Thread: Arrangement Reports
+
Add Report
Results 15,466 to 15,480 of 16834
-
08-24-18 13:44 #1369Senior Member

Posts: 39Kay Lis
Was talking with this one for a hot minute and then the profile disappeared. I didn't do or say anything to get blocked.
https://www.seeking.com/messages/inb...7-60c236aa9800
-
08-24-18 13:34 #1368Banned Member

Posts: 124The value of her pussy
She's moderately new, that should change soon.
Originally Posted by Randolph
[View Original Post]
One of the underrated aspects of SA is seeing how hilariously out of touch the new girls are. If you read through the new accounts so many of them seem to have no idea of their competition on the site. Girls I wouldn't give 100 to are signing up with attitudes like they are SA's saving grace and about to change the game, with headlines like "believe it or not I'm real" or "chicago's best finally here". Then you read the bio and some BS about "not willing to meet but can possibly send some lucky daddy some cute photos if the price is right". I always get a kick out of these, especially when I check back in 2 weeks and their profiles / attitudes are completely different since they finally get the idea that 1) there are much better looking women than them on the site and 2) we have the internet and don't pay for photos.
-
08-24-18 12:01 #1367Senior Member

Posts: 349Talk about an overinflated view.
Of the value of her pussy.
https://www.seeking.com/member/52749...8-67b645351559
I asked if she had a place to meet and she said its 1000 for the meet but only 800 if I get the room.
Seriously who the hell is going to give this one that kind of money?
Happy hunting.
Randolph.
-
08-24-18 10:47 #1366Senior Member

Posts: 59LEO Question for the Board
Hi Gents. I was an SA member several months ago, had a bad experience with my personal info being compromised and I was one of those 'extortion' victims. Spent a little money (through a reputable site) to take down my private info from the web so shied away from SA since then. However, with the new laws in place resulting in all our favorite websites being MIA (I truly miss CL Personals always had a lot of fun there but glad USG figured out how to stay alive), I recently rejoined SA a bit wiser but with an extremely discreet mindset. During my previous stint on SA, one of the women I was chatting with shared a warning with me that Federal LEO was starting to look at the 'arrangement' sites more carefully. Apparently wherever she got that news from freaked her out and she closed her account. How much validity I put to that statement, I do not know. However, I've recently had somewhat unusual interactions with a couple of the ladies out here when it came to scheduling a meeting and discussing price. I think a combination of my past extortion experience, the warning she gave me and these recent unusual interactions are promoting this question. What thoughts do you guys have on LEO (federal or local) spending resources by creating fake accounts and pursuing us horny innocents for trying to get our rocks off with some of these lovely ladies?
I'll now hang up and listen for my answers.
I've been weighing on this forever. Guys who think "arrangements" aren't prostitution are delusional.
If the chick isn't fucking you without getting paid, by the year, month, week, day or hour she's a hooker and you are a john. I know more than a few real sugar daddies and their "babies" don't fuck other guys nor do they have ads.
It's like boxing hoss, protect yourself at all times.
A2
-
08-24-18 01:16 #1365Senior Member

Posts: 86I have a child.
https://www.seeking.com/member/ad816...8-f2586d8ab030
$300 for BBFS, DFK, and face shot. I got the sense that she'd pretty much let you do whatever you wanted. Only downside is advanced age and I'd say her body is slightly below average. Worth checking out if you're into super short Asians.
-
08-23-18 23:40 #1364Banned Member

Posts: 54Gps
Contacted this one and she wanted $700 for covered sex. I inquired about BBFS and a tried to talk her down and she went ape shit through text.
She's hot but I am not sure she is worth the craziness.
https://www.seeking.com/member/c27dc...0-b10e7eca5703
-
08-23-18 18:01 #1363Banned Member

Posts: 54Watch out for this one.
Contacted her and we started texting. She sent some pics that didn't quite match up. She then wanted money sent before we met. I declined and then she said that all men are cheap for not paying for her pics.
Stay away from this one.
https://www.seeking.com/member/2ed92...e-036948feff93
-
08-23-18 17:34 #1362Senior Member

Posts: 89I met her over a year ago. She was fun, but did not repeat. Did not get the same idea of her being utr as you did, but again, this was a while ago. Also have access to her social media.
Originally Posted by FScott
[View Original Post]
-
08-23-18 17:09 #1361Senior Member

Posts: 59And that's why we have this board. Thank you Pau.
Originally Posted by PauFord
[View Original Post]
-
08-23-18 14:28 #1360Senior Member

Posts: 754Angela Glover. Bad Baby
Contacted her on SA, and she immediately shared her private pics with me. After a few messages back and forth, we switched to texting, and set up an M&G near her place in the South Loop for coffee, and if all went well, a trip back to her apartment immediately afterward. She requested 500, I countered at 3, and we met in the middle at 4. A little more than I like, but take a look at her pics. She is hot AF!
The Big Date was for a few days later, so we texted off and on in the interim, and she even asked to talk on the phone, since there are "a lot of flakes out there", and she said she would feel more comfortable if she could hear my voice. I apparently passed the vocal screening test, and was cleared for landing late this morning.
As I normally do, I texted this morning to confirm and was given permission from the tower for final approach. As I'm driving down there, I get several texts asking how far away I am, how much longer will it be, am I still coming, and messages of this sort. I reply as best I can while driving, saying I'm 10 minutes at best from wheels down. She then texts me that she got someone to agree to the full 500, so she is waving me off, and hopes I understand!
In the back of my mind was always the nagging suspicion that she was UTR at best, and not a true SB, but again, just take a look at her pics! If anyone is successful in actually getting to the FC with this one, let us know how it went. If you do schedule some flight time with her, make sure you have back up plans!
Scott.
https://www.seeking.com/member/079cb...e-875d3e58e653
-
08-23-18 14:24 #1359Senior Member

Posts: 749She's A Pro
She's been a pro for a long time, regular advertiser on BP for years.
Originally Posted by CreativeEros
[View Original Post]
-
08-23-18 10:55 #1358Senior Member

Posts: 59Ladytrinity
Ladytrinity.
https://www.seeking.com/member/4a8aa...c-5d90e2c4f40a
She's an older woman but quite sexy from what the pics show. She can host and is in the NW Burbs. She's willing to meet for 300 but when I gave her a little push back on that price (especially considering her age), she shut communication down very quickly and turned rather nasty. Perhaps she might be a better fit for one of you.
-
08-23-18 00:00 #1357Senior Member

Posts: 534Usually if she host, likely she is a pro, amateur college girls can't host because most will have roommates and most roommates don't know that they on SA, so sometime is better that she don't host so you know she is an amateur, hope that help.
Originally Posted by Csamstag
[View Original Post]
-
08-22-18 23:56 #1356Senior Member

Posts: 534Yeah that's likely true, dancer are usually non GFE and condom only, but what a body tho.
Originally Posted by BigTen
[View Original Post]
-
08-22-18 22:01 #1355Senior Member

Posts: 513She states her occupation as "dancer" That is a huge red flag. Remember, every dancer is trying to separate you from your cash as quickly as possible while giving you as little as possible.
Originally Posted by Pal5600
[View Original Post]








Reply With Quote




