Los Angeles County Asian Providers

[BonerAppetitty]

She is mainly known as Sia but now she uses a different name sometimes. I like her so I think her service is above average.

Here is her old pic when she was at K-Town where I first saw her: https://www.gfemonkey.com/profiles/s...1e539b998b4673.

Any comments on her on Sia before? She looks familiar did she go by another name previously?

[PlutoKiller]

Haven't seen M's Chanel, but J's is providing a solid, better than average experience. And she is a fantastic rimmer.

I prefer Chanel / J (so far) vs Chanel / M.

Chanel / J review: https://www.eroticmonkey.ch/chanel-e...angeles-507801.

Chanel / M review: anybody? Mr. T?

[HapaBoy86]

Between Glow and Lyn, who is the hotter of the two? And who has better service?

Totally 2 different type of girls.

Obviously Lyn is hotter in my opinion. For me both still offer a wonderful session.

[HapaBoy86]

Any comments on her on Sia before? She looks familiar did she go by another name previously?

Origional Sia has always been "Sia" that started at Hobart location many years ago. Since than she travels all over now.

They're was also another lower tiet khouse that promoted a Sia as well few years ago. But, it didn't last.

She is a girl to be seen.

[IAmGib1]

I prefer Chanel / J (so far) vs Chanel / M.

Chanel / J review: https://www.eroticmonkey.ch/chanel-e...angeles-507801.

Chanel / M review: anybody? Mr. T?

[IAmGib1]

Any comments on her on Sia before? She looks familiar did she go by another name previously?

[Kakashiz]

Between Glow and Lyn, who is the hotter of the two? And who has better service?

I would go with Lyn. Glow is way past her prime.

[IAmGib1]

So is anyone in the know as to whether or not Yoco is back? Some "new" reviews with weird phone numbers on the monkey site, but with regard to reliability that site is about the same as our politicians' promises to look out for us.

Fake number and review. Drumming up interest to herald her return. Hang in there. All will know when "the legend" returns.

[AsianBaller1]

Great idea. The format has been established on the OC board and seems successful. One idea I would like to see incorporated is general location, eg. DTLA, Mid-Wilshire, etc. For some (like me), that can be a factor as whether or not to see a gal.

I created an asian agency section for this reason. But if the name asian pleaser fit the bill I'm cool with it.

http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/show...and-discussion

[Zakares]

To book, be prepared to provide refs. Never ever lead with KTE / SAG / EUK / Six / Fruit / TOM and probably KUP. The places you -want- to be in, will ignore you. They ain't got shit to play 20 questions with why'all newb asses. If a booker is going to take you either way, then he / she won't ignore you, will ask you for more deets, and then you can follow up with the above list that I mentioned. M also never ever never never never provides ref no matter how much you beg so you can just forego her as a ref. The -want-to-be-in-bookers- will never work with KTE / SAG / EUK / Six / Fruit / TOM / KUP-they're unsafe and will take anyone with half ass pseudo screening.

If you're completely new. The list I gave in sentence #2 is your in. If you -can- provide the -want-to-be-in-bookers- then you'll obviously get a response from the bookers that are friendlies.

Who are the want-to-be-in bookers? I'm good with Ca-K Dolls but I don't know anyone else.

[SpaceShuttle77]

Between Glow and Lyn, who is the hotter of the two? And who has better service?

[DailyFantasy]

To book, be prepared to provide refs. Never ever lead with KTE / SAG / EUK / Six / Fruit / TOM and probably KUP. The places you -want- to be in, will ignore you. They ain't got shit to play 20 questions with why'all newb asses. If a booker is going to take you either way, then he / she won't ignore you, will ask you for more deets, and then you can follow up with the above list that I mentioned. M also never ever never never never provides ref no matter how much you beg so you can just forego her as a ref. The -want-to-be-in-bookers- will never work with KTE / SAG / EUK / Six / Fruit / TOM / KUP-they're unsafe and will take anyone with half ass pseudo screening.

If you're completely new. The list I gave in sentence #2 is your in. If you -can- provide the -want-to-be-in-bookers- then you'll obviously get a response from the bookers that are friendlies.

I seldom post, but when I do, it's either confirming a fact or helping with unanswered question. But these KTE / SAG / EUK / SIX / FRUIT / KUP are the new kids on the block who are here to take advantage of noobs. Besides the point, don't use them as a reference. Won't help your case.

[Veni1]

So is anyone in the know as to whether or not Yoco is back? Some "new" reviews with weird phone numbers on the monkey site, but with regard to reliability that site is about the same as our politicians' promises to look out for us.

[Veni1]

Thank you to whoever started the asian pleaser la forum. That's exactly what we need. Honest reviews, descriptions, details, opinions.

We can all argue about age and bookers or whatever but in the end, we just want a great session and this info helps a lot!

Great idea. The format has been established on the OC board and seems successful. One idea I would like to see incorporated is general location, eg. DTLA, Mid-Wilshire, etc. For some (like me), that can be a factor as whether or not to see a gal.

[DashingD]

Thank you to whoever started the asian pleaser la forum. That's exactly what we need. Honest reviews, descriptions, details, opinions.

We can all argue about age and bookers or whatever but in the end, we just want a great session and this info helps a lot!

I second that all the way. Will contribute my own there this week.