BackPage Advertiser Reviews

**PasionMmx** · 01-22-18 03:02

Originally Posted by HarryPlopper [View Original Post]

AMEN. Can we all agree "TRUE GFE" is DFK, BBBJ and BBFS? Otherwise we should say she was "not quite GFE" for DFK, BBBJ and CFS.

Based upon most of my interactions with most of the Advertisers they are "not quite GFE". Which is fine for most people. When I find a TRUE GFE, I usually scream to the heavens and play the lottery it is so rare. LOL.

Stay Safe.

Harry P.

We should all agree on certain terminology to clarify. In Miami, GFE was BBBJ and CFS, and Ultra GFE was BBBJ and BBFS. I like your suggestions, but I feel like "not quite GFE" is a little negative and will cause white knights to show up, or even girls to defend themselves in the USA review board. "Not quite GFE? You didn't say that when we were LFK!" We need more positive terms.

**TimDrake1234** · 01-22-18 02:50

I agree with you all the way.

Originally Posted by HarryPlopper [View Original Post]

AMEN. Can we all agree "TRUE GFE" is DFK, BBBJ and BBFS? Otherwise we should say she was "not quite GFE" for DFK, BBBJ and CFS.

Based upon most of my interactions with most of the Advertisers they are "not quite GFE". Which is fine for most people. When I find a TRUE GFE, I usually scream to the heavens and play the lottery it is so rare. LOL.

Stay Safe.

Harry P.

**Jjones3** · 01-21-18 23:28

Originally Posted by HarryPlopper [View Original Post]

AMEN. Can we all agree "TRUE GFE" is DFK, BBBJ and BBFS? Otherwise we should say she was "not quite GFE" for DFK, BBBJ and CFS.

Based upon most of my interactions with most of the Advertisers they are "not quite GFE". Which is fine for most people. When I find a TRUE GFE, I usually scream to the heavens and play the lottery it is so rare. LOL.

Stay Safe.

Harry P.

When I expetience GFE I run like hell! I've been offered BBFS too many times, and that to me is a red flag. DFK, not for me. GFE is what I'm trying to avoid. No emotional strings. Reciprocal. Otherwise, you're only fooling yourself. To each their own I guess.

**Jjones3** · 01-21-18 23:09

Was in orlando on business and gave backpage girl with title above a try. $$ for hour, but when arrived girl said same price for 30 minutes nude. I advised that was fine. Not same girl as pics, but nice body. Couldn't tell age. Talked alot. Bad massage. DATY. Offered prostate thing, which was a no from me. She said no FS but then put on cover and laid on her back. Entrance was extremely challenging. She appeared uncomfortable, but tried to fake her way through it. Ok experience. Might repeat in a pinch. Repeatedly advised she normally doesn't do FS, but who knows. YMMV.

**Putzy** · 01-21-18 22:03

That would my definition too. Everything bare for GFE. That, and non-stop nagging and never being able to decide where to go for dinner. 3.

Originally Posted by HarryPlopper [View Original Post]

AMEN. Can we all agree "TRUE GFE" is DFK, BBBJ and BBFS? Otherwise we should say she was "not quite GFE" for DFK, BBBJ and CFS.

Based upon most of my interactions with most of the Advertisers they are "not quite GFE". Which is fine for most people. When I find a TRUE GFE, I usually scream to the heavens and play the lottery it is so rare. LOL.

Stay Safe.

Harry P.

**Harry Plopper** · 01-21-18 21:18

Originally Posted by HeyFlint [View Original Post]

To clarify the post I was replying to said that he got CBJ and no GFE which meant his definition of GFE was something like DFK, DTY, or cuddling. My definition of GFE is at minimum BBJ and could include BBFS. Ana does not do BBJ nor BBFS. I was saying I got GFE based on his definition.

GFE is the most unclear acronym out there. Everyone seems to have their own meaning. When it first came out and how I still define it is as everything uncovered or at least BBJ. I don't know of anyone whos girlfriend blows him with a wrapper. LOL, if there was a case like that then I don't think she even considered him a friend.

I wish people would stop using GFE and just spell it out to prevent misunderstanding.

AMEN. Can we all agree "TRUE GFE" is DFK, BBBJ and BBFS? Otherwise we should say she was "not quite GFE" for DFK, BBBJ and CFS.

Based upon most of my interactions with most of the Advertisers they are "not quite GFE". Which is fine for most people. When I find a TRUE GFE, I usually scream to the heavens and play the lottery it is so rare. LOL.

Stay Safe.

Harry P.

**PedroRulz** · 01-21-18 20:14

If it's the one that looks to good to be true with a -2212 phone number, she is awesome. No longer a blonde.

But a brunette, an outstanding ass that won't quit, ate that like groceries and hit it.

Originally Posted by FredaGroper [View Original Post]

Can anyone vouch for this one?

http://orlando.backpage.com/WomenSee...-1870/28836147

Her pics / video look great but to me not so amazing that she could in fact be legit.

**CasualPlay** · 01-21-18 19:38

Originally Posted by Dlaun [View Original Post]

I am a sucker for Asians so I decided to give this one a shot. Going in I knew the pics would be fake and she would be older than the age listed in the ad, just figured I would leave if she wasn't attractive. So I get there and it was very dark in the room, so she looked good enough to stay. She was closer to 40 than 23 though. Very mechanical performance, in and out in 20 minutes. The thing that upset me the most was the ad is very clear that GFE and bbj is open, well not true either, everything covered. I will definitely not be repeating this one. Location was just off of I-drive, and damage was 140 coins for hh.

http://orlando.backpage.com/WomenSee...-6896/28957832

I almost got fooled by it's ad. If it's too good to be true then it's probably not. Thanks for the review.

**Master77** · 01-21-18 17:40

I've noticed Gianna's pics are linked to a new number: (813)**6141. Does anybody know if she's actually back in Orlando? I'd like to play with them puppies!!

http://orlando.backpage.com/WomenSee...-6141/29128672

**OkokListenNow** · 01-21-18 09:14

Has anyone seen this one?

https://escortbabylon.net/#orlando / post /4075350701/25586405/25586405.

**ShokDJ** · 01-21-18 02:27

Originally Posted by FredaGroper [View Original Post]

Can anyone vouch for this one?

http://orlando.backpage.com/WomenSee...-1870/28836147

Her pics / video look great but to me not so amazing that she could in fact be legit.

The link is down.

**Member #5739** · 01-20-18 14:17

Originally Posted by Miahdog [View Original Post]

Smart man. Black girl pretending to be asian. WTF.

Hold on. I may be interested but I want to know what I'm getting. Is she "mulatto" or is she "black". I thought mulatto means mixed with typical mixed hair texture, features, and hair texture. Just want to make sure if I go she is what I expect?

**Freda Groper** · 01-20-18 09:53

Can anyone vouch for this one?

http://orlando.backpage.com/WomenSee...-1870/28836147

Her pics / video look great but to me not so amazing that she could in fact be legit.

**H20 Monger** · 01-19-18 23:29

Originally Posted by H20Monger [View Original Post]

I've been away, back in town an pleased to see Susan posting on Backpage and with a nice incall in Altamonte just off I-4. If you like cute 40 year olds with head game skills, she's your girl. Got that great deep BBBJ with attention where it was needed. For some reason her sister site ad has been down I suggested she repost. Still my go-to girl now that I'm back. If you can't find her ad, I'll share digits.

http://orlando.backpage.com/WomenSee...-7795/20292788

**SDragonGuy** · 01-19-18 21:14

Originally Posted by MasterHammer [View Original Post]

Yes the photos are fake. I said "She is that hot" and her real photos would probably get more bite. She is a beautiful 31 yo blonde with a pretty face and b / c tits and perfect assess.

Come on man. When you say "she is for real". I think we can all agree on here, that means the girl you see in the ad, is the one you are getting when you get there. Especially when followed up with " she is that hot". A little clarification for futures reviews will help. Thanks for sharing the experience, at the end of the day she used fake photos of a well-known adult film star to allure mongers.

Regards.

SDG.