Massage Parlor Reports

[MrFunTime222]

Does anyone know of any good spots in Cambridge?

[Jon Gris]

I think I agree with most people who posted. I try to respect their opinion if the session was good or okay. If they try and scam me rush me on time or play any of the other games they play then sorry all bets are off. A lot of providers handle everyone differently. I for one have seen providers expecting based upon intel say just a HE then for me it has been a FS session. One provider actually started texting me when she was not working and I saw her outside of the Spa. Then on the other hand I have went to a place that was mentioned on here as FS and for me it was a rush job HE with a FS tip expected. I have also had providers ask me not to review and I respect their wishes then I see a bunch of reviews on them.

[Neddd]

If she's a ripoff with a really terrible service, I'm not going to hide her scam. If she's neutral or good, I won't post if she doesn't want.

I have to agree, There are a lot of terrible providers out there and mongers should at least know about them. They're a waste of time and $. This forum is a great way to inform others. I would alert people to a phone scam and an MP scam artist is just as bad. If a good provider asks me not to post I won't.

If nothing is mentioned and I think she is good I'll write in her favor and discreetly. Of course.

[Nrlmus]

Lots of thoughtful responses. Certainly no consensus. My thoughts: If I give my word not to post then I never, ever would go back on that. If the service was average or below average or terrible then I would not agree to begin with. If the service was exceptional anyone, whether being asked or not, would be nuts to post, because it would be a sure fire way to get the place shut down. I've been doing this long enough to see dozens of places that gave more than standard be shut down on the north shore over the years. Places in Stoneham and Wilmington and Reading and Dracut and Andover and North Andover just in the past couple of years. I still miss many of them.

This is how I see it. You got to use common sense in regards to your word promises. If the service was bad, or bait & switch, or say one and do the other I'd be writing her up. If she asks you in advance for no reviews and then fucks you (figuratively speaking) you'd definitely hear about her here. My word means nothing if it was gotten out of me as a part of the scheme. I you're trying to fuck me up I'd promise you the world.

If on the other hand they're at least ok, and I don't feel like I just experienced anything sinister and they ask me not to write about them it's as good as done. I forgot how many UTRs I had telling me not to talk about them on the web only to find somebody else posting about them later.

[HappyDave]

Lots of thoughtful responses. Certainly no consensus. My thoughts: If I give my word not to post then I never, ever would go back on that. If the service was average or below average or terrible then I would not agree to begin with. If the service was exceptional anyone, whether being asked or not, would be nuts to post, because it would be a sure fire way to get the place shut down. I've been doing this long enough to see dozens of places that gave more than standard be shut down on the north shore over the years. Places in Stoneham and Wilmington and Reading and Dracut and Andover and North Andover just in the past couple of years. I still miss many of them.

Towns you mention do not tolerate AMPs well. Quincy Waltham Watertown and others have had well reviewed AMPs since the beginning of time. Visually it seems the high Asian populations are were they are more accepted. Towns you mention along with Needham, Dedham, Westwoood and others they do not last long. Newton they are growing as is the Asian population of the city. One AMP in Newton did get busted, it was in a very tight residential area and it appeared a disgruntled customer ratted them out. Other than that most of the places that were around when I started this are still there.

[OlmanDriver]

What is the consensus here when a provider pleads with you not to post any report on the "internet" and would especially great or especially bad service influence your actions?

Lots of thoughtful responses. Certainly no consensus. My thoughts: If I give my word not to post then I never, ever would go back on that. If the service was average or below average or terrible then I would not agree to begin with. If the service was exceptional anyone, whether being asked or not, would be nuts to post, because it would be a sure fire way to get the place shut down. I've been doing this long enough to see dozens of places that gave more than standard be shut down on the north shore over the years. Places in Stoneham and Wilmington and Reading and Dracut and Andover and North Andover just in the past couple of years. I still miss many of them.

[Plyfun]

Are there any asian Apt, places close to the south shore? I'm on the cape and looking for something close bye, I know I might have to go up to wey or qui for this. Options? Suggestions? Feel free to PM me thanks in advance, like to get back into it.

[TheIceGuy]

What is the consensus here when a provider pleads with you not to post any report on the "internet" and would especially great or especially bad service influence your actions?

If she's a ripoff with a really terrible service, I'm not going to hide her scam. If she's neutral or good, I won't post if she doesn't want.

[Admin2]

What is the consensus here when a provider pleads with you not to post any report on the "internet" and would especially great or especially bad service influence your actions?

Did she make an issue of it beforehand? Did I agree? (no fucking way I would but I'm speaking in general).

If not, then I would most likely pull out my phone while I was laying next to her in bed and post the review. If she was bad I would for damn sure do it exactly like that.

I'm not a dick to providers, I have a lot of good friends in the biz, but I won't give up the power of the pen, chicks who badger you to do or not do anything are looking to see if you will follow orders. If you do, guaranteed 100% the next session will be worse.

A2.

[HappyDave]

This is the same way that I treat it. Most AMP shops with high turnover beg for a review, solo practitioners usually prefer to build a loyal base. Why honor an agreement not to review if the experience is not up to "their" own advertisement. I only rate by what's in their ad rather than against what a random review says is to be expected.

This site has a commercial side like BP and CL so it would not be much of a jump to land here. That said in MA it's not moving much. Would be nice if it was like RM or the now shut down SH. Were a monger submits the location info and photo, then others add reviews. Sure would help getting clear Intel with a visual time. The forums are so cryptic that searches are tough.

[Daddy Big Dick]

What is the consensus here when a provider pleads with you not to post any report on the "internet" and would especially great or especially bad service influence your actions?

If she pleads with me not to post about her online, I'll respect that regardless of how good or bad the service was. If she rips me off, robs me etc, then all bets are off.

[HappyDave]

OD, With the basis of your inquiry, you seem to be assuming that the provider is aware of this particular site. Especially where you mention the general internet. Unless you are in love with the provider and / or place, share your experience good or bad here. You can save certain details for pm's if you need to. Do you really think the providers don't share info about us when we ask them not to with other providers? The idiots who mention and inform an unknowing provider about this specific site are the problem when that occurs. That is when all of the drama begins.

I had often been to providers an seen CL or NO on the screen, they seemed to post a lot when business is slow. If you Google names or addresses this site and others pop up with info. Google just a phone number and RM ad pops up. Recently I was shown a RM ad by the provider. And proof almost positive they read reviews. I don't know how many times a post of a girl at Admiral or NMS on the RI board was made of a girl offering more than the standard menu would quickly be gone. I have been asked many times if I found out about them by. Internet. This is our hobby but it's there business. I am sure a lot of them monitor the site and can even tell who some of us are by those posts.

[OlGary]

What is the consensus here when a provider pleads with you not to post any report on the "internet" and would especially great or especially bad service influence your actions?

There is no any specific report protocol. LOL! Normally, I would not post a review if I was asked by the provider not to post a report. However, I would certainly put her on blast if STI is involved.

[PadMe5]

If I have a bad or mediocre experience I will post here regardless. If she is exceptional and asks me not to post a review online and I agree, I will honor my word and not post it publicly. I will however share it in a PM with senior members if I think she is what they are looking for.

This is the same way that I treat it. Most AMP shops with high turnover beg for a review, solo practitioners usually prefer to build a loyal base. Why honor an agreement not to review if the experience is not up to "their" own advertisement. I only rate by what's in their ad rather than against what a random review says is to be expected.

[Fuhgetaboudit]

OD, With the basis of your inquiry, you seem to be assuming that the provider is aware of this particular site. Especially where you mention the general internet. Unless you are in love with the provider and / or place, share your experience good or bad here. You can save certain details for pm's if you need to. Do you really think the providers don't share info about us when we ask them not to with other providers? The idiots who mention and inform an unknowing provider about this specific site are the problem when that occurs. That is when all of the drama begins.

What is the consensus here when a provider pleads with you not to post any report on the "internet" and would especially great or especially bad service influence your actions?