Thread: Escort Reports
+
Add Report
Results 7,516 to 7,530 of 9710
-
01-03-20 19:07 #2195Senior Member

Posts: 75Genie
Genie, what more needs to be said. She's always a great solid choice! Now has anyone ever done anything more than a one on one with her? Or would be interested in it?
-
01-03-20 11:23 #2194Senior Member

Posts: 84Sites Without. Com on Internet
All the Internet sites outside Can't use. Com. These are only for USA based sites. That is why backpage. Co and other New sites are based Overseas with. Ch, . Nl and so on. These are represented by countries they are being Hosted from. Like Colombia, Netherland, Slovakia, Chekoslovakia and so on. Very limited or no real jurisidiction by US Law enforcement agencies.
.
Originally Posted by Hcat113
[View Original Post]
-
01-02-20 22:43 #2193Senior Member

Posts: 1244Cautious
If I was really cautious, I'd quit mongering. Its inherently risky in the US. As I mentioned, I have been "detained" and I didn't like it much!
ARG
.
Originally Posted by Matty1169
[View Original Post]
-
01-02-20 20:07 #2192Regular Member

Posts: 21Isabella
https://worcester.skipthegames.com/f...a/917866805109
Not seen this one before. Any info?
-
01-02-20 19:14 #2191Senior Member

Posts: 113Com vs. Co
The. Com website is the US based site that was shutdown and still is. The one that can be reached is a. Co.
Originally Posted by SecretSquirell
[View Original Post]
The. Co websites are hosted in Colombia not the US. No idea if there is any connection to the original backpage.
-
01-02-20 17:56 #2190Senior Member

Posts: 672Warning page
Might be nothing but McAfee protection put up a warning page for suspicious site with virus warnings. It allows me to go anyway but since the only time I've seen it before was when I accidentally clicked a link in a spam email, I'll heed the warning.
Originally Posted by TinType
[View Original Post]
-
01-02-20 17:50 #2189Senior Member

Posts: 163No idea what the deal is. You get that blocked front page when you type it in. I grabbed a link from the RI group. Boston & RI seem to know what is going on. I don't know? Someone crack into BP, or something?
Originally Posted by Hcat113
[View Original Post]
-
01-02-20 17:32 #2188Senior Member

Posts: 763Cool. Thanks bro.
Originally Posted by TinType
[View Original Post]
-
01-02-20 17:26 #2187Senior Member

Posts: 163https://backpage.co/search-results/?...female-escorts
Originally Posted by Hcat113
[View Original Post]
-
01-02-20 16:16 #2186Senior Member

Posts: 763Bp
[http://backpage.com/.
You sure about that?
-
01-02-20 15:06 #2185Banned Member

Posts: 968Very well said ARG
Usually I'd like to play it safe myself. When I don't get a good sense of being familiar, with that particular provider. So I won't mention details until in person. Cause I don't know much about that provider. But when I do have a good sense that the provider ain't no LE setup. I will stupidly mention a couple details. Over the phone. Of what I'm looking for. Just the typical stuff. LOL. BJ and foreplay. Leading up to the FS. I am not one of those guys who wants to go straight to sex. I like to ease into it. To me the people who like to go straight to fucking, are the ones who are just easily satisfied. But everybody has their own way of doing things. Yes you do sound overly cautious ARG. But it's a GOOD thing my friend. I need to be like that myself. I should be that way too all the time. Rather than half the time. Haha. Happy New Year. I appreciate you saying that to me.
-
01-02-20 14:46 #2184Senior Member

Posts: 163Bp
So I guess the BP site is back up?
-
01-02-20 13:03 #2183Senior Member

Posts: 621Not overly cautious
Safe rather than sorry is a good modus operandi.
Originally Posted by ARegularGuy
[View Original Post]
-
01-02-20 12:47 #2182Senior Member

Posts: 1244Discussing details
With several decades of experience that includes SW's, incalls, outcalls, CD's (no more) and being detained and questioned by LE on more than a couple occasions, I only discuss specific acts or even general terms like a reference to FS, in person. Using txt or phone I ask only about "money for your time". Even If a provider offers or suggests acts in the context of donations or money in txt or phone calls, I don't agree or confirm what was offered. Instead, I reiterate that I am only interested in her time and don't want to discuss or agree to anything that might be illegal. Anyhow, that rarely happens. Typically I inquire about how much does an hour of her time cost and go from there. Discussing acts is dumb unless you know who you are talking to. Sure, I might meet with someone that doesn't offer what I'm looking for, so be it, it's a small price to pay for safety.
Maybe a bit overly cautious but it works for me.
ARG.
-
01-02-20 11:21 #2181Senior Member

Posts: 163Little red
I doubt that would be a problem. She's also a SW.
Originally Posted by RawBart
[View Original Post]







Reply With Quote




