Rubrankings.com
Find Your New Baby
rubmaps
Best Escorts
Meet Sugar Babies
LoveHUB Escorts Directory
High Class Companions
Live Escorts
Best Escorts
Meet Sugar Babies
LoveHUB Escorts Directory
High Class Companions
Live Escorts
Best Escorts
Meet Sugar Babies
LoveHUB Escorts Directory
High Class Companions
Live Escorts
This forum thread is moderated by Admin
  1. #580

    Decriminalizing sex work

    Sex work may be decriminalized in New York soon!

    https://www.nbcnewyork.com/news/loca...511067151.html

  2. #579

    Gimme some COCK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    [Deleted by Admin]

    EDITOR's NOTE: This report was edited or deleted to remove references to Transvestites/Transsexuals/SheMales. As provided in the Forum's Posting Guideline, members may not discuss Transvestites/Transsexuals/SheMales. Please read the Forum's Posting Guidelines for further information. Thanks!

  3. #578

    Bungled from Beginning

    https://www.sun-sentinel.com/local/p...35a-story.html

    But Hanser concluded the warrant still broke federal law, because police didn't do enough to focus only on crimes and to minimize the cameras' intrusiveness. At all of the spas with the secret cameras, police wound up recording people receiving lawful services, even though the focus was supposed to be only on men paying for sex acts.

    Failing to be vigilant and not record women "is a serious flaw in the search warrant, especially considering that the search warrant did not allege women were seeking illegal contact," Hanser wrote. He called it "unacceptable" that "some totally innocent women and men had their entire lawful time spent in a massage room fully recorded. ".

  4. #577

    What goes around comes around time for me to get some cock

    [Deleted by Admin]

    EDITOR's NOTE: This report was edited or deleted to remove references to Transvestites/Transsexuals/SheMales. As provided in the Forum's Posting Guideline, members may not discuss Transvestites/Transsexuals/SheMales. Please read the Forum's Posting Guidelines for further information. Thanks!

  5. #576

  6. #575

    100%

    I want to light bags of shit on fire on each of their doorsteps.

  7. #574

  8. #573
    Senior Member


    Posts: 2189
    Quote Originally Posted by ThatGuy23  [View Original Post]
    To be fair, these women believe girls are being trafficked. It's not just that they're looking to shut down places that don't approve of, but they believe they're work will save these girls. They simply hear the news reports as fact. "Under suspicion of human trafficking" becomes "My God, these poor girls are being trafficked, doing this work against their will!" They might not be as aggressive if they believed these girls were willingly working in these places.
    If by chance they actually come across a "real" trafficking establishment, would guess they would not be able to leave and would be put to work themselves.

  9. #572

    Globe

    Quote Originally Posted by CheezeFist  [View Original Post]
    In today's Globe:

    https://www2.bostonglobe.com/metro/2...lZK/story.html

    I am not a lawyer but I am pretty sure that it is illegal to approach random people asking them whether they want to be where they are.

    A quick search on the Internet showed this: "Invasion of privacy is a Class A misdemeanor, but can be charged as a Level 6 felony if a person has a prior unrelated conviction for invasion of privacy." These crazy people don't seem to realize that invading providers' privacy may result in jail time. Not for providers.
    Someone want to copy and paste the article? I'm over my limit for the paywall.

  10. #571
    Senior Member


    Posts: 2195
    Quote Originally Posted by ThatGuy23  [View Original Post]
    To be fair, these women believe girls are being trafficked. It's not just that they're looking to shut down places that don't approve of, but they believe they're work will save these girls. They simply hear the news reports as fact. "Under suspicion of human trafficking" becomes "My God, these poor girls are being trafficked, doing this work against their will!" They might not be as aggressive if they believed these girls were willingly working in these places.
    Actually it's not that they "believe" that these girls are being trafficked. They just refuse to believe that they are NOT being trafficked.

    There is ample info out there that says that 99.9% of those girls do it on their own accord, and many are even proud to be able to support their families back home. Also, considering the quality of life in rural China many of those girls never had it as good as when working in America's whorehouses and look at any attempt to remove it from there as an attempt to do them harm. But accepting that would go against these ladies puritanical heritage (Cotton Mather is grinning in his grave about his values are being alive and well after all that time if not in word then in spirit), would make them feel like evil-doers instead of the heroes, and also hit something Fraudean inside, first of all this action makes them feel superior: since they're saving hoes they not hoes themselves, even if back in the day they were their HS football team's "goto" toys. Also by doing that they're almost "chasing the devil away" from themselves. Also many women who live in Wayland (I personally know two) have a lot of time on their hands and that keeps it all busy and interesting.

    There are a lot of reasons for those women doing that but when you strip it all down benevolence is the last one on their list.

  11. #570

    Do gooders

    Quote Originally Posted by ThatGuy23  [View Original Post]
    To be fair, these women believe girls are being trafficked. It's not just that they're looking to shut down places that don't approve of, but they believe they're work will save these girls. They simply hear the news reports as fact. "Under suspicion of human trafficking" becomes "My God, these poor girls are being trafficked, doing this work against their will!" They might not be as aggressive if they believed these girls were willingly working in these places.
    And they don't see the irony when after their meetings they stop and get their nails done at the expensive salon with Vietnamese woman servicing them.

  12. #569
    Quote Originally Posted by MeatMan  [View Original Post]
    Those old crusty fat bags have nothing else better to do with their time.
    To be fair, these women believe girls are being trafficked. It's not just that they're looking to shut down places that don't approve of, but they believe they're work will save these girls. They simply hear the news reports as fact. "Under suspicion of human trafficking" becomes "My God, these poor girls are being trafficked, doing this work against their will!" They might not be as aggressive if they believed these girls were willingly working in these places.

  13. #568
    Senior Member


    Posts: 3024
    Quote Originally Posted by IGotID69  [View Original Post]
    Go walk your effing dogs.
    Those old crusty fat bags have nothing else better to do with their time.

  14. #567

    Desperate housewives

    Quote Originally Posted by CheezeFist  [View Original Post]
    In today's Globe:

    https://www2.bostonglobe.com/metro/2...lZK/story.html

    I am not a lawyer but I am pretty sure that it is illegal to approach random people asking them whether they want to be where they are.

    A quick search on the Internet showed this: "Invasion of privacy is a Class A misdemeanor, but can be charged as a Level 6 felony if a person has a prior unrelated conviction for invasion of privacy." These crazy people don't seem to realize that invading providers' privacy may result in jail time. Not for providers.
    Go walk your effing dogs.

  15. #566
    Senior Member


    Posts: 2189
    Quote Originally Posted by CheezeFist  [View Original Post]
    In today's Globe:

    https://www2.bostonglobe.com/metro/2...lZK/story.html

    I am not a lawyer but I am pretty sure that it is illegal to approach random people asking them whether they want to be where they are.

    A quick search on the Internet showed this: "Invasion of privacy is a Class A misdemeanor, but can be charged as a Level 6 felony if a person has a prior unrelated conviction for invasion of privacy." These crazy people don't seem to realize that invading providers' privacy may result in jail time. Not for providers.
    All of them concerned about the sex trafficking in FL. Which turned out not to be happening.

Posting Limitations

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Top Escorts
The Velvet Rooms
Top Tier Escorts
The hottest girls are here
Top Escorts
The Velvet Rooms
Top Tier Escorts
The hottest girls are here
Top Escorts
The Velvet Rooms
Top Tier Escorts
The hottest girls are here

Protected by Copyscape