Bare Back Ladies

**Win56** · 07-08-19 00:27

Originally Posted by BostonRedSox [View Original Post]

I tried sending you a PM, but your box is full.

Mailbox cleaned out thanks.

**CameronMcLon** · 07-07-19 23:28

Saw her a few days ago.

The good: nice tits, clean pussy and light kisses, thought not DFK. With a full test report spanning the entire spectrum, she gives a great BBBJ, BBFS and CIP for me. She likes to chat, nice girl in her 40's and wants you to enjoy the full hour. 1. 5 was the rate.

The bad: The tummy was a bit too much for me! And while not horrible by many standards, I am not too big on them. So the pics are way flattering!

The ugly (or the real ugly): Hosts at a trailer in Webster! Not the cleanest and has a dog (nice one that she keeps in the other room)! The experience was the first for me! And while I didn't feel unsafe (day time), and enjoyed dumping a load in a good and clean pussy, I won't repeat! Simply for the living conditions!

http://boston.skipthegames.com/female-escorts/caucasian_w/looking-for-a-smart-sexy-pret/757209210537

**BostonRedSox** · 07-07-19 14:43

Originally Posted by Win56 [View Original Post]

Your review is right on, good job. Side note Kiera and Kaycie tattoo girl are on the same floor. It seems like all the working girls are on the top floor, Place is a dump at night you need someone to buzz you in cause of the problems there, FYI LE are always checking license plates in the parking lot.

I tried sending you a PM, but your box is full.

**Win56** · 07-03-19 06:22

Originally Posted by BostonRedSox [View Original Post]

I saw this one the other day. She was hosting in a sketchy motel in Danvers. I would not recommend.

I saw that Jen had an old ad with a good review. I texted her on one of her numbers, confirmed BBFS and set up a time. She only does hhr and does not do qv or hr. I like to do an hr and get two pops out of it, but I'm glad that she didn't offer it, because having sex with this one was not my proudest moment. When I got there, her roommate was leaving. She definitely looks better in the pics than in person. Started with a lackluster BBBJ that didn't last very long, and kept telling me that she wanted to have sex. She wouldn't climb up on top because she had a previous injury from a car crash, but it made her sterile, which is why she didn't mind BBFS. So, mish it was. When she opened her legs, she had a strong odor even though she had just showered. I figured, what the hell, I paid her already, so I might as well do it, and stuck it in. It was an awkward position so we switched to doggy, and the odor made me not want to feel around with my hands to put my dick in, so we went back to mish. Just as I was about CIP she said that she usually charges more for CIP. At that point, I had already came, so I could have just balked at it, but I decided to be a nice guy and paid the CIP upcharge.

After that, I went home and took a long hot shower and now I'm hoping that I don't get a yeast infection on my dick.

Damage was 140 for the hh, plus an upcharge of 30 for CIP.

Jen asked me if I had seen any of the other providers at the motel before. Turns out that the motel knows about the providers doing business there and don't mind it. All of the providers are on the same floor. I don't know how long this has been going on, but that ought to end up on uncle LEO's radar at some point.

She also has a cat with her, so if you're is allergic to cats, you probably shouldn't see her; if my review hasn't dissuaded you from seeing her already.

Previous ad:

https://escortbabylon.net/posts_view...112/9786996434

Current ad:

https://escortbabylon.net/posts_view...047/9786995727

Your review is right on, good job. Side note Kiera and Kaycie tattoo girl are on the same floor. It seems like all the working girls are on the top floor, Place is a dump at night you need someone to buzz you in cause of the problems there, FYI LE are always checking license plates in the parking lot.

**DaddyDollaz** · 07-03-19 03:20

Originally Posted by Cr440 [View Original Post]

I won't get into how giving 175 for a hh is insane for a crackhead at best but just a heads up before letting this girl in your house, she's spent time in prison for multiple armed robberies of a store clerk and woman in her 80's. We are fb friends and you can google it because it did make the newspaper. Also had a follow up article where she gave birth in prison. Just thought I'd let you guys know just what this girl is capable of just being around here but for the love of christ don't give this girl 175 for a HH. Its insane she's in her 30's with kids and addicted spend the money on someone actually worth it.

Some of you dudes are really the reason why junkies and unsanitary bitches be trying to charge all that bread.

**Longjblues** · 07-02-19 21:55

My post had to do with the veracity of the posters in regards to the law enforcement allegedly calling them. I had no issue with the affidavit or where the investigation took place. I don't really care.

Just so you clearly understand the point of my post, I was calling the two posts stating they received calls from the police asking questions about "x" total bullshit. Hopefully, I was clear enough for you that time. I am sorry if my earlier post was too ambiguous for you. If you have any further questions or comments, please let me know.

I applaud the fact that you were the only one to realize that x was videotaping the sessions with his/her girls. I am sorry that everyone ignored your warnings. However, my post was commenting on law enforcement practice and procedure, and not the fbi investigation of ‘x’.

Originally Posted by CephlapodLove [View Original Post]

Just a question. Did you read the affidavit and get familiar with the case? Fwiw X is not some generic term but stands for Xavier _(can't post last name) _ the target of the FBI investigation. It is anyone's prerogative to not read the details, to question the veracity, to defend the homeboys and decide to ignore the warnings therein. Me thinks there is plenty to be learned from this experience, if one is willing to do the homework and I was just sharing the information to help others. Apparently some do not wish any help, which is fine with me.

I am amazed that this factual information is so easily discounted. But then again, perhaps I should not be. After all I issued warnings over the years that stated that X was recording dates using a cam in the motel room and many ignored those warnings and went ahead and dated X's girls and now have their naked b*tts on tape in the FBI hands!

Good luck mongering!

**BostonRedSox** · 07-02-19 16:23

I saw this one the other day. She was hosting in a sketchy motel in Danvers. I would not recommend.

I saw that Jen had an old ad with a good review. I texted her on one of her numbers, confirmed BBFS and set up a time. She only does hhr and does not do qv or hr. I like to do an hr and get two pops out of it, but I'm glad that she didn't offer it, because having sex with this one was not my proudest moment. When I got there, her roommate was leaving. She definitely looks better in the pics than in person. Started with a lackluster BBBJ that didn't last very long, and kept telling me that she wanted to have sex. She wouldn't climb up on top because she had a previous injury from a car crash, but it made her sterile, which is why she didn't mind BBFS. So, mish it was. When she opened her legs, she had a strong odor even though she had just showered. I figured, what the hell, I paid her already, so I might as well do it, and stuck it in. It was an awkward position so we switched to doggy, and the odor made me not want to feel around with my hands to put my dick in, so we went back to mish. Just as I was about CIP she said that she usually charges more for CIP. At that point, I had already came, so I could have just balked at it, but I decided to be a nice guy and paid the CIP upcharge.

After that, I went home and took a long hot shower and now I'm hoping that I don't get a yeast infection on my dick.

Damage was 140 for the hh, plus an upcharge of 30 for CIP.

Jen asked me if I had seen any of the other providers at the motel before. Turns out that the motel knows about the providers doing business there and don't mind it. All of the providers are on the same floor. I don't know how long this has been going on, but that ought to end up on uncle LEO's radar at some point.

She also has a cat with her, so if you're is allergic to cats, you probably shouldn't see her; if my review hasn't dissuaded you from seeing her already.

ready for an experience youll never forget? located in Danvers.., HOSTING ONLY RIGHT NOW.. search my other account by my phone number 857-xxx-3275 . young wet tight and horny and waiting for you. open and flexible to almost anything and everything. *no greek* if your looking for a time and experience youll never ever forget call me now ...cant wait to hear from you 😘 text me at 978-xxx-5727,....,, #SERIOUS INQUIRIES ONLY PLEASEEE AND THANK YOUUU!!!

Previous ad:

https://escortbabylon.net/posts_view...112/9786996434

Current ad:

https://escortbabylon.net/posts_view...047/9786995727

**Cephlapod Love** · 07-02-19 12:03

Originally Posted by Longjblues [View Original Post]

The two posters that actually posted that they had been called by LE were DragonFlyJones with 3 posts and Pacoow 12 with 15 posts at time of their "Investigation" posts on April 12,2019. Other posters on that Board questioned their veracity.

I read their posts. Sounds like total BS, or someone is scamming them. They both said the cops called them, and were asking about a certain person "X". The cops assured them both that they were only investigating "X". Must have been the FBI, because no legitimate, competent law enforcement official is going to say that, particularly over the phone. LOL. I am calling total BS by those two posters.

Just a question. Did you read the affidavit and get familiar with the case? Fwiw X is not some generic term but stands for Xavier _(can't post last name) _ the target of the FBI investigation. It is anyone's prerogative to not read the details, to question the veracity, to defend the homeboys and decide to ignore the warnings therein. Me thinks there is plenty to be learned from this experience, if one is willing to do the homework and I was just sharing the information to help others. Apparently some do not wish any help, which is fine with me.

I am amazed that this factual information is so easily discounted. But then again, perhaps I should not be. After all I issued warnings over the years that stated that X was recording dates using a cam in the motel room and many ignored those warnings and went ahead and dated X's girls and now have their naked b*tts on tape in the FBI hands!

Good luck mongering!

**Squints1880** · 07-02-19 11:58

Shayla will fuck raw BTW, been in there myself and even have proof, she just needs to kind of know you and be in a desperate spot. Timing is key with her being willing to do it. I chose not to review her in the past because she had asked specifically at that time I didn't and she was a semi go to girl for me at the time so I didn't want to fuck up a sure thing (back when I kind of gave a shit about these girls) but haven't seen her on her come back tour.

Saw the squirting MILF in Malden the other night, dumped a load in her for 125, good time, floppy tits, nice person, shitty motel.

https://escortalligator.com.boston.l...4454647/Malden

Filled up this little junkie in peabody / danvers too for 130. Not as fun, kind of spacey and just a lay there and be a cum dumpster kind of experience.

https://escortalligator.com.boston.l...4723459/Malden

**KingOfFours** · 07-02-19 11:38

Originally Posted by DragonflyJones [View Original Post]

I was just contacted by someone claiming they are a detective building a case and wanted to ask me questions. UGHHH I stated I would rather speak with him with a lawyer present and that I would need to verify his credentials. This is fawked!

Originally Posted by KingOfFours [View Original Post]

I'm not calling bullshit, as I've found that almost anything can happen with government "officials" that is not generally the norm. But in general, I think you are correct. I think they were either scammed, or perhaps the reports just got garbled in the translation on here, as frequently happens on these hobby boards.

The post by the dragon fly dude was apparently the original post in question. The posts by that second Pacoow dude were just chiming in to say the same thing happened to him too. The dude with the original post, above, though, said, "detective", not LE, for whatever that is worth. Sure sounds like a scammer or a blackmailer, to me.

**KingOfFours** · 07-02-19 11:15

Originally Posted by Longjblues [View Original Post]

The two posters that actually posted that they had been called by LE were DragonFlyJones with 3 posts and Pacoow 12 with 15 posts at time of their "Investigation" posts on April 12,2019. Other posters on that Board questioned their veracity.

I read their posts. Sounds like total BS, or someone is scamming them. They both said the cops called them, and were asking about a certain person "X". The cops assured them both that they were only investigating "X". Must have been the FBI, because no legitimate, competent law enforcement official is going to say that, particularly over the phone. LOL. I am calling total BS by those two posters.

I'm not calling bullshit, as I've found that almost anything can happen with government "officials" that is not generally the norm. But in general, I think you are correct. I think they were either scammed, or perhaps the reports just got garbled in the translation on here, as frequently happens on these hobby boards.

**Longjblues** · 07-02-19 09:44

The two posters that actually posted that they had been called by LE were DragonFlyJones with 3 posts and Pacoow 12 with 15 posts at time of their "Investigation" posts on April 12,2019. Other posters on that Board questioned their veracity.

I read their posts. Sounds like total BS, or someone is scamming them. They both said the cops called them, and were asking about a certain person "X". The cops assured them both that they were only investigating "X". Must have been the FBI, because no legitimate, competent law enforcement official is going to say that, particularly over the phone. LOL. I am calling total BS by those two posters.

Originally Posted by KingOfFours [View Original Post]

I never said it was "false", sir. Nor am I challenging your veracity. Please re-read what I said. I said the idea of LE calling to "interview" potential targets was fishy and I still think its fishy. And I will continue to think it is fishy until I talk to someone directly that it happened to. I did scan thru that court docket, but it is very long, so I very well might have missed any parts of it that says that LE contacted the "witnesses" by telephone. If anyone has time, please cut and paste the part that says that, if it is there, because I could not find it.

But I did find the part where they used USASG in the warrant application, and Cephlapod's posts! And in seeing that, I DID indeed learn something! I do v ery much appreciate this info, and I think everyone sould read that court docket. So, thank you sir! I also saw the part where LE came to the "witness's" home. THAT as I understand it, is the usual LE methodology--NOT making phones calls to residences.

But I'd still like to hear from those dudes that claimed that they they got such calls from LE. Again, I'm not saying that this is false. What I am saying, is that so far, to my knowledge, the reports of such calls are second hand and we all know how innacurrate second hand info can be. So I'd like to get the info from the horse's mouth, in order to try to determine for myself, what may or may not have really happened. Because if they really are doing this, then the deteriorstio of our constitutional rights may have progressed furtje than I was aware of. In which case, not only posting on this site is a risk! If they are calling people's homes and disrupting mongers' marraiges, etc, then we've reached the point that just existing in this society is itself a risk.

**KingOfFours** · 07-02-19 08:23

Originally Posted by CephlapodLove [View Original Post]

Sounds fishy to you? LOL! I dunno, whenever I "think" I know something in the hobby is when it teaches me a lesson! Just because I have never heard of any of this doesn't make it false! But hey if one wishes to operate on that basis, no skin off my teeth! I'm just saying.

Oh wait! It just hit me, someone who is LE friendly would have an interest in dissuading others from paying attention to these techniques and tactics! After all if too many take heed, then LE will have to come up with new techniques!

Maybe what you aren't comprehending is that the FBI was after a PIMP who was running a website. The calls to mongers were not to jam up the monger's for solicitation, but to collect evidence against the pimp. Perhaps there is more of this in the future as Federal Prosecutors build their case and compels testimony of customers captured on tape? Of course, the mongers could lie to Federal Officials and deny sex occurred and then get jammed up when the Pimps go-pro videos prove otherwise? When you have a dude, who picks up girls in one state, drives them across state lines to do "dates", controls when or IF the girls work, takes money from them and in some cases requires them to have video taped sex with him in order to get a job (oh & he posted on his website one video where he was urinating on the girl) me thinks LE is going to use more than a few techniques and resources to get the guy regardless of what anyone has heard!

I don't understand why a dude who is trying to help & add to the conversation as to assist other mongers has to have their veracity challenged. If one studies the background they will see I am taking some level of risk by posting here. I could just say * you and let you continue on with your beliefs which apparently in this case are flawed. Sigh.

1.

WHFT investigation.
I was just contacted by someone claiming they are a detective building a case and wanted to ask me questions. UGHHH I stated I would rather speak with him with a lawyer present and that I would need to verify his credentials. This is fawked!

http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/show...509&viewfull=1#post4229509.

2.

Yes same here I received a call yesterday wanting to know more about x and everything that was happening. Its not looking good I got a attorney today.

http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/show...752&viewfull=1#post4229752.

3.

Investigation
He said he was just interested in X but I felt super uncomfortable talking about any of that without having a lawyers advice. I told him I will call him back after I could verify his info. Ughhh has anyone else been called?

http://www.usasexguide.nl/forum/show...814&viewfull=1#post4229814.

Since LE reads these threads, any number of LT mongers have disappeared, gone underground or whatever, but no longer post! I suspect more were contacted that a) are not members on this site or b) who thought it prudent to NOT post on the threads that they had been contacted, or perhaps were advised by counsel not to post anymore.

So if one reads the affidavit that LE filed in support of warrants there one can see various LE techniques:

* the use of on-site surveillance of the motel room & pimps house.

* tracking devices on cars.

* access to FaceBook emails.

* access to bank accounts and banking records.

* pole cameras to record pimp & girls coming & going as well as mongers and their license plates.

* a fake prostitute (UCLE / decoy) doing "dates" in an adjacent room to get pimp's interest (it worked).

* traffic stops after dudes completed their dates.

* LE reading posts here on usasg and using those posts as "evidence" in support of the affidavit and.

* the pimp's use of a go-pro camera in the room to record dates!

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket...y-lane-elkton/

See Doc 3, the pdf file!

Then dudes reported on the USASG forums that they had been contacted. So everyone is free to draw their own conclusions and take actions or just blow it off as "can't happen here. " One thing I know about the hobby is that it involves some level of risk and everyone is free to make their own evaluation: ignore the risks or take actions to minimize the risks. So in my view the risk exists regardless of whether anyone has heard of it or not. Anyone can parse this and discount it as they wish. Me thinks this is quite sobering information.

Good luck mongering! Stay safe!

I never said it was "false", sir. Nor am I challenging your veracity. Please re-read what I said. I said the idea of LE calling to "interview" potential targets was fishy and I still think its fishy. And I will continue to think it is fishy until I talk to someone directly that it happened to. I did scan thru that court docket, but it is very long, so I very well might have missed any parts of it that says that LE contacted the "witnesses" by telephone. If anyone has time, please cut and paste the part that says that, if it is there, because I could not find it.

But I did find the part where they used USASG in the warrant application, and Cephlapod's posts! And in seeing that, I DID indeed learn something! I do v ery much appreciate this info, and I think everyone sould read that court docket. So, thank you sir! I also saw the part where LE came to the "witness's" home. THAT as I understand it, is the usual LE methodology--NOT making phones calls to residences.

But I'd still like to hear from those dudes that claimed that they they got such calls from LE. Again, I'm not saying that this is false. What I am saying, is that so far, to my knowledge, the reports of such calls are second hand and we all know how innacurrate second hand info can be. So I'd like to get the info from the horse's mouth, in order to try to determine for myself, what may or may not have really happened. Because if they really are doing this, then the deteriorstio of our constitutional rights may have progressed furtje than I was aware of. In which case, not only posting on this site is a risk! If they are calling people's homes and disrupting mongers' marraiges, etc, then we've reached the point that just existing in this society is itself a risk.

**KingOfFours** · 07-02-19 07:38

Originally Posted by GiilsonWH [View Original Post]

Just because the girl doesn't offer bbbfs anymore doesn't make her less enjoyable nor a bad person. After all it's for her own safety as well as for everyone else. I honestly prefer girls who don't openly advertise bbbfs. Too many risks involved.

Taking BBFS off the menu and simultaneously raising rates is a sure sign that they've learned that fucking raw is worth more than they were previously charging. Because they now have regulars that they can milk for more frequent visits and / or more cash. I have had this happen to me fairly recently by a couple of first rate CIP girls, both hot and both great performers, who are sisters who I inseminated several times, both in solo and threesome sessions. Then, out of the blue, they doubled thir rates for me, and took raw fucking off the menu. Of course that does not make them bad peope! But for me, it does make them less enjoyable--in fact, as far as I'm concerned, without fucking them raw, it would just not be enjoyable at all. So I've never gone back. Different strokes for difference folks.

**BebeBozzo** · 07-02-19 01:37

Originally Posted by CephlapodLove [View Original Post]

Not sure why the truth isn't believed!

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket...y-lane-elkton/

See Doc 3, the pdf file!

You are a long time poster in another state, I started to go through your posts to find links to posts claiming calls from popo but just don't have the time, thank you for links. That request for search warrants was an interesting read. Wonder what made them go after this guy after being around for a decade. Also see why you have a personal interest in the case. Another example of why "agencies" may be a thing of the past.

This conversation should probably be moved to general reports or news / media rather than the BB forum.