Thread: Streetwalker Reports
+
Add Report
Results 23,326 to 23,340 of 61398
-
11-14-18 07:36 #38073Senior Member

Posts: 2419Never mentioned the size of pussy. Was speaking about the size of their ass and the ability to take dick. PAWG is not the same as fat.
Originally Posted by Poggi1212
[View Original Post]
I work with and see ladies in the gym that are true PAWGs (squat booty) and not obese. Yes, I've seen PAWGs turn fat; especially after going on vacation.
Someone like Ranee is always a PAWG weight on or off. Thats genetics.
Size & tightness of pussies is variable too. I just prefer a bubble wrapped around my meat. IMHO.
-
11-14-18 07:11 #38072Senior Member

Posts: 994Pawg
Because there are several girls out there with nice toned skin, slim waists, flat stomach, and hardly any fat on their body but the trunk is nice and round and unexpectedly plump (no cottage cheese). I agree, fat girls should not be in the classification as PAWGs. The ass has to be Pretty Hot And Tempting for her to be a PAWG. Blame the morons in this world for always fuckin up a good thing.
Originally Posted by Checkumout
[View Original Post]
PAWGs are sexy yes, but in my opinion, a nice slim girl with long slim legs, flat stomach and a little round booty is what is worth shelling out the ducketts for.
Shooter out!
-
11-14-18 07:02 #38071Senior Member

Posts: 994Tight Loose
Genetics play a more significant role than how many times it's been slammed.
Originally Posted by Poggi1212
[View Original Post]
-
11-14-18 02:21 #38070Senior Member

Posts: 48Doll
Had a dream tonight I met a Doll of a woman. It truly was a miracle on 25th street for it being after 1 in the morning. The spot I got in was kinda tight but the walls were nice and wet. Reversed riding with a man's best friend finish for standard admission gave me a good night. Dreams are hard to produce numbers so as usual none were received.
-
11-13-18 22:10 #38069Senior Member

Posts: 1126PAWGs
They are definitely respected in my world. Phat girls are different than Fat girls. (P) retty (H) ot (A) nd (T) empting women are exactly that. Which is where the terminology comes from, (P) hat (A) ss (W) hite (G) irls. Fat women are just that. Overweight women with no curves. So there is a huge difference. So saying why not call them all fat would be like calling Spinners, Anorexic girls. My two cents.
Originally Posted by Checkumout
[View Original Post]
Phyuck!
I get it that you just like to fight and I have heard that before (Chris Tucker "Money Talks" 1997) but he didn't ask what PHAT means he asked what a PAWG was and that is a Phat Ass White Girl which I have never heard of one referred to as a (P)[retty Hot And Tempting] (A)ss (W)hite (G)irl.
A PAWG is a fat white chick with a big ass. If you're into them more power to you, not my thing but that doesn't mean it shouldn't be yours. The dick you must please is your own sir.
A2
-
11-13-18 20:47 #38068Senior Member

Posts: 694Pawgs
The one on the left has one beautiful coochie but is still prefere smaller women.
Originally Posted by Klove48
[View Original Post]
-
11-13-18 18:22 #38067Senior Member

Posts: 174Ditto, love PAWGS
Couldn't agree more. Definately love pawgs!
Originally Posted by Klove48
[View Original Post]
-
11-13-18 17:58 #38066Senior Member

Posts: 694Yep not my first choice like with small tight ass.
Originally Posted by Klove48
[View Original Post]
-
11-13-18 16:05 #38065Senior Member

Posts: 1369Pawg
A picture says a thousand words!
Originally Posted by Checkumout
[View Original Post]
-
11-13-18 14:29 #38064Regular Member

Posts: 9Did agree nitetimer.
You are wrong sir the size of the chick has nothing to do with the size of the pussy I've had rail thin girls who are clearly nasty addicts and weigh 90-100 lbs and their pussies were loose and wide as a tunnel and I've had thick woman (which is what I prefer) have some of the tightest pussies I've ever been in. Loosing weight and gaining weight have nothing to do with the looseness of a tricks pussy. Its all about how much mileage she's had on it.
Originally Posted by NiteTimer
[View Original Post]
-
11-13-18 13:46 #38063Regular Member

Posts: 16Edgewood Kelly
Met a nice WSW named Kelly on Edgewood Rd the other afternoon. Claims to be homeless because her boyfriend kicked her out. Nice ass and tits, and great mic skills.
Took a full load and seemed to enjoy sucking cock, even talking about how she likes to "listen to the cock" as she sucks so she can give the best experience to her customer. Would definitely repeat.
She can be usually found walking Edgewood Rd between Pulaski and Willoughby Beach Rd.
Long brown hair.
She will wave if you make eye contact.
-
11-13-18 11:59 #38062Senior Member

Posts: 289Phyuck Yiu
Clear out your inbox!
-
11-13-18 08:01 #38061Senior Member

Posts: 694Pawgs
I myself I prefer the spinner frame small but not with the bones showing spinner are more flexible and get the job done and I love the bubble ass on the smaller girls.
Originally Posted by NiteTimer
[View Original Post]
-
11-13-18 07:47 #38060Senior Member

Posts: 2419Well PAWGs sometimes have a better shape than just fat chicks. For instance; Stephanie has an X frame. More athletic, but happens to have a thick ass.
Originally Posted by Checkumout
[View Original Post]
Very desirable. Sometimes you want a girl like Angel, who is just thick all over, you may say overweight. She is easier to fuck comfortably.
The lightweight girls, usually overmedicated; have a tendency to be a waste of time. Too small, it hurts, etc. You have ladies who started as PAWGS who get smaller which takes away from the experience, especially if you can't get your meat in, and they don't have enough cushion to sustain a sound pounding. Not very sexy.
You may get a May, who has a very small hip girdle, but takes dick well, or Jalin who used to be thicker, but now has problems getting it in. Both Head queens, so by the time you get in you want to bust anyway not minding the lack of cushion. My preference is for a Holly or Liz, and definitely Crystal or Angel. Prefer more cushion. YMMV.
-
11-12-18 23:20 #38059Senior Member

Posts: 197Brittany / Britney on Conkling
Had the urge tonight and went out looking on Conkling. Met up with a young lady named Brittany / Britney, blonde, thin but not CCL, 5'6, perky As small B's. Very pleasant, sweet, cold and wet but still a 7 on the civi scale IMHO. Paid way too high for a CBJ but between the weather and the pleasant demeanor I'm not complaining. No signs of heavy use, smelled nice and was very personable. Excellent skills, didn't rush, did what I asked her to do and was just overall very nice. Would repeat in a heartbeat, which means with my luck I'll never see her again LOL.











Reply With Quote




