Sugar Baby / Sugar Daddy relationships

[JaxSon07]

Angelgirltori.

Complete time waster. Pics via text look great too. No idea how they match reality. Can't communicate worth shit consistently. Texts then ghosts. Few days later does it again, wash, rinse, repeat. Have not met despite several times worked out, then ghosted. Never even talked money or anything.

https://www.seeking.com/member/838d9...f-c1e3b83de0b5

You are correct that her communication is one of the worst, she can have a piss poor attitude and she acts like she's gods gift. However, on 2 occasions she has texted me out of the blue wanting to meet up. She showed both times and we had a great time. She is cute and has a great body. Obviously I wouldn't put a lot of effort into her, but if you keep her on your radar she may surprise you sometime when she's hard up for some cash.

[TryinAgain2]

Especially if you can get a text or SA message stating so, screenshot that and report the profile. Why bother?

1) you're protecting a child from predators, which is extremely important imo. A 17 year old is still a child by the law and morally.

2) you're getting her off the site, even if only temporarily until she creates a new profile, which is protecting the rest of us too.

SA removed the account I reported below immediately after I submitted the screenshot of her admitting she's 17.

Well, Bob0324 says via text that he's fucked the 17 year old, and while she denies it, she still swears she's only 17. So one of them is lying and possibly Bob fucked an under age girl. Keep that in mind about the safety of his recommendations.

[Zakk Wylde]

Thank you so much for providing links to your reviews, even if the user may delete their profile in the future.

With the deletion of the advanced search button on SA, it's so much easier to follow links here straight to the profile.

The profile text search feature is back. Still good to send links though if you can.

[TryinAgain2]

There are more than a few underage Profiles on SA. Check their ID for sure. I almost got bit on this. (I took her word for it) . More than likely its angry parent / guardian that calls LE. It did not go well.

Fortunately I didn't do anything wrong but I did find out what the " age of consent" was for Indiana real fast. I made a fast U turn.

Especially if you can get a text or SA message stating so, screenshot that and report the profile. Why bother?

1) you're protecting a child from predators, which is extremely important imo. A 17 year old is still a child by the law and morally.

2) you're getting her off the site, even if only temporarily until she creates a new profile, which is protecting the rest of us too.

SA removed the account I reported below immediately after I submitted the screenshot of her admitting she's 17.

[WreckItRight]

Let me add a different perspective to this. I can't think of why LEO would be monitoring potential SD / SB communications and trying to get into the sugar bowl unless someone tipped them, they want to catch a big fish or someone underage is involved. The fear of LEO's monitoring of SA is largely unfounded IMO. It is not a public nuisance or health issue (at least not yet) compared to escorts and SWs. They go for such raids where they can catch a large number of people at once, make a big public spectacle and try to curtail such things. They can't do it in sugar bowl. Those are individual personal communications. While being careful in communications with SBs not to talk about specific acts for money, I find it actually in the SDs interest to have some communications in writing about what they should expect during the date and getting those acknowledged by SB. More realistic chance is that the SB goes sour (for whatever reason, lower allowance than expected, they want to blackmail you for more money) and try to accuse you of something that is not true, then you have evidence that she knew what to expect during date. The chance of you ending up in that situation is much higher than LEO randomly monitoring sugar bowl and picking you. Few things I do to safeguard myself in case if I happen to fall into those situations.

1. Very early in my communications with SB, I get a written response from her that she is indeed over 18 yrs and tell her that I don't date anyone who hasn't turned 18.

2. Don't relate some acts to allowance, but make her acknowledge she knows what activities I expect from the date and she is Ok with that.

3. Never talk about having drinks if she is not above legal drinking age.

4. After the date, I ask her to text me back when she gets home safe. Almost all of them do. Then I thank her for good time and looking forward to the next date. It will give some evidence that the date ended in a pleasant way.

Play safe.

Dr. S.

There are more than a few underage Profiles on SA. Check their ID for sure. I almost got bit on this. (I took her word for it) . More than likely its angry parent / guardian that calls LE. It did not go well.

Fortunately I didn't do anything wrong but I did find out what the " age of consent" was for Indiana real fast. I made a fast U turn.

[Goatee1456]

Let me add a different perspective to this. I can't think of why LEO would be monitoring potential SD / SB communications and trying to get into the sugar bowl unless someone tipped them, they want to catch a big fish or someone underage is involved. The fear of LEO's monitoring of SA is largely unfounded IMO. It is not a public nuisance or health issue (at least not yet) compared to escorts and SWs. They go for such raids where they can catch a large number of people at once, make a big public spectacle and try to curtail such things. They can't do it in sugar bowl. Those are individual personal communications. While being careful in communications with SBs not to talk about specific acts for money, I find it actually in the SDs interest to have some communications in writing about what they should expect during the date and getting those acknowledged by SB. More realistic chance is that the SB goes sour (for whatever reason, lower allowance than expected, they want to blackmail you for more money) and try to accuse you of something that is not true, then you have evidence that she knew what to expect during date. The chance of you ending up in that situation is much higher than LEO randomly monitoring sugar bowl and picking you. Few things I do to safeguard myself in case if I happen to fall into those situations.

1. Very early in my communications with SB, I get a written response from her that she is indeed over 18 yrs and tell her that I don't date anyone who hasn't turned 18.

2. Don't relate some acts to allowance, but make her acknowledge she knows what activities I expect from the date and she is Ok with that.

3. Never talk about having drinks if she is not above legal drinking age.

4. After the date, I ask her to text me back when she gets home safe. Almost all of them do. Then I thank her for good time and looking forward to the next date. It will give some evidence that the date ended in a pleasant way.

Play safe.

Dr. S.

My brain was telling me the same things. I do age validate and ask for state issues I'd at the first meet. Don't talk expectations other than a general SD / SB relationship in the setup, and only offer to OT for the meet, and maybe some trivial specific expense just for meeting.

In this case, the cooncidence of the delays in meeting, the ask for identifying clothing, a guy sitting in a truck scoping me out (probably bored and just people watching), and then the arrival of a plain clothes female officer in a marked car. Spooked me. I realize the worst that could have happen would have been a "talking to of the risks of prostitution" and nothing more, but the circumstances just told me to leave.

I did reconnect with xxSexxiLexxi and apologized for ditching the meet, and I think we are good now.

[Romeoinsd]

Angelgirltori.

Complete time waster. Pics via text look great too. No idea how they match reality. Can't communicate worth shit consistently. Texts then ghosts. Few days later does it again, wash, rinse, repeat. Have not met despite several times worked out, then ghosted. Never even talked money or anything.

https://www.seeking.com/member/838d9...f-c1e3b83de0b5

Thank you so much for providing links to your reviews, even if the user may delete their profile in the future.

With the deletion of the advanced search button on SA, it's so much easier to follow links here straight to the profile.

[TryinAgain2]

Angelgirltori.

Complete time waster. Pics via text look great too. No idea how they match reality. Can't communicate worth shit consistently. Texts then ghosts. Few days later does it again, wash, rinse, repeat. Have not met despite several times worked out, then ghosted. Never even talked money or anything.

https://www.seeking.com/member/838d9...f-c1e3b83de0b5

[TryinAgain2]

Danibaby08.

Wants min 250 for a quick visit. More for longer. Pics sent via text don't look nearly as young or tight as profile. Have not met.

[TryinAgain2]

Listed in Indy, says via messaging that she's in Louisville and has no transportation here. Have not met.

https://www.seeking.com/messages/inb...8-1ea0c974e478

[TryinAgain2]

Profiles says 19 and out of HS. After many texts, says she's still a senior but 18. When proof was requested, admitted she isn't even 18. No idea of the truth of any of it. Proceed at your own risk. I have not and will not meet her.

https://www.seeking.com/member/48648...f-166c5ecc5e60

[DrSummer]

Let me add a different perspective to this. I can't think of why LEO would be monitoring potential SD / SB communications and trying to get into the sugar bowl unless someone tipped them, they want to catch a big fish or someone underage is involved. The fear of LEO's monitoring of SA is largely unfounded IMO. It is not a public nuisance or health issue (at least not yet) compared to escorts and SWs. They go for such raids where they can catch a large number of people at once, make a big public spectacle and try to curtail such things. They can't do it in sugar bowl. Those are individual personal communications. While being careful in communications with SBs not to talk about specific acts for money, I find it actually in the SDs interest to have some communications in writing about what they should expect during the date and getting those acknowledged by SB. More realistic chance is that the SB goes sour (for whatever reason, lower allowance than expected, they want to blackmail you for more money) and try to accuse you of something that is not true, then you have evidence that she knew what to expect during date. The chance of you ending up in that situation is much higher than LEO randomly monitoring sugar bowl and picking you. Few things I do to safeguard myself in case if I happen to fall into those situations.

1. Very early in my communications with SB, I get a written response from her that she is indeed over 18 yrs and tell her that I don't date anyone who hasn't turned 18.

2. Don't relate some acts to allowance, but make her acknowledge she knows what activities I expect from the date and she is Ok with that.

3. Never talk about having drinks if she is not above legal drinking age.

4. After the date, I ask her to text me back when she gets home safe. Almost all of them do. Then I thank her for good time and looking forward to the next date. It will give some evidence that the date ended in a pleasant way.

Play safe.

Dr. S.

I don't understand why some get nervous about LEO on SA. Nothing illegal about a SD / SB relationship. Even if you meet up with her just once. Unless you are texting her or telling her that you will give her money for sex acts, you shouldn't worry.

[JaxSon07]

Setup a 1st meet with xxSexxiLexxi from SA for 1 today at a coffee shop. Get there a bit earlier and at 1 get a text that she has transportation issues but will be there no later than 130. At 140 I ask if she is close by and get a response at 150 that she is less than 2 blocks away. At 210 I ask her if she has cold feet and she responds at 215 no, had to stop and get gas and asks what I am wearing. I text her that I am leaving to get back to work. As I am pulling away, a plain clothes woman in a marked LEO vehicle pulls in and walks into the coffee shop.

15 minutes later I get a rather angry text that "I am here where are you? You just going to say fuck it and leave after I made this trip?

Unbelievable. Not sure if the plains clothes was involved or not, but spooked me fast.

Like someone earlier said, she is real. I met up with her for a drink. Communication was a struggle, but she did show up, we had a drink. A little rough for my taste, but after a little fun in the car I flipped her $ and she was on her way.

I don't understand why some get nervous about LEO on SA. Nothing illegal about a SD / SB relationship. Even if you meet up with her just once. Unless you are texting her or telling her that you will give her money for sex acts, you shouldn't worry.

[SpinAndWin85]

Setup a 1st meet with xxSexxiLexxi from SA for 1 today at a coffee shop. Get there a bit earlier and at 1 get a text that she has transportation issues but will be there no later than 130. At 140 I ask if she is close by and get a response at 150 that she is less than 2 blocks away. At 210 I ask her if she has cold feet and she responds at 215 no, had to stop and get gas and asks what I am wearing. I text her that I am leaving to get back to work. As I am pulling away, a plain clothes woman in a marked LEO vehicle pulls in and walks into the coffee shop.

15 minutes later I get a rather angry text that "I am here where are you? You just going to say fuck it and leave after I made this trip?

Unbelievable. Not sure if the plains clothes was involved or not, but spooked me fast.

I guess LEO is looking for new ways to trap us. Glad your Spidey sense didn't let you down.

[John401]

Setup a 1st meet with xxSexxiLexxi from SA for 1 today at a coffee shop. Get there a bit earlier and at 1 get a text that she has transportation issues but will be there no later than 130. At 140 I ask if she is close by and get a response at 150 that she is less than 2 blocks away. At 210 I ask her if she has cold feet and she responds at 215 no, had to stop and get gas and asks what I am wearing. I text her that I am leaving to get back to work. As I am pulling away, a plain clothes woman in a marked LEO vehicle pulls in and walks into the coffee shop.

15 minutes later I get a rather angry text that "I am here where are you? You just going to say fuck it and leave after I made this trip?

Unbelievable. Not sure if the plains clothes was involved or not, but spooked me fast.

She's real, I met her in public. Very similar issues in meeting. Kept saying she was close, had to stop to pee and had to run errands. She doesn't have her own vehicle. Then conversation was a disaster. I paid for her dinner and told her I was good. Didn't look as good in pics as in person. She got shitty with me too after making me wait.