Thread: Escort Reports
+
Add Report
Results 14,401 to 14,415 of 24137
-
04-08-20 11:56 #9737Regular Member

Posts: 19Anyone try this one?
http://providence.skipthegames.com/f...y/490858777586
Has anyone given this a try?
-
04-08-20 03:29 #9736Senior Member

Posts: 68My two cents
I saw Kerry last summer. The pics aren't accurate but I still thought she was ok. It was a good time, like 6. 5/10. I didn't think anything was up with her she seemed normal. Maybe that person saw her on a bad day? Or maybe I just saw her on a good day.
Originally Posted by Cropsey
[View Original Post]
Anyway if you're looking for alternatives I'd def recommend Michelle in Warwick. She's been around for awhile and I'm sure has been mentioned on here. Seen her for the first time recently and it was great. Pics are her and I dare say she looks even better in person. Just FYI she works out of a long stay hotel and has a dog with her, a pitbull. It was a totally harmless and sweet 12 year old though. Felt bad for the thing Michelle said it's developing lot of health problems. Anyway, here's her ad:
https://providence.skipthegames.com/...y/231881158422
-
04-07-20 16:39 #9735Senior Member

Posts: 77Yeah, the whole thing really makes no sense. If you buy your girlfriend dinner and then have sex with her afterwards, that could technically be construed as "prostitution". What if you lend a woman some money, have a sexual relationship, and then she pays you back? Is that still prostitution and / or a crime? I'm sure the courts and legal precedent have made up their minds about what they want to believe but it's still pretty arbitrary. Just more reasons to fine people and put them in jail, because Uncle Sam might not be getting his cut of the $ action.
Originally Posted by TonyStank
[View Original Post]
-
04-07-20 12:31 #9734Senior Member

Posts: 166I searched for her after the recommendation and I had to skip after I saw the reviews here. Not really in the mood to waste money if she turns out to be a dud like the reviewers here have said.
Originally Posted by DpmSaturn14
[View Original Post]
-
04-07-20 09:21 #9733Shill for Mandy, ignore all my posts

Posts: 94I agree. Even if something that someone posted here somehow ended up being used against them in court (seems highly unlikely, but let's go with that scenario for the sake of argument), obfuscating the actual amount you paid for sex using a code is pointless. It's clear that you're saying you paid SOMETHING. The amount that you paid a sex worker doesn't make it any more or less illegal. Paying her $1 for sex carries the exact same legal repercussions as paying her $1,000 (I read a story recently about a guy who got arrested for offering an undercover female officer a burger he had just gotten from a fast food place in exchange for sex). That's what gets guys arrested. When the person who think is a sex worker is actually a cop. They don't get arrested because they wrote "$150" on the internet instead of "$.5".
Originally Posted by VicksBurg70
[View Original Post]
-
04-07-20 09:12 #9732Shill for Mandy, ignore all my posts

Posts: 94That may be the reason why they do it. It's definitely not going to help them in court though. First of all, anything anyone wrote on the internet they could easily claim they just made up. Secondly, how would anything that anyone writes here get connected with their actual identity in the first place? Only way I can see (unless you were dumb and posted some identifying info about yourself) is if LE confiscated your phone or computer that was signed into your account here. If you're in a situation where they're raiding your house and taking your computer, I'm guessing you're in significantly more trouble than just a misdemeanor charge for soliciting a prostitute. They're not busting down someone's door and dragging them off to jail because they made a post on the internet about hiring a hooker.
Originally Posted by DudeGuy
[View Original Post]
Having said that, the "dream" thing isn't confusing like the "money code". I just kinda took it as a way of guys being funny, not seriously thinking it protected them or anything.
-
04-06-20 21:26 #9731Regular Member

Posts: 18Roxana. Olita-Eros
Easy communication to setup threw text, limited English Russian. Walked in and was pleased at the scenery. Pics were some what accurate. Performance was good had a pleasant time. She tried and seemed interested in pleasing. Overall I would recommend.
-
04-06-20 16:25 #9730Senior Member

Posts: 83Ah shame
Ah that's a shame. Really wanted to see the skinny one and its way few and far between on available skinny (spinner types) up here. If anyone has a UTR spinner outcall / car number, willing to trade (have some great ones outside of new England).
Originally Posted by MrMissedHer
[View Original Post]
-
04-06-20 12:26 #9729Senior Member

Posts: 177Trouble.
Actually he has both girls working from an apt in CF. Yes the skinny brunette is a bit off the rails. She is obviously on something. Reports here have ranged from ghosting, lack of interest, poor service, and even taking off with the money.
Originally Posted by JohannJohann
[View Original Post]
My own experience.
Attempt 1. Was made to wait and rescheduled reapetedly over the course of one evening. Ended up just going home.
Attempt 2. Met with provider. Good service, but was walked in on by a couple coming back from some addiction treatment (heard the guy keep yelling about how much he loves his meds). Upon leaving was followed by somebody and lost them between buildings.
Attempt 3. Met with provider at sketchy ass apartment. Extremely poor service. As we were engaged in one room the rest of the apartment quickly filled up with people. When leaving had to walk through at least 7 people standing in the living room and exterior hallway.
This is not a safe provider. Will not repeat.
Be safe.
http://providence.skipthegames.com/f...y/757665194761
http://providence.skipthegames.com/female-escorts/other/wana-play/607436198182Last edited by MrMissedHer; 04-06-20 at 12:30. Reason: Added links
-
04-06-20 10:40 #9728Senior Member

Posts: 44I dreamed of.
This is just a way for people to not implicate themselves in a crime. They dreamed of it instead of doing it. Most judges would probably rule against them if it ever came down to it since the "it was just a dream" defense isn't a very good one. If it really concerns them that much then they should probably consult a lawyer before posting anything.
-
04-06-20 09:42 #9727Senior Member

Posts: 2129Dreaming is different issue.
Dreamed about it has nothing to do with prices. Just some guys start reviews "I dreamed of" so and so doing such and such.
Originally Posted by VicksBurg70
[View Original Post]
Just another stupid thing that serves no useful purpose. Though will say have not seen much "dreaming" lately.
-
04-06-20 06:52 #9726Senior Member

Posts: 135Why dream about it?
Just put the amount that the provider charges in simple English. $100 means $100, $150 means $150, $200 means $200.
-
04-05-20 21:37 #9725Senior Member

Posts: 640Agreed
Ill put that up there with "I dreamed of".
Originally Posted by Sounds
[View Original Post]
-
04-05-20 19:43 #9724Senior Member

Posts: 32No. She's older. Busty. Weathered. I have her cell will trade for other utr girls number.
Originally Posted by DpmSaturn14
[View Original Post]
-
04-05-20 19:33 #9723Senior Member

Posts: 2129Price BS
Problem is people try to use the decoder ring and still don't post correctly by that.
Originally Posted by Handiman69
[View Original Post]
Many of us are of the mindset that it is stupid and you should just put the amount. Saves on the confusion. There is really no good reason not to do it.









Reply With Quote


