The Prickyard

[BobUp]

My friend is alive and well. Still chasing the freckles I'm sure.

Has anyone heard from the infamous Freckle Freak. Seems like a long time since I have seen anything from him. I for one always like to read his posts & found them very useful. If he said the provider was safe, I wasn't nearly as apprehensive. I know he had butted heads with a monger or two, but that shit happens. Things are kind of boring with him IMO. People come & people go I guess. Did I miss something?

How right you are VixenRed. I just exchanged messages with FF he says he's doing well and to tell everyone "I'm buried in freckles right now haven't been able to come back from underneath them".

Lucky bastard.

[VixenRed]

My friend is alive and well. Still chasing the freckles I'm sure.

[DaveRue]

Has anyone heard from the infamous Freckle Freak. Seems like a long time since I have seen anything from him. I for one always like to read his posts & found them very useful. If he said the provider was safe, I wasn't nearly as apprehensive. I know he had butted heads with a monger or two, but that shit happens. Things are kind of boring with him IMO. People come & people go I guess. Did I miss something?

Be Safe, g.

A few months ago was when I spoke with him. Last I heard he is doing well. Seems to be healthy and happy. He will no longer be participating in the forum.

Dave.

[IndyGolfer60]

Wondering that myself. Awhile back he and I were in the middle of a conversation and one day he just stopped responding. Haven't heard a word about him since.

Me too, he vouched for me a couple of times.

[RonBurgIndy]

He was a big contributor to the forum. He can't stay away forever, right? I'm thinking he's taking vacation on an island of boobies and asses.

Has anyone heard from the infamous Freckle Freak. Seems like a long time since I have seen anything from him. I for one always like to read his posts & found them very useful. If he said the provider was safe, I wasn't nearly as apprehensive. I know he had butted heads with a monger or two, but that shit happens. Things are kind of boring with him IMO. People come & people go I guess. Did I miss something?

Be Safe, g.

[Chelli4me]

Has anyone heard from the infamous Freckle Freak. Seems like a long time since I have seen anything from him. I for one always like to read his posts & found them very useful. If he said the provider was safe, I wasn't nearly as apprehensive. I know he had butted heads with a monger or two, but that shit happens. Things are kind of boring with him IMO. People come & people go I guess. Did I miss something?Be Safe, g.

Wondering that myself. Awhile back he and I were in the middle of a conversation and one day he just stopped responding. Haven't heard a word about him since.

[Garmila]

Has anyone heard from the infamous Freckle Freak. Seems like a long time since I have seen anything from him. I for one always like to read his posts & found them very useful. If he said the provider was safe, I wasn't nearly as apprehensive. I know he had butted heads with a monger or two, but that shit happens. Things are kind of boring with him IMO. People come & people go I guess. Did I miss something?

Be Safe, g.

[Admin2]

The bullshitters usually don't last.

10,000 fucking times.

[Jjbee62]

Your review is about this guy, who gives a fuck? If you went to the place then review the chick you fucked. Then guys read yours, they read his, they read others and they make up their minds.

Seriously why are you even wasting your time looking at time stamps in order to write this post? You guys complicate something so fucking simple.

• Read about pussy

• Fuck pussy

• Write about pussy

How much fucking easier than that could it possibly be?

A2

How much easier? Skip step 1 and 3.

There are always going to be bullshit reviews and bullshit reviewers. If a review doesn't match your experience, post your experience. It doesn't take long for everyone to figure out whose posts are accurate. The bullshitters usually don't last.

[Bob0324]

It's bad forum edict to call out Cleary fake reviews? Dead serious question because I feel like it should be called out but I don't want to break any rules.

When I read scot409's first review yesterday I thought a bot wrote it. Sentence structure and keywords are exactly like fake reviews on google or Amazon. Looking though his post its extra clear it or whomever someone is up to something because he contradicts himself.

How is this a good thing to allow?

That's why there is a fight thread. If you can see it's a fake report so can everybody else. The problem is it never stops with one, 5 guys call it out. Then guys want to be the first to call it out so they start shooting first and figuring it out later.

Use the fight thread.

A2

Maybe Scott has dementia or is on benzos or something, if you read his post he's either very fake or very confused.

[Admin2]

I'm not calling out fake reviews or anything along those lines, however, LonelyInBTown does make a point. I've been to Banner as recently as late September and Jenny is no longer there. The description of Jenny is correct but I didn't have the same experience, although I was very new to the hobby at that time so that may have contributed. The girl that is currently there goes by Cindy unless she uses multiple names or there is indeed a new girl there named Amy. I doubt a new girl is there as that would mean Cindy left after only a month or so, but again I could be wrong.

Also, when you look at the reviewer's posting content and date / timestamps you see where LonelyInBTown may be correct. There is a pattern to all posts regarding sentence structure, description, and word usage. Reviews from this individual lack a lot of qualities you see in other posts--they have the appearance of being crafted in a specific way.

As far as whether or not this is a good thing to allow, I think the real question is--how can it be prevented? Some sort of analysis algorithm for writing would be required (or someone pouring over all these posts looking for specific patterns). Can't really say how feasible that is. Not my wheelhouse.

Your review is about this guy, who gives a fuck? If you went to the place then review the chick you fucked. Then guys read yours, they read his, they read others and they make up their minds.

Seriously why are you even wasting your time looking at time stamps in order to write this post? You guys complicate something so fucking simple.

• Read about pussy

• Fuck pussy

• Write about pussy

How much fucking easier than that could it possibly be?

A2

[Strych9999]

It's bad forum edict to call out Cleary fake reviews? Dead serious question because I feel like it should be called out but I don't want to break any rules.

When I read scot409's first review yesterday I thought a bot wrote it. Sentence structure and keywords are exactly like fake reviews on google or Amazon. Looking though his post its extra clear it or whomever someone is up to something because he contradicts himself.

How is this a good thing to allow?

I'm not calling out fake reviews or anything along those lines, however, LonelyInBTown does make a point. I've been to Banner as recently as late September and Jenny is no longer there. The description of Jenny is correct but I didn't have the same experience, although I was very new to the hobby at that time so that may have contributed. The girl that is currently there goes by Cindy unless she uses multiple names or there is indeed a new girl there named Amy. I doubt a new girl is there as that would mean Cindy left after only a month or so, but again I could be wrong.

Also, when you look at the reviewer's posting content and date / timestamps you see where LonelyInBTown may be correct. There is a pattern to all posts regarding sentence structure, description, and word usage. Reviews from this individual lack a lot of qualities you see in other posts--they have the appearance of being crafted in a specific way.

As far as whether or not this is a good thing to allow, I think the real question is--how can it be prevented? Some sort of analysis algorithm for writing would be required (or someone pouring over all these posts looking for specific patterns). Can't really say how feasible that is. Not my wheelhouse.

[Jeast72]

It's bad forum edict to call out Cleary fake reviews? Dead serious question because I feel like it should be called out but I don't want to break any rules.

When I read scot409's first review yesterday I thought a bot wrote it. Sentence structure and keywords are exactly like fake reviews on google or Amazon. Looking though his post its extra clear it or whomever someone is up to something because he contradicts himself.

How is this a good thing to allow?

That's why there is a fight thread. If you can see it's a fake report so can everybody else. The problem is it never stops with one, 5 guys call it out. Then guys want to be the first to call it out so they start shooting first and figuring it out later.

Use the fight thread.

A2

That is what the fight thread is for. I mistakenly thought it would be less controversial to indirectly call it out but had to put it near the offending post so people could figure out who I was talking about. That was before I even noticed the "general reports" connection and posted there also. I shouldn't have worried about pointing fingers directly and just taken it all, with quotes, to the "prickyard". The same people willing to dig to see who I was talking about would have still seen it there also.

I'm no less irked than anyone else when a report thread gets swamped with back and forth posts between arguing mongers. Not wanting to be the cause of it myself.

[Keepinitclean]

I can't see why people feel the need to post false reviews, embellished info, or otherwise twisted accounts. Especially when their past posts contradict the latest. What is the benifit?

Because it's the internet and they can? I can't see why people feel the need to start up shit like this on review threads when you have a fight thread.

A2

It's bad forum edict to call out Cleary fake reviews? Dead serious question because I feel like it should be called out but I don't want to break any rules.

When I read scot409's first review yesterday I thought a bot wrote it. Sentence structure and keywords are exactly like fake reviews on google or Amazon. Looking though his post its extra clear it or whomever someone is up to something because he contradicts himself.

How is this a good thing to allow?

That's why there is a fight thread. If you can see it's a fake report so can everybody else. The problem is it never stops with one, 5 guys call it out. Then guys want to be the first to call it out so they start shooting first and figuring it out later.

Use the fight thread.

A2

[Jeast72]

I can't see why people feel the need to post false reviews, embellished info, or otherwise twisted accounts. Especially when their past posts contradict the latest. What is the benifit?

Because it's the internet and they can? I can't see why people feel the need to start up shit like this on review threads when you have a fight thread.

A2