Thread: Seeking Arrangements
+
Add Report
Results 8,341 to 8,355 of 10678
-
10-14-19 00:08 #2338Regular Member

Posts: 5Anyone seen this blonde from Andover?
She was on SA last year and was excellent. Went by HappyBlondie2020 or something.
-
10-13-19 23:08 #2337Senior Member

Posts: 350WhatsYourPrice London / Stefanie XXX-XXX-0322?
Wondering if anyone's been down this road before I TOFTT.
Found a very cute 18 year old latina on WYP. Exchanged numbers and I texted my offer for a date and expectation of sex and she quickly accepted.
The trouble is she's asked me to send her money three times already and we haven't met yet. I'm hoping she's just young and new to the game, but it's a red flag. Now I'm wondering if she's scammer or even a female at all. I want badly to believe she's the sexy girl in the pictures. And even if she is, how is she going to behave in person? Her profile is gone from the site now, which makes me wonder if someone reported it.
Still, the big head isn't in control now. Think I'll try a video call before proceesing any further.
-
10-13-19 13:31 #2336Senior Member

Posts: 199Flowerlilacs
https://www.seeking.com/member/50163...c-8a9c8e0b140c
Can't host. Wants $500. Will do two holes bare. Not interested. Could find much much hotter for half that.
-
10-12-19 11:58 #2335Senior Member

Posts: 3748I'm not exactly sure what you are asking, but here goes: With the method I've just revealed, you will not know if the girl got your number or not, that is, whether or not the mods intercepted it and blocked it, until and unless you get a call or text from the girl.
However, I'm not commenting at all on that issue, regarding the second method, which I'm keeping COMPLETELY UTR for ALL, except to repeat the statement I already made below--that I can now get my contact info to ANY girl on SA. 100% of the time, without paying a cent. Details of how that second method works, however, or how I set it up, will just have to remain unsaid.
Originally Posted by OffTheGrid
[View Original Post]
-
10-12-19 10:59 #2334Senior Member

Posts: 328SA message scanning and beating their crooked system.
Am I correct in my thinking that since you've received some replies, that is proof to you that coded messages from non-paying members are getting through to the women? If so, do you have a way of knowing which messages have gotten through and which have not? Otherwise, you may be flooding a woman with many messages and she may not be savvy enough to see your embedded code. Then she will be angry about getting blown up with all of your messages. But of course if she's not seeing the coded message, I suppose it doesn't really matter, because you won't ever meet her anyway. Also, once the woman has broken the code and responded to your number, do you exchange e-mails and correspond by e-mail or do you stay with text messages?
.
Originally Posted by KingOfFours
[View Original Post]
-
10-12-19 09:40 #2333Senior Member

Posts: 3748SA message scanning and beating their crooked system.
You are correct, they surely DO scan messages! Humans are actually reading those messages. Now, I don't know whether they also use bots or filters to do that. But whether or not they do, I have, neverheless, been able to determine definitively that a HUMAN actually READS those out-going messages from non-paying males, before they let them go out. This is NOT so for paying males. Nor is it so for either paying or non-paying females. But for non-paying males, a human reads those messages CAREFULLY. Well, at least they read them carefully SOMETIMES! But occassionally, contact info, such as an email address or phone number, CAN be slipped thru in those messages! That is indeed the method I've been using that has allowed me to get a phone number to quite a few hoes on SA, and some did indeed text me. Most of those were platinum pussy delusionals, and so I did not follow up. But there were some that I indeed did meet, and enjoyed inseminating, for a fair price.
Originally Posted by Bran001
[View Original Post]
I am now going to reveal how I got my messages thru as a non-paying member, as I've been promising now for a long time, to make public! Well here's the trick, and I'm going to reveal it now, finally, because it has become increasingly difficult to use successfully, because, I suspect, the moderators have caught on, and so are now looking MUCH more closely at non-payng males' outgoing messages.
The trick is to simply embed your burner number in the text of your message, so it will be somewhat inconspicuous. This was easy about a year ago, but now they have become MUCH more diligent about detecting and censoring messages from non-paying males with contact info in them. Here's an example of the type of message I'm talking about:
Hey there, LilCunntBaby89! I'd love to meet you, for oh one! If you would like to get together, ate sicks for, please get in contact with me, but not here, because as a non-VIP I won't be able to read your replies--I can send messages on here, but I can't read your replies! So please get in touch off-site, for for three too, if you are interested! Looking forward to hearing from you soon, LilCunnt!" (Of course, you need to make the message much longer, talk about your interests with the girl, ask about hers, or whatever, etc. , to make a longer message in which the embedded number is less noticible by some poor dude sitting there all day speed-reading those hundreds of messages!
Now, the main reason that I'm FINALLY revealing this now, is that SA has become, over the last year or so, MUCH more diligent about finding and preventing these types of messages from going out! But nevertheless, sometimes it is still possible to slip them thru, if you are clever enough at writing a message in which the contact info is not too noticible. Keep in mind that some minimum wage dude is sitting there reading hundreds or thousands of these messages every day. So its really not all that surprising that you can slip a message through, occassionally, whiile the moderstors are asleep at the switch! And I know it is humans doing this, and not bots, for two reasons: There is a time delay before the female gets a message from a non-paying male. No such time delay exists for a non-paying female. And secondly, it has been possible to get the same, identically written message thru sometimes, but not other times.
But even when it used to work more frequently, generally a LOT of messages were needed before one got thru. I would estimate less than 10% got thru. Now, a lot less less than that, unfortunately, because they are looking more closely! Maybe that was because of little' old me, but I suspect that others have also figured out this very simple trick!
So my reasoning now is, the more non-paying members that know this trick, the better! Because I do think that it might overwwhelm their system, and with hundreds or even thousands of such messages out there, it will, once again, become MORE likely to get some of them thru the overwhealmed censors! So try it, non-payong dudes! You may indeed catch a very nice pussy-fish or three that that way, as did I!
Now, that said, there is yet ANOTHER, VERY DIFFERENT way to get one's contact info thru to them on SA, without paying! This new method requires a LOT more preparation, but once established, it works every time! It now allows me to get my contact info to ANY hoe I choose, without paying a penny to SA, 100% of the time! And this NEW method, I am not going to be revealing to ANYBODY, any time soon! Not even my long-term email contacts will get the necessary details for this new method! Because I'm going to milk this new method for all its worth, for quite a while! So PLEASE do not clog my emails or inbox on here, asking me for the new method! Some of its essential details I actually discovered quite accidentally, and fortuitously. So I'm surely going to be sitting on this new method, probably for about a year, if it continues to work, before I will think about revealing its salient features.
But, regarding the old method--just remember the ancient saying, "If one is PERSISTENT enough, one can sharpen an axe with a banana! " .
-
10-12-19 09:33 #2332Senior Member

Posts: 702I found her impossible to work with as well. Messages as if she's quite interested, then goes silent / won't progress the process. I'm intrigued by her preferences (not so much the allowance) but my lack of interest in "chasing" women means it won't happen. This happens a fair bit on SA; chasing has very diminishing returns.
Originally Posted by RedStar819
[View Original Post]
-
10-12-19 00:38 #2331Senior Member

Posts: 386Watertown / newton
After a couple back experiences, I am back on the wining side again. I have been chatting with this one for a while but $400 was a little stiff so I pass. 2 weeks later got a a text saying she'd agree to a price range to my liking. She has a killer body, I mean I don't usually DATY but this one I could not resist and Icing on the cake, she's a squirter. I had a lot of fun with this one. GFE, DFK was on point. I had to admit she well worths the $400 . She takes direction well. She's a keeper. She looks much younger in person.
https://www.seeking.com/member/56978...3-517b59429542
JP.
-
10-11-19 16:53 #2330Senior Member

Posts: 178I tried reaching out to this lady in the past and she ghosted me when we actually decided to meet up.
Originally Posted by BR1201
[View Original Post]
-
10-10-19 19:41 #2329Senior Member

Posts: 199Mallory123
Met her at a hotel. All holes available bare but kind of pricy at 400 per meet.
https://www.seeking.com/member/0cc3c...7-338916f5663f
Likes it rough. Almost out of my comfort zone.
-
10-10-19 09:46 #2328Senior Member

Posts: 1686WYP, Issa5236,5', 135,40 yr old
Isabel is a reasonable and accommodating 40 yr old, in the Lowell / Methuen area.
Cute MILF, 5', 135,40 yr old, GFE. Slightly bigger than my usual preferences, but very nice. Here is link and pics. PM me if you have questions.
https://members.whatsyourprice.com/p...E18Yb5j4qbwQpE
-
10-09-19 11:32 #2327Senior Member

Posts: 615Ipvanish
Yes, that is what I am using now.
Originally Posted by Aimstraight
[View Original Post]
-
10-08-19 20:23 #2326Senior Member

Posts: 295Vpn?
I've used IPVANISH before and it did the trick.
Originally Posted by Spill
[View Original Post]
-
10-08-19 19:04 #2325Senior Member

Posts: 229No meet
Nope, I refused to meet for the prices they offered and they didn't do any counterproposal.
So the search goes on!
Originally Posted by SHawker25
[View Original Post]
-
10-08-19 17:47 #2324Senior Member

Posts: 702SA absolutely scans messages. That's not to say they ban every one the first time it's detected. I never talk "PPM" or any $ talk within SA. KiK or texting via my Google Voice number.
Originally Posted by ItIsWhatItIs45
[View Original Post]










Reply With Quote








