Thread: Escort Reports
+
Add Report
Results 6,361 to 6,375 of 10026
-
04-04-20 16:29 #3666Senior Member

Posts: 482More information please
Dk469, can you please elaborate on your recent experience with Brooke?
Originally Posted by Dk469
[View Original Post]
You specifically say "scamming again," and I wasn't aware of scamming before. I've just read all 40-ish mentions of her here on the Daytona forum which include seven actual reports of meetings. Four were positive, one was so-so, and two were negative (referring to her monthly gift or her appearance at the time). All seven were from reputable sources. Also, unless I missed something, none of the 40-or-so mentions that I read said anything about scamming.
These boards are rife with true stories of honest providers falling from grace, so your claims may indeed have merit. However, without additional details, I for one can't judge the veracity of your claims very favorably.
More information please.
Cheers!
-
04-04-20 16:18 #3665Senior Member

Posts: 103Brooke curious
What happened I'm curious. I almost scheduled with her.
Originally Posted by Dk469
[View Original Post]
-
04-04-20 16:15 #3664Senior Member

Posts: 103Curious about cip
That is a heck of a list and some really nice ones but I wonder which ones allow cip. I like cip and daty, its my thing.
Originally Posted by JoshuaFalken
[View Original Post]
-
04-04-20 15:43 #3663Senior Member

Posts: 482Brooke confirmed
Hey Shaggy, yes, the wee lass in this ad is the erstwhile Brooke:
Originally Posted by ShaggyJax
[View Original Post]
http://archive.ph/X8SUW
I have stayed clear due to the publicly available information on her husband, but Green's pics here should remove all doubt:
http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/show...720&viewfull=1#post4290720.
Cheers!
-
04-04-20 12:48 #3662Senior Member

Posts: 85Michelle
I've seen her twice, first time a car date, second was an in call, both on beachside. Both encounters we very good. Will repeat if she comes back to the area.
Originally Posted by JoshuaFalken
[View Original Post]
-
04-04-20 10:53 #3661Senior Member

Posts: 468Fun!
She was always a lot of fun at the baymont.
Originally Posted by Dk469
[View Original Post]
-
04-03-20 20:25 #3660Senior Member

Posts: 875RE: Brooke
Is that Brookie Cheese?
Originally Posted by Dk469
[View Original Post]
Shaggy.
-
04-03-20 18:16 #3659Banned Member

Posts: 608Brooke
[Deleted by Admin]
EDITOR'S NOTE: This report was redacted or deleted to remove sections of the report that were largely argumentative. Please read the Forum FAQ and the Forum's Posting Guidelines for more information. Thank You!
You're telling him there is a ripoff thread and he should use it when there is a fight thread and you wouldn't use it to criticize him?
See the irony?
A2
-
04-03-20 16:54 #3658Senior Member

Posts: 482Michelle
Just like Lacey (and my next few reviews), this is a catch-up review from a time when I was absent these boards. So this rendezvous is, therefore, dated by a couple of months. However, since there aren't many contemporary reviews being posted these days, and since some of you blokes are now using Escort Reports for Coffee Bar topics, LOL, I figure you gents can forgive me a review that is a bit dated. Also, I can't find any links to give you as the lass has apparently been diligent about deleting her old ads. I was, however, able to dig into the burner and extract the verification photo she'd provided (see below) for our date. Some of you will recognize her as the lass that did a few doubles with Essie a few months back. I also recall her posting an ad more recently. Probably a month ago now.
So I scheduled up a rare hour-long first date with the lass. The burner indicates she'd asked for 200 but gladly took the 175. She subsequently vectored me in to her hotel in Ormond near I-95; the same place I'd scooped Lizzy once or twice. The room was on the better side of decent. Not exactly upscale, but definitely clean, comfortable, and not seedy by any means. Michelle is very much the lass in the picture. Smooth skin with moderate-to-heavy tattooing. She also sports a tastefully executed breast augmentation and a solid athletic frame (thick). I seem to recall her being of medium height, but I'm hesitant to guess at her exact inches.
Michelle proved to be an extremely cordial conversationalist, putting us both at ease with ice-breaking small talk as we leisurely disrobed. This led to naked cuddling, followed by wandering fingers and lips, an excellent BBBJ, some very scenic and tactile ccg, with a vigorous missionary finish. Much of the sensory details have left me, but I do recall everything on the lass being fit and tight with great hygiene.
There was the slightest of cigarette odors in the room, but this was really the only downside I remember. I had a good time and I'm guessing you will too, assuming she's still active.
Cheers!
-
04-03-20 15:51 #3657Regular Member

Posts: 12Avoid at all costs
Brooke is back in town and I should have been thinking with the other head but she's scamming again beware and avoid.
http://daytona.skipthegames.com/fema...d/106325193783
http://daytona.skipthegames.com/stri...h/303057716877
-
04-03-20 05:14 #3656Senior Member

Posts: 59Info requested on this one
Anyone had experience with one named katt.
https://escortbabylon.net/review_list/3862648430
Thanks.
-
04-02-20 15:02 #3655Senior Member

Posts: 791The addicts don't care about the pandemic, likely their only awareness is that it affects their business. The primary concern is the next fix.
Originally Posted by Nikka
[View Original Post]
-
04-02-20 14:55 #3654Senior Member

Posts: 590I could have written that myself.
Originally Posted by Nikka
[View Original Post]
-
04-02-20 14:01 #3653Banned Member

Posts: 608Sarah
http://daytona.skipthegames.com/fema...n/706030723216
I realize she's got cheaper rates but I think if you contact her at her 407 number in her ad she's got GPS LOL she told me 300 when I reached out from another number even though I have her 321 number in my phone. So maybe her GPS is only indigenous to that 407 number.
-
04-02-20 13:35 #3652Senior Member

Posts: 69Coronavirus
Due to a single condition that puts me at risk I am not doing any wick dipping these days. Even if I weren't at risk I'd be abstaining. However, I continue to peruse the various provider sites but rather than looking for who is posting I'm concentrating on who is NOT posting. Those are the ones who I will be contacting once we're out of this pandemic. I understand that for some providers it may be necessary to take the additional risks inherent in pursuing their profession at this time in order to survive. I doubt that very few, if any, will qualify for federal or state assistance. Tough times for all of us.
Originally Posted by RedNose1
[View Original Post]








Reply With Quote



