Massage Parlor Reports

**AnonJohn** · 02-23-19 22:40

What is the penalty for pleading guilty to getting a hand job at an AMP? It's hard to believe in 2019 we're even talking about this being such a serious headline news worthy event...it's like a reality TV show, complete with multiple units, cameras, turncoat AMP workers, etc. Robert Mueller doesn't have this level of intensity.

Would any judge give Kraft anything more than a fine and a slap on the wrist? I know this is Florida & God only knows what's possible but it's just that John's are usually not prosecuted or slapped on the wrist.

The damage they've done to Kraft in the press is already way beyond the level of punishment that any john doe getting a rub and tug would get.

**CoochieMac** · 02-23-19 22:18

Originally Posted by Willie24 [View Original Post]

Just my thoughts, it causes a severe damper on the whole business throughout the state and elsewhere. It is definitely politically motivated. Most people will now think twice before entering any of these establishments not to mention the number that will close down as a result of this publicity. If the State of Florida wanted to dictate morality they have certainly succeeded. These girls will return to the streets and the pages of Skip the Games and elsewhere. I for one would think twice before entering any of these places as a result of these headlines. Be safe and cautious out there!

Conservatives have lamented the attack on freedom for decades, now look at what we have- the embodiment of KGB practices. I can think of at least 5 more serious threats to public safety than 2 consenting adults harming no one.

**DJMiles** · 02-23-19 18:11

Originally Posted by AreaGentleman [View Original Post]

No, not that kind (.)(.). The bad kind. I'd be interested in opinions from you guys out there with legal expertise. Will post this on several other boards around state.

Presumably, the mega-wealthy Kraft has the best legal team money can buy. Is it possible that local authorities are having an "Oh Shit!" experience as they conjure up the possibility of facing a high-powered legal onslaught? Maybe not. But, with thousand dollar per hour (or whatever they get) people figuring out ways to overcome this clusterfuck for their guy, is it conceivable that a determination would be made that the whole thing gets thrown out due to citizen privacy rights getting trampled, extreme bias or other factors (which I know nothing about)? And if that were the case, could it result in the opposite of intended effect by making it less likely that LE would execute similar operations? Maybe even make it unconstitutional to bug a massage therapy client room? It would be pretty amazing if LE landed a fish so big that it sinks their boat.

-AG.

It doesn't matter to the system if Kraft gets off. Nabbing Kraft is the icing on the cake. He is what has given this bust legs. It's mentioned in every newspaper I've seen and given the bust a 1000 x magnification. The real purpose is to scare Johns, which will close these places down. Given how easily they were able to put video cameras in the therapy rooms, it's hard to imagine anyone going there again. And with such a high profile win, more and more stings like this will be authorized. The danger is after they bore with that, where do they start looking next?

**Midfla** · 02-23-19 17:48

Yes, I do believe that the Asian massage parlors are going to have rough times ahead and most will end up shutting down as people stop going. I know I for one will stay clear for the forseeable future. It just isn't worth the risks. Too much paranoia now.

**Dragons** · 02-23-19 14:42

It will likely settle out of court with a "no admission of guilt " where the extortionist (prosecutor) gets paid and the violator pays the tax to the king aka municipality for several reasons.

One being that football is a huge social engineering effort by global investors through government to gain profit from the mass of illiterates out there. A huge media circus over this could hurt the industry and the profits therefrom.

Football is an "American" family sport and pimps and hoes are not so widely accepted by the family unit.

Another is that the lawyers ALWAYS attempt settlement if they are any good at all to avoid any further infamy for their client. More infamy gets in the way of the blackmail on the DL.

To examine that bust profile is to see a unicorn on the billions of acres of sheep.

It will not be thrown out for lack of merit, be sure of that. ELO would not make that bust unless they had a good case.

It will never be heard of in public again because that is the exact job good legal counsel MUST and will do.

The record will be expunged and no further public comments will be made for the possibility of being sued for slander and libel as the NFL, the pats, the advertisers, the cities where the games are played, all the vendors to the industry have a LOT to lose on this one.

Originally Posted by AreaGentleman [View Original Post]

No, not that kind OO. The bad kind. I'd be interested in opinions from you guys out there with legal expertise. Will post this on several other boards around state.

Presumably, the mega-wealthy Kraft has the best legal team money can buy. Is it possible that local authorities are having an "Oh Shit!" experience as they conjure up the possibility of facing a high-powered legal onslaught? Maybe not. But, with thousand dollar per hour (or whatever they get) people figuring out ways to overcome this clusterfuck for their guy, is it conceivable that a determination would be made that the whole thing gets thrown out due to violation of citizen privacy rights getting trampled, extreme bias or other factors (which I know nothing about)? And if that were the case, could it result in the opposite of intended effect by making it less likely that LE would execute similar operations? Maybe even make it unconstitutional to bug a massage therapy client room? It would be pretty amazing if LE landed a fish so big that it sinks their boat.

-AG.

**Willie24** · 02-23-19 14:22

Originally Posted by AreaGentleman [View Original Post]

No, not <i>that<i/> kind. The bad kind. I'd be interested in opinions from you guys out there with legal expertise. Will post this on several other boards around state.

Presumably, the mega-wealthy Kraft has the best legal team money can buy. Is it possible that local authorities are having an "Oh Shit!" experience as they conjure up the possibility of facing a high-powered legal onslaught? Maybe not. But, with thousand dollar per hour (or whatever they get) people figuring out ways to overcome this clusterfuck for their guy, is it conceivable that a determination would be made that the whole thing gets thrown out due to violation of citizen privacy rights getting trampled, extreme bias or other factors? And if that were the case, could it result in the opposite of intended effect by making it less likely that LE would execute similar operations? Maybe even make it unconstitutional to bug a massage therapy client room? It would be pretty amazing if LE landed a fish so big that it sinks their boat.

-AG.

Just my thoughts, it causes a severe damper on the whole business throughout the state and elsewhere. It is definitely politically motivated. Most people will now think twice before entering any of these establishments not to mention the number that will close down as a result of this publicity. If the State of Florida wanted to dictate morality they have certainly succeeded. These girls will return to the streets and the pages of Skip the Games and elsewhere. I for one would think twice before entering any of these places as a result of these headlines. Be safe and cautious out there!

**Area Gentleman** · 02-23-19 14:11

No, not that kind (.)(.). The bad kind. I'd be interested in opinions from you guys out there with legal expertise. Will post this on several other boards around state.

Presumably, the mega-wealthy Kraft has the best legal team money can buy. Is it possible that local authorities are having an "Oh Shit!" experience as they conjure up the possibility of facing a high-powered legal onslaught? Maybe not. But, with thousand dollar per hour (or whatever they get) people figuring out ways to overcome this clusterfuck for their guy, is it conceivable that a determination would be made that the whole thing gets thrown out due to citizen privacy rights getting trampled, extreme bias or other factors (which I know nothing about)? And if that were the case, could it result in the opposite of intended effect by making it less likely that LE would execute similar operations? Maybe even make it unconstitutional to bug a massage therapy client room? It would be pretty amazing if LE landed a fish so big that it sinks their boat.

-AG.

**DJMiles** · 02-23-19 12:20

Originally Posted by JSunSurf [View Original Post]

Had a legit shoulder problem Monday from moving and building furniture for a friend. For years I have seen Cindy's ads and tried to hook up but never worked it out. This week, the communication was better and I set up an hour.

Her studio is really cool. Retro, nice vibe with a 1990's bose radio providing tunes. Cindy, as others have said, looks nothing like her photos. She's a little heavier and a bit older. She asked if I wanted a shower. I just had one so I declined, which may have been a mistake.

Good massage, she focused on legs. I didn't mention my shoulder. It's been my experince that if you mention pain, a good LMT will stay away for liability reasons. Maybe because of the lack of shower, it was only 45 minutes start to finish. I felt better but not like a LMT worked out things.

No extras were offered nor did it feel any time like they were forthcoming. The $ fee was paid up front and I didn't tip. It was a short massage, although a good one, and was a bit overpriced in my opinion. Here's my take:

Cindy is super nice and I would think about going back for legit massage. That said, she's about 0. 3 overpriced for a legit one hour massage that has the extra sketch factor of old school massage parlor. Cocoa Beach Health and fitness offers a much better sports massage for similar money and a legit location.

Maybe I had a bad vibe. As I said, Cindy is a great person, but I think it's a tough business model to straddle the line between legit and posting on the usual sites.

Perhaps this is more easily explained now? Possibly she'd been given a head-up by a "leaking" client.

**Cutter56** · 02-23-19 11:45

Originally Posted by EastDragon [View Original Post]

Mind describing her? How old was she? Want to see if it's worth the drive.

Sorry EastDragon, I didn't see this post. She is small, small breast, pretty face. Tight in all the right places.

**SunDog321** · 02-23-19 00:51

Originally Posted by PeterNorth9 [View Original Post]

Cameras were already in place. They used the existing security system footage for the busts. If this is all what they are saying, the owners kept pretty tight control.

At the presser in IRC, the VBPD Chief and IRC Sheriff flat out said they obtained surveillance warrants from a judge to install hidden cameras in the shops. So they may have also seized the shops footage or tapped into it as well as you suggested.

IRC Sheriff also hinted they used other means of surveillance but refused to go into detail when asked.

I'd bet a dollar, they had multiple cameras in the parking lots, as well as Stingrays deployed at each shop to capture your cell phone I'd and number from your cell phone, and that stuff of course is logged and time stamped.

**ScottyM3** · 02-23-19 00:12

Robert Kraft, you just won Super Bowl LIII, what are you going to tell your players and staff. "HEY EVERYBODY, WE'RE GOING TO ORCHID SPA, WE'RE ALL going to GET LAID. ".

**BeachBum15** · 02-22-19 19:11

The repercussions are already spreading far and wide and likely will affect all of FL for months to come. This one calculated bust will slow down and in some cases close down many shops as most of us will head for safe ground. The camera angle alone was evil genius on LEOs part as now all of use will wonder and be suspicious. Either of the police or the owners. Suspicion and fear of something like a tiny recording device will keep many away from the more fun spots. Big win for the legit parlors but those too will clamp down on any under the table favors. I really don't think this is the end of it. The targets seem to be those shops known for FS menus so Orlando might be next. But then I can't help but think places like BO and GG are well known establishments. I'll stick to UTR sites for the foreseeable future and watch and wait for the dust to settle. From now on I'll be looking any room over closely. Stay safe and stay out of the news.

**CoochieMac** · 02-22-19 18:57

Originally Posted by ScottyM3 [View Original Post]

Well if LEO used their own camera's it's quite easy actually to put them in a room. When I go to Zen, and others, I go in, pay the door fee, then the girl leaves the room to give mamasan the money. In that short of time I'm sure they could possibly get their own camera installed in a short time. Or they hacked in to the spa's camera system. As far as making a deal with the owners for use of their cams, I kind of doubt that as many owners were "reported" arrested. But hey, we'll never really know.

TMZ reports a worker at Orchid assisted with camera. Also no vaginal sex recorded. Only hh and bjs.

**ScottyM3** · 02-22-19 18:34

Originally Posted by PeterNorth9 [View Original Post]

Cameras were already in place. They used the existing security system footage for the busts. If this is all what they are saying, the owners kept pretty tight control.

Well if LEO used their own camera's it's quite easy actually to put them in a room. When I go to Zen, and others, I go in, pay the door fee, then the girl leaves the room to give mamasan the money. In that short of time I'm sure they could possibly get their own camera installed in a short time. Or they hacked in to the spa's camera system. As far as making a deal with the owners for use of their cams, I kind of doubt that as many owners were "reported" arrested. But hey, we'll never really know.

**Peter North 9** · 02-22-19 18:20

Originally Posted by Jamesj [View Original Post]

Several good questions arise.

1st, in news articles, the police claim the girls actually lived at the parlors, could not leave without supervision.

How did under cover install cameras in side a "room" ? Perhaps, the "therapist " left the room for a few minutes, with modern tech, no wires would be needed and micro camera could be hidden in a non conspicuous spot.

Which Parlor did Pat's Owner visit? Police are not saying (at this time).

How did he (Pat's Owner) get there? Most billionaires have chauffeur AND have employees sign NDAs (Non disclosure agreements).

If a crime, or potential crime is accused, any NDA is null and void. Therefore the chauffeur would be force to testify, cooperate with law enforcement.

Which poses a 3rd question. WHY, with that kind of $ $ $ $, would you not order outcall?

4th Question. With all the trouble his very good friend, POTUS is in (for sexual indiscretions), you would think he may have been a bit more cautious?

Glad I did not visit a "relief " station last fall, while vacationing in South Florida (LOL).

Jamesj.

Cameras were already in place. They used the existing security system footage for the busts. If this is all what they are saying, the owners kept pretty tight control.