Thread: Korean Agency BB
+
Add Report
Results 40,471 to 40,485 of 50987
-
02-12-20 19:45 #10517Senior Member

Posts: 293[Deleted by Admin]
EDITOR'S NOTE: This report was edited or deleted in accordance with the Forum's policy prohibiting unsubstantiated reports claiming that another person is afflicted with a Sexually Transmitted Disease, this limitation being necessary because a disturbing number of these reports are less than genuine.
STD allegations are not permitted in the forum at any time EXCEPT when substantiated by links to internet-accessible public records.
Please read the Forum's Posting Guidelines for further information.
-
02-12-20 17:23 #10516Senior Member

Posts: 118Min
Thought I had read an earlier comment about her (not the NewTopAsian one), but unable to find any in previous threads. Anyone know if this particular Min's menu includes BBFS. If so, is it with or w / o upcharge? Thanks.
-
02-12-20 17:16 #10515Senior Member

Posts: 939I never attempted Angel until this week. I figured it was her but there were better girls at the time when she was working so I never saw her at the time. This could of been sometime last year. Either way, at least a recent report of her is out there. I feel it's another slow month for M. I might have to go with another agency and see who's good out there.
Originally Posted by Toungsten
[View Original Post]
-
02-12-20 17:08 #10514

Posts: 904Definite confusion on my end, my apologies. I read Angel forgetting that she is going by Sienna not Angel.
Originally Posted by Toungsten
[View Original Post]
-
02-12-20 16:34 #10513Senior Member

Posts: 3480My apologies. I thought you said Hanna and not Sara.
Originally Posted by DarthDiggler
[View Original Post]
-
02-12-20 14:58 #10512Senior Member

Posts: 27Jamie review from KTE
Decided to try out Jamie despite the extra 100 for BBFS. From the reviews she seemed decent for the price and I wasn't disappointed.
Face: looks nothing like the kte photos. More GND and cute. Got a nice natural look to her. Tan and not pasty white.
Body: to me personally it's one of my favorites, but others may have other opinions. I just love her size, she's compact and got a nice rack thin tummy and just a nice grabbable spankable booty. Something you can just hold on to. And it's not rock hard or fake or Kim k like. Any ways k digress. If your a butt guy I'd recommend. Her boobs from what I can tell are either real or done really well.
Attitude: was good, lots of dfk and giggling. Decently warm. She's not Nina by any means where she takes control and is a nympho, but she's easy going & relaxed.
Service: takes a pounding: bbfscip x 2. Had to do it for the views. Tried her in all positions and they all looked good. Only weird part was after the first bbfscip she was dry and tight again, not really sure what happened there.
Recommend: yes! If your ok with the extra 100. Had a good time and I'd probably repeat if the other $260 agency's are busy or the girls are wack.
-
02-12-20 14:09 #10511Regular Member

Posts: 20Her profile was taken down from them, but someone PM'ed me the number already.
Originally Posted by HapaBoy86
[View Original Post]
-
02-12-20 14:06 #10510Banned Member

Posts: 113Sara = LA Lina
Sara rebranded as LA Lina - That is a fact. I've seen her under both brands 29 days apart. I asked her WTF is up with the re-brand and she said the booker chose the name.
Originally Posted by Toungsten
[View Original Post]
Think about it, she got mixed reviews as Sara so it makes sense to rebrand specifically because 1) she kept with the same org 2) it was so recent.
If anyone saw her under both brands they'd know.
Its like Anakin Skywalker and Dar...sorry couldnt resist.
-
02-12-20 13:26 #10509Regular Member

Posts: 9This did not work. Two Pepsis came up but not nearby.
Originally Posted by HapaBoy86
[View Original Post]
-
02-12-20 12:55 #10508Senior Member

Posts: 3480There may be some confusion. The Angel with M today is the same one that was here before. Princess who was with Jewelry is now Sienna and also with M.
Originally Posted by HeavySetD
[View Original Post]
-
02-12-20 12:29 #10507Regular Member

Posts: 9Can someone please pm me the number to this place. I really want to check it out.
-
02-12-20 12:05 #10506Senior Member

Posts: 3480THEM is feeiing the pressure.
I'm hearing that they have been banning agencies, profiles and reviewers for what they call fake postings. That coming from a site that allowed virtually anything including girls who haven't been around for years and may not even be alive. Must be the pressure of T*r coming back. Well the good news is we won't have to deal with all the crap that has been on THEM while the hobby has been suffering in a black hole for the last couple of years.
-
02-12-20 10:30 #10505Senior Member

Posts: 3480Not sure who you saw. Sara or LA Lina? Not a rebranding. Sara is gone and her pics are on Lina's profile. If it was Lina you're right. She's young and good.
Originally Posted by DarthDiggler
[View Original Post]
-
02-12-20 05:12 #10504Senior Member

Posts: 7236Very simple.
Originally Posted by A0C1234
[View Original Post]
Open web browser and type in eroticmonkey, enter pepsi. Their's here profile.
-
02-12-20 03:50 #10503

Posts: 904Only God knows who you saw because that was not Angel, safe to say that you got bait and switched. I didn't leave a review for her as the review of her as Princess with Jewelery was pretty much spot on what I experienced. Kinda shady that M does clients like this. Also read that M doesn't take new clients? Fairly new to this board and was able to book her girls just fine.
Originally Posted by TheAbc
[View Original Post]










Reply With Quote


