Sugar Baby / Sugar Daddy relationships

**Zakk Wylde** · 12-02-18 19:18

She's been on a while and she's all business so I know one of you has intel. I'm on the fence.

**Zakk Wylde** · 12-02-18 19:15

Cool girl. Playful and easy going. No limits as far as I could tell. Not my type, a little thick and a moms body. But if you like her pics she is a good time.

**JohnBuddy** · 12-02-18 10:57

Saw her yesterday. She has a hotel room in Carmel till Tuesday. Yes she is a pro but very nice body and the best BBBJCIM that I have had in years. Thin small tits pm me for more! JB.

**MljThick7** · 11-30-18 13:13

I met up with a nice young girl who is just beginning this type of adventure. She is a very small BBW. Very nice ass and small b cup tits. Extremely tight. The only catch is you have to see her during the day because she lives with her boyfriend so she plays while he's at work. She's not a GFE yet but I think with time that's an option. Still kinda timid. I will not give out her information on here because the last time I posted something to help us all out someone contacted her and told her that I wrote a blog about her on here. What a d__ck! Senior members only contact me for her username on SA. I will not give out her number.

**TryinAgain2** · 11-30-18 12:10

Originally Posted by Dnims [View Original Post]

Is the only way to read or send a message by subscription on SA? Does that go for both men and women?

Long answer: "Attractive" accounts are free, I believe. That's why so few take them seriously. I think a premium account just offers more controls and filters, etc. "Successful" accounts have to be a paid account in order to read msgs. I believe if your account is new, and you load a photo, it says you can send msgs, but they are edited. You can't just send your contact info to bypass paying and you still can't read replies, so that's a misleading way to get someone to join and then get acquainted with the site before realizing the high cost, LOL.

That's all open for correction if someone knows better than I.

I know most here want NSA or a harem of girls, but if one wants a true SB, monogamous commitment without thousands in monthly allowance, they can be found. Had one short term in last Spring (most amazing girl I've ever met), but now I think she's dancing, dammit. And it's taken quite awhile but I just found another one and we both disabled our accounts yesterday. I've talked to several that say they want that, but few actually do. Worth the find if that's what you're looking for!

**WanderingAbout** · 11-30-18 12:02

Anyone know how to direct contact (PM please) or has she ghosted the sugar scene? Not on seeking much.

https://www.seeking.com/member/8734a...6-4c3ed20c4a60

**Dnims** · 11-30-18 11:21

Is the only way to read or send a message by subscription on SA? Does that go for both men and women?

**JohnBuddy** · 11-28-18 13:51

Originally Posted by MljThick7 [View Original Post]

I met up with Xoxoxo_xoxoxo. She is very tiny like her pics show. Probably 5 ft tall 100 lbs. Kinda in a rundown house on the Westside. Not sure I would go in the dark. She does have a female roommate but she didn't bother us. Really good BBBJ and on went the cover and she rode me cg and then doggy. She is very tight and gets very wet and creamy. I pulled out off went the cover and finished with CIM. Not too bad for $.2. I think she is a pro though. Maybe hit it again in a pinch.

Pretty dirty and big time drug use. She scared me. Did suck good for $. Will not be back way to filthy.

**MljThick7** · 11-27-18 13:44

I met up with Xoxoxo_xoxoxo. She is very tiny like her pics show. Probably 5 ft tall 100 lbs. Kinda in a rundown house on the Westside. Not sure I would go in the dark. She does have a female roommate but she didn't bother us. Really good BBBJ and on went the cover and she rode me cg and then doggy. She is very tight and gets very wet and creamy. I pulled out off went the cover and finished with CIM. Not too bad for $.2. I think she is a pro though. Maybe hit it again in a pinch.

**JaxSon07** · 11-26-18 21:15

Originally Posted by TryinAgain2 [View Original Post]

Angelgirltori.

Complete time waster. Pics via text look great too. No idea how they match reality. Can't communicate worth shit consistently. Texts then ghosts. Few days later does it again, wash, rinse, repeat. Have not met despite several times worked out, then ghosted. Never even talked money or anything.

https://www.seeking.com/member/838d9...f-c1e3b83de0b5

You are correct that her communication is one of the worst, she can have a piss poor attitude and she acts like she's gods gift. However, on 2 occasions she has texted me out of the blue wanting to meet up. She showed both times and we had a great time. She is cute and has a great body. Obviously I wouldn't put a lot of effort into her, but if you keep her on your radar she may surprise you sometime when she's hard up for some cash.

**TryinAgain2** · 11-26-18 16:45

Originally Posted by TryinAgain2 [View Original Post]

Especially if you can get a text or SA message stating so, screenshot that and report the profile. Why bother?

1) you're protecting a child from predators, which is extremely important imo. A 17 year old is still a child by the law and morally.

2) you're getting her off the site, even if only temporarily until she creates a new profile, which is protecting the rest of us too.

SA removed the account I reported below immediately after I submitted the screenshot of her admitting she's 17.

Well, Bob0324 says via text that he's fucked the 17 year old, and while she denies it, she still swears she's only 17. So one of them is lying and possibly Bob fucked an under age girl. Keep that in mind about the safety of his recommendations.

**Zakk Wylde** · 11-26-18 12:45

Originally Posted by Romeoinsd [View Original Post]

Thank you so much for providing links to your reviews, even if the user may delete their profile in the future.

With the deletion of the advanced search button on SA, it's so much easier to follow links here straight to the profile.

The profile text search feature is back. Still good to send links though if you can.

**TryinAgain2** · 11-26-18 09:48

Originally Posted by WreckItRight [View Original Post]

There are more than a few underage Profiles on SA. Check their ID for sure. I almost got bit on this. (I took her word for it) . More than likely its angry parent / guardian that calls LE. It did not go well.

Fortunately I didn't do anything wrong but I did find out what the " age of consent" was for Indiana real fast. I made a fast U turn.

Especially if you can get a text or SA message stating so, screenshot that and report the profile. Why bother?

1) you're protecting a child from predators, which is extremely important imo. A 17 year old is still a child by the law and morally.

2) you're getting her off the site, even if only temporarily until she creates a new profile, which is protecting the rest of us too.

SA removed the account I reported below immediately after I submitted the screenshot of her admitting she's 17.

**WreckItRight** · 11-26-18 02:22

Originally Posted by DrSummer [View Original Post]

Let me add a different perspective to this. I can't think of why LEO would be monitoring potential SD / SB communications and trying to get into the sugar bowl unless someone tipped them, they want to catch a big fish or someone underage is involved. The fear of LEO's monitoring of SA is largely unfounded IMO. It is not a public nuisance or health issue (at least not yet) compared to escorts and SWs. They go for such raids where they can catch a large number of people at once, make a big public spectacle and try to curtail such things. They can't do it in sugar bowl. Those are individual personal communications. While being careful in communications with SBs not to talk about specific acts for money, I find it actually in the SDs interest to have some communications in writing about what they should expect during the date and getting those acknowledged by SB. More realistic chance is that the SB goes sour (for whatever reason, lower allowance than expected, they want to blackmail you for more money) and try to accuse you of something that is not true, then you have evidence that she knew what to expect during date. The chance of you ending up in that situation is much higher than LEO randomly monitoring sugar bowl and picking you. Few things I do to safeguard myself in case if I happen to fall into those situations.

1. Very early in my communications with SB, I get a written response from her that she is indeed over 18 yrs and tell her that I don't date anyone who hasn't turned 18.

2. Don't relate some acts to allowance, but make her acknowledge she knows what activities I expect from the date and she is Ok with that.

3. Never talk about having drinks if she is not above legal drinking age.

4. After the date, I ask her to text me back when she gets home safe. Almost all of them do. Then I thank her for good time and looking forward to the next date. It will give some evidence that the date ended in a pleasant way.

Play safe.

Dr. S.

There are more than a few underage Profiles on SA. Check their ID for sure. I almost got bit on this. (I took her word for it) . More than likely its angry parent / guardian that calls LE. It did not go well.

Fortunately I didn't do anything wrong but I did find out what the " age of consent" was for Indiana real fast. I made a fast U turn.

**Goatee1456** · 11-25-18 20:48

Originally Posted by DrSummer [View Original Post]

Let me add a different perspective to this. I can't think of why LEO would be monitoring potential SD / SB communications and trying to get into the sugar bowl unless someone tipped them, they want to catch a big fish or someone underage is involved. The fear of LEO's monitoring of SA is largely unfounded IMO. It is not a public nuisance or health issue (at least not yet) compared to escorts and SWs. They go for such raids where they can catch a large number of people at once, make a big public spectacle and try to curtail such things. They can't do it in sugar bowl. Those are individual personal communications. While being careful in communications with SBs not to talk about specific acts for money, I find it actually in the SDs interest to have some communications in writing about what they should expect during the date and getting those acknowledged by SB. More realistic chance is that the SB goes sour (for whatever reason, lower allowance than expected, they want to blackmail you for more money) and try to accuse you of something that is not true, then you have evidence that she knew what to expect during date. The chance of you ending up in that situation is much higher than LEO randomly monitoring sugar bowl and picking you. Few things I do to safeguard myself in case if I happen to fall into those situations.

1. Very early in my communications with SB, I get a written response from her that she is indeed over 18 yrs and tell her that I don't date anyone who hasn't turned 18.

2. Don't relate some acts to allowance, but make her acknowledge she knows what activities I expect from the date and she is Ok with that.

3. Never talk about having drinks if she is not above legal drinking age.

4. After the date, I ask her to text me back when she gets home safe. Almost all of them do. Then I thank her for good time and looking forward to the next date. It will give some evidence that the date ended in a pleasant way.

Play safe.

Dr. S.

My brain was telling me the same things. I do age validate and ask for state issues I'd at the first meet. Don't talk expectations other than a general SD / SB relationship in the setup, and only offer to OT for the meet, and maybe some trivial specific expense just for meeting.

In this case, the cooncidence of the delays in meeting, the ask for identifying clothing, a guy sitting in a truck scoping me out (probably bored and just people watching), and then the arrival of a plain clothes female officer in a marked car. Spooked me. I realize the worst that could have happen would have been a "talking to of the risks of prostitution" and nothing more, but the circumstances just told me to leave.

I did reconnect with xxSexxiLexxi and apologized for ditching the meet, and I think we are good now.