Rubrankings.com
High Class Companions
LoveHUB Escorts Directory
Top Tier Escorts
Live Escorts
This Escort Review thread is moderated by Admin.
  1. #3163

    Guys this is a site for sharing!

    Everyone when a senior member gives advice to another member for instance not to see a provider that means you go at your own risk!! Just because a girl has a video on pornhub and did a incredible job doesn't mean she's a good risk! Alot of you guys go bareback which is your choice, but don't say, dam playboy I should of listened!! Just had a member pm me saying I should of listened to your review! Not a good result! So guys please think before you do some crazy stuff you will regret! Stay safe playboy.

  2. #3162
    Quote Originally Posted by JonMels  [View Original Post]
    I had seen these ads, but was reluctant, as there is not much of a menu indicated. Good work TOFTT.
    I always bring my own covers just for this reason.

  3. #3161
    Banned Member


    Posts: 729
    Quote Originally Posted by JonMels  [View Original Post]
    I'm noticing that more and more girls are advertising that they only accept payments, or at least deposits, through a wire transfer such as CashApp, PayPal, Western Union, etc. As they keep advertising, I have to assume they are getting some payment this way, at least enough to keep fishing for it.

    My questions are:

    1. Who is doing this?

    2. Why?

    Does anyone have experience with this model? Has it worked in any way? Are there situations where the girl doesn't disappear after getting a wire transfer?
    It's all scams and why would you want to pay this way? You want a prostitute to know your identity?

  4. #3160
    Quote Originally Posted by JonMels  [View Original Post]
    I'm noticing that more and more girls are advertising that they only accept payments, or at least deposits, through a wire transfer such as CashApp, PayPal, Western Union, etc. As they keep advertising, I have to assume they are getting some payment this way, at least enough to keep fishing for it.

    My questions are:

    1. Who is doing this?

    2. Why?

    Does anyone have experience with this model? Has it worked in any way? Are there situations where the girl doesn't disappear after getting a wire transfer?
    Heck of a way to implicate yourself if you ask me. The whole point of an unsealed envelope is that you can deny it's yours.

    Personally, I won't see a provider who demands payment through an app.

  5. #3159
    Quote Originally Posted by JonMels  [View Original Post]
    I'm noticing that more and more girls are advertising that they only accept payments, or at least deposits, through a wire transfer such as CashApp, PayPal, Western Union, etc. As they keep advertising, I have to assume they are getting some payment this way, at least enough to keep fishing for it.

    My questions are:

    1. Who is doing this?

    2. Why?

    Does anyone have experience with this model? Has it worked in any way? Are there situations where the girl doesn't disappear after getting a wire transfer?
    I know some girls that accept cash and cashapp / Venmo / PayPal. But if it's a girl that I have never met before and she has no reviews and is only accepting cashapp / PayPal / western union. Then it has to be a scam.

  6. #3158

    Anybody know about this one?

    Does anybody have information about this provider?

    http://hartford.skipthegames.com/fem...n/041936182018

  7. #3157

    CashApp / PayPal / WesternUnion

    I'm noticing that more and more girls are advertising that they only accept payments, or at least deposits, through a wire transfer such as CashApp, PayPal, Western Union, etc. As they keep advertising, I have to assume they are getting some payment this way, at least enough to keep fishing for it.

    My questions are:

    1. Who is doing this?

    2. Why?

    Does anyone have experience with this model? Has it worked in any way? Are there situations where the girl doesn't disappear after getting a wire transfer?

  8. #3156

    Nice Review

    Quote Originally Posted by ManLovesLadies  [View Original Post]
    I have been seeing this lady's ads for quite some time and decided I needed to take the plunge.

    http://hartford.skipthegames.com/fem...e/801251511932

    Dreamed of a visit with her in a Berlin Turnpike establishment on Sunday evening.

    She answered the door wearing thigh highs and a slinky red lace top and with her makeup done perfectly. This is the disappointment part. She is significantly heavier than her photos. You might even classify her as a smaller BBW. I am not into big girls (although I sometimes get sucked into it) and I thought about leaving. But I knew my curiosity needed to be satisfied. In addition to being larger than in her pictures, she is also prettier. She is also a pleasant person, seems to have a head on her shoulders and engaged in a nice conversation. We proceeded to a good old make out session, nice technique and tongue action. All in all very pleasant. She moved down to pay more attention to the little guy, and her technique there was very, very good. In addition to having a nice way with him, he took direction well. At my request, moved to 69. Very, very tasty and clean. I was ready to send it home. She got up and we had a problem. She could not find a condom. After looking everywhere she reluctantly agreed to go bare if I pulled out before finishing. I could see it was not her first choice for out first date, so I asked her to just finish with her mouth. Did a great job bringing to where I needed to be. CIM and Swallow. Had some more pleasant conversation and I was on my way. 80 for qv which was closer to hhr. I may visit again, but I am not a fan of the bigger girls. If you don't mind them on the chunky side, have yourself some fun here.
    I had seen these ads, but was reluctant, as there is not much of a menu indicated. Good work TOFTT.

  9. #3155

    Any info?

    http://hartford.skipthegames.com/fem...n/041936182018

    Does anybody know anything about this one?

  10. #3154

    Gb

    Quote Originally Posted by SullyErna69  [View Original Post]
    Got the text this morning. She's looking for a DP today and a GB onTuesday. She's legit and wants to be used and filled up so if it's your thing then now is your chance. I have no idea how long this girl will be around. http://waterbury.skipthegames.com/fe...f/853403361974.
    Showed up right on time and found LEO parked in the parking lot. Texted and waited for a reply which she did about an hour later to come back. I had moved on and wasn't able to return.

  11. #3153

    Disappointed, yet satisfied

    I have been seeing this lady's ads for quite some time and decided I needed to take the plunge.

    http://hartford.skipthegames.com/fem...e/801251511932

    Dreamed of a visit with her in a Berlin Turnpike establishment on Sunday evening.

    She answered the door wearing thigh highs and a slinky red lace top and with her makeup done perfectly. This is the disappointment part. She is significantly heavier than her photos. You might even classify her as a smaller BBW. I am not into big girls (although I sometimes get sucked into it) and I thought about leaving. But I knew my curiosity needed to be satisfied. In addition to being larger than in her pictures, she is also prettier. She is also a pleasant person, seems to have a head on her shoulders and engaged in a nice conversation. We proceeded to a good old make out session, nice technique and tongue action. All in all very pleasant. She moved down to pay more attention to the little guy, and her technique there was very, very good. In addition to having a nice way with him, he took direction well. At my request, moved to 69. Very, very tasty and clean. I was ready to send it home. She got up and we had a problem. She could not find a condom. After looking everywhere she reluctantly agreed to go bare if I pulled out before finishing. I could see it was not her first choice for out first date, so I asked her to just finish with her mouth. Did a great job bringing to where I needed to be. CIM and Swallow. Had some more pleasant conversation and I was on my way. 80 for qv which was closer to hhr. I may visit again, but I am not a fan of the bigger girls. If you don't mind them on the chunky side, have yourself some fun here.

  12. #3152

    Amber

    I didn't find any reviews on this one. Wondering if anyone has sampled and willing to provide any feedback.

    MH.

    http://hartford.skipthegames.com/fem...y/698566554773

  13. #3151

    Thanks for the Info

    Thanks for the info. I don't have access to premium on them. I may take one for the team if my schedule allows. But I don't like going in to visit someone with such little info.

    Stay safe.

    Quote Originally Posted by Shz1181  [View Original Post]
    Reviews here.

    https://www.eroticmonkey.ch/honey-es...artford-423611

    Wanted to see her for some time, but reviews on that site are tricky. You have to look at who else the reviewer reviewed. With her, there are quite a number of single reviews by users, or same 2 girls reviewed by different folks (Honey and Aaliyah). Seems like some of the ladies may game the review system there, but what else is new. Just my. 02 to help inform.

    Good luck.

  14. #3150

    She is not new! Been around for years!

    Quote Originally Posted by BoPhoenix  [View Original Post]
    I've seen her. Good BBBJ, cute little ass, pussy tight as hell. Also a very nice girl.
    As I stated previously she is nice does a decent job but she does not look well and has the notorious skin condition all the addicts get, I would never go back she gives me The heebie jeebies, meaning she is definitely not healthy! She use to team up with Rae who has been around for many years! Just my two cents! Stay safe playboy.

  15. #3149

    Tg recomendations

    Can anyone recommend a tg excort or tg SW, or share which ones to stay away from?

Posting Limitations

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Top Escorts
The Velvet Rooms
Best Escorts

Protected by Copyscape