Los Angeles County Asian Providers

[The Librarian]

[Deleted by Admin]

EDITOR'S NOTE: This report was deleted because the content of the report was pointless, unproductive drama. Please read the Forum FAQ and the Forum's Posting Guidelines for more information. Thank You!

[MunchMyXbox]

Don't want to beat a dead horse, but most of everything on here about Bijou is true. She's hot. She's skinny. And she's sweet. The only downside for me was, she wasn't into DFK and her scream / moan / cries. It took me a bit to get a good rhythm going as I was drilling her, because I kept stopping and asking, "/ you okay?" I'm not Dirk Diggler but it sounded like I was destroying this chick with her painful yelps. All in all, a positive experience. Nutted in the bag, showered and was on my way. Won't repeat, but I never do. I always like to see what's next. Have fun out there, Mongers.

[TickingTock]

Looks like Aki might be back. Check stelia on HX photo album. Great spinner with amazing service, supposedly Japanese.

https://www.humaniplex.com/profiles/stelia

I don't have hx, mind sharing the pics? They mention what area. Wla, mdr, mw?

Thanks.

[Bastard Chorum]

I think you might be referring to this Sena, correct me if I'm wrong.

https://www.eroticmonkey.ch/sena-esc...angeles-418730

Same booker, two different girls. The girl you linked goes by Cream and has a boob job now.

[Bastard Chorum]

I was browsing them this afternoon and low and behold there were so new gals up and reviewed. Clicking each link led me to discover that all five of them were supposed SAG ladies. Each review claimed that it was recent as in today it seemed. Unless I am missing something. And each review had a ling to the SAG website. However, if one were to click on the link and go to the SAG homepage to see the girl reviewed, surprise. None of the ladies in the reviews are currently listed. I don't know what is up what this deal, are they UTR with SAG? Or is someone creating and posting reviews up to either get credit or prop up SAG? My guess is that they are trying to get new customers since they have not gotten a lot of reviews or business lately. Since I reviewed Cherry there has been one on Sonya and that is it. Taylor's reviews seemed to have disappeared and when I tried to book her yesterday, the booker told me she was off. I asked about today and the booker told me she would get back, never did. I also asked about Sunny, who's profile has been set on "Off today" forever it seemed. Never got any information back in regards to Sunny either.

It sucks that the SAG booker was the only one that responded after I sent out some requests. The booker won't give me a reference as of yet so I am stuck with one gal that I have seen, and no ability to reference SAG to another agency. Anyway, I just thought that I would post this interesting observation from them seen this afternoon.

I have sent out texts to Hyun Ah's booker to see any of their ladies, and a number of other bookers as well. Not getting any response. Frustrating to say the least. I have a hobby phone with an out of town number, but I am forward telling the bookers that while the number is out of town I am local. Anyway, just an FYI on the them reviews. Good weekend gents.

I don't bother with the monkey site anymore. It's not worth it for me to sit, read, and sift through the BS. I mainly use it now to look at the pictures and get contact info. It wouldn't be surprising if it's just someone posting a fake review to extend their access. If you can, I would see about changing your hobby number to one with a local area code. It'll be more convenient for both you and the booker. It's quite painless to just let the booker know that you changed numbers. Another avenue to try is HX. Many agencies have profiles on there.

[BobLove]

I was browsing them this afternoon and low and behold there were so new gals up and reviewed. Clicking each link led me to discover that all five of them were supposed SAG ladies. Each review claimed that it was recent as in today it seemed. Unless I am missing something. And each review had a ling to the SAG website. However, if one were to click on the link and go to the SAG homepage to see the girl reviewed, surprise. None of the ladies in the reviews are currently listed. I don't know what is up what this deal, are they UTR with SAG? Or is someone creating and posting reviews up to either get credit or prop up SAG? My guess is that they are trying to get new customers since they have not gotten a lot of reviews or business lately. Since I reviewed Cherry there has been one on Sonya and that is it. Taylor's reviews seemed to have disappeared and when I tried to book her yesterday, the booker told me she was off. I asked about today and the booker told me she would get back, never did. I also asked about Sunny, who's profile has been set on "Off today" forever it seemed. Never got any information back in regards to Sunny either.

It sucks that the SAG booker was the only one that responded after I sent out some requests. The booker won't give me a reference as of yet so I am stuck with one gal that I have seen, and no ability to reference SAG to another agency. Anyway, I just thought that I would post this interesting observation from them seen this afternoon.

I have sent out texts to Hyun Ah's booker to see any of their ladies, and a number of other bookers as well. Not getting any response. Frustrating to say the least. I have a hobby phone with an out of town number, but I am forward telling the bookers that while the number is out of town I am local. Anyway, just an FYI on the them reviews. Good weekend gents.

Same here, getting the silent treatment from some of the smaller bookers even though I am cool with J and M.

[Cream Inside]

Don't know the name of the booker and she doesn't use a website. Use the alt phone number to contact her.

https://www.eroticmonkey.ch/boa-esco...-angeles-91771

Photos: Different girl.

Looks: GND looks. Big smile, natural Bs with large areolas, 5'2", average ass (more on this later), small Bush, petite and slender frame.

English: Very little.

Attitude: Friendly and welcoming, easy going.

Service: Overall decent, slightly above average kgirl service. Starts out with an ok massage. BBBJ is mediocre. She alternates between BBBJ and BLS often and IMO a little too often to meaningfully enjoy either. Catbath was rather extensive. She's very receptive to DATY. For mish, she was quite engaging with good audio feedback with and legs wide open. She will hold you tightly if you lean in during mish. The highlight of the session was surprisingly K9. Her unassuming ass in doggie was incredibly shapely and erotic to look at and pound upon. I lend it to her form in doggie: good arch, legs very wide, and ass high and extended out. I rarely pop in doggie but with her I did. That alone put her above average in service.

Expense: $260.

Repeat: Maybe.

I think you might be referring to this Sena, correct me if I'm wrong.

https://www.eroticmonkey.ch/sena-esc...angeles-418730

[Cream Inside]

Looks like Aki might be back. Check stelia on HX photo album. Great spinner with amazing service, supposedly Japanese.

https://www.humaniplex.com/profiles/stelia

[Cream Inside]

I was browsing them this afternoon and low and behold there were so new gals up and reviewed. Clicking each link led me to discover that all five of them were supposed SAG ladies. Each review claimed that it was recent as in today it seemed. Unless I am missing something. And each review had a ling to the SAG website. However, if one were to click on the link and go to the SAG homepage to see the girl reviewed, surprise. None of the ladies in the reviews are currently listed. I don't know what is up what this deal, are they UTR with SAG? Or is someone creating and posting reviews up to either get credit or prop up SAG? My guess is that they are trying to get new customers since they have not gotten a lot of reviews or business lately. Since I reviewed Cherry there has been one on Sonya and that is it. Taylor's reviews seemed to have disappeared and when I tried to book her yesterday, the booker told me she was off. I asked about today and the booker told me she would get back, never did. I also asked about Sunny, who's profile has been set on "Off today" forever it seemed. Never got any information back in regards to Sunny either.

It sucks that the SAG booker was the only one that responded after I sent out some requests. The booker won't give me a reference as of yet so I am stuck with one gal that I have seen, and no ability to reference SAG to another agency. Anyway, I just thought that I would post this interesting observation from them seen this afternoon.

I have sent out texts to Hyun Ah's booker to see any of their ladies, and a number of other bookers as well. Not getting any response. Frustrating to say the least. I have a hobby phone with an out of town number, but I am forward telling the bookers that while the number is out of town I am local. Anyway, just an FYI on the them reviews. Good weekend gents.

When girls leave, the page gets deleted but it's still there on the review site. There's a ton of guys who submit reviews well after the girls are gone so that they can get VIP credit but to not share any good intel.

[Cowboy21]

I was browsing them this afternoon and low and behold there were so new gals up and reviewed. Clicking each link led me to discover that all five of them were supposed SAG ladies. Each review claimed that it was recent as in today it seemed. Unless I am missing something. And each review had a ling to the SAG website. However, if one were to click on the link and go to the SAG homepage to see the girl reviewed, surprise. None of the ladies in the reviews are currently listed. I don't know what is up what this deal, are they UTR with SAG? Or is someone creating and posting reviews up to either get credit or prop up SAG? My guess is that they are trying to get new customers since they have not gotten a lot of reviews or business lately. Since I reviewed Cherry there has been one on Sonya and that is it. Taylor's reviews seemed to have disappeared and when I tried to book her yesterday, the booker told me she was off. I asked about today and the booker told me she would get back, never did. I also asked about Sunny, who's profile has been set on "Off today" forever it seemed. Never got any information back in regards to Sunny either.

It sucks that the SAG booker was the only one that responded after I sent out some requests. The booker won't give me a reference as of yet so I am stuck with one gal that I have seen, and no ability to reference SAG to another agency. Anyway, I just thought that I would post this interesting observation from them seen this afternoon.

I have sent out texts to Hyun Ah's booker to see any of their ladies, and a number of other bookers as well. Not getting any response. Frustrating to say the least. I have a hobby phone with an out of town number, but I am forward telling the bookers that while the number is out of town I am local. Anyway, just an FYI on the them reviews. Good weekend gents.

[DasBunka]

Any Intel? I gotten burned too many times thru them reviews but most info here has been reliable.

I've seen EJ and Iriz most recently and would like to see how she compares.

I think I saw her awhile back but not really memorable. Check out Chanel if you haven't already done so.

[Bastard Chorum]

Don't know the name of the booker and she doesn't use a website. Use the alt phone number to contact her.

https://www.eroticmonkey.ch/boa-esco...-angeles-91771

Photos: Different girl.

Looks: GND looks. Big smile, natural Bs with large areolas, 5'2", average ass (more on this later), small Bush, petite and slender frame.

English: Very little.

Attitude: Friendly and welcoming, easy going.

Service: Overall decent, slightly above average kgirl service. Starts out with an ok massage. BBBJ is mediocre. She alternates between BBBJ and BLS often and IMO a little too often to meaningfully enjoy either. Catbath was rather extensive. She's very receptive to DATY. For mish, she was quite engaging with good audio feedback with and legs wide open. She will hold you tightly if you lean in during mish. The highlight of the session was surprisingly K9. Her unassuming ass in doggie was incredibly shapely and erotic to look at and pound upon. I lend it to her form in doggie: good arch, legs very wide, and ass high and extended out. I rarely pop in doggie but with her I did. That alone put her above average in service.

Expense: $260.

Repeat: Maybe.

[Kenchana]

Hey, does anyone have any intel on London and who's she currently with? She is not with Kay anymore, even though the them website still shows Kay's # as her contact!

https://www.eroticmonkey.ch/london-e...angeles-472005

You understand that the review website doesn't update a provider's contact info in real time and that there are more than one agency right?

[Bastard Chorum]

Hey, does anyone have any intel on London and who's she currently with? She is not with Kay anymore, even though the them website still shows Kay's # as her contact!

https://www.eroticmonkey.ch/london-e...angeles-472005

Went back to Hawaii. Only comes to socal for a week or two to visit family and provide part time as she has a job back on the big island. She told me that she might come back around Oct or Nov and return to OC location.

[Jeff1976]

Have to agree on Huynah, pretty attractive but not very pleasant imo service-wise, and not worth it. Sixshop has better girls. Just look for the young ones.

Huyn Ah is not (repeat NOT) the girl in her pictures. She is a pretty young thing, with a very thin frame. She does have a certain pout with her lips, that can go from full and puffy to tight and playful. Her frame (if you have spent time with her) is unique, including her little tail bone protuberance. Nothing distracting (think snow leopard), but it's an odd / exciting feeling, all the same. She will try to DT if she likes you, but it's more of a gesture than an erotic accomplishment. Any girl that tries that hard, can't be too bad. She has decent bolt-on C-cups, with incisions under the nipples, so they have lost some reactivity.

I didn't repeat, but I might in the future. I would rate her above average, but not spectacular.