The Prickyard

[Candace38G]

So BM how deep is it getting. Do you ever stop and think before you type? Your facts are a little off, let me enlighten you.

The day (s) before the sting, Uncle Steve made an appointment to see Reese on the only phone number used to make appointments. He was using a text app but was verified as a friend and being safe by another hobbyist that had seen Reese the week before. So it must be one of two things the hobbyist had flipped or was another uncle. Uncle Steve arrived, negotiated a deal for sex for $ with Reese and then suddenly had to leave before services were provided. What is the crime BM? Prostitution dude! She was not charged that day because uncle was building his case. What is building a case, probable cause!

The day of the sting, uncle had been verified with a real phone number (not an app, drop phone or internet phone) and with two provider references, one from Milfy and the other from an unknown CMT. The screener used only the references. So all is good right? NO, but more on that later. The now verified customer was given several options of ladies to see via texts on the same phone number that Uncle had made an appointment with Reese. The ladies were told he was coming and were asked if they would see him however, he only wanted to see Candace. So what crime is being committed? Promoting prostitution. Why? Same phone number already used to commit documented previous illegal activity and multiple ladies offered to provide service. Then shortly after the sting, while at the property Reese admits that she and Candace had put thousands of $ into fixing up the house that they had just leased and was hoping the landlord would reimburse them.

So now some thoughts for the community.

Why wasn't Reese arrested for her previous meeting with uncle? Why were two ladies, one of them Jan, who you tag as the "roller", who were in rooms right next to each other, released within two hours and Reese was there for several hours. Mind you, only a prosecutor can make a deal for immunity. Uncle can say anything they want but, immunity can only be negotiated by a prosecutor and a sworn statement. The two ladies next to each other only had Uncle questioning them, no prosecutor. OOPPPPS BM there goes your theory! So community probable cause via an illegal action committed the day before, probable cause by offering multiple ladies to Uncle when he was coming to visit. Isn't it probable cause if a "Lessee" works multiple ladies out of their property?

Questions for you BM. Why don't you have the same enthusiasm to bring to the lime light the hobbyist that flipped, or the other providers that provided false verifications? Why are you focused on one person? Why are you attacking the business decisions of another service that you never use and never will use?

Now for the kicker, let's go back to Uncle involved in the sting. If the SCREENER had just taken the time to run the digits through something as simple as White Pages his real name showed up. Then if she had googled his name, guess what? He's an IMPD police officer, DUH! So the moral of this story is: If you don't screen properly you are going to get arrested. This is what happens when a screener doesn't do their job correctly and makes it easy for multiple cases of probable cause.

So BM does Knighthood come complete with sexual favors? Now how deep is it getting?

So the real kicker is.

Yes there's no denying my part as a screener I made a mistake. I DID SCREEN on mulitple platforms, all in which came back to the same name. However, once a # is verified by Multiple current providers. # was in the name of person who he said he was. I didn't continue to look or google him. I trusted the references and screening platforms. Generally if the number is associated with law enforcement. ITS DISCLOSED. Again MY MISTAKE and I owned that in my orginal post. Which is why I took the heat for the Misdemeanor charge. No biggie.

However, Reese seeing "Steve" days prior wasnt enough for them to charge a level 4 felony because NO SEX ACTS where commited. Even agreeing to sex acts for cash would have only got her prostitution at best. But they didn't want REESE. Which is exactly why they couldn't obtain a search warrent at the time. I have the affidavit NOBODY is included in the Felony charge affidavit EXCEPT JAN and it clearly states once JAN disclosed AMB and monies exchanged. They THEN BOOKED ME FOR FELONY AT THAT TIME AND OBTAINED SEARCH warrent.

They can not simply charge a promotion of prostitution soley based off "assumption" because there was NO PROOF that sex was taking place in the appts. I actually don't know if that's what they were doing or not. Each appt is different per wach client.

Until it was VERIFIED by JAN that that's exactly what she was doing they had ZERO proof and only assumptions. So with admission from JAN saying yes that's what she was doing. Why WASNT SHE BOOKED?

Reese was released later because EVERYONE could here Jan telling the detectives what happen. REESE then yelled out that she was a lair in the southeast building where questioning happen. All girls were released with all of their money and no charges. However, for Jans safety she was released first. Yes Reese admited to putting money in the property for her to live there because that was true. She did live there at the time and did help set it up to fit her needs.

The reason BM is focusing on JAN is simply because people who got on this thread and PUT NAMES ON POSTS left her out. WHY DID THEY LEAVE JAN OUT BUT PUT NAMES OF OTHERS ON THERE?? Because well Jan is the only one THAT TOLD. Also because JAN is banging a well known MONGER on the boards that is not alloweed to post anymore. BM POINT TO ALL THIS IS MATTER OF FACT:

IF YOU ARE IN THIS COMMUNITY YOU. THERES A LOYALTY TO IT. WHEN YOU GET ON A POST AND START PUTTING NAMES MAKE SURE YOU PUT ALL OF THE NAMES NOT JUST THE ONES YOU WANT TO SIMPLY BECAUSE you ARE FUCKING HER.

So if the shit wants to get deep IT CAN GO THERE.

[AaaGabriel812]

So BM how deep is it getting. Do you ever stop and think before you type? Your facts are a little off, let me enlighten you.

The day (s) before the sting, Uncle Steve made an appointment to see Reese on the only phone number used to make appointments. He was using a text app but was verified as a friend and being safe by another hobbyist that had seen Reese the week before. So it must be one of two things the hobbyist had flipped or was another uncle. Uncle Steve arrived, negotiated a deal for sex for $ with Reese and then suddenly had to leave before services were provided. What is the crime BM? Prostitution dude! She was not charged that day because uncle was building his case. What is building a case, probable cause!

The day of the sting, uncle had been verified with a real phone number (not an app, drop phone or internet phone) and with two provider references, one from Milfy and the other from an unknown CMT. The screener used only the references. So all is good right? NO, but more on that later. The now verified customer was given several options of ladies to see via texts on the same phone number that Uncle had made an appointment with Reese. The ladies were told he was coming and were asked if they would see him however, he only wanted to see Candace. So what crime is being committed? Promoting prostitution. Why? Same phone number already used to commit documented previous illegal activity and multiple ladies offered to provide service. Then shortly after the sting, while at the property Reese admits that she and Candace had put thousands of $ into fixing up the house that they had just leased and was hoping the landlord would reimburse them.

So now some thoughts for the community.

Why wasn't Reese arrested for her previous meeting with uncle? Why were two ladies, one of them Jan, who you tag as the "roller", who were in rooms right next to each other, released within two hours and Reese was there for several hours. Mind you, only a prosecutor can make a deal for immunity. Uncle can say anything they want but, immunity can only be negotiated by a prosecutor and a sworn statement. The two ladies next to each other only had Uncle questioning them, no prosecutor. OOPPPPS BM there goes your theory! So community probable cause via an illegal action committed the day before, probable cause by offering multiple ladies to Uncle when he was coming to visit. Isn't it probable cause if a "Lessee" works multiple ladies out of their property?

Questions for you BM. Why don't you have the same enthusiasm to bring to the lime light the hobbyist that flipped, or the other providers that provided false verifications? Why are you focused on one person? Why are you attacking the business decisions of another service that you never use and never will use?

Now for the kicker, let's go back to Uncle involved in the sting. If the SCREENER had just taken the time to run the digits through something as simple as White Pages his real name showed up. Then if she had googled his name, guess what? He's an IMPD police officer, DUH! So the moral of this story is: If you don't screen properly you are going to get arrested. This is what happens when a screener doesn't do their job correctly and makes it easy for multiple cases of probable cause.

So BM does Knighthood come complete with sexual favors? Now how deep is it getting?

[Rch9394]

After arriving plenty early and just observing, I took the leap of faith and saw Jan this past Thursday. Let me just state upfront that all is well with her. She feels that she has been wrongly accused of flipping on Candace, but that there is a monger among us spreading that rumor for reasons she doesn't know. She does admit she was there (as was Reese) at the time Candace was busted. They were questioned and released. LE just somehow slipped through the screening process and got to Candace. In fact, Jan has reason to believe the cop saw Candace once before and didn't bust her. Anyway, that's her story and she's sticking to it.

All that aside, we had another excellent time. Fabulous GFE. She was only up north temporarily, and is only in town Tuesdays through Fridays right now. Hoping to settle in permanently somewhere south, and start advertising again on the sister site.

How do you get a hold of Jan now. I have her old txt, but not using it in case it is compromised. I sent you a PM.

[BigCat44]

After arriving plenty early and just observing, I took the leap of faith and saw Jan this past Thursday. Let me just state upfront that all is well with her. She feels that she has been wrongly accused of flipping on Candace, but that there is a monger among us spreading that rumor for reasons she doesn't know. She does admit she was there (as was Reese) at the time Candace was busted. They were questioned and released. LE just somehow slipped through the screening process and got to Candace. In fact, Jan has reason to believe the cop saw Candace once before and didn't bust her. Anyway, that's her story and she's sticking to it.

All that aside, we had another excellent time. Fabulous GFE. She was only up north temporarily, and is only in town Tuesdays through Fridays right now. Hoping to settle in permanently somewhere south, and start advertising again on the sister site.

I have sent you 2 PMs on Jan and you have not responded. We are suppose to share information on here so share it or do you have a problem with that.

[BigMack]

Let me first say that I am happy that S and W did not get busted but a simple review of the posts gives these conclusions like them or not. There were five girls in the bust and taken down to precinct. Only one of them was charged with a felony and she came on the boards and told her story with her counselors permission. According to S and W Jan admitted being there with Reese and no one was busted but one. It is safe to assume that the one who was didn't just throw her hands up and say OKAY BOYS YA GOT ME GIVE ME A FELONY. No the correct assumption would be one of the other four rolled. Now some thoughts for the community. If someone rolled once to save her ass and is still working is it safe to assume that she would roll again? Why did the other four not get busted? Is it because they were not caught doing anything in the original bust. That is a legal requirement. It this goes to trial the attorney for the defendant has the right to depose the lady who rolled and it becomes public record. OPPPPS. So why would one of the ladies who was busted roll unless she was promised immunity for prosecution when she had not been caught doing anything illegal unless she was too stupid to figure that out on her own? S and W said he had already seen one of the girls on the 25th then took a leap of faith and saw her again. Why is that a leap of faith if you had already seen her once before and nothing happened? Only Candace knows who rolled on her but again if it goes to trial the name will become public. Escorting is not a felony it is a misdemeanor and it is safe to say Candace did not out herself so someone in the group had to have rolled When that name becomes public if it does I wouldn't want to be in her shoes. Last but not least why would anyone tell the name of a girl who walked from the bust and where she is going to be soon and what site she is going to be working on? Do that kind of shit back channel in view of what happened. Have a good day all. Enjoy your week.

[Mmgeg]

After arriving plenty early and just observing, I took the leap of faith and saw Jan this past Thursday. Let me just state upfront that all is well with her. She feels that she has been wrongly accused of flipping on Candace, but that there is a monger among us spreading that rumor for reasons she doesn't know. She does admit she was there (as was Reese) at the time Candace was busted. They were questioned and released. LE just somehow slipped through the screening process and got to Candace. In fact, Jan has reason to believe the cop saw Candace once before and didn't bust her. Anyway, that's her story and she's sticking to it.

All that aside, we had another excellent time. Fabulous GFE. She was only up north temporarily, and is only in town Tuesdays through Fridays right now. Hoping to settle in permanently somewhere south, and start advertising again on the sister site.

Not a monger BTW that is spreading anything. That's coming from.

The horses mouth who pretty much should.

Know what the heck happened. But hey as they say Its that 50/50 chance right?

[MayTag4040]

I did not take it personally. I'm too old to care what others think of me. I just don't understand why you had to make an insulting comment at all. You made a comment about Mmgeg, why couldn't you just leave it at that? Your last sentence, which I guess can be interpreted different ways, was absolutely unnecessary.

I apologize to you for anything that upset you, it was not my intent. I should have worded it better but the person who sent me the message I wasn't going to answer since I did not know him but he was specific about mmgeg. And I was in error of not saying that and put it out without saying that. My wish is to put this to rest and say I apologize for any offense anyone took.

[SpinAndWin85]

Has been hit with a felony and most of us have been around long enough to know that being an escort is a misdemeanor unless someone flips on you. One might contact PM and ask the lady who came on the forum at allegedly her counsels agreement, and the one who got flipped on and hit with the felony what happened and who flipped on her. If she is being charged with a felony it means someone flipped and filed a deposition. Now whoever that was needs to be outed as she would be a danger to the ladies and the mongers in the community. The question would be if she did flip how was she not charged if she wasn't and why wasn't she arrested at the scene if she flipped. Always go to the source for info and if she wishes to divulge BC then you have your answer. As I have said before most of the ladies on here are quality and trustworthy but those who would turn on their sisters once would do it again to save their asses and so would guys if they did it once. JMO.

After arriving plenty early and just observing, I took the leap of faith and saw Jan this past Thursday. Let me just state upfront that all is well with her. She feels that she has been wrongly accused of flipping on Candace, but that there is a monger among us spreading that rumor for reasons she doesn't know. She does admit she was there (as was Reese) at the time Candace was busted. They were questioned and released. LE just somehow slipped through the screening process and got to Candace. In fact, Jan has reason to believe the cop saw Candace once before and didn't bust her. Anyway, that's her story and she's sticking to it.

All that aside, we had another excellent time. Fabulous GFE. She was only up north temporarily, and is only in town Tuesdays through Fridays right now. Hoping to settle in permanently somewhere south, and start advertising again on the sister site.

[Chelli4me]

The reason why he said what he did chelli is because of the discussion him and I had during our appt. I am and Im sure others are getting messages about wanting to make appts but not willing to be screened. These are people that have 1 post or are newbies and want to argue or lie that the text app that they sent is a verifiable phone when the screening I do, believe me will let me know. We as providers do things differently and I have been in this game for a couple years. When someone wants to be dishonest / shady I cut them off and will not move ahead with vetting. I understand how some feel a certain way about the screening process but its my rule and its clear on my ad what I need. Its for my safety as well as theirs. I do not think meant anything towards anyone else . I do not judge members that use SW or see certain providers.
Everyone has their own preference.

Yours, or anyone else's, right to do business however you wish. But you know as well as I do there is not any screening method that totally proves anything or provides absolute safety. Does screening decrease the odds of having a bad experience? Yep. T leaset for the provider. I just prefer to go with my gut feeling in any situation. I have been in this game longer than I care to admit and the one and only time I have ever gotten in a legal jam is when I did not listen to my gut. I broke a cardinal rule and tried to see a gal that appeared to be working but was not strolling, she was hanging on a corner. The other thing that got me burnt, before I knew better anyway, was paying upfront. A cash and dash, while much more likely with a SW you plan on seeing in your car, can happen at any level of this hobby. This board is full of cash and dash reports of all kinds. Or cash upfront then some dude showing up. Also have gotten burnt when paying upfront then getting lousy service, also many reports of this nature on this board. Every other service business is service first, then payment. So, now that is a cardinal rule I don't break, ever. I would never stiff a provider but have on many occasions upon getting half-assed service given half-assed payment. Now I don't know you, and do not know personally anyone that's met you, but by most accounts you are a trustworthy and excellent provider. I'm inclined to believe it. Thank-you for your comments and I wish you continued success in however you choose to conduct your business.

[Chelli4me]

I did not "insult" others. First I am very limited on who I can see. Second I didn't mention your name or anyone's else. Third, I do not know you so I can't say anything at all about you. Fourth I was I'm'ed about MMGEG specifically and not "others". Not knowing this person I did not answer him except in the generalized way that I did. I never said anyone else was involved so if you feel insulted I am sorry. I said NOTHING about any person being untrustworthy. If you feel insulted there is nothing I can ever do about you being thin skinned. You should have IMed me also instead insulting me with accusations. People know who I was talking about and it was not you.

I did not take it personally. I'm too old to care what others think of me. I just don't understand why you had to make an insulting comment at all. You made a comment about Mmgeg, why couldn't you just leave it at that? Your last sentence, which I guess can be interpreted different ways, was absolutely unnecessary.

[MayTag4040]

That you couldn't just make your statement about Mmgeg without having to insult others. You must be quite insecure.

I did not "insult" others. First I am very limited on who I can see. Second I didn't mention your name or anyone's else. Third, I do not know you so I can't say anything at all about you. Fourth I was I'm'ed about MMGEG specifically and not "others". Not knowing this person I did not answer him except in the generalized way that I did. I never said anyone else was involved so if you feel insulted I am sorry. I said NOTHING about any person being untrustworthy. If you feel insulted there is nothing I can ever do about you being thin skinned. You should have IMed me also instead insulting me with accusations. People know who I was talking about and it was not you.

[BigMack]

If you have / had such concerns, perhaps you should wait (have waited?) until those concerns were fully put to rest.

And really, she's likely the only one, now or in the future, who knows what the answers actually are.

Has been hit with a felony and most of us have been around long enough to know that being an escort is a misdemeanor unless someone flips on you. One might contact PM and ask the lady who came on the forum at allegedly her counsels agreement, and the one who got flipped on and hit with the felony what happened and who flipped on her. If she is being charged with a felony it means someone flipped and filed a deposition. Now whoever that was needs to be outed as she would be a danger to the ladies and the mongers in the community. The question would be if she did flip how was she not charged if she wasn't and why wasn't she arrested at the scene if she flipped. Always go to the source for info and if she wishes to divulge BC then you have your answer. As I have said before most of the ladies on here are quality and trustworthy but those who would turn on their sisters once would do it again to save their asses and so would guys if they did it once. JMO.

[FrazzleSnazzle]

I was fortunate enough to see Jan back on the 25th before all the observed LE activity reported in this forum. I texted with her recently. She's now moved north and I'm planning to see her tomorrow. That is, unless any of you have heard that she's flipped or something in light of the aforementioned activity observed outside her former south side location. Any new updates on that front? I sincerely hope she's still legit, because she is a wonderful provider!

If you have / had such concerns, perhaps you should wait (have waited?) until those concerns were fully put to rest.

And really, she's likely the only one, now or in the future, who knows what the answers actually are.

[Drof1]

I was fortunate enough to see Jan back on the 25th before all the observed LE activity reported in this forum. I texted with her recently. She's now moved north and I'm planning to see her tomorrow. That is, unless any of you have heard that she's flipped or something in light of the aforementioned activity observed outside her former south side location. Any new updates on that front? I sincerely hope she's still legit, because she is a wonderful provider!

Is she advertising anywhere? Her email address doesn't work anymore. Thanks.

[Mmgeg]

That you couldn't just make your statement about Mmgeg without having to insult others. You must be quite insecure.

The reason why he said what he did chelli is because of the discussion him and I had during our appt. I am and I’m sure others are getting messages about wanting to make appts but not willing to be screened. These are people that have 1 post or are newbies and want to argue or lie that the text app that they sent is a verifiable phone when the screening I do, believe me will let me know. We as providers do things differently and I have been in this game for a couple years. When someone wants to be dishonest / shady I cut them off and will not move ahead with vetting. I understand how some feel a certain way about the screening process but it’s my rule and it’s clear on my ad what I need. It’s for my safety as well as theirs.

I do not think meant anything towards anyone else . I do not judge members that use SW or see certain providers.
Everyone has their own preference.