NoVA SugarBabies

[SkyBB]

Oh this is absolutely true! Once you weed out the GPS there are some truly stellar women that really focus much more on exploring their sexual horizons. The cash is incidental. Ironically I'm more likely to want to help then even though the money isn't as important.

Yeeesss I completely agree. I have had a bad run of meeting way too many women with GPS recently ever since my ATF sadly moved away. If they only knew that I am MUCH more likely to help out and do more if they didn't put such an overvalued premium on what they have to offer. I've had some amazing experiences without having to break the bank or put up with a shitty attitude and know it's possible to find that again. As painful and tempting as it is sometimes, I can be a stubbornly patient person. LOL.

[Member #6951]

Frequently, the location does help to give some insight but I will say that I've had home runs in the wealthier / privileged areas because there's just something about women who were coddled and treated like true princesses their entire life that make them want to do something "naughty" in their early 20's.

Oh this is absolutely true! Once you weed out the GPS there are some truly stellar women that really focus much more on exploring their sexual horizons. The cash is incidental. Ironically I'm more likely to want to help then even though the money isn't as important.

[BookerTNelson]

Has anyone else noticed how a girl's location can often be a predictor or outcome? A few observations:

- girls from Potomac or McLean almost always tend to be either scammers or GPS. My guess is scammers choose those locations because they are known as high-wealth areas.

- half the women that list DC as their location don't actually live there. Many seem to actually be in Maryland.

- the closer in, the more likely (though not always) you will need to get a hotel because she has a roommate.

- girls from Tyson's often tend to be UTR or just visiting.

Frequently, the location does help to give some insight but I will say that I've had home runs in the wealthier / privileged areas because there's just something about women who were coddled and treated like true princesses their entire life that make them want to do something "naughty" in their early 20's.

[CoolPix]

Has anyone else noticed how a girl's location can often be a predictor or outcome? A few observations:

- girls from Potomac or McLean almost always tend to be either scammers or GPS. My guess is scammers choose those locations because they are known as high-wealth areas.

- half the women that list DC as their location don't actually live there. Many seem to actually be in Maryland.

- the closer in, the more likely (though not always) you will need to get a hotel because she has a roommate.

- girls from Tyson's often tend to be UTR or just visiting.

Don't know about you but my experience is that they tend to want more in terms of allowance as well. It's the main reason I play in the RVA area.

[Member #6951]

Has anyone else noticed how a girl's location can often be a predictor or outcome? A few observations:

- girls from Potomac or McLean almost always tend to be either scammers or GPS. My guess is scammers choose those locations because they are known as high-wealth areas.

- half the women that list DC as their location don't actually live there. Many seem to actually be in Maryland.

- the closer in, the more likely (though not always) you will need to get a hotel because she has a roommate.

- girls from Tyson's often tend to be UTR or just visiting.

[MonkeyDoc]

https://www.seekingarrangement.com/m...8-b88055e076fc

DTF for $.

[Member #6951]

Activity levels have picked up significantly on SA this week. Not sure what it is. May be a combination of holiday travel and midsummer finances needing a boost. A lot of very active messaging and profiling from the ladies directly as well. It almost makes me wish I had paced myself in the spring and early summer. But no regrets!!

I'm also seeing a new common practice from otherwise "real" girls (not pros). Basically sales techniques being used to "close the deal". High pressure, pushing for quick decisions based on seemingly arbitrary deadlines, a little bit of not so subtle aggressiveness. Makes me think it is coming from some advice guide or blog. Though in a couple of my cases conversation and oppo research reveals they are actually in sales. (And I do tend to go for the smart and assertive types, so I get what I deserve.).

Going the opposite way, had a M&G with a POT last night. Gorgeous thin innocent looking thing, though she dressed very sexy with an appreciated amount of cleavage. It was a fine M&G but I can just kind of tell it won't be sparks. I was interested in her but not blown away and she seemed to either be the same or just too shy. A hard one to read. So I am struggling with whether to press on or just let her go. I have done this long enough to know you really can't force it. But at the same time she might be one of the top girls I could pull, and I have this arrogant sense that I could just unlock her. Sigh. Not looking for feedback per se, but I know my brothers can empathize.

[BookerTNelson]

Pardon my naivete and that I am posting this here, which may not be the appropriate place.

BUT.

I had always assumed that gals on seekingarrangement required long term commitments. What I am seeing in this thread is that some or most are available for one-shot deals or simple, repeated meetings? I had also assumed that they would be expensive as shit. (Can I assume that $ means 100 USD? Is that also correct?) Anyway. I had assumed they would be a minimum of like $$ but it seems that many can be banged for $$ or $$ ?

Just trying to figure things out (and maybe being slow to do to, sorry). I am especially curious as, with the recent loss of many escort / review sites I am trying to find other ways to find partners.

My experience has been that you can find a bit of everything on SA. I like per meets and had had success with having that run consistently for 1-3 months but they'd still be up for some fun down the line.

[MonkeyDoc]

Anyone know of any good slim Indian or Middle Eastern girl in the area? They are so hard to find. PM me.

[CoolPix]

Pardon my naivete and that I am posting this here, which may not be the appropriate place.

BUT.

I had always assumed that gals on seekingarrangement required long term commitments. What I am seeing in this thread is that some or most are available for one-shot deals or simple, repeated meetings? I had also assumed that they would be expensive as shit. (Can I assume that $ means 100 USD? Is that also correct?) Anyway. I had assumed they would be a minimum of like $$ but it seems that many can be banged for $$ or $$ ?

Just trying to figure things out (and maybe being slow to do to, sorry). I am especially curious as, with the recent loss of many escort / review sites I am trying to find other ways to find partners.

I've only been on SA for about six months and I'm sure the dynamics have changed quite a bit over the years. That being said, my experience has shown me that just about every type of arrangement is available, but you have your work cut out for you in finding exactly what you want.

I thought I wanted a long term deal but after my 4th SB, I realized I enjoyed the dance as much as the arrangement. I've got two SBs I see on a regular basis while I search for the next ATF. There are brothers here who claim to have SBs that expect no allowance whatsoever and I believe most of them. I had a very good friend while on active duty who was the goofiest looking fucker but the dude could pick up the best looking women so I know some of our brothers are pulling it off on SA.

As for allowance, I think it depends upon location. Here in the NOVA and DC, the SBs can get a bit unreasonable. But do your due diligence and you can fin whatever suits your taste and budget. So the answer to your question is, yes to all of the above.

Happy hunting.

[Member #6951]

Pardon my naivete and that I am posting this here, which may not be the appropriate place.

BUT.

I had always assumed that gals on seekingarrangement required long term commitments. What I am seeing in this thread is that some or most are available for one-shot deals or simple, repeated meetings? I had also assumed that they would be expensive as shit. (Can I assume that $ means 100 USD? Is that also correct?) Anyway. I had assumed they would be a minimum of like $$ but it seems that many can be banged for $$ or $$ ?

Just trying to figure things out (and maybe being slow to do to, sorry). I am especially curious as, with the recent loss of many escort / review sites I am trying to find other ways to find partners.

It all depends. There's a long thread on the topic in the Richmond board. Read it.

Many are long term. Many are pricey or think they are. Plenty of short term. And everything is negotiable. Just have to put in the time and respect that people are on there looking for different things.

[BasketCase]

Pardon my naivete and that I am posting this here, which may not be the appropriate place.

BUT.

I had always assumed that gals on seekingarrangement required long term commitments. What I am seeing in this thread is that some or most are available for one-shot deals or simple, repeated meetings? I had also assumed that they would be expensive as shit. (Can I assume that $ means 100 USD? Is that also correct?) Anyway. I had assumed they would be a minimum of like $$ but it seems that many can be banged for $$ or $$ ?

Just trying to figure things out (and maybe being slow to do to, sorry). I am especially curious as, with the recent loss of many escort / review sites I am trying to find other ways to find partners.

[MonkeyDoc]

Looking at this work of art.

Anyone been in contact with her?

https://www.seekingarrangement.com/m...a-e91c364b5a8c

Tribute:

https://www.seekingarrangement.com/m...9-ae6cac4b9697

Cool chick, studying massage therapy, likes to go hard. Can verify dtf first date, gift was unspoken as I just gave her what I though I could get away with after first date. That continued for 3 more dates over 6 months and now she ghosted. Nice memories.

Talked to her some time back. This was her copy / pasta reply:

I need to apologize that I do not have the SA app that could allow us exchange messages as swiftly as possible that's why I'm hardly on here. Due to my currently situation, I'm not in possession of my mobile phone, I'm chatting with you from the desktop site with a desktop computer. I hope you kindly understand. I like your profile, it is straight forward and transparent and I hope we can be able to get to know each other by exchanging letters for a while before planning to meet each other for a mutually beneficial arrangement and more. Here's my email xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx@gmail.com.

Thanks.

Sounds like spam / scam, so never continued.

[ChrisCarr]

Looking at this work of art.

Anyone been in contact with her?

https://www.seekingarrangement.com/m...a-e91c364b5a8c

Tribute:

https://www.seekingarrangement.com/m...9-ae6cac4b9697

Cool chick, studying massage therapy, likes to go hard. Can verify dtf first date, gift was unspoken as I just gave her what I though I could get away with after first date. That continued for 3 more dates over 6 months and now she ghosted. Nice memories.

[BlueDrive]

Corresponded with this one a couple of times, but I don't think I'm going to take the plunge, mostly because I think her quote of between $$$ and $$ $$ is a bit steep for my taste. Maybe I'm just cheap, but it'd have to be unique situation with someone I'm a lot more attracted to and / or with more on the menu. She clearly stated no greek BTW. She seems like she wants to get straight to the meet and isn't interested in much communication or answering many questions ahead of time. Another red flag for me. With all of this said, she may be a great fit for someone else, but I'll leave that up to ya'll to decide. Good luck out there guys.

https://www.seekingarrangement.com/m...8-d8a9e2fa65af

Soooo possibly dreamt on this one, location is way out there, extremely sketchy getting in there (out in the woods) and the place is odd. She was nice enough, shy, lots of limitations and not sure I would have a dream again.