The Prickyard

[XxxMail77]

Can Administrator take this down?

Highly doubt they would as it would have been put there by the admin to begin with. It is the most annoying one though.

[RunForGold]

How do I remove?

Can Administrator take this down?

[JohnBuddy]

How do I remove?

[Power Tool]

I'll say this for the third and final time, since you seem to have skipped over the most important point of my post. . . Again. I did not call anyone out for a first review, like not even a little. I did not in any way insinuate that he was full of shit, like not even a little. I called him out for one thing and one thing only, and it was rely clear if you read the original post (and the follow ups). I gave him some advice (admittedly, passive aggressive advice) about board norms. It's really that simple.

I'm rely good at research BTW. So I appreciate the advice that it's important to research, but that's probably unnecessary in my case.

However not everything is about you. If you go back and look at the timeline I didn't quote you for a reason. I just mentioned you in regards to research. The reason I did is to give some guidance for others, not just you, regarding research. Too be fair, based on the timeline, Toisin could have made the same post on 1/23/2020 21:45 but, he could have quoted SpinAndWin85's post on 1/23/2020 16:03 because by then he had confirmed she was real. That probably would have helped to add some credence to Toisin's first and second post.

Now if your post had said the following:

If your very first post is a glowing review, no one will give it any credence.
If your second post is a smartass retort, as opposed to an explanation of why you've never posted before, you're dead here. I'm not saying any of this is fair, just that it is.

That would have said the same thing, but in your original post you referenced the fact that she was no longer listed. Actually the original link was dead but, as I said, with research she was still listed. Plus because of his (Faux pas, at least in your mind) you suggested he get a new handle. I originally assumed based on those two comments, you were somewhat calling him out. Sorry if I was wrong but, that's how I interpreted it. Either way, my point of the post was, take a noobies post with a grain of salt, do your own research and see what you find, check the board to see what is reported, and last but not least TOFTT if necessary. I'm not trying to win the argument, I GOT your point, seems like you missed mine.

[EarlyCuyler]

Many links disappear shortly after a new chick posts. That's why good research is so important. I just clicked on the original link of Toisin's post and it came up blank. So then I tried searching STG with beechgrove (the reported location), and came up with nothing. Then I searched with Alexis (the reported name of the provider) and the below link brings up what I found. My point is sometimes a monger has to take the extra steps to find the information. It's normally out there.

https://indianapolis.skipthegames.com/?keywords=alexis

I'll say this for the third and final time, since you seem to have skipped over the most important point of my post. . . Again. I did not call anyone out for a first review, like not even a little. I did not in any way insinuate that he was full of shit, like not even a little. I called him out for one thing and one thing only, and it was rely clear if you read the original post (and the follow ups). I gave him some advice (admittedly, passive aggressive advice) about board norms. It's really that simple.

I'm rely good at research BTW. So I appreciate the advice that it's important to research, but that's probably unnecessary in my case.

[Power Tool]

Because the ad was gone from the first time I tried to click the link.

I didn't call out anyone based on a first review. I called out someone when they basically said "fuck you" to the unwritten rule that noob reviews are suspect.

Many links disappear shortly after a new chick posts. That's why good research is so important. I just clicked on the original link of Toisin's post and it came up blank. So then I tried searching STG with beechgrove (the reported location), and came up with nothing. Then I searched with Alexis (the reported name of the provider) and the below link brings up what I found. My point is sometimes a monger has to take the extra steps to find the information. It's normally out there.

https://indianapolis.skipthegames.com/?keywords=alexis

[EarlyCuyler]

Here's my question Why didn't NuruGurus or EarlyCuyler just try and contact her or see her before calling out Toisin? Maybe they didn't like her looks or have the time, I don't know. But a smart hobbyist would do some research and then post a comment based on what they discovered not on what can be easily assumed by the first post about a new chic by an assumed Noobie.

Because the ad was gone from the first time I tried to click the link.

I didn't call out anyone based on a first review. I called out someone when they basically said "fuck you" to the unwritten rule that noob reviews are suspect.

[SpinAndWin85]

Base a decision on the number of good and bad posts. That being said look at the information that was provided to everyone to make an informed decision.

First Post by a Noobie on 1/21/2020 22:00. Could also be a BF or a pimp. That to be decided later.

Response on 1/23/2020 11:55 by NG who may or may not have even contacted her to find out if she was real, he just shot out his opinion.

First post by a senior member 1/23/2020 16:03 confirming she is real.

Noobies response on 1/23/2020 21:45 in the prickyard tells me he understands the rules of the board so he's either a long time lurker or a senior member under a new handle. Most likely he's not a pimp or BF who would have made the rookie mistake of posting it in the original thread not the fight thread.

Another confirmation 1/25/2020 5:05 that she's most likely real.

Jjbee's post on 1/26/2020 2:50. We can somewhat agree to disagree.

The point is wait and see if someone you trust posts a review on the chic after the first suspicious review. She was confirmed by 2 people one who actually saw her and one who communicated with her but didn't see her. Here's my question Why didn't NuruGurus or EarlyCuyler just try and contact her or see her before calling out Toisin? Maybe they didn't like her looks or have the time, I don't know. But a smart hobbyist would do some research and then post a comment based on what they discovered not on what can be easily assumed by the first post about a new chic by an assumed Noobie.

This is the best response on the board at 1/23/2020 13:26 that really defines my point which is do your research, research, research and give it time to see if the chic is real.

Or you can TOFTT and report back just like many of us have done in the past.

Good post PT. Thanks. As always, the key word is RESEARCH. It's a bit harder when a new player hits the street, but there are still steps one can take while proceeding with caution. Be safe!

[Power Tool]

Base a decision on the number of good and bad posts. That being said look at the information that was provided to everyone to make an informed decision.

First Post by a Noobie on 1/21/2020 22:00. Could also be a BF or a pimp. That to be decided later.

Had a dream of Alexis tonight. 100% would recommend and I'm definitely going to spend more time with her in the future.
http://indianapolis.skipthegames.com...b/533615360960

Response on 1/23/2020 11:55 by NG who may or may not have even contacted her to find out if she was real, he just shot out his opinion.

Obviously fake. Don't be stupid guys.

First post by a senior member 1/23/2020 16:03 confirming she is real.

I saw Alexis last night. Nice hotel in the Beech Grove area. We chatted via text off and on, exchanged verification pics, and I took the leap of faith. She's real, gents. Give her a try!

Noobies response on 1/23/2020 21:45 in the prickyard tells me he understands the rules of the board so he's either a long time lurker or a senior member under a new handle. Most likely he's not a pimp or BF who would have made the rookie mistake of posting it in the original thread not the fight thread.

Your loss!

Another confirmation 1/25/2020 5:05 that she's most likely real.

So I had some fun these past two weeks doing some exploring and please note I didn't visit a single one of them but I believe them all to be real.
Finally the much talked about petite 95 lb Alexis. She and I texted several times back and forth over a couple of days. Seems like a nice girl. I tried the link previously posted but it doesn't work now, seems her ad is down. Couldn't find one when I googled her number either.

Jjbee's post on 1/26/2020 2:50. We can somewhat agree to disagree.

The trouble with fake reviews is the average guy doesn't know what he's getting himself into. The point is, it's a review which can't be trusted and should be called out. There's nothing negative about EarlyCuyler's post. He just stated the facts. Everyone needs to earn their wings. The new guy's first post does raise a red flag. The new guy's second post screams that the red flag shouldn't be ignored. When you consider the advertisement from the first post was quickly taken down after the review was called out, it's hard to think new guy received undeserved abuse. Maybe it really was a good review and the new guy was telling the truth with "your loss. " He's still going to carry around the suspicion until he gets enough reliable reviews under his belt to earn everyone's trust. If he's serious about becoming a trusted contributor, it might be easier to just start over with a new account.

The point is wait and see if someone you trust posts a review on the chic after the first suspicious review. She was confirmed by 2 people one who actually saw her and one who communicated with her but didn't see her. Here's my question Why didn't NuruGurus or EarlyCuyler just try and contact her or see her before calling out Toisin? Maybe they didn't like her looks or have the time, I don't know. But a smart hobbyist would do some research and then post a comment based on what they discovered not on what can be easily assumed by the first post about a new chic by an assumed Noobie.

This is the best response on the board at 1/23/2020 13:26 that really defines my point which is do your research, research, research and give it time to see if the chic is real.

The review its self didn't look necessarily fake, but the person who posted it that has his first post so you always have to take those with a grain of salt. Might be legit but use caution.

Or you can TOFTT and report back just like many of us have done in the past.

[Jjbee62]

Some of us, who actually read the forum and pay attention to who are useful contributors and who are just plain dicks, don't knock a guy for responding in kind to someone who goes of half cocked on his post. Yes, it's still a first post. It still carries no weight until he's proven himself. But he's not dead to all of us. In fact, his antagonist carries less weight with me than he does based on my opinion of NG's posts. Everyone has an opinion, they're definitely not all the same.

Just recently I wasted some money based on a fake review. I knew the review was fake before I went, but I decided to throw away my money, just to make a point. It probably won't be too difficult to figure out which of my recent reports was a response to the fake review.

I'm not complaining about wasting the money and time. The trouble with fake reviews is the average guy doesn't know what he's getting himself into. It could just be a bait and switch. It could just be someone exaggerating about the girl or AMP. It could also be from a pimp who is robbing customers. Sadly, most guys, if they get robbed, won't report it.

Or, the fake review could be completely accurate.

The point is, it's a review which can't be trusted and should be called out. You can call them out nicely, or you can kick the reviewer in the crotch.

There's nothing negative about EarlyCuyler's post. He just stated the facts. Everyone needs to earn their wings. It took dozens of reports before people figured out I try to write accurate reviews. I respect that.

The new guy's first post does raise a red flag. The new guy's second post screams that the red flag shouldn't be ignored. When you consider the advertisement from the first post was quickly taken down after the review was called out, it's hard to think new guy received undeserved abuse.

Maybe it really was a good review and the new guy was telling the truth with "your loss. " He's still going to carry around the suspicion until he gets enough reliable reviews under his belt to earn everyone's trust. If he's serious about becoming a trusted contributor, it might be easier to just start over with a new account.

[Jeast72]

If your very first post is a glowing review, no one will give it any credence.

If your second post is a smartass retort, as opposed to an explanation of why you've never posted before but chose to review someone who is no longer even listed, you're dead here. I'm not saying any of this is fair, just that it is. Might want to get a new handle and start over.

Some of us, who actually read the forum and pay attention to who are useful contributors and who are just plain dicks, don't knock a guy for responding in kind to someone who goes of half cocked on his post. Yes, it's still a first post. It still carries no weight until he's proven himself. But he's not dead to all of us. In fact, his antagonist carries less weight with me than he does based on my opinion of NG's posts. Everyone has an opinion, they're definitely not all the same.

[EarlyCuyler]

Your loss!

If your very first post is a glowing review, no one will give it any credence.

If your second post is a smartass retort, as opposed to an explanation of why you've never posted before but chose to review someone who is no longer even listed, you're dead here. I'm not saying any of this is fair, just that it is. Might want to get a new handle and start over.

[Toisin]

Obviously fake. Don't be stupid guys.

Your loss!

[NuruGurus]

Had a dream of Alexis tonight. Responsive to texts, nice incall location in Beach Grove. Was very accommodating, met me at the door in requested outfit. Pics are her, recent, and don't do her justice. Definitely 4'9", nice perky tits, couple of small tattoos, sexy af and the definition of a spinner. She was freshly showered, smelled great and ready for me. CBJ was great, CG and mish were awesome, she said she wasn't great at CG but I had no complaints. Very friendly, didn't see a phone at all, I was clock watching more than she was. 2/ hr, said she doesn't like QV. 100% would recommend and I'm definitely going to spend more time with her in the future.

http://indianapolis.skipthegames.com...b/533615360960

Obviously fake. Don't be stupid guys.

[SpinAndWin85]

Well then, in that light, GFY.

Don't piss off admin. Could come back and bite you in the ass. Especially a newby. Be safe!