Thread: Asian PLEASER Reviews only
+
Add Report
Results 2,146 to 2,160 of 2378
-
03-01-19 12:37 #233Senior Member

Posts: 142Making some arrangements this weekend for a K girl in LA.
The last Kgirl I had from a Vegas agency rushed me and didn't offer multiple pops.
Are the LA girls the same?
-
02-28-19 21:04 #232Senior Member

Posts: 1834Look into Glow or Mindy7 in LA.
Originally Posted by Fuzion
[View Original Post]
-
02-28-19 11:31 #231Senior Member

Posts: 289Recommendations?
Looking for a recommendation of a K doll that has the fakest / large implants that is a skinny spinner or muscular (or close, I don't like thick or fat). Basically a girl with a body like Danielle Derek but Korean or more muscular and not thick.
Is any around at the moment? Does Shannon fit the bill? LA works too.
Any suggestions welcome over PM too.
-
02-27-19 15:36 #230Senior Member

Posts: 25Kupcake site still same except ending is now. Live.
Originally Posted by Xmul22
[View Original Post]
-
02-26-19 17:14 #229Senior Member

Posts: 142Has anyone ever used the pinkislands booker (Asuka) for other providers?
-
02-26-19 15:45 #228Senior Member

Posts: 154Haven't seen Tina but have been curious about her. Shana gave me good service and encouraged msog. She's petite and very slim. Natural B cups if I remember correctly. 7. 5 in looks. She works out of a residential house which feels a little strange the first time. Only negative for me is that the two times I saw her the house reeked of cigarettes when you first walk in, though bedroom was fine.
Originally Posted by MayoKr
[View Original Post]
-
02-26-19 15:09 #227Senior Member

Posts: 122Kupcake
Not only that, but the kupcake site is gone too. (and its password doesn't work with ca-kdolls, FYI: P).
Originally Posted by ElonMusk
[View Original Post]
-
02-26-19 12:32 #226Senior Member

Posts: 33Shana Vs Tina
Have you seen Tina? Who would you recommend Shana or Tina. Tina seems to be new and doesn't have any review. Anyone have any details about her?
Originally Posted by BonerAppetitty
[View Original Post]
-
02-26-19 09:30 #225Senior Member

Posts: 3570Well
If you want to try Kupcake, wait for Aurora to come back. Not girl in the pics but pretty nonetheless. Nice ass nice tits slim and hot body with a pretty face and good service. YMMV. She was in Las Vegas before. Many LA guys know about Wawa and Lexi already so search for their posts. Sky uses the same name and pics as Sky in the Bay so check her reviews on EroticMonkey.
I don't go to this agency often but the girls I saw were worth repeating. I don't know who TWill saw to be that disappointed. Most of the time I just want to unload and move on so I don't remember enough details to recommend.
You could also try Mina and Patra if available from Happyangels. Again LA guys already posted about them.
Originally Posted by DHorn420
[View Original Post]
-
02-26-19 00:02 #224

Posts: 904Soooo
Kupcake is not worth it and Happyangels is?
Originally Posted by Kerkerker
[View Original Post]
-
02-25-19 23:29 #223Senior Member

Posts: 160Same here. She is lazy. Not willing to do much. Ask 2nd, she gave me attitude, just laid there.
Originally Posted by AngelFreak
[View Original Post]
-
02-25-19 17:05 #222Regular Member

Posts: 6Happyangels, kupcake, k-girlfriends
Only went to kupcake and happyangels.
Originally Posted by TWill182
[View Original Post]
I agree kupcake photo is way off, like only matches 40 50 percent, happyangels was like 70 80, going to see how kA-girlfriends are.
-
02-24-19 21:23 #221Senior Member

Posts: 3570No worry
Booker 5760 is legit. You must be talking about Tina. Yes, some bookers are more aggressive and try to bring back old customers. It's hard for smaller bookers without CV. Clients are disappearing when they don't know who's available or good. I rotate between many bookers so I know who are busy and who are not so busy. For background, I have used most K-girl bookers you guys mentioned in LA and OC threads as well as most who advertised on CV in LA and OC before. I still know of 100+ girls to choose from just like when CV was around.
Still using bookers you guys complained about in LA and OC. I have been happy with their recommendations and managed to steer away from all girls you would eventually complained about. Aside from repeats, I always TOFTT based on which pics I like more. I stop going to some bookers who don't seem to have new girls or don't post pics. I don't expect girls in the pics but I can tell certain things based on the pics.
So I haven't used booker 1869 since CV went down because I thought there were only Caramel. I think still legit. I feel left out that only a very few bookers send random "hi" to me so far. A couple bookers texted a number I haven't used in a few years. I confirmed their identity by asking a couple of questions. We never say anything unlawful and if I visit and it smells funny then I can just walk out, right?
Originally Posted by OCaznLuvr
[View Original Post]
-
02-24-19 19:52 #220Senior Member

Posts: 289All good
I texted back and all is safe. They just said come back next week. Just wanted to confirm out of an abundance of caution.
Originally Posted by Fuzion
[View Original Post]
I haven't seen anyone other than Nana, and she was great. How's the rest of the lineup -- recommended? I like skinny, fake tits. Prefer younger, but as long as not grandma, should be ok.
-
02-24-19 15:49 #219Senior Member

Posts: 39Same here but was contacted by a different number ending in 5760. The booker indicated a new provider ("Happi") was in town. They quickly corrected themselves with the new provider's name advertised for another location (BP). I have always assumed the locations are somehow related.
Originally Posted by Fuzion
[View Original Post]
I haven't visited either location for at least 6 months so I too thought it was strange getting a text now. Perhaps business is slow or 1 booker is more aggressive than the other.
I don't want to create any more paranoia than already exists, but given all of the current events, it's important to stay vigilant and share info. Be safe!







Reply With Quote




