Massage Parlor Reports

[Jafo1968]

Anyone been to the new place on main st cambridge? Ad is on CL looks good, but didn't know if anyone has toftt?

Happy hunting.

[SixPacking]

No need to take it personal, we all have our preferences, and I'm always willing to share, that's the point of these forums! Angela at CB Waltham and Coco in Framingham were both much cuter than Sara at 90 B, but I don't know if either is still working. So is anyone at 1060 (all more real, less plastic-looking and makeup, but also less done up). Tulip in Brookline occasionally has a real looker (4 years ago they had an Angela that was my ATF for looks, only 9/10 I've ever met, but they rotate fast). Then there's always taking the drive to RI for clubs and spas when things are dry up here (clubs if you want a real looker for 15 min). Used to be a huge fan of Opulence down there before they shut down. I'm still on the lookout for my ideal masseuse and don't have a current "real world 8/10," but that's no reason to stop the hunt.

I'm not into "extra extras," so yes, I realize that I am demanding when it comes to looks and then massage skill as a distant second. Sara is very sensual (if you like her, you'd like Angie at Spa Tao who is similar in attractiveness- teeth aren't great) and does have a great body in a mini-skirt that feels really nice when she's crawling all over the table (all that was great). If you're looking for that extra thing, I agree that she'd be a good deal for some. With the dim lights and two beers, I could see her being a 7+ or more in looks. Her ponytail is long and cute as well, but she's got an older face (GILF?) with a receding hair line. Not my thing. I hope you understand. Since I'm not interested in the mileage she may provide, and since her massage skills were just OK to good, her looks weren't enough to bring me back. She was very nice.

If anyone can recommend true stunners who provide a limited massage, I'd be appreciative! It sounds like Miss Venice is the way to go, but I prefer fixed locations with a store front.

Wish I could help you here. It seems exceptionally rare to find an 8+ in these places and someone like Angela at Cherry is basically unheard of. My problem with Angela was she was so hot that I just couldn't see her with her limited menu, it was frustrating for someone like me who always is on the hunt for FS. Based on your own desires (Pretty, HJ, no FS) I can see how she was perfect.

While it is rare to get both, really hot and FS, it would happen with some frequency at 195. Going thru my archives I recall Jennifer and Shirley, plus more, who were easy 8's and FS. Sadly those days are lost forever.

[OlGary]

No need to take it personal, we all have our preferences, and I'm always willing to share, that's the point of these forums! Angela at CB Waltham and Coco in Framingham were both much cuter than Sara at 90 B, but I don't know if either is still working. So is anyone at 1060 (all more real, less plastic-looking and makeup, but also less done up). Tulip in Brookline occasionally has a real looker (4 years ago they had an Angela that was my ATF for looks, only 9/10 I've ever met, but they rotate fast). Then there's always taking the drive to RI for clubs and spas when things are dry up here (clubs if you want a real looker for 15 min). Used to be a huge fan of Opulence down there before they shut down. I'm still on the lookout for my ideal masseuse and don't have a current "real world 8/10," but that's no reason to stop the hunt.

I'm not into "extra extras," so yes, I realize that I am demanding when it comes to looks and then massage skill as a distant second. Sara is very sensual (if you like her, you'd like Angie at Spa Tao who is similar in attractiveness- teeth aren't great) and does have a great body in a mini-skirt that feels really nice when she's crawling all over the table (all that was great). If you're looking for that extra thing, I agree that she'd be a good deal for some. With the dim lights and two beers, I could see her being a 7+ or more in looks. Her ponytail is long and cute as well, but she's got an older face (GILF?) with a receding hair line. Not my thing. I hope you understand. Since I'm not interested in the mileage she may provide, and since her massage skills were just OK to good, her looks weren't enough to bring me back. She was very nice.

If anyone can recommend true stunners who provide a limited massage, I'd be appreciative! It sounds like Miss Venice is the way to go, but I prefer fixed locations with a store front.

C'Mon. Man, you misinterpreted the tone of my comments. I apologize if I sounded too aggressive, I didn't mean to be offensive.

[Griswold]

I visited Sunshine in Cambridge (2464 Mass Ave). It was OK. Nothing special, and I probably won't repeat (or at least go out of my way to get there again). Very vanilla, uninspired soft massage, albeit with lots of teasing from the start (after I answered "soft" to her question about whether I wanted hard or soft). She did whip out the girls for me to play with, but batted my hand away when I tried to go through the long skirt. She did not use any oil on the boys, until I asked for it. She played just outside the back door, but did not enter. After mission accomplished, it was about 10 more minutes of an uninspired rub. One really weird thing was that she held the boys in the cup of her hand, from beginning to end, but it really didn't add anything. She just held them. Her efforts would have been better if she had used two hands all over. After climax, she used alcohol to clean around my groin, and then left a tissue on Mr. Thomas. At the very end, she leaned over and kissed the little guy (which was covered with a tissue). Overall, weird and uninspired. Not a repeat.

[Fnm123]

You guys will laugh at me but I found myself in CT late night and the only place I knew was open was 40 Harrison so I figured might as well try it once. Got there right around closing time 11 pm. They took me but were in a rush. Drew a chubbier girl who had glasses and a mod haircut with bangs like Pulp Fiction or something. And no way UTC because she had undershirt tucked tight into shorts and she kept mentioning "No because boss. " Standard TS, below average quick massage, below average HE rushed and mechanical. 60+40 because they wouldn't let me buy just 30 minutes.

That place is a factory. Not going back even in a pinch.

I need to find a better CT location or take the plunge and try AAMPs downtown.

[TCollins]

Adams has very good talent right now. I would recommend Candy. I have not been to Waverly in a while any good recommendations there? Asking for a friend!

[AmpExplorer]

Masseuse: Sara.

AMP Looks: 6/10.

Real World: 4/10.

Time paid: 30 min.

Time given: 40 min.

Cost: . 4.

Tip: standard.

Facility: Kind of sketchy, but clean seeming and warm.

Repeat: No.

Notes:

With all the hype, I stopped by on an evening hoping to see a beautiful, older masseuse in a nice uniform. I did not find Sara to be very attractive. What people say about the uniform is true, and she has great legs for her age, but I will not be repeating. I don't doubt the reports about extras here after multiple visits, but that's not my thing. Parking down the street is super easy and it is discrete at night, but sketchier seeming at night too. She dims the lights to great effect and has a very warm personality, but she is older and her hair is receding a little.

The ambivalence of posting a good report. RTF leads to further exploration and corroboration. The intel seems solid. So many will take a visit to see for them self. The place and provider feel the influx of business maybe with short term increase in their cash business. Human nature takes over soon and give less for more $. Local business may or may not like the extra street traffic depending on the local area. More reports will be posting possibly saying the service is less due to either fear of provider or "dues / mult visits gets more access. Then buisness may drop off if the place "has jumped the shark". Then a few months later you read it is easier to get again.

Please delete first.

Report if posted twice.

[AmpExplorer]

Masseuse: Sara.

AMP Looks: 6/10.

Real World: 4/10.

Time paid: 30 min.

Time given: 40 min.

Cost: . 4.

Tip: standard.

Facility: Kind of sketchy, but clean seeming and warm.

Repeat: No.

Notes:

With all the hype, I stopped by on an evening hoping to see a beautiful, older masseuse in a nice uniform. I did not find Sara to be very attractive. What people say about the uniform is true, and she has great legs for her age, but I will not be repeating. I don't doubt the reports about extras here after multiple visits, but that's not my thing. Parking down the street is super easy and it is discrete at night, but sketchier seeming at night too. She dims the lights to great effect and has a very warm personality, but she is older and her hair is receding a little.

The ambivalence of posting a good report. RTF leads to further exploration and corroboration. The intel seems solid. So many will take a visit to see for them self. The place and provider feel the influx of business maybe with short term increase in their cash business. Human nature takes over soon and give less for more $. Local business may or may not like the extra street traffic depending on the local area. More reports will be posting possibly saying the service is less due to either fear of provider or "dues / mult visits gets more access.

[Jack A Dogov]

Stopped into Lotus in Danvers as a walk in. I asked if Suzy was still there but unfortunately she isn't. My masseuse was Gia. Pretty girl with a very friendly and fun personality. Very good English too. Good hard massage which bordered on painful at times but it was just what I needed. She mixed in a fair amount of teasing. Nice ST and she told me to flip when I wanted. She has an interesting technique on the finish and while it's nothing more than what is usually available here, it was done very well. Suzy may no longer be there but Gia is a nice replacement and I will repeat with her.

[PadMe5]

Wow, man, you are so demanding! I am curious how your AMP 8/10 or 9/10 look like and where you get them in Bostonian suburbs. Care to share a name or two?

No need to take it personal, we all have our preferences, and I'm always willing to share, that's the point of these forums! Angela at CB Waltham and Coco in Framingham were both much cuter than Sara at 90 B, but I don't know if either is still working. So is anyone at 1060 (all more real, less plastic-looking and makeup, but also less done up). Tulip in Brookline occasionally has a real looker (4 years ago they had an Angela that was my ATF for looks, only 9/10 I've ever met, but they rotate fast). Then there's always taking the drive to RI for clubs and spas when things are dry up here (clubs if you want a real looker for 15 min). Used to be a huge fan of Opulence down there before they shut down. I'm still on the lookout for my ideal masseuse and don't have a current "real world 8/10," but that's no reason to stop the hunt.

I'm not into "extra extras," so yes, I realize that I am demanding when it comes to looks and then massage skill as a distant second. Sara is very sensual (if you like her, you'd like Angie at Spa Tao who is similar in attractiveness- teeth aren't great) and does have a great body in a mini-skirt that feels really nice when she's crawling all over the table (all that was great). If you're looking for that extra thing, I agree that she'd be a good deal for some. With the dim lights and two beers, I could see her being a 7+ or more in looks. Her ponytail is long and cute as well, but she's got an older face (GILF?) with a receding hair line. Not my thing. I hope you understand. Since I'm not interested in the mileage she may provide, and since her massage skills were just OK to good, her looks weren't enough to bring me back. She was very nice.

If anyone can recommend true stunners who provide a limited massage, I'd be appreciative! It sounds like Miss Venice is the way to go, but I prefer fixed locations with a store front.

[Floatinglife]

Agree completely, my experience was identical, including the odd post finish massage holding my package in one hand and rubbing the length of my leg with the other. Will not repeat, BBBJ was all teeth, and disjointed with constant stopping to kiss my legs and nuts. Kudos to those that enjoy her service, not for me though.

Which 569, Boylston or Cambridge St or? Is Mia at this place!

Float.

[OlGary]

AMP Looks: 6/10.

Real World: 4/10.

Wow, man, you are so demanding! I am curious how your AMP 8/10 or 9/10 look like and where you get them in Bostonian suburbs. Care to share a name or two?

[PadMe5]

Masseuse: Sara.

AMP Looks: 6/10.

Real World: 4/10.

Time paid: 30 min.

Time given: 40 min.

Cost: . 4.

Tip: standard.

Facility: Kind of sketchy, but clean seeming and warm.

Repeat: No.

Notes:

With all the hype, I stopped by on an evening hoping to see a beautiful, older masseuse in a nice uniform. I did not find Sara to be very attractive. What people say about the uniform is true, and she has great legs for her age, but I will not be repeating. I don't doubt the reports about extras here after multiple visits, but that's not my thing. Parking down the street is super easy and it is discrete at night, but sketchier seeming at night too. She dims the lights to great effect and has a very warm personality, but she is older and her hair is receding a little.

[Motoman36]

Anyone been to 157 LATELY? I saw Angela in Danvers shop couple weeks ago & she said Lola & a younger provider were working in Malden shop. Been a while for me there. Any comments anyone?

MM.

[Motoman36]

In revere I have been to 7 Foster Street, Holistic and Julia's electric revolution. For years I have seen the multiple vague other adds for waxing, facials, massage, etc. Does anyone know if any of these places offer anything we are interested in?

Thanks,

DP.

Julia's is beyond horrible. Can't answer your Q but I've been to 333 Broadway and the one advertising as near Shirley Ave. , it's an AAMP. Both not worth bothering with.

MM.