Korean Agency BB

**DrDisney** · 07-31-18 11:11

Originally Posted by SkyTheLimit [View Original Post]

I looked up the bookers number and the reviews say its bait and switch.

Can anyone confirm?

Not Heri, she's still with her original booker. Also, still no BB.

**Nakadashi69** · 07-31-18 09:14

Originally Posted by Bulak [View Original Post]

Definitely no BB from my experience and a very controlled kissing. No passion, just going through the motion. But from looks dept. , found her looking good than any Palace girls, presently.

Thanks. What girls have you seen, and what is their BBFS CIP status? Please share.

Thanks!

**SkyTheLimit** · 07-31-18 01:14

Originally Posted by JohnPot [View Original Post]

Heri is currently booking with Asian Pretty on HX. She was my ATF a couple of years ago. Important to mention, Heri is not BB, but her tounge bath and rimming was to die for.

Last time I saw her was about a yr ago. She got fat and service was burned out, lackluster, so I stop seeing her. Don't know if she slim down now.

https://www.humaniplex.com/profiles/AsianPretty

I looked up the bookers number and the reviews say its bait and switch.

Can anyone confirm?

**JohnPot** · 07-30-18 23:33

Haven got boobs done? Is there new pics some where? Last guy laser said she's A cup and her pics on them show flat chess.

Originally Posted by JohnRichard [View Original Post]

Looks like she got boobs done. That's a missed opportunity to me as I prefer natural small ones (I know, that is a rarity in kworld). I'm still tempted to visit since the service comments are so good. Couple of quick questions. Is she limiting play with boobs because of discomfort / pain? How tall is she?

Thanks.

**JohnPot** · 07-30-18 23:26

Originally Posted by SkyTheLimit [View Original Post]

Anyone has agency number or link to ad for these two Heri and Cari?

I tried the numbers I found on them but number is no longer in service.

Any info is appreciated. Feel free to pm.

Heri / Uhee:

https://www.eroticmonkey.ch/heri-esc...-angeles-72090#erotic.

Cari:

https://www.eroticmonkey.ch/cari-esc...ngeles-92415-5

Heri is currently booking with Asian Pretty on HX. She was my ATF a couple of years ago. Important to mention, Heri is not BB, but her tounge bath and rimming was to die for.

Last time I saw her was about a yr ago. She got fat and service was burned out, lackluster, so I stop seeing her. Don't know if she slim down now.

https://www.humaniplex.com/profiles/AsianPretty

**DHorn420** · 07-30-18 23:24

She doesn't offer BBFS.

Originally Posted by JohnRichard [View Original Post]

Didn't realize gyu offer BBFS. She fits my other criteria to a t (short, slim, small boobs).

**DHorn420** · 07-30-18 23:23

Same can someone pm their booker number. The erotic monkey doesn't # give you a respond at all.

Originally Posted by SkyTheLimit [View Original Post]

Anyone has agency number or link to ad for these two Heri and Cari?

I tried the numbers I found on them but number is no longer in service.

Any info is appreciated. Feel free to pm.

Heri / Uhee:

https://www.eroticmonkey.ch/heri-esc...-angeles-72090#erotic.

Cari:

https://www.eroticmonkey.ch/cari-esc...ngeles-92415-5

**Tetzuo9** · 07-30-18 18:43

Miss X is back at the palace.

**SkyTheLimit** · 07-30-18 18:42

Anyone has agency number or link to ad for these two Heri and Cari?

I tried the numbers I found on them but number is no longer in service.

Any info is appreciated. Feel free to pm.

Heri / Uhee:

https://www.eroticmonkey.ch/heri-esc...-angeles-72090#erotic.

Cari:

https://www.eroticmonkey.ch/cari-esc...ngeles-92415-5

**SkyTheLimit** · 07-30-18 16:06

Originally Posted by GoodBoy88 [View Original Post]

I have a question about Namu before I try her, how does she look compared to current photos? I read a review recently on them that said she's nowhere near as skinny and tight as her photos indicate. He said she was about 10 yrs older than her pics. Skinny is my fetish so this is a deal breaker for me. Thanks.

Yeah she's about 10 yrs older than her pics. Pics are very outdated and she's not skinny.

**Member #5844** · 07-30-18 14:37

Originally Posted by SaltyDog [View Original Post]

https://sangabrielvalley.adlist24.com/womenmen/a181025

For now I think this site is better. If anyone else has something better.

Adlist24 is an advertising site, whereas Eroticmonkey is a review site, so I'm not sure what you mean. Maybe you are referring to the CL and BP girls. Only a tiny fraction of them are on adlist24 so far.

**JohnRichard** · 07-30-18 13:30

Originally Posted by DHorn420 [View Original Post]

Go see Gyubeche if Skinny is your thing.

Didn't realize gyu offer BBFS. She fits my other criteria to a t (short, slim, small boobs).

**JohnRichard** · 07-30-18 13:27

Originally Posted by GoodBoy88 [View Original Post]

CIP is YMMV because I got it easily on the first try, she didn't seem to mind it at all but I can take a guess as to why. I think it might be because I was her last client for the day and she was going to wash out anyway. Because of my graveyard schedule I'm practically always a providers last client, which has it's share of downsides but a on rare occasion it has some upsides.

Looks like she got boobs done. That's a missed opportunity to me as I prefer natural small ones (I know, that is a rarity in kworld). I'm still tempted to visit since the service comments are so good. Couple of quick questions. Is she limiting play with boobs because of discomfort / pain? How tall is she?

Thanks.

**JohnRichard** · 07-30-18 13:22

Originally Posted by Jl0991 [View Original Post]

Also does anyone know if the Nana there is the same one that others have mentioned at a different agency?

There have been a couple of Nana I have read about on this forum. I don't think this ktownesc* Nana is either of those. And don't know if her services will meet expectations of the readers of this thread either.

Otoh the other Nana's are definitely worth a visit.

**SaltyDog** · 07-30-18 08:28

Originally Posted by Opus109 [View Original Post]

Since there have been a few inquiries about Eroticmonkey on the forum, I thought I would give my two cents. There is a lot to say, but I think it is worth taking the time to say it.

I have been using Eroticmonkey both as a reviewer and a lurker since quite a bit before that other, superior alternative went dark. It has changed and grown quite a bit since the draconian laws were passed, and it definitely has its pros and its cons.

Let's start with the cons. I can understand where the skepticism is coming from. To start, in the early days of E. M. , many, if not most of the reviews were literally stolen verbatim from that other site. Moreover, it was free, and had (and still has) very little screening and relatively low standards regarding what types of reviews can be posted. For example, it allows reviews of providers who advertise on classified sites. The other site did not allow that simply because the fake ads, phishing scams, bait and switch ads are so prevalent on those types of sites. This creates a situation where the posters of fake and malicious ads can easily post false and misleading reviews of their own scandalous and / or fake providers. Thus, you have to be very careful and scrupulous when reading E. M. Reviews and determining whether or not you will pursue a particular provider who is reviewed there. Nonetheless, it is very easy to filter out the BS--google numbers and providers, look at the profiles and reviews of the reviewers themselves. If a provider has only one or two reviews, and those reviewers themselves have ONLY reviewed that particular provider, it is a major red flag and you should pass. However, if that provider has a large amount of reviews left by reviewers who have written about many different providers, you are most likely safe. Another thing you can do is PM other reviewers. Most are willing to communicate with you. Of course, a response does not guarantee anything, but a lack of a response regarding a provider who is already iffy is further indication that you should avoid that provider. Lastly, reviews of well-known and extensively reviewed providers are almost always legit and reliable on E. M. If the girl has double digit reviews and you have seen her discussed here, those reviews are generally valid.

Now to the cons of the new them system. It is no longer free. However, like the now defunct site, it allows free access to reviewers. The downside, however, is that each review only provides seven days of free access, which is significantly less generous than the other site. This creates its own problems. Many mongers do not have the time and / or money to hobby once a week, but you damn well know they are lurking and are always looking for that next girl to book. Couple this with the fact that there are no time restrictions on reviews (the other site, for example, requested that your reviews be written no more than three months after the appointment), and it creates a temptation for people to either post fake reviews to gain access, or to review providers who are retired or have disappeared. I have seen reviews that say things like "this is a review of a session that look place before so and so retired / left the area. " Obviously, these reviews are of no use to anyone and have only been written to give the reviewer access to the site. E. M really needs to reconsider this and give members longer access for each review.

Finally, the pros. E. M is rapidly filling the void left by that other site, and is supplying for its demand. That being said, the members and reliable posters of the other site are now flooding E. M. With their reviews an insights. They have no alternative. The result is that E. M. Has exploded since the laws were passed and it is rapidly becoming a more vast and reliable source of legitimate information. The regular influx of k girl reviews is a testament to that. I can tell you, E. M. Was not like that BEFORE the other site went dark.

Ironically, E. M's low standards for reviews, namely the allowance of reviews of providers who advertise via classified sites, creates a VERY large pro. BP girls and other girls of that sort were not very well-reviwed on the other site--that was E. M's niche. Therefore, E. M. Has become an excellent tool to track down BP and CL girls who have vanished since those sites went dark! Many of them are still active, and you can find their contact info on E. M. !

All that being said, I believe E. M. To be a great source of information that will keep growing and getting better, at least until the other site comes back (if it does). It has its downsides, but those can be avoided if you do you research and know what you are doing.

https://sangabrielvalley.adlist24.com/womenmen/a181025

For now I think this site is better. If anyone else has something better.