Escort Reports

**Matty1169** · 01-02-20 15:06

Usually I'd like to play it safe myself. When I don't get a good sense of being familiar, with that particular provider. So I won't mention details until in person. Cause I don't know much about that provider. But when I do have a good sense that the provider ain't no LE setup. I will stupidly mention a couple details. Over the phone. Of what I'm looking for. Just the typical stuff. LOL. BJ and foreplay. Leading up to the FS. I am not one of those guys who wants to go straight to sex. I like to ease into it. To me the people who like to go straight to fucking, are the ones who are just easily satisfied. But everybody has their own way of doing things. Yes you do sound overly cautious ARG. But it's a GOOD thing my friend. I need to be like that myself. I should be that way too all the time. Rather than half the time. Haha. Happy New Year. I appreciate you saying that to me.

**TinType** · 01-02-20 14:46

So I guess the BP site is back up?

**Spill** · 01-02-20 13:03

Originally Posted by ARegularGuy [View Original Post]

With several decades of experience that includes SW's, incalls, outcalls, CD's (no more) and being detained and questioned by LE on more than a couple occasions, I only discuss specific acts or even general terms like a reference to FS, in person. Using txt or phone I ask only about "money for your time". Even If a provider offers or suggests acts in the context of donations or money in txt or phone calls, I don't agree or confirm what was offered. Instead, I reiterate that I am only interested in her time and don't want to discuss or agree to anything that might be illegal. Anyhow, that rarely happens. Typically I inquire about how much does an hour of her time cost and go from there. Discussing acts is dumb unless you know who you are talking to. Sure, I might meet with someone that doesn't offer what I'm looking for, so be it, it's a small price to pay for safety.

Maybe a bit overly cautious but it works for me.

ARG.

Safe rather than sorry is a good modus operandi.

**ARegularGuy** · 01-02-20 12:47

With several decades of experience that includes SW's, incalls, outcalls, CD's (no more) and being detained and questioned by LE on more than a couple occasions, I only discuss specific acts or even general terms like a reference to FS, in person. Using txt or phone I ask only about "money for your time". Even If a provider offers or suggests acts in the context of donations or money in txt or phone calls, I don't agree or confirm what was offered. Instead, I reiterate that I am only interested in her time and don't want to discuss or agree to anything that might be illegal. Anyhow, that rarely happens. Typically I inquire about how much does an hour of her time cost and go from there. Discussing acts is dumb unless you know who you are talking to. Sure, I might meet with someone that doesn't offer what I'm looking for, so be it, it's a small price to pay for safety.

Maybe a bit overly cautious but it works for me.

ARG.

**TinType** · 01-02-20 11:21

Originally Posted by RawBart [View Original Post]

Only way to know would be to ask. She had a good head game.

I doubt that would be a problem. She's also a SW.

**RawBart** · 01-01-20 09:08

Originally Posted by IsThataSw [View Original Post]

Not a big fan of hotel room providers. You think she'd be willing to do a car date BBBJCIM?

Only way to know would be to ask. She had a good head game.

**Is Thata Sw** · 12-31-19 22:59

Yes, happy new year Matt. I was ranting earlier and skank is actually correct after doing some research. Any agreement in text or voice is criminal. It makes sense LOL. I suppose I'm distracted by the veil we have between us when it's anonymous messaging. Which keeps us safe for sure. However, if they want to, they can get a warrant to reveal who the texter is. This just usually doesn't happen because there's not enough gravity to a text solicitation.

Once again. Happy new year ha!

Originally Posted by Matty1169 [View Original Post]

Cream, IsThataSw, and Skank you all make great points. And all of ya's have great reasoning. Keep in mind too with a lot of these providers. That if you don't make it clear, what you want for services. They can use us not being specific about stuff, as leverage. Leverage to NOT perform. And do what we want. For services. Not that we have to mention services through texts. But just to make sure we make it clear to them. In person. Before forking over the donation. To make sure she's willing to do that / those specific acts. I just thought that was a bit odd. That she was naming off all those services. Before I even told her. Cause usually providers don't go about it. In that manner. But everyone is dif, I guess. Me personally would rather tell the provider what I'm looking for. From talking voice to voice. Or better yet, in person. I hope the Worcester area gets better guys, provider wise! For the coming year of 2020. And even if your someone who I haven't always seen eye to eye on. On here. I DON'T want any of you guys getting scammed. Happy New Year folks.

**Matty1169** · 12-31-19 20:31

Cream, IsThataSw, and Skank you all make great points. And all of ya's have great reasoning. Keep in mind too with a lot of these providers. That if you don't make it clear, what you want for services. They can use us not being specific about stuff, as leverage. Leverage to NOT perform. And do what we want. For services. Not that we have to mention services through texts. But just to make sure we make it clear to them. In person. Before forking over the donation. To make sure she's willing to do that / those specific acts. I just thought that was a bit odd. That she was naming off all those services. Before I even told her. Cause usually providers don't go about it. In that manner. But everyone is dif, I guess. Me personally would rather tell the provider what I'm looking for. From talking voice to voice. Or better yet, in person. I hope the Worcester area gets better guys, provider wise! For the coming year of 2020. And even if your someone who I haven't always seen eye to eye on. On here. I DON'T want any of you guys getting scammed. Happy New Year folks.

**Techny22** · 12-31-19 18:45

Originally Posted by IsThataSw [View Original Post]

There is no actus reas with words. You must have the guilty act (actus reas) coupled with the guilty conscious (mens rea) for there to be a chargeable offense of soliciting. That's why prostitution arrests are always done when the John shows up to the providers place. They need you to be physically there, completing the crime. Otherwise, they can't charge you with anything. You can barter prices and services all day over the phone with a *****, until you show up in person, it's all just words. A defense lawyer would simply say you had an addiction to texting ****** for the thrill of it, but, you never actually acted on it. No harm done in making false offers for a mental thrill.

I agree however, it usually never greases the skids with a provider if you start getting graphic.

No need to leave a trail of text messages to incriminate yourself with. I will always try and avoid discussing any details or money for specific acts when meeting a new provider, most of them are keen to this as well and will not mention any specifics. If someone asks tell them you'd like a massage, no harm in that.

**Is Thata Sw** · 12-31-19 16:47

I suppose if you reach an agreement through text or email and give your personal information or it's your work email, then they could tie you to the verbal agreement. But, if you're texting through an app or emailing through CL exchange. I'd say your anonymous enough that they're not going to obtain a warrant for text plus to reveal your name.

Originally Posted by SkankMagnet [View Original Post]

Agreeing to money for sex, whether over the phone, text, or in person amounts to a criminal act. I think. Not saying you're wrong, I'm not not 100% sure you're right. That said, I never talk about any of that. Just set up a time to meet. There is no need to talk at all about details. If they ask, "what you lookin for?" Just say, "Dunno, we'll see. " You don't have to say anything. If they don't like it, you can always fond another ho. I never talk about it.

**Is Thata Sw** · 12-31-19 14:42

Originally Posted by RawBart [View Original Post]

A few days ago I took the plunge and dreamed of Ms Riding Hood. Location was easy, hotel right off of 70. She texted me about 50 x before I showed up. Apparently a lot of people flake. Room was clean for the most part. She looks like her pictures, if you like them short. Discussed what we wanted to do. I chose qv greek for $ 8 and we were off. She took it like a champ cleaned me up after and I was on my way. She does show signs of drug use and was mostly coherent but all over the place so YMMV. Seems to be willing to do whatever you're down for, if you're willing to pay. If it wasn't such a drive for me I would consider dreaming again.

Originally Posted by Hcat113 [View Original Post]

Little red riding ho!

Not a big fan of hotel room providers. You think she'd be willing to do a car date BBBJCIM?

**Matty1169** · 12-31-19 13:59

http://worcester.skipthegames.com/fe...l/689669391467

SkankMagnet and IsThataSw, I appreciate the candor. On the subject of the services being named off. If its a crime. Well anyways that was referring to this girl. Up above link. And I DON'T think my original concern should've been LE. I'd say more like robbery. Her ads indicate incalls and outcalls. Both have the check mark. But she will not budge on outcalls, now. A friend of mine on here, contacted her. For doing a car date. She wouldn't even do that. Incalls only, she says. She's in a rough area too. Over by _ st. My last text from her, willingly gave me a sob story. On why she doesn't do outcalls. She said, "sounds like a sick trick your playing on me. Doing an outcall to you. Last time did an outcall, I got raped by 5 men. Don't care what you guys offer, NO outs. " I said back to her, sounds like you're deflecting. More like, I'll get robbed by 5 of your dudes. If I go in your place. With the way you were telling me that shit. Randomly, out of no where. This to me guys reads nothing but incall rob / scams. Fact that she felt the need to willingly give me a crazy sob story. And every day she has that $50 dollar QV thing in her ads. So my original thoughts to stay away, was correct. From last week. But for the wrong reason. At that time. Sounds like a robbery setup!

**Is Thata Sw** · 12-31-19 11:59

There is no actus reas with words. You must have the guilty act (actus reas) coupled with the guilty conscious (mens rea) for there to be a chargeable offense of soliciting. That's why prostitution arrests are always done when the John shows up to the providers place. They need you to be physically there, completing the crime. Otherwise, they can't charge you with anything. You can barter prices and services all day over the phone with a *****, until you show up in person, it's all just words. A defense lawyer would simply say you had an addiction to texting ****** for the thrill of it, but, you never actually acted on it. No harm done in making false offers for a mental thrill.

I agree however, it usually never greases the skids with a provider if you start getting graphic.

Originally Posted by SkankMagnet [View Original Post]

Agreeing to money for sex, whether over the phone, text, or in person amounts to a criminal act.
I think. Not saying you're wrong, I'm not not 100% sure you're right. That said, I never talk about any of that. Just set up a time to meet. There is no need to talk at all about details. If they ask, "what you lookin for?" Just say, "Dunno, we'll see. " You don't have to say anything. If they don't like it, you can always fond another ho. I never talk about it.

**SkankMagnet** · 12-30-19 20:48

Originally Posted by IsThataSw [View Original Post]

Matty, no need to worry about texting or calls, nothing criminal can come from any agreement (of this type) over the phone. You can agree to a triple rim job BJ for $150 all day long through text or voice and there's no evidence of anything criminal actually taking place.

The way you get arrested is by showing up in person. This completes the crime. Investigators will and can (try) to use the texts leading up to the in person meeting as supporting evidence against you. In fact, in your agree to the sexual acts for money in advance, this could allow them to arrest you upon arrival to the spot, instead of having you get out and talk business before the arrest.

Also, a cop would not be trying to scare you away by saying incriminating type language through text. They're more likely to talk gently, agree with prices and services, just to get you to arrive in person in order to complete the arrest.

Agreeing to money for sex, whether over the phone, text, or in person amounts to a criminal act. I think. Not saying you're wrong, I'm not not 100% sure you're right. That said, I never talk about any of that. Just set up a time to meet. There is no need to talk at all about details. If they ask, "what you lookin for?" Just say, "Dunno, we'll see. " You don't have to say anything. If they don't like it, you can always fond another ho. I never talk about it.