Humaniplex

[Wahoo2000]

I've met her a few times. I believe her "Safety" marks are due to the fact that she used to have multiple active accounts (which have been voted off) and I'd say 90% of the pictures are not her. She's reliable, even on short notice, so that's why I've kept going back. Sessions are ok, not great but not bad either. She's not as hot looking as most of her pictures, but she is slender and good looking, I'd say a boob lift and teeth straightening away from being pretty hot. I think she does sprinkle some of her actual pictures within her album, but she's probably a notch or two lower on the hotness scale than what you're lead to believe

All this 100%. I *think* her private album pics (175 fx points, or only about $1. 75 real cash) are all or almost all legit pics. She is hot. Just not as hot as the pics of the free album. Service is ok. Definitely not bad, but won't blow your mind either.

[Dmzhost]

I've met her a few times. I believe her "Safety" marks are due to the fact that she used to have multiple active accounts (which have been voted off) and I'd say 90% of the pictures are not her. She's reliable, even on short notice, so that's why I've kept going back. Sessions are ok, not great but not bad either. She's not as hot looking as most of her pictures, but she is slender and good looking, I'd say a boob lift and teeth straightening away from being pretty hot. I think she does sprinkle some of her actual pictures within her album, but she's probably a notch or two lower on the hotness scale than what you're lead to believe.

She used to go by Jessica Summers and has been around since the SDASP days.

[SDHobbyGuy]

Any one seen Lisa. Lane?

https://www.humaniplex.com/profiles/Lisa.Lane

Search on the forums had some negative reviews, not sure if it is the same provider as reviews were from LA and no links. Her networks on her HX profile has a couple of unsafe reviews but only 4 vs. 259 safe reviews.

I've met her a few times. I believe her "Safety" marks are due to the fact that she used to have multiple active accounts (which have been voted off) and I'd say 90% of the pictures are not her. She's reliable, even on short notice, so that's why I've kept going back. Sessions are ok, not great but not bad either. She's not as hot looking as most of her pictures, but she is slender and good looking, I'd say a boob lift and teeth straightening away from being pretty hot. I think she does sprinkle some of her actual pictures within her album, but she's probably a notch or two lower on the hotness scale than what you're lead to believe.

[JitMarc]

Any one seen Lisa. Lane?

https://www.humaniplex.com/profiles/Lisa.Lane

Search on the forums had some negative reviews, not sure if it is the same provider as reviews were from LA and no links. Her networks on her HX profile has a couple of unsafe reviews but only 4 vs. 259 safe reviews.

[Kroditpakshi]

Thank you my friend. I have a gut feeling I met her through another site. She is a bit of a diva and I did not enjoy my time with her.

She has a lot of pics in her albums showing a perfectly formed body. Here are a couple.

Steak.

[SteakTartare]

I have not seen the other two but Lexy was great. Had a nice 90 minute session, full GFE with 2 pops, pussy is so sexy because it is not 100% shaven, love eating kitty with a bit of hair in it, super tight and smelled so sweet. LFK only. Her BBBJ is amazing, wet, DT, lots of eye contact. I also included pics and an hour video. Problem is her kitty is so tight that she will pull back when you try to enter, but once inside you won't last long. Her body is perfect with no ugly tats, super firm, tight bubble butt, perky boobs.

-Steak.

Has anyone met PaulinaG94, XoxoLexy, or foreveramber? You can message me if you prefer.

[SteakTartare]

She has a lot of pics in her albums showing a perfectly formed body. Here are a couple.

Steak.

Could you or some helpful high level person please post some pics of her? Hope it is not a violation of some tos and will help low level folks like me.

I asked her but she did not respond.

[Guy456]

Has anyone met PaulinaG94, XoxoLexy, or foreveramber? You can message me if you prefer.

[Kroditpakshi]

Could you or some helpful high level person please post some pics of her? Hope it is not a violation of some tos and will help low level folks like me.

I asked her but she did not respond.

Hit the nail on the head. Her albums have a level 1 requirement. I second what BearD said on her.

[OleDog47]

I've seen her or her twin a while back. Very pretty, very fit. Bolt ons were ok, not my favorite. Pretty good GFE service, dfk daty BBBJ cfs.

It's not Celine"s sister but her cousin CamillaFox23. I've seen Celine and had a great time. I haven't pulled the trigger on CamillaFox as I've heard mixed reviews about her being a bit cold and detached.

[Solidus]

https://www.humaniplex.com/profiles/kimberlygatesxo

Highly worthy of your consideration.

I second this. Awesome girl, easy to talk to and get along with. Great skills and nice tight body.

[Jason619]

I don't see any photo albums for her. Is it just me I. E. Level related?

Also looks like she is having some issue keeping her ad up.

Hit the nail on the head. Her albums have a level 1 requirement. I second what BearD said on her.

[Trusty Hairlip]

I've seen her or her twin a while back. Very pretty, very fit. Bolt ons were ok, not my favorite. Pretty good GFE service, dfk daty BBBJ cfs.

She has a twin? What is her hx handle?

[BearD]

Has anyone seen here before? https://www.humaniplex.com/profiles/Exotic1Celine. I see she is visiting and in Mission Valley starting today.

I've seen her or her twin a while back. Very pretty, very fit. Bolt ons were ok, not my favorite. Pretty good GFE service, dfk daty BBBJ cfs.

[Trusty Hairlip]

I don't know. Are you using the same password for usasexguide as the one for your bank and credit card accounts? It's a hooker site. If you populate boxes here using the same cleartext as the one you use for your real life, no HTTPs in the world can save you. Technology cannot replace good ol' common sense.

Look, of course I am not using the same passwords. My issue is with not implementing something as simple as HTTPS. No valid argument exists to not use HTTPS.