NoVA SugarBabies

**Pathfinder04** · 01-26-20 19:18

We exchanged flirty texts for about a day until she informed me she wanted to be an "online sugar baby" only. Whatever that is LOL. Avoid and block.

https://www.seeking.com/member/f8b60...a-1493875cb42c

**Jost815** · 01-26-20 16:15

Saw she was discussed sometime last year but no real feedback posted. Definitely dtf but not have discussed how much yet. Anyone have experience with her?

https://www.seeking.com/member/3bac9...7-e97118b2a996

**Jost815** · 01-26-20 15:51

Don't have any new information other than what you posted. They only meet together. They want around $500. Didn't discuss services but they seemed DTF. There are actually 3 of them. They are kind of hard to get a hold of and will disappear for weeks with no contact. I stopped pursuing but would start again if anyone has a good report.

https://www.seeking.com/member/06719...5-1dfbff323359

https://www.seeking.com/member/afd65...b-186a9fe4a453

https://www.seeking.com/member/8ed61...3-203719a36d3b

Originally Posted by HighwayGuy [View Original Post]

Curious if anything ever came to fruition with this one. She's messaged me a couple times and states it's a non-negotiable package deal at first with her and a friend. I never get into specific terms until meeting in person, but wondering if it's even worth the time.

**Novaxor** · 01-26-20 10:26

Originally Posted by DirteeBoy [View Original Post]

You had the same experience too? Hahahaha Did she "look at your naked body and throw out your condoms" ? LOL Who says shit like that?

https://www.seeking.com/member/93e60...f-a04dc13224af

Nope, she just got on top and started riding me.

**Newbie1961** · 01-25-20 22:05

Based on your post sounds like your done with? Post a link please?

Originally Posted by KevinCalormis [View Original Post]

I've been with a few for free, but if I met them on SA and am getting it for free it sends up even more alarm bells. What kind of crazy is f*cking guys off seeking for free? I had one tell me I was her second partner ever and that she was falling for me, right after I dropped a load in her. Don't need any of that crazy LOL.

The amount is just a different version of escorts merely charging for their time.

Bottom line, these girls are all damaged goods. If you forget that, sooner or later you're going to have a bad time.

**RegularJoe1985** · 01-25-20 21:39

Was texting with this one and spidey sense started tingling.

She wanted me to Uber her and after I started asking some questions, she promptly blocked me.

Be careful. Too many flakes around.

**DWinthrop** · 01-25-20 20:51

Originally Posted by SamTam [View Original Post]

It's been interesting. I've run into more than one that really didn't wish to be paid. Just a nice night out (or in). Not sure if they qualify as wh*res. Then, there are others that are nothing but all about the Benjamins. But, my favs are those that think that at $200 they're hookers, but at $400 they're not (they're sugarbabies). And, I've actually been told that. I didn't argue the point, because there's no value in it, but it truly is hilarious.

I've been with a few for free, but if I met them on SA and am getting it for free it sends up even more alarm bells. What kind of crazy is f*cking guys off seeking for free? I had one tell me I was her second partner ever and that she was falling for me, right after I dropped a load in her. Don't need any of that crazy LOL.

The amount is just a different version of escorts merely charging for their time.

Bottom line, these girls are all damaged goods. If you forget that, sooner or later you're going to have a bad time.

**Jsidd** · 01-25-20 20:33

https://www.seeking.com/member/20382...e-08f21007104a

Interesting profile, LOL. I found it ironic she isn't looking for south asians when she's wearing their traditional clothing in her profile pic.

GPS for sure.

**Grafenberg** · 01-25-20 18:30

Originally Posted by SamTam [View Original Post]

It's been interesting. I've run into more than one that really didn't wish to be paid. Just a nice night out (or in). Not sure if they qualify as wh*res. Then, there are others that are nothing but all about the Benjamins. But, my favs are those that think that at $200 they're hookers, but at $400 they're not (they're sugarbabies). And, I've actually been told that. I didn't argue the point, because there's no value in it, but it truly is hilarious.

Check out the Richmond sugarbaby thread and the guy being blackmailed by the sugarbaby that did "not" want to be paid.

**Shinshi** · 01-25-20 17:47

Originally Posted by DirteeBoy [View Original Post]

Latest. I asked if I can just meet one and she refused. Said they will meet for 7. Then I asked if I can keep the money in the safe and pay her when we are done. She said that sounds suspicious, no way!

Second time I wasted effort with these d-bags.

Her exact message: "Hey handsome, was wondering if you had any plans later on today. I was thinking maybe we can meet and have some fun. I'm free this evening and would love to meet you for some fun. Let me know if today works or even later on this evening & we can text and plan our meet. I'd want 500 cash to have some fun, if that's ok with you. Leave your number & when your free. ".

She's hardly the exception, so I shouldn't be surprised when I see messages like that. However, it does make me wonder just how many dudes actually get sucked into that practice of paying before a meet-and-greet. To me, it's almost criminally stupid that anyone pays direct deposit, utilizes PayPal, or whatever prior to meeting! If they skip out on you, who would you run to? Just seems like folks roll the dice each time they wire money without even seeing if they're real or can carry out the services advertised. Might as well play fucking slots at Live! Casino with that logic.

**SamTam** · 01-25-20 17:28

Originally Posted by KevinCalormis [View Original Post]

Bingo. Too many of the posters on here are under the impression that these girls are something other than wh*res.

It's been interesting. I've run into more than one that really didn't wish to be paid. Just a nice night out (or in). Not sure if they qualify as wh*res. Then, there are others that are nothing but all about the Benjamins. But, my favs are those that think that at $200 they're hookers, but at $400 they're not (they're sugarbabies). And, I've actually been told that. I didn't argue the point, because there's no value in it, but it truly is hilarious.

**DWinthrop** · 01-25-20 15:40

Originally Posted by DDarko [View Original Post]

If they are on SA they are hookers for sure.

A2

Bingo. Too many of the posters on here are under the impression that these girls are something other than wh*res.

**DirteeBoy** · 01-25-20 14:27

I agree that technically if a woman is paid for sex, by definition, she is a hooker / prostitute / escort. It makes me laugh when a girl from SA gets offended and tells you they are not "hookers" because they are.

But. There is a long list of differences between escorts and SB's. Anyone who reads this board knows what they are (we all have a million stories) and this topic has been covered here before.

I like to think that this SB Thread helps us weed out the high mileage escorts, if not then why even have a SB thread? Am I wrong?

Originally Posted by DDarko [View Original Post]

Agreed. However there is always that offchance that someone is not an escort or other sites except for tinder etc. I have had the pleasure on having a few of these (only pay for uber if needed and dinners here and there) and when I am done will be more than happy to share on here.

If they aren't doing sex for money then sharing their info on here is inappropriate unless they want to change that. They also aren't a sugar baby if you aren't paying them for fucking you.

Uber and dinners here and there are girlfriends/hookups not hookers. If they are on SA they are hookers for sure. If they are on tinder they only might be hookers if they mention money.

A2

**DirteeBoy** · 01-25-20 14:11

All fake pics of IG models. They now have 3 active accounts on SA and are spreading like a virus. LOL I almost met them, just to see how far I can take it, but I decided it's not worth the risk.

Originally Posted by Dimples572 [View Original Post]

Did they at least send you actual real pics of what they look like? 3 or 4 diff times she sent me pics of her or her girlfriend but every time I'd do an image search it'd be some instagram model. If call her on it every time but she kept trying it. Then she said she'd FaceTime me, but it was as night driving in a dark car. Could barely see her face and her friend would come on camera at all. And refused to send actual real selfies of any kind. That's when I told them good luck in finding their next moron to scam.

**DDarko** · 01-25-20 11:44

Originally Posted by DirteeBoy [View Original Post]

Man, if you guys are going to post about this broad, take it to the escort board! She is on EROS.

Yes, we CERTAINLY can't have any women who accept MONEY for SEX on this thread.

Oh wait, let me say this again

It's fine for you guys to let them think they aren't hookers if that helps you make them fuck like girlfriends but it's pretty bad news when the mongers forget they are dealing with escorts. I know it makes you feel like you have some sense of exclusivity but 99.999999% of the chicks on all these SB sites will fuck whoever has the coin.

A2

Agreed. However there is always that offchance that someone is not an escort or other sites except for tinder etc. I have had the pleasure on having a few of these (only pay for uber if needed and dinners here and there) and when I am done will be more than happy to share on here.

If they aren't doing sex for money then sharing their info on here is inappropriate unless they want to change that. They also aren't a sugar baby if you aren't paying them for fucking you.

Uber and dinners here and there are girlfriends/hookups not hookers. If they are on SA they are hookers for sure. If they are on tinder they only might be hookers if they mention money.

A2