Arrangement Reports

**Matts1975** · 09-20-18 13:46

Has seen her 5 yrs ago.

https://www.seeking.com/member/b7846...1-a33f74704485

Tall, lots of freckles, avg body and performance. Everything covered. Don't have digits anymore. Would do in a pinch. 2 oo.

**Joey Jojo** · 09-19-18 23:58

Originally Posted by PauFord [View Original Post]

Facebook squashed the ability to find profiles by phone # (and email add too I think) . It's been several months since that was taken away from us It was enabling stalkerish behavior so they killed it.

My image searching seems about the same as it always has. Lots of misses but still a fair amount of hits. I don't really think there is any concerted effort recently by SB's to avoid image search detection. No more now than before IMO.

One thing I noticed was that Chrome on the desktop was better than Chrome mobile. Desktop would find hits whereas the mobile browser wouldn't in some cases.

If you add a number to your contacts, any Facebook page linked to that number will pop up when you hit the find friends tab. But you need to have contact uploading enabled. Works for instagram too.

**Chicago41** · 09-19-18 23:22

I've been chatting with her a little. Those tits look magnificent. Anyone meet her?

https://www.seeking.com/member/81ed0...c-73dfa554e082

**Chicago41** · 09-19-18 23:21

Originally Posted by ChicagoGoer [View Original Post]

Exchanged numbers with this one and was up to meet in a public place and take it somewhere private after an ice breaker. Didn't ask for cash and sent a few nudes over the course of our conversations. Finally set a meeting spot and she no showed. Reached out again and told her to meet me a few days later. Never left my place but insinuated I was on my way. 5 minutes before we are supposed to meet no reply. Ended up blocking my number. Hopefully someone has had more luck than I.

https://www.seeking.com/member/d1fc6...0-583fb0f7ecaa

Looks fake to me. I can't even tell what she looks like with the stupid Snapchat filters. Probably a gay guy playing games.

**ChicagoGoer** · 09-19-18 23:13

Exchanged numbers with this one and was up to meet in a public place and take it somewhere private after an ice breaker. Didn't ask for cash and sent a few nudes over the course of our conversations. Finally set a meeting spot and she no showed. Reached out again and told her to meet me a few days later. Never left my place but insinuated I was on my way. 5 minutes before we are supposed to meet no reply. Ended up blocking my number. Hopefully someone has had more luck than I.

https://www.seeking.com/member/d1fc6...0-583fb0f7ecaa

**Pau Ford** · 09-19-18 22:33

Says previous SD's have all paid $1000 / meet (plus fancy dinners, shows, sporting events, etc) for ongoing arrangements. Out of curiosity I countered at 500/ meet (not that I would actually pay that!) and she declined, saying that she has more respect for herself than 500.

Okie dokie!

https://www.seeking.com/member/1ac42...d-228a96d97a20

**KisaHero** · 09-19-18 20:53

Originally Posted by SugarDaddyX [View Original Post]

I used to have a fair deal of success when running SB's pictures through Google image search and running SB's phone numbers through Facebook search. Both of these in the past have tipped me off to the real identities of SB's and saved me from meeting people I would have not wanted to pursue an arrangement with. Some were plain lying on their profiles and others turned out to be felons.

Nowadays I am having almost no hits when googling images. Have SB's wisened up or is Seeking doing something to pictures uploaded to the site, altering them so they cannot match with the same picture on other sites? Also, I have not had any hits in a long time on phone number searches. Are SB's learning to use burn numbers or has Facebook defaulted privacy settings to where phone numbers will only be searchable if a member checks a box to allow it? It would make sense in the wake of the scandal where Facebook got caught selling people's private information.

Get that sex.

SDX.

I use truepeoplesearch because it's surprisingly comprehensive. I've used the info there to search Facebook a little better and gotten a few hits on girls I've been chatting up. If you manage to get a hit, good odds that you're dealing with the real deal. Unfortunately it's just really good at collecting public info so if your girl hasn't left much of a trail online, you won't find anything. Best of luck to you.

**Wolves432** · 09-19-18 20:28

Bijoubijou.

https://www.seeking.com/member/f06f8...3-af19e0336729

Sent a message to her and she was quick to get back saying her rate was $500 per meet. She refused to share her private photos and has an "average" body type according to her profile. Wouldn't even negotiate, not sure why all these girls think they can charge so much.

**Pau Ford** · 09-19-18 17:46

Facebook squashed the ability to find profiles by phone # (and email add too I think) . It's been several months since that was taken away from us It was enabling stalkerish behavior so they killed it.

My image searching seems about the same as it always has. Lots of misses but still a fair amount of hits. I don't really think there is any concerted effort recently by SB's to avoid image search detection. No more now than before IMO.

One thing I noticed was that Chrome on the desktop was better than Chrome mobile. Desktop would find hits whereas the mobile browser wouldn't in some cases.

Originally Posted by SugarDaddyX [View Original Post]

Also, I have not had any hits in a long time on phone number searches. Are SB's learning to use burn numbers or has Facebook defaulted privacy settings to where phone numbers will only be searchable if a member checks a box to allow it? It would make sense in the wake of the scandal where Facebook got caught selling people's private information.

Get that sex.

SDX.

**SugarDaddyX** · 09-19-18 16:51

I used to have a fair deal of success when running SB's pictures through Google image search and running SB's phone numbers through Facebook search. Both of these in the past have tipped me off to the real identities of SB's and saved me from meeting people I would have not wanted to pursue an arrangement with. Some were plain lying on their profiles and others turned out to be felons.

Nowadays I am having almost no hits when googling images. Have SB's wisened up or is Seeking doing something to pictures uploaded to the site, altering them so they cannot match with the same picture on other sites? Also, I have not had any hits in a long time on phone number searches. Are SB's learning to use burn numbers or has Facebook defaulted privacy settings to where phone numbers will only be searchable if a member checks a box to allow it? It would make sense in the wake of the scandal where Facebook got caught selling people's private information.

Get that sex.

SDX.

**Matts1975** · 09-19-18 13:15

Hello all,

I am a newbie to this forum but have been on SA on and off for the past 3 years. Was inactive for a while but back in the game now. Lot of flakes and GPS now compared to the past. Will update group on the keepers and scammers. Any tips or leads in the Naperville Aurora area are appreciated. No expectations since I haven't contributed so far, but I will try to repay over time.

**CumHere** · 09-19-18 11:15

Originally Posted by Chicago41 [View Original Post]

Looks like she deleted her profile.

I just clicked on her profile and its still active. I copied her URL precisely but when it appears here it said profile was taken down. I don't understand; so frustrating!! https://www.seeking.com/member/01408...b-4f68a04f5191.