Rubrankings.com
High Class Companions
Best Escorts
Top Tier Escorts
Live Escorts
This blog is moderated by Admin
  1. #1867
    Quote Originally Posted by TheAbc  [View Original Post]
    Texted M today and her roster has changed. She now books:

    Katie.

    June.

    Kandy.

    Megan.

    Ginger.

    Also, the girl I posted last week "Haze" isn't working anymore with that booker. I am assuming in just a few days, business was too slow and either changed bookers or left to some other town. Business seems to have slowed down enough where girls aren't reliably here for too long. Maybe they will be here for days and if it sucks, they skip town and go somewhere where it's more busy. Very fickle industry.
    Also Allison, Cynthia and Sue.

  2. #1866
    Quote Originally Posted by Veni1  [View Original Post]
    I think we all recognize that most Kgirls use Photoshopping in their ads. However, it can lead to wrong impressions. A recent example on this board was a poster mentioning that he was going to pass on Juicy since she looked too skinny. And yes her photo seemed to back that up. However, her profile listed her as 5'3", 110 lbs, a bust of 34 C, and an ass of 36". Hardly what I would consider "skinny". My take is to check out the posted stats on a gal in addition to the pictures. It's not a foolproof approach, but it helps in arriving at a realistic expectation.
    I'm like 90% sure that bookers just pick random stats out of the air. They say "Natural DD" then you get there and she's got bolt on Cs (or even Bs.) Generally 15 lbs heavier. The generally have the height right tho.

  3. #1865

    An update

    Texted M today and her roster has changed. She now books:

    Katie.

    June.

    Kandy.

    Megan.

    Ginger.

    Also, the girl I posted last week "Haze" isn't working anymore with that booker. I am assuming in just a few days, business was too slow and either changed bookers or left to some other town. Business seems to have slowed down enough where girls aren't reliably here for too long. Maybe they will be here for days and if it sucks, they skip town and go somewhere where it's more busy. Very fickle industry.

  4. #1864

    Visiting the area for one night!

    I am visiting LA for one short night, and came across this stunningly beautiful K-girl. Although she has reviews on another site (that I cannot read due to premium membership access), I am not sure if this provider is legit. If she truly is the girl in the photos. I need to pack my bags and move there so I can see her as much as possible. That is all.

    Has anyone on these boards had experience with this girl? What is she like? Any insight would be greatly appreciated.

    https://www.stellat-vip.com

  5. #1863
    Quote Originally Posted by NintyNine  [View Original Post]
    How do you guys find out what the bookers' HX usernames are? You just randomly search that site?
    Its hard to tell now. Some bookers like M only have one hx site. No other sites.

    Others like Julie book LA girls but the same girls that are on her site are not booked by Julie of theyre in the OC or Norcal.

    Kay has 2 sites on hx.

  6. #1862
    Senior Member


    Posts: 415

    Pictures vs Profiles

    I think we all recognize that most Kgirls use Photoshopping in their ads. However, it can lead to wrong impressions. A recent example on this board was a poster mentioning that he was going to pass on Juicy since she looked too skinny. And yes her photo seemed to back that up. However, her profile listed her as 5'3", 110 lbs, a bust of 34 C, and an ass of 36". Hardly what I would consider "skinny". My take is to check out the posted stats on a gal in addition to the pictures. It's not a foolproof approach, but it helps in arriving at a realistic expectation.

  7. #1861

    Bay Area KGirls.

    I recently moved from LA to the Bay and have been missing my usual K Girl providers. I've seen some ads for local Korean working girls but I'm not familiar with any of them and I have no idea who might offer bareback and who won't. It feels like starting over again.

    Could I get a few recommendations thrown my way. Of course I'm willing to trade info having many contacts in both LA and the Bay Area.

  8. #1860

    Hx

    Quote Originally Posted by NintyNine  [View Original Post]
    How do you guys find out what the bookers' HX usernames are? You just randomly search that site?
    DO a people search and view the profiles for LA and or OC area and you will find them.

  9. #1859
    Quote Originally Posted by VeryVictor  [View Original Post]
    I don't know if booker still responds on HX since I don't book them using HX but here it is: Sweet83.
    Thanks I will give it a try.

  10. #1858
    No only "Chloe O" was bareback. This "Chloe" was a no no. Two different Chloe.

    Quote Originally Posted by SixPacking  [View Original Post]
    Just did a search here and the original BB thread. Seems to be conflicting info so I ask is she BB friendly?

    http://www.girlfriendboston.com/gfechloe/

  11. #1857
    How do you guys find out what the bookers' HX usernames are? You just randomly search that site?

  12. #1856
    Quote Originally Posted by JFret  [View Original Post]
    Anyone have an up to date on kiss stable? I only see kiss's number associated on her add so wondering who else is there. Can lurk for other info just need up to date list.

    Thanks guys.
    Her booker says just her now.

  13. #1855
    Senior Member


    Posts: 127

    Seiko

    Quote Originally Posted by JohnPot  [View Original Post]
    My experience was no bareback and adamant about it. I'm not a newbie on how to persuade a girl to go bare. But a few other guys here swear that she like bare on both holes. So either I'm and a few other guys are not lucky. Or she just have a few enemies.
    Was rumored to be a BB provider. While in Socal was 1st in Orange Co. And had a TER review going BB. Then had a short stint in Wla where I saw her but was denied BB. So I guess she is YMMV or very selective.

  14. #1854

    Chloe.

    Just did a search here and the original BB thread. Seems to be conflicting info so I ask is she BB friendly?

    http://www.girlfriendboston.com/gfechloe/

  15. #1853

    Kiss stable

    Anyone have an up to date on kiss stable? I only see kiss's number associated on her add so wondering who else is there. Can lurk for other info just need up to date list.

    Thanks guys.

Posting Limitations

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
rubmaps
Top Escorts
LoveHUB Escorts Directory
The Velvet Rooms

Protected by Copyscape