I'm sorry I meant she looked like #1.
Originally Posted by BonerAppetitty
[View Original Post]
-
06-05-20 22:03 #1282Senior Member

Posts: 461Ooh. Iriz and Loren
Iriz and Loren photos. Thise were the good ol days. So hot. So beautiful. So feminine. Stealth nymphos.
Originally Posted by SkippedWords
[View Original Post]
-
06-05-20 21:55 #1281Senior Member

Posts: 3656Velvet
You missed the part where both of his links are for a girl named "Creed" at the same agency. Proof enough that a girl may use different set of pics even at the same agency. It's not unusual for a girl to use completely different or fake pics or change name when they feel like it. It's got to the point that I would point out identifying feature such as tattoo to help you guys identify a girl. I would not have done that before FOSTA.
If the Velvet you saw looked like #2 then I can almost guarantee she's at PG now. After all, she is using those same pics there too. I haven't come to verify yet.
I completely forgot her different pics in your attachment. My memory was imprinted by pics in #2 link. I didn't see her with the pics you attached only because I figured it was her and I wanted to see someone new. Same profile 5'4" or 5'5" and 33 C or 34 C. As I have shown before, she was in the Bay a lot too. Here are her reviews roughly at the time you saw here: (Click here).
Originally Posted by SkippedWords
[View Original Post]
-
06-05-20 21:16 #1280Senior Member

Posts: 31I find it hard to believe that those 2 are the same girl. They don't look anything like each other imo. The velvet I saw looked like #2 100%. If it is her why would she use accurate pictures with one agency and not accurate pictures with another?
Originally Posted by StraightOmar
[View Original Post]
-
06-05-20 20:02 #1279Senior Member

Posts: 294I saw her up north as Creed.
Originally Posted by BonerAppetitty
[View Original Post]
These were the photo set's they were using:
#1.
https://www.peach.cafe/listings/l/un...ose/ad/?id=660
#2.
https://www.peach.cafe/listings/l/un...ose/ad/?id=675
She looked like the girl in set #2, not #1.
-
06-05-20 15:09 #1278Senior Member

Posts: 58Same girl
Same girl. I saw her at both agencies. Just the ones you posted are more recent. She gained some quarantine weight.
Originally Posted by SkippedWords
[View Original Post]










Reply With Quote




