Rubrankings.com
The Velvet Rooms
Best Escorts
Top Tier Escorts
High Class Companions

Thread: Arrangement Reports

+ Add Report
Page 972 of 1125 FirstFirst ... 472 872 922 962 963 964 965 966 967 968 969 970 971 972 973 974 975 976 977 978 979 980 981 982 1022 1072 ... LastLast
Results 14,566 to 14,580 of 16872
This forum thread is moderated by Admin
  1. #2307

    Clarification please

    Quote Originally Posted by RiverMan1  [View Original Post]
    That escort line she gave is funny cause I met the same girl off LC a few days ago with no problems, . 50 for head in a shitty little motel in south holland, even used the same number you mentioned. I agree with all the signs of a druggie though and photo above is big difference from SA. She also offered full for a Benjamin but I declined. Guess she changed her mind when she needed her medicine, LOL.
    What's "LC"?

    Thanks,

    Scott.

  2. #2306
    Quote Originally Posted by NdFanMan  [View Original Post]
    Sadly the girl in the pics looks very cute. But I think those pics are from a time several years ago when the girl used to be healthy and drug free. For those of you who knows meth users, this girl has all the signs of one. On top of that, total scammer. She gives a BS story about her place being remodeled so she must meet in a hotel in Calumet City. Go there and asks for allowance up front. Claims she has been ripped off too many times by guys and requires money up front. Red flag. Allowance was low enough so I figured I would take the chance. Wrong! Took the money and came up with every excuse in the book to stay fully clothed and do nothing. Ended up doing nothing and decided to leave. On the way out the door, she says I should try an escort if I wanted more because she only spends time hanging out with guys and that's it.

    https://www.seeking.com/member/99015...5-b0220592d8dc

    Last 4 digits 6939.
    That escort line she gave is funny cause I met the same girl off LC a few days ago with no problems, . 50 for head in a shitty little motel in south holland, even used the same number you mentioned. I agree with all the signs of a druggie though and photo above is big difference from SA. She also offered full for a Benjamin but I declined. Guess she changed her mind when she needed her medicine, LOL.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails 70e2c7fe900531fe4569bca098025159_f.jpg‎  

  3. #2305

    Latina

    Anyone have a review on this one? Been going back and forth but haven't been able to line up availability.

    https://www.seeking.com/member/e916b...4-60f50bf55604

  4. #2304
    Quote Originally Posted by SugarDaddyX  [View Original Post]
    I have a baby that has been really good to me this fall that I'd like to give something extra to for Christmas. She gave me her address and I have picked her up and dropped her off from her residence many times. She only knows my first name, and I do not want her knowing my address. Is there a way I could send her something from Amazon without any of my info being on any shipping slips? Will the USPS allow me to ship a package without a return address? We will not be seeing each other until January due to scheduling.

    Get that sex.

    SDX.
    It is very easy to do with USPS, and you can use the priority boxes they provide. Costs a little more, but you can get a tracking number with it to make sure she gets it.

  5. #2303

    Shipping

    Quote Originally Posted by SugarDaddyX  [View Original Post]
    I have a baby that has been really good to me this fall that I'd like to give something extra to for Christmas. She gave me her address and I have picked her up and dropped her off from her residence many times. She only knows my first name, and I do not want her knowing my address. Is there a way I could send her something from Amazon without any of my info being on any shipping slips? Will the USPS allow me to ship a package without a return address? We will not be seeing each other until January due to scheduling.

    Get that sex.

    SDX.
    Amazon has an option at check out to send as gift, don't include cost on receipt, etc. I've never done it so I'm not entirely sure if your info is completely hidden but you can check the help section on Amazon.

    And yes, USPS will let you send w / out a return address. Even if for some reason they tried to force you to do it you could always put Santa Clause, North Pole as the return address, haha.

  6. #2302

    Sending A Gift Anonymously?

    I have a baby that has been really good to me this fall that I'd like to give something extra to for Christmas. She gave me her address and I have picked her up and dropped her off from her residence many times. She only knows my first name, and I do not want her knowing my address. Is there a way I could send her something from Amazon without any of my info being on any shipping slips? Will the USPS allow me to ship a package without a return address? We will not be seeing each other until January due to scheduling.

    Get that sex.

    SDX.

  7. #2301

    She does know the signs.

    Quote Originally Posted by Trogon  [View Original Post]
    I find hilarious she wants to be a substance abuse counselor.
    What's the old adage, it takes one to know one?? LOL.

  8. #2300

    A lot of dating sites use fake profiles.

    Quote Originally Posted by Kellster  [View Original Post]
    You might be right. I can only go off of my experience. One petite, young white chick I was supposed to meet put in her profile that she was real & sick of people who don't want to meet and waste her time. We were scheduled to meet near her work and she was a total no show. No call, no text, nothing. When I contacted her on what happened- radio silence. So I have my doubts about how many petite, young, white chicks are out there. I met two chicks near my age, but that's a different age range. Match.com has fake accounts to attract more potential new members so it's not much of a stretch to think that doesn't happen on SA as well.
    I remember a couple of years ago the Ashley Madison dating site was hacked. Part of the fallout regarding that was the disclosure that a majority of the female profiles are fake.

  9. #2299

    Par for the course.

    Quote Originally Posted by ILikeBlowjobs2  [View Original Post]
    Made contact with a baby, messaged and then texted, seemed to be on the same page. Shared my photo with her, she wanted to meet right away. Said I was really busy this week, but would try to find time.

    I texted her at 8:30 AM. Maybe a little early, but whatever. Asked if she wanted to meet this evening. She answers at 10:30, yes, she is free all day. I ask if she is willing to travel, as we are fairly close in our listed locations. 6 hours later she responds "where?" I tell her a hotel and She says sure and asks about the gift.

    No problem there, but now she wants a picture of me via text. Never mind that we've been messaging for almost a week, and texting over the course of 8 hours. Somehow this is the moment she wants due diligence. Google voice sucks balls for sending pictures, so of course it takes forever, and I'm never giving out my real number.

    A little after 7 PM she's finally comfortable and asks when she can meet, so I tell her 6 pm. 11 hours after my first message, and she is now upset that I'm not going to rent a room on the spot and come running to meet her with a shower of money.

    What the fuck is happening that SBs have no understanding of accommodating a SD in regards to time and attention to detail?
    I'm talking with one for a month and have told her 20 times that it's impossible for me to do last minute. Yet once a week she texts "can you meet now. " Not a lot between those ears.

  10. #2298

    Sometimes I wonder how some women are smart enough to get dressed in the morning

    Made contact with a baby, messaged and then texted, seemed to be on the same page. Shared my photo with her, she wanted to meet right away. Said I was really busy this week, but would try to find time.

    I texted her at 8:30 AM. Maybe a little early, but whatever. Asked if she wanted to meet this evening. She answers at 10:30, yes, she is free all day. I ask if she is willing to travel, as we are fairly close in our listed locations. 6 hours later she responds "where?" I tell her a hotel and She says sure and asks about the gift.

    No problem there, but now she wants a picture of me via text. Never mind that we've been messaging for almost a week, and texting over the course of 8 hours. Somehow this is the moment she wants due diligence. Google voice sucks balls for sending pictures, so of course it takes forever, and I'm never giving out my real number.

    A little after 7 PM she's finally comfortable and asks when she can meet, so I tell her 6 pm. 11 hours after my first message, and she is now upset that I'm not going to rent a room on the spot and come running to meet her with a shower of money.

    What the fuck is happening that SBs have no understanding of accommodating a SD in regards to time and attention to detail?

  11. #2297

    Queen

    Quote Originally Posted by NdFanMan  [View Original Post]
    Sadly the girl in the pics looks very cute. But I think those pics are from a time several years ago when the girl used to be healthy and drug free. For those of you who knows meth users, this girl has all the signs of one. On top of that, total scammer. She gives a BS story about her place being remodeled so she must meet in a hotel in Calumet City. Go there and asks for allowance up front. Claims she has been ripped off too many times by guys and requires money up front. Red flag. Allowance was low enough so I figured I would take the chance. Wrong! Took the money and came up with every excuse in the book to stay fully clothed and do nothing. Ended up doing nothing and decided to leave. On the way out the door, she says I should try an escort if I wanted more because she only spends time hanging out with guys and that's it.

    https://www.seeking.com/member/99015...5-b0220592d8dc

    Last 4 digits 6939.
    I find hilarious she wants to be a substance abuse counselor.

  12. #2296

    Queen46290 = Scammer and druggie

    Sadly the girl in the pics looks very cute. But I think those pics are from a time several years ago when the girl used to be healthy and drug free. For those of you who knows meth users, this girl has all the signs of one. On top of that, total scammer. She gives a BS story about her place being remodeled so she must meet in a hotel in Calumet City. Go there and asks for allowance up front. Claims she has been ripped off too many times by guys and requires money up front. Red flag. Allowance was low enough so I figured I would take the chance. Wrong! Took the money and came up with every excuse in the book to stay fully clothed and do nothing. Ended up doing nothing and decided to leave. On the way out the door, she says I should try an escort if I wanted more because she only spends time hanging out with guys and that's it.

    https://www.seeking.com/member/99015...5-b0220592d8dc

    Last 4 digits 6939.

  13. #2295
    Quote Originally Posted by PauFord  [View Original Post]
    Can't say I agree with the conspiracy theories. Free accounts for ladies, ever growing curiosity and popularity of the sugar world, way too many tire kickers who sign up but too afraid to actually do it, etc. All this kind of stuff leads to all the bullshit we've come to know as SA. Scammers reusing profile wording is just part of the mass production of profiles they do to stay steps ahead of inevitable profile bans from SA.

    None of us know for sure. But I don't see this as SA being fishy behind the scenes. It's just a byproduct of how SA has grown, was not prepared to police their growth, SA becoming the wild Wild West and them being unable to keep up with let alone stay ahead of it.

    SA doesn't need self generated fake profiles and / or messaging bots. They have an abundance of real profiles as it is. There's just no quality control. It's huge quantity of real profiles but low quality of serious SB's.
    You might be right. I can only go off of my experience. One petite, young white chick I was supposed to meet put in her profile that she was real & sick of people who don't want to meet and waste her time. We were scheduled to meet near her work and she was a total no show. No call, no text, nothing. When I contacted her on what happened- radio silence. So I have my doubts about how many petite, young, white chicks are out there. I met two chicks near my age, but that's a different age range. Match.com has fake accounts to attract more potential new members so it's not much of a stretch to think that doesn't happen on SA as well.

  14. #2294

    Tin Foil Hat Theories

    Quote Originally Posted by Kellster  [View Original Post]
    I've suspected this as well. When I was on a few years ago- I emailed those petite, thin, young (20's) non pro, girl next door types as well. I didn't get many emails back, the few that I did ended up being no shows when it was time to meet, and then they ghosted me. I'm a decent looking guy, fit workout regularly, etc. Others I've seen their location move back and forth to different areas of the country- one is even out of the country in China and she's white which I find extremely hard to believe. I think it's in SA's best interest to keep fake profiles on there to gain more paying members. Only after you join do you realize many never respond or have any intention to meet you.
    Can't say I agree with the conspiracy theories. Free accounts for ladies, ever growing curiosity and popularity of the sugar world, way too many tire kickers who sign up but too afraid to actually do it, etc. All this kind of stuff leads to all the bullshit we've come to know as SA. Scammers reusing profile wording is just part of the mass production of profiles they do to stay steps ahead of inevitable profile bans from SA.

    None of us know for sure. But I don't see this as SA being fishy behind the scenes. It's just a byproduct of how SA has grown, was not prepared to police their growth, SA becoming the wild Wild West and them being unable to keep up with let alone stay ahead of it.

    SA doesn't need self generated fake profiles and / or messaging bots. They have an abundance of real profiles as it is. There's just no quality control. It's huge quantity of real profiles but low quality of serious SB's.

  15. #2293
    Quote Originally Posted by Kellster  [View Original Post]
    I've suspected this as well. When I was on a few years ago- I emailed those petite, thin, young (20's) non pro, girl next door types as well. I didn't get many emails back, the few that I did ended up being no shows when it was time to meet, and then they ghosted me. I'm a decent looking guy, fit workout regularly, etc. Others I've seen their location move back and forth to different areas of the country- one is even out of the country in China and she's white which I find extremely hard to believe. I think it's in SA's best interest to keep fake profiles on there to gain more paying members. Only after you join do you realize many never respond or have any intention to meet you.
    They are out there but the GPS is real. What I have noticed is the average girl is becoming more frequent. When I say average I mean the average working girl. I have come in contact with more pros then I care to handle. Funny thing is I'm able to find their pro rates and And see if they are up charging on SA. I have been most successful contacting 30-40 years of hotties as they are more realistic and easy to work with. Just my advice I would stay out of the 18-20 range for a bit.

Posting Limitations

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Live Escorts
LoveHUB Escorts Directory
Top Escorts

Protected by Copyscape