Find Your New Baby
Rubrankings.com
rubmaps
Live Escorts
High Class Companions
The Only Limits are Your Imagination
Meet Sugar Babies
Best Escorts
Live Escorts
High Class Companions
The Only Limits are Your Imagination
Meet Sugar Babies
Best Escorts
Live Escorts
High Class Companions
The Only Limits are Your Imagination
Meet Sugar Babies
Best Escorts
This forum thread is moderated by Admin
  1. #17905

    CincyKyla.

    I had a dream with Kyla a few weeks ago and it was a wet dream for sure. I sent her a message and she worked with me even though I had no references at the time. After a little back and forth she sent me her address. When I arrived I let her know I was there and she said she had to let her pup out first. She came out and walked right past me, not knowing who I was. She is beautiful. I wanted to start right then and there. When she came back she introduced herself and we went inside. Played with the pup for a minute and she put the pup in its crate and covered it with a blanket. Talked a little while clothes came off and then some more while she roamed. Then I dived in for a taste and she was clean and fresh. Kyla then returned the favor with BBJ and after a while put the cover on. She looks fantastic on top and below. Finished with BBJ and talked a little more. The clock went over and she had no problem with it. A very relaxed and comfortable evening which I will repeat when I am in the area again.

    http://usaadultclassifieds.nl/classi...418&cityid=350

  2. #17904

    Davine.

    She is from the Louisville area and I've seen her Snapchat. She is definitely pregnant and I want to say due in about six weeks.

    Quote Originally Posted by Newbie78  [View Original Post]
    You can also search Davine or Davinetime on the USA Classifieds site. Preggo sex is fine but not mentioning it at all and having on pregnancy photos on your ad is either dumb or worse intentionally misleading. Looks like she has another ad now saying she will send pics or FaceTime to verify but still no mention of pregnant.

    http://usaadultclassifieds.nl/classi...872&cityid=350

  3. #17903
    Quote Originally Posted by Dazhiba  [View Original Post]
    How about a link so we know exactly who you are speaking of? I know some guys just aren't into it but IMHO prego sex can be great and in my years in this hobby and first wife prego sex was some of the best ever. Stay safe, Daz.
    You can also search Davine or Davinetime on the USA Classifieds site. Preggo sex is fine but not mentioning it at all and having on pregnancy photos on your ad is either dumb or worse intentionally misleading. Looks like she has another ad now saying she will send pics or FaceTime to verify but still no mention of pregnant.

    http://usaadultclassifieds.nl/classi...872&cityid=350

  4. #17902

    Jessie29

    Quote Originally Posted by BigGusDickUs55  [View Original Post]
    Had a date with Jessie29 last week. Communication was not seamless and could be improved. Hour incall at a home in Covington / Ludlow area. The accommodations are sparse but not the worst or the best. Dogs were present in the home but not a problem. She is a nice girl and has a great body and gives a decent BBBJ and covered FS. MPOPS was on the menu with BBBJWCIM for the 2nd pop. She was not a fan of CIM and ran to the garbage can with the prize in her mouth and spit like she had botulism in her mouth. Clean up supplies were lacking. She is GFE, but over priced in my opinion. The pic of her in the red is current and the bed she is standing on is the bed we played on.
    Based on the height and weight listed in her ad, I would surmise that only one of the pictures is recent and accurate, I. E. The one with the fireworks. Just my take.

  5. #17901

    Jessie29

    Quote Originally Posted by BigGusDickUs55  [View Original Post]
    Had a date with Jessie29 last week. Communication was not seamless and could be improved. Hour incall at a home in Covington / Ludlow area. The accommodations are sparse but not the worst or the best. Dogs were present in the home but not a problem. She is a nice girl and has a great body and gives a decent BBBJ and covered FS. MPOPS was on the menu with BBBJWCIM for the 2nd pop. She was not a fan of CIM and ran to the garbage can with the prize in her mouth and spit like she had botulism in her mouth. Clean up supplies were lacking. She is GFE, but over priced in my opinion. The pic of her in the red is current and the bed she is standing on is the bed we played on.
    Here is the link for those that need it. http://usaadultclassifieds.nl/classi...924&cityid=350.

    BTW, what rate were you quoted?

  6. #17900
    Quote Originally Posted by ToddCincy  [View Original Post]
    I think it's good to acknowledge that there is some diversity in what individual men prioritize in a provider. I, too, am sensitive on price. There is presently a really hot escort on Eros, Bianca Carlilse. She is exactly my type: a high-end twenty something. But at $500 per hour, I am hesitant to pull the trigger. (I notice that most of the more expensive escorts have to travel, because when you're charging that kind of coin, you have a limited market in any given area.).

    That said, I think it would be unfortunate if USAG were to degenerate into an exclusively low-end venue, filled with obese and rough-looking girls. That's a race to the bottom.

    Historically, I think Steve of EE strikes a good balance: His girls have been reasonably thin, reasonably young, and moderately priced. I remember his girl Cat, of a few years ago. She wasn't an aloof supermodel. But she *was* a slender, drug-free young woman who performed enthusiastically. Why assume that a provider has to be old, fat, or an obvious addict in order to be a good performer? Steve has proved otherwise many times. (Cherry Daquari proves that, too.).

    In summary, then, I don't think we need "exacting standards". We don't need supermodels, and we're unlikely to get supermodels here, anyway. But I would make the case for "minimal standards": I would wager that most of us don't want the extreme low-end of the market. We want more of what EE provides.
    I agree that we need diversity, because everyone here obviously has their own tastes, preferences, and budgets. I generally don't want to get into heated discussions over this, because it's all a personal preference, but I like this rationale. I'm at a point now that I have very few opportunities to hobby, and I had incredibly bad luck getting appointments last summer / fall when I had my "windows of opportunity" (contacting ladies from here, and listcrawler at that time). So, I'm willing to pay more now, if that means I can actually get an appointment when I want, and get the GFE services that I prefer. I'm jealous of all of you who have the time to hobby regularly, and experiment. Therefore, I appreciate all of the feedback and information on this board. So, let's keep the diversity, because, hey, I like a bargain too sometimes.

  7. #17899

    Cat

    Quote Originally Posted by ToddCincy  [View Original Post]
    I think it's good to acknowledge that there is some diversity in what individual men prioritize in a provider. I, too, am sensitive on price. There is presently a really hot escort on Eros, Bianca Carlilse. She is exactly my type: a high-end twenty something. But at $500 per hour, I am hesitant to pull the trigger. (I notice that most of the more expensive escorts have to travel, because when you're charging that kind of coin, you have a limited market in any given area.).

    That said, I think it would be unfortunate if USAG were to degenerate into an exclusively low-end venue, filled with obese and rough-looking girls. That's a race to the bottom.

    Historically, I think Steve of EE strikes a good balance: His girls have been reasonably thin, reasonably young, and moderately priced. I remember his girl Cat, of a few years ago. She wasn't an aloof supermodel. But she *was* a slender, drug-free young woman who performed enthusiastically. Why assume that a provider has to be old, fat, or an obvious addict in order to be a good performer? Steve has proved otherwise many times. (Cherry Daquari proves that, too.).

    In summary, then, I don't think we need "exacting standards". We don't need supermodels, and we're unlikely to get supermodels here, anyway. But I would make the case for "minimal standards": I would wager that most of us don't want the extreme low-end of the market. We want more of what EE provides.
    Cat was my ATF when she was in the business. Saw her probably more than a dozen times.

  8. #17898
    Senior Member


    Posts: 2111

    Prego

    How about a link so we know exactly who you are speaking of? I know some guys just aren't into it but IMHO prego sex can be great and in my years in this hobby and first wife prego sex was some of the best ever. Stay safe, Daz.

    Quote Originally Posted by Newbie78  [View Original Post]
    Set an appointment with this girl a couple times. She asks how old you are and your race as verification. The first time, we agreed on a time and donation and when I arrive, crickets. She texts me back the next day and I am dumb enough to go back. I get to her room and she at least 7 months pregnant. Didn't mention it once while setting up our meeting and her photos on her ads are all of her not pregnant. I told her I wasn't interested and she goes off that I wasted her time and I should at least give her something for the time I wasted. I obviously declined and told her that she needs to say she is pregnant up front and not wait until someone shows up.

    She got upset and told me I would be blacklisted. As I was leaving she yelled something about my race and implied she was armed and not to come around anymore. Clearly a rational provider.

  9. #17897

    Minimal standards, and the direction of the board

    Quote Originally Posted by WhereDreamsGo  [View Original Post]
    I'm certain she would not meet Todd Cincy's exacting standards. I'm not really interested in strictly twentysomethings with perfect bodies, because my experience is that they're more likely to suffer from GPS and less likely to actually be fun in the sack. I like a wide variety of women who may not be perfect looking, or even far from perfect, but I feel some chemistry with. On the other hand, I want to be attracted to them, and BadKookie or however you spell her handle, is another one where I think the raves have gotten ahead of the reality maybe. But it's a YMMV world, and I'm not doubting that other guys have had a good time.
    I think it's good to acknowledge that there is some diversity in what individual men prioritize in a provider. I, too, am sensitive on price. There is presently a really hot escort on Eros, Bianca Carlilse. She is exactly my type: a high-end twenty something. But at $500 per hour, I am hesitant to pull the trigger. (I notice that most of the more expensive escorts have to travel, because when you're charging that kind of coin, you have a limited market in any given area.).

    That said, I think it would be unfortunate if USAG were to degenerate into an exclusively low-end venue, filled with obese and rough-looking girls. That's a race to the bottom.

    Historically, I think Steve of EE strikes a good balance: His girls have been reasonably thin, reasonably young, and moderately priced. I remember his girl Cat, of a few years ago. She wasn't an aloof supermodel. But she *was* a slender, drug-free young woman who performed enthusiastically. Why assume that a provider has to be old, fat, or an obvious addict in order to be a good performer? Steve has proved otherwise many times. (Cherry Daquari proves that, too.).

    In summary, then, I don't think we need "exacting standards". We don't need supermodels, and we're unlikely to get supermodels here, anyway. But I would make the case for "minimal standards": I would wager that most of us don't want the extreme low-end of the market. We want more of what EE provides.

  10. #17896

    Davinetime

    Set an appointment with this girl a couple times. She asks how old you are and your race as verification. The first time, we agreed on a time and donation and when I arrive, crickets. She texts me back the next day and I am dumb enough to go back. I get to her room and she at least 7 months pregnant. Didn't mention it once while setting up our meeting and her photos on her ads are all of her not pregnant. I told her I wasn't interested and she goes off that I wasted her time and I should at least give her something for the time I wasted. I obviously declined and told her that she needs to say she is pregnant up front and not wait until someone shows up.

    She got upset and told me I would be blacklisted. As I was leaving she yelled something about my race and implied she was armed and not to come around anymore. Clearly a rational provider.

  11. #17895
    Sounds familiar.

    Quote Originally Posted by KnottyWood  [View Original Post]
    She used to be a stripper at cheeks in the Dayton area, I met her for take out at a motel and made the mistake of paying first, she did not dash but I ended up with a bad case of blue balls.

  12. #17894

    Jessie29

    Had a date with Jessie29 last week. Communication was not seamless and could be improved. Hour incall at a home in Covington / Ludlow area. The accommodations are sparse but not the worst or the best. Dogs were present in the home but not a problem. She is a nice girl and has a great body and gives a decent BBBJ and covered FS. MPOPS was on the menu with BBBJWCIM for the 2nd pop. She was not a fan of CIM and ran to the garbage can with the prize in her mouth and spit like she had botulism in her mouth. Clean up supplies were lacking. She is GFE, but over priced in my opinion. The pic of her in the red is current and the bed she is standing on is the bed we played on.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails 5c5859b39c903dbe34f206d1b.jpg‎   5c5859b39cdfe3163308c0197.jpg‎  

  13. #17893

    I have seen Kookie, and yes

    Quote Originally Posted by ToddCincy  [View Original Post]
    Just so we can avoid some of the misunderstandings that arose about "pretty Cameron".

    This woman has multiple ads, and they seem to convey different angles. At least one I saw depicts a woman with rolls of fat and cellulite. In another one, her face looks kind of rough.

    Maybe this one is better avoided, especially given her legal troubles?
    I'm certain she would not meet Todd Cincy's exacting standards. She doesn't even meet my far lower standards. I just happened to see her because she was sharing space with another provider. I'm not really interested in strictly twentysomethings with perfect bodies, because my experience is that they're more likely to suffer from GPS and less likely to actually be fun in the sack. I like a wide variety of women who may not be perfect looking, or even far from perfect, but I feel some chemistry with. On the other hand, I want to be attracted to them, and BadKookie or however you spell her handle, is another one where I think the raves have gotten ahead of the reality maybe. But it's a YMMV world, and I'm not doubting that other guys have had a good time.

  14. #17892
    Quote Originally Posted by GSpotPhun  [View Original Post]
    You should have stated the increase was nominal in your initial report. She didn't double the rate or anything crazy. I do agree she should not change after it is set. But now you got the el cheapo crowd that dominates this market going crazy. No wonder hot chicks bypass Cincy often as they go to Columbus and Cleveland without fail.

    Guys listen, pay for what you can afford and leave better looking, better performing. Better, better, better for those of us that can.

    I have met Allurah once and will go back. And especially since she is a smart enough as a business person to understand supply and demand. Her product is in demand she can ask for more. God Bless America!
    If she would have told me in her earlier texts, or even on the phone right before I started driving in her general direction that her rates had increased, I would have kept the appointment. Telling me on the back end, after I'd told her I was on my way was not cool.

    And, who's to say she wouldn't have tried raising her rates again when I got to the door?

    I'm glad you enjoyed her company. This may well be an isolated case with an otherwise good provider. Time will tell. Thank you for your contributions to this forum.

  15. #17891

    Wow.

    Quote Originally Posted by GSpotPhun  [View Original Post]
    You should have stated the increase was nominal in your initial report. She didn't double the rate or anything crazy. I do agree she should not change after it is set. But now you got the el cheapo crowd that dominates this market going crazy. No wonder hot chicks bypass Cincy often as they go to Columbus and Cleveland without fail.

    Guys listen, pay for what you can afford and leave better looking, better performing. Better, better, better for those of us that can.

    I have met Allurah once and will go back. And especially since she is a smart enough as a business person to understand supply and demand. Her product is in demand she can ask for more. God Bless America!
    It's readily apparent some people have more money than sense. Nobody is trying to restrain you from throwing bad money after bad. But make it a tip. And don't drive the market by being blinded. No Wonder some women come down with gps. This post smacks of payola.

Posting Limitations

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Top Escorts
The Velvet Rooms
The hottest girls are here
Top Tier Escorts
LoveHUB Escorts Directory
Top Escorts
The Velvet Rooms
The hottest girls are here
Top Tier Escorts
LoveHUB Escorts Directory
Top Escorts
The Velvet Rooms
The hottest girls are here
Top Tier Escorts
LoveHUB Escorts Directory

Protected by Copyscape