Thread: Escort Reports
+
Add Report
Results 18,766 to 18,780 of 23333
-
03-26-19 09:56 #4568Senior Member

Posts: 93Tara DC
Does any of my fellow mongers have an experience with the girls from Tara Escortbook? https://tdc.escortbook.com/.
Not many available at any given time as it seems, but they look promising and advertise GFE.
-
03-26-19 08:23 #4567Senior Member

Posts: 99Personal info
I personally think it is crazy to give your personal information. Specially, nowadays with the many crackdowns and shut downs.
Originally Posted by Accordian
[View Original Post]
Who are you giving the info? Can they sell it to people that can really hurt you economically and personally. Or can the government find ways to hurt you.
No way. Thank you.
-
03-26-19 06:41 #4566Senior Member

Posts: 1979Don't know if they're legit or not but they seem pretty worthless to me. Every review I've seen on that site has consisted of mostly vague details and gushingly positive comments, without a hint of anything negative ever happening. Since the providers can see the reviews and respond, it's seems more like a fanboy section than anything else. When I read reviews I can usually tell which ones reflect real experiences and which ones are embellished (for good or bad). My spidey-sense tells me something is not quite right on that site.
Originally Posted by Schmoopy
[View Original Post]
-
03-26-19 06:28 #4565Senior Member

Posts: 1979The main problem with giving out PII
Is that, once you give it, it's out there forever (and associated with an escort site) and completely out of your control. Everyone has their own level of risk tolerance and only you can decide whether it's worth it or not. An agency getting taken down by LE, or any number of different scenarios, could compromise your information. Depending how things shake out, job loss, divorce, and such have been known to happen. I'm sure other members can relate some examples, like the Ashley Madison incident, etc.
Originally Posted by Accordian
[View Original Post]
As with most things in the hobby, it's a cost-benefit and risk analysis only you can make for yourself because you're the only one who knows how much you have to lose. IMHO, there are enough options out there, including high-end ones, where I've never had to give out my PII. So trying my best to always think with the big head, and long-term, that's not a bridge I'm prepared to cross. Also, for anyone who works in a job or industry where security clearances are required, they're at a higher risk level because of the way those adjudication are done.
-
03-25-19 21:27 #4564Senior Member

Posts: 188Natalie of P. L.
This review might be useless since today was her last day and who knows if she'll ever come back. Sorry about that.
Beautiful girl (face and body), dark eyes, long dark hair, tan skin (no tan lines). I rather doubt she's the advertised 20 year old But at my age close enough LOL.
Minimal English (she's from southern Brazil).
She basically just lay there while I worshiped her body, including DATY but no FIV allowed. Put the condom on with her mouth and I finished in mish. She has strong legs and kept me from going deep. She wasn't totally disgusted with me, but I could tell she would rather be somewhere else. Lying on the beach in Miami, as it turns out from our chat via the amazing multilingual talking app on her phone. 325 for the hour.
-
03-25-19 20:56 #4563Senior Member

Posts: 75Are these reviews legit?
I have had good luck trusting the reviews on this forum. Not so sure about privatedelights though. Anyone have any luck?
https://privatedelights.ch/listing/S...rginia/Herndon
-
03-25-19 20:46 #4562Regular Member

Posts: 15High-Class Tastes
Question for my fellow mongers out there who may or may not be members. Is it worth taking the plunge and giving out all your work information and other PII in order to get accepted at sites like City-girls, luxury companions, etc. Because personally if the pics don't lie I definitely wouldn't blame anyone for giving it up, but at the same time it's kinda sketch they won't take references or paid subscriptions like P411. Just somewhat curious how the community feels about it.
-
03-25-19 17:04 #4561Senior Member

Posts: 560Ashley.
She has dropped the quick visit. Told me guys easily give her 200. Not me.
Originally Posted by Cachito123
[View Original Post]
-
03-25-19 16:25 #4560Senior Member

Posts: 75Auto-correct.
Thanks for picking up on the auto-correct that turned them into THEM. Charlotte sounds dreamy! Sorry to hear your dive with Shaina didn't go as well. Must have been a bad day.
Originally Posted by HotNuts
[View Original Post]
-
03-25-19 13:58 #4559Senior Member

Posts: 224I met with Charlotte from elitemodels over the weekend. Looked just like her pics and maybe a little better. Started with a quick shower then got down to business. Didn't seem like a clock watcher. Nice suck-able tetas and a toned athletic body. After some time with the girls, she took junior in her mouth. Started with sitting then figured I wanted a better view so had her positioned in 69. She was tight, and said no FIV. Still, the view of her perfectly round ass and cute kitty was so good that I had to sample a little bit and sucked firmly on her button. She bucked a little and rode my face some while I did this. She climbed on for some quick CG, and then we went back to more French. She did try to use her hands more than I liked; however, to prevent that, I took hold of both of her hands passionately and had her carry on. This allowed me to pull her down deeper on me and get the hands free experience I wanted until I blasted in her mouth. She didn't swallow, but complemented the volume and gave me a nice cleanup. I asked if I could take another quick shower, and she said no problem.
Originally Posted by Schmoopy
[View Original Post]
Overall, very eager to please. Said she might be here a while. I think I need to make another stop by for her.
I met with Shaina the week before, but she was more of a clock watcher. She did look nice, but I didn't feel as much of a connection with her. YMMV.
-
03-25-19 13:38 #4558Senior Member

Posts: 99Ad says 100 hh. 150 hr.
Originally Posted by SlowBlo
[View Original Post]
No mention of qv.
-
03-25-19 00:25 #4557Senior Member

Posts: 75Them
Shaina. Spinner, knockout, skilled. Sasha and Giselle real. Nothing man made. That can be good or bad depending on your preference. Sasha was more skilled and a bit freakier. In a good way. I may see Shaina and / or Sasha again.
-
03-24-19 13:55 #4556Senior Member

Posts: 1979More on Ashley.
Received multiple PMs, mostly from members with limited posting histories, asking about Ashley's rates and service. Rather than replying individually I would direct anyone wanting details to her ad, which clearly lists her rates, and to her reviews on Emonkey (search phone number). As far as my experience goes, can't really add much to the info above. And my personal definition of GFE can be seen in some of my recent posts.
Originally Posted by JmSuttr
[View Original Post]
-
03-24-19 13:35 #4555Senior Member

Posts: 1979More on Diamond.
Many providers have preferences and quirks about their screening process that may not make sense to clients. In the grand scheme of things, Diamond's aren't a deal breaker, IMHO. When I saw her she had just returned from going out, was nicely dressed and, with makeup on, looked just like her pics. I'm sure she looks different when she first wakes up, as do most women. And, no matter what time you catch up with her, one constant feature is an outstanding set of headlights, which I thoroughly enjoyed.
Originally Posted by BMax986
[View Original Post]
I'm not a video guy so I didn't ask for that. About GFE, so much depends on personal chemistry that it's hard to pin down. Even if a provider has a menu that includes BBBJ, DATY, and DFK, without at least some chemistry the session (at least to me) feels like going through the motions. So YMMV always applies and I'm just lucky that Diamond and I hit it off. The nice thing is that it wasn't much of a $ risk at her 200 hr rate. What really sucks is when guys spend 300+, even for reviewed providers, for a session that doesn't match expectations.
She's left the area for now and, IIRC, she advertises primarily on Listcrawler. I told her that's one of my least favorite ad sites and recommended she look at AdultSearch or STG. She also has multiple reviews on the Emonkey site (search her phone number).
-
03-24-19 13:16 #4554Senior Member

Posts: 34Michelle and Victoria.
I've recently had great experiences with Michelle and Victoria, who work with Kelly and have advertisements on Eros. Screening and scheduling with Kelly was straightforward, consistent with earlier reports. The advertisement pictures were accurate, and I would recommend my experience with Michelle and Victoria to anyone. Michelle also advertises in LA under a different name, which shows up in a google image search. Both kept up interesting conversations that made the experience more comfortable while I was generally stunned and at loss for words. I hope you treat them well and keep them in business so I'll have the opportunities to repeat when they are in this area.
I've also had several good experiences with different providers at Lotus Flowerz, in spite of mixed reviews in earlier reports. I would recommend scheduling providers listed as GFE on their website such as Candy, with whom I had great experiences. Screening and scheduling through their website has been straightforward. The website pictures are generally accurate, although sometimes with additional make up or possibly photoshop in the pictures.
Happy to provide more information, but don't intend to share explicit details. Thank you to everyone for all of the useful information on this forum.







Reply With Quote



