Bare Back Ladies

**Mark IV** · 08-16-18 16:39

Originally Posted by PewPewPewPew [View Original Post]

I think I read before that the response rate on dating website / apps for the average man is something like 4% or less.

It depends who you contact. If you aim at the ones that are less popular, you get a higher response rate. Different races, different age groups also play a huge part in the dating game. 4% doesn't sound strange to me at all.

Statistics tell you: Don't be an Asian man or a black woman, LOL.

**OlmanDriver** · 08-16-18 11:45

Originally Posted by Skatar018 [View Original Post]

Well at least 57.14% of the time you were gold, which isn't bad, not bad at all!

Only once was I asked to use a rubber. Fat girl in Rochester NH who told me she was screwing 30 different guys in 30 days to celebrate her thirtieth birthday.

**Skatar018** · 08-15-18 23:44

Well at least 57.14% of the time you were gold, which isn't bad, not bad at all!

Originally Posted by OlmanDriver [View Original Post]

When I was younger I played around on Plenty Of Fish which was, and still is, free. I went on actual dates with around 70 women and screwed about 40 of them on the first date, and I'm no Adonis. My method was always the same. I told them that during the date I was eventually going to try and get in their panties, and if after that they still agreed to meet then I knew I was gold.

**Mark IV** · 08-15-18 12:35

Originally Posted by Nrlmus [View Original Post]

That's dirty and disgusting. Yuck! You should do like normal people do. Go on the date, you may get laid or likely not so you'd feel disappointed and won't call her again while she'd expect you to call her again so now she'd feel disappointed too. That's so much nicer and cleaner and romantic then paying for sex and having everybody feel fine afterwards which is outright sickening! I can't believe that many of you would prefer a thing like that to regular dating. What's wrong with you people! LOL.

I believe backpage and craigslist spoiled us.

**OlmanDriver** · 08-15-18 11:46

Originally Posted by MarkIV [View Original Post]

I just hate human trafficking and believe ladies should get every penny that we paid for them.

What I always disagree is how people in public will equal paying an escort to human trafficking. Everybody will tell you that you should feel shame for buying sex. That's not how I felt.

You could pay $60 buck a month sign up for a dating website, send 30-50 emails a day to various women on the site, then, fortunately, I mean, fortunately, you will hear back from one of them. You meet up with her after three days of chatting, buy her dinner, take her home if you play your card right you get laid that night. And the lady will expect you to call her back for the second date...and you won't. that makes you feel bad.

Or you can just text an escort and she will tell you to come over that day. You have sex, pay her and leave. She will say: I hope I will see you soon.

No harm is done, save money, save time, save energy. I am happy, she's happy... what shame?

When I was younger I played around on Plenty Of Fish which was, and still is, free. I went on actual dates with around 70 women and screwed about 40 of them on the first date, and I'm no Adonis. My method was always the same. I told them that during the date I was eventually going to try and get in their panties, and if after that they still agreed to meet then I knew I was gold.

**PewPewPewPew** · 08-15-18 08:48

Originally Posted by MarkIV [View Original Post]

You could pay $60 buck a month sign up for a dating website, send 30-50 emails a day to various women on the site, then, fortunately, I mean, fortunately, you will hear back from one of them. You meet up with her after three days of chatting, buy her dinner, take her home if you play your card right you get laid that night. And the lady will expect you to call her back for the second date...and you won't. that makes you feel bad.

I think I read before that the response rate on dating website / apps for the average man is something like 4% or less.

**Aardvarks** · 08-15-18 00:06

Originally Posted by MarkIV [View Original Post]

I just hate human trafficking and believe ladies should get every penny that we paid for them.

What I always disagree is how people in public will equal paying an escort to human trafficking. Everybody will tell you that you should feel shame for buying sex. That's not how I felt.

You could pay $60 buck a month sign up for a dating website, send 30-50 emails a day to various women on the site, then, fortunately, I mean, fortunately, you will hear back from one of them. You meet up with her after three days of chatting, buy her dinner, take her home if you play your card right you get laid that night. And the lady will expect you to call her back for the second date...and you won't. that makes you feel bad.

Or you can just text an escort and she will tell you to come over that day. You have sex, pay her and leave. She will say: I hope I will see you soon.

No harm is done, save money, save time, save energy. I am happy, she's happy... what shame?

I don't really see a gray area here. If the provider is not being forced into it and the providee is not forcing anything it's just a simple exchange of goods. I do agree that the whole trafficking thing is horrible. A few bad apples ruining everyone's fun.

**Nrlmus** · 08-14-18 17:29

Originally Posted by MarkIV [View Original Post]

No harm is done, save money, save time, save energy. I am happy, she's happy... what shame?

That's dirty and disgusting. Yuck! You should do like normal people do. Go on the date, you may get laid or likely not so you'd feel disappointed and won't call her again while she'd expect you to call her again so now she'd feel disappointed too. That's so much nicer and cleaner and romantic then paying for sex and having everybody feel fine afterwards which is outright sickening! I can't believe that many of you would prefer a thing like that to regular dating. What's wrong with you people! LOL.

**Mark IV** · 08-14-18 14:36

I just hate human trafficking and believe ladies should get every penny that we paid for them.

What I always disagree is how people in public will equal paying an escort to human trafficking. Everybody will tell you that you should feel shame for buying sex. That's not how I felt.

You could pay $60 buck a month sign up for a dating website, send 30-50 emails a day to various women on the site, then, fortunately, I mean, fortunately, you will hear back from one of them. You meet up with her after three days of chatting, buy her dinner, take her home if you play your card right you get laid that night. And the lady will expect you to call her back for the second date...and you won't. that makes you feel bad.

Or you can just text an escort and she will tell you to come over that day. You have sex, pay her and leave. She will say: I hope I will see you soon.

No harm is done, save money, save time, save energy. I am happy, she's happy... what shame?

**Nrlmus** · 08-14-18 14:03

Originally Posted by Aardvarks [View Original Post]

Free advertising for RM! Fantastic.

Actually I can't see the name of the site so unless you're already on it you wouldn't be able to figure out what it is and where to go.

On the other hand the message to us all is pretty clear: Big Brother is watching you. 'I'm back in USSR! You don't know how happy I am, boy!' LOL. When I just came here, sometime BC, never in my wildest thoughts I could've ever imagined that there will be a time when I'd be thinking about this place in those terms.

**Aardvarks** · 08-14-18 09:06

Originally Posted by Jolem [View Original Post]

One of the article's photos shows an Auburn detective reading this site. <waves hand .

Free advertising for RM! Fantastic.

**CyberBosco** · 08-13-18 21:40

That article is a very interesting read hits upon all the points bad girl gone good trying to help the less fortunate.

I did some research and found that Audra had quite the record before her change.

I would venture to guess that during her dealing with the Criminal Justice system after racking up more and more charges the realization was probably starting to set in that she was probably going to do some time incarcerated and that was probably not something that she felt comfortable with so probably after a meeting and some coaching by the Committee for Public Counsel and going over all the paperwork and her lawyer having access knew how to steer her towards the path she needed to go towards.

History of addiction yes History of abuse probably by a relative who is no longer alive just fit into the pattern the court wants to see.

**JCHolmes** · 08-13-18 18:11

Originally Posted by Jolem [View Original Post]

One of the article's photos shows an Auburn detective reading this site. <waves hand .

Detective work my ass! The photographer just caught that cop mongering on his lunch break!

**Nrlmus** · 08-13-18 15:50

Originally Posted by GianniVersace [View Original Post]

Wow I have no idea what to think about this article. First of all the handful of times I have seen her it never apaeared to me that she was being pimped out, the 1st time I met up with her I picked her up outside of her parents house. I never meet her at a hotel but always at her own apartment or an apartment she shared with another girl. She is very brave to use her first and last name in that article. I wonder if she is an advocate for sex trafficking victims as part of an community service agreement with the courts system. I know she was in trouble with LE often.

Originally Posted by Longjblues [View Original Post]

They are always the victim of human trafficking now, no matter what the facts. I don't doubt that she feels very much the victim, but they are probably from her own bad decisions and actions. Not much sympathy for her if she admits, "I wanted some quick money, and I already had a few one night stands, why shouldn't I get paid for it."

Human trafficking or sexual assaults by family members or friends always garners mucho sympathy and support.

In reading her story, it is not very believable that she was working in an office setting, and her female boss pimps her out. But, of course, the media doesn't question or analyze the person's story, just prints the story if it fits their desired narrative.

Perhaps at some point she had a pimp who controlled her, but that initial tale of how she started in the escort business isn't really believable.

For the record, don't know this "victim" and never met her.

The press and LE encourage certain narratives too to make it more in line with what is expected to get help, publicity, and consequently funding and support. You got to be "pimped out" otherwise you might not fall under being "a victim of human trafficking". And that is besides having bad parents and childhood, mental issues (ADD, bipolar and other fashionable ailments), addictions (opioid preferably), and other more conventional issues. Some of them may have it all anyway, others may have some but not the other, but the ladies know what's expected of them and cater to it to get help or just to get themselves extricated from low level hooking.

Not saying that all of this is not happening but it happens in more diverse forms then what we hear in mass media. I mean if you haven't been pimped out then you're not a victim of human trafficking and you don't qualify under certain assistance guidelines then you would've otherwise and so on.