Escort Reports

**Flipper12** · 01-19-18 18:02

[Deleted by Admin]

EDITOR'S NOTE: This report was redacted or deleted to remove sections of the report that were largely argumentative. Please read the Forum FAQ and the Forum's Posting Guidelines for more information. Thank You!

**Eric Lex** · 01-19-18 17:41

Originally Posted by Flipper12 [View Original Post]

Read his first message. He did complain and didn't get anything. It's obvious that his complaint got her canned so they definitely heard him.

I got nowhere via the text in regards to my bad experience. After emailing, I was helped greatly.

**Riina** · 01-19-18 17:39

Right back at you from EEC.

Attention clients,

There's been some gossip on one of the forums recently regarding our customer service. I like to think that we do a pretty good j0b taking care of our clients as well as offering them the best variety in the city, and at the best price. The two people that were making negative accusations towards our customer service abilities are not giving you the full story. Discounts are offered to clients that have had disappointing appointments with our models. These girls are new and some will be great for the industry and some will not. Cate was problematic and was fired. If we hear a few complaints we fire these girls immediately. Some people are bewildered by our turnover rate. It's called quality control. Many other agencies might want to do the same.

There is always lots of talk about EEC and when people have bad experiences. Especially the two guys recently on the forums. I know that the other agencies have girls that give bad experiences. I know this because they used to work for us and they were fired. Zarah is a good example. Complaint after complaint. And she was canned. Angelis Angels picked her up and I know she is repeating her bad habits with their clients. But it's not talked about. We charged $300 for Zarah. They charge $400. We fired Zarah because we believe in standards. They keep Zarah because they have lower standards and a buck is a buck. Zarah could've kept making money for us but we won't allow girls to mistreat our clients. They need to hit the road. McDonald's is always hiring as well. When we have to keep shelling out discount after discount then enough is enough.

We don't have shill accounts or pay others to write fake reviews. We also don't have paid groups of people propping us up on every forum. We prefer just to give you great appointments and prices.

When dealing with humans there will always be inconsistencies. That's why we try to make things right when we learn of any issues.

There is no risk making appointments with our models. If the experience is below expectation then we can give credit or refunds depending upon the circumstances. Remember you can't have new talent and many reviews. By the time a girl gets 5 reviews she isn't really new talent anymore.

Low prices. Beautiful girls, Weekly new hires, thats EEC. If there is anything else we can do to improve simply send us an email or text. We will consider everything and are always trying hard to deliver the best value.

**CoolPatrick** · 01-19-18 17:17

Originally Posted by MoneyT [View Original Post]

One of the reasons why I continue to use EEC is that whenever I have had a bad experience with a girl, they always made it up to me. I would reach out to the handler again. I'm sure they will give you a credit of some sort. They have never let me down.

EEC just emailed to their client list explaining and telling their side of the story in response to the comments going around here. Two recent complaints about Cate come from one senior member and one regular member. Other than the minor error, their explanation falls in my expectation. It's the tradeoff between different business practices. Regardless, I respect the fact that EEC would engage and response to customers' feedback, rather than just block people out from inquiries.

**Ron M** · 01-19-18 17:15

Originally Posted by Chicago41 [View Original Post]

It's ridiculous that agencies, indys, or whomever will go to the trouble of verifying you, then if you ask them to clarify their offerings they get mad. They get just as mad if you assume, and "PSE" means something different to every escort, it seems.

I find it's best to ask what's on the Menu in person rather than asking on the phone or text. By asking over the phone the agency might have suspected you were the police. Just my guess.

**CoolPatrick** · 01-19-18 17:11

Originally Posted by MoneyT [View Original Post]

So today I inquired about seeing one of their PSE girls and when I asked the difference between their GFE and pse girls, I was told that I am now blocked. Oh well LOL.

If you didn't ask them that, at least you can try the girl out and see how open she is and how far you can go with the same rate. With AA, you may need to indicate the choice of PSE upfront and pay more. People will feel worse about the letdown if they are underwhelmed by AA girls in this sense.

**Chicago41** · 01-19-18 17:02

Originally Posted by MoneyT [View Original Post]

So today I inquired about seeing one of their PSE girls and when I asked the difference between their GFE and pse girls, I was told that I am now blocked. Oh well LOL.

It's ridiculous that agencies, indys, or whomever will go to the trouble of verifying you, then if you ask them to clarify their offerings they get mad. They get just as mad if you assume, and "PSE" means something different to every escort, it seems.

**CoolPatrick** · 01-19-18 13:27

Originally Posted by MoneyT [View Original Post]

So today I inquired about seeing one of their PSE girls and when I asked the difference between their GFE and pse girls, I was told that I am now blocked. Oh well LOL.

This is a really bad business practice. You cannot have it both ways. If you want to use these lingos for marketing, at least you need to set your providers' expectation straight, and let your providers know what type of service they need to do as standard package.

Or if you want to avoid the explicit questions about lingos / services, then STOP using these lingos. You don't even need to say GFE since most clients expects BBBJ when they pay $350+ per hour.

A better practice is to do what ChicagoCoverGirls does, not mentioning anything about greek or pse and let the girls and clients figuring out themselves. Agency just arranged the appointment for companions. All reviews on girls from CCC indicated BBBJ and kissing. And that's the consistency clients would appreciate.

Another better practice is to do what EliteSecret does, just be specific about who are willing to speak Greek in the implicit way that everyone understands. Whether the girl or agency want to add upcharge is a different question. But at least the information is clear. Sandra hardly used PSE, I knew she used it to described Linda Muse before, but Linda does provide a decent PSE by its definition regarding the style of interaction and intercourse, and Linda does anal as default. So when Sandra uses the term, she set clients' expectation correctly. And again, all reviews on her girls indicate the same kind of consistency: girls provides what Sandra advertise they do. There are at least one girl on Sandra's bullpen that do CBJ mostly, but the reviews do reveal that fact, while only a handful indicating bbbj.

You may find the appearance of girls from these two agencies less attractive than MCE/CEC, EEC, or the 262. But you are unlikely to run into a surprising disappointment with their girls. There are reasons why they stay long in this business with lower turnover.

Angelis started to include additional details as "PSEWA" and "PSE no A" on profiles, so at least I know for those with these notes, whether they speak greek. Yet, I still wish they can clarify what the heck their PSE is because I want to know if upcharge is fair. But I'm not going to ask them straight up. I may book Chloe and ask her 'in person' about this. But meanwhile, I have my eyes on enough girls besides Chloe. So...not anytime soon.

Sidenote: if agency providers insist on CBJ, not just for a client showing up sweaty and filthy, but for every one, then the agency has a problem of talent management. And if an agency advertise vaguely and its girls provides YMMV services on these rather standard expectations, I am just less inclined to use the agency even if it represents my ATF. There are better agencies and more girls out there. I appreciate how hard it is to run an escort agency, but like any other business, there are always successes and failures. Market will work it out. Some agencies don't really care about business practice because there are always johns out there. Why would they care about a few customers wanting more clarity of their advertisement?

**LaCoyote** · 01-19-18 12:48

You are annoying, Sr.

*IF you know "the sin" then said to him and send him some flowers, he is already famous here!

* No we are not the same person, read my name LA COYOTE!!

Have you notice gfemon. Why and t. E. Site have the same reviews.

Also this I found http://chicagoescorts.com/escorts/.

I haven't had any problems with EEC, so far, I always leave with a big smile in my face, No complaints so far.

**MoneyT** · 01-19-18 12:42

Originally Posted by EricLex [View Original Post]

There are no half hour rates with the agency, and there is no reason why any one of us should tolerate 325 for 30 minutes unless the price and allotted time is advertised as such. We know all too well that YMMV with any provider, but there is no reason why you should be shorted for your time specially at these rates.

Email the booker about the experience. You may hopefully get some sort of credit, and if not, simply walk away and thank them for their business but make it clear you will no longer be a patron.

I have been lucky to have amazing experiences with eec ladies (full GFE, msog, etc), except for one instance where the girl in the pictures looked way different than who I thought I was going to meet. Good experience but felt like I was jipped. Thankfully, I received a credit for my troubles. This kept me happy because it really showed me that the agency really cares for my business.

If I had the same experience as you, I would definitely consider never using them again if I felt like the agency didn't care about me enough to make it right.

One of the reasons why I continue to use EEC is that whenever I have had a bad experience with a girl, they always made it up to me. I would reach out to the handler again. I'm sure they will give you a credit of some sort. They have never let me down.

**MoneyT** · 01-19-18 12:34

So today I inquired about seeing one of their PSE girls and when I asked the difference between their GFE and pse girls, I was told that I am now blocked. Oh well LOL.

**Flipper12** · 01-19-18 09:35

Originally Posted by EricLex [View Original Post]

Email the booker about the experience. You may hopefully get some sort of credit, and if not, simply walk away and thank them for their business but make it clear you will no longer be a patron.

Read his first message. He did complain and didn't get anything. It's obvious that his complaint got her canned so they definitely heard him.

**Flipper12** · 01-19-18 09:32

Originally Posted by Vern2020 [View Original Post]

Cate, the cute spinner. No complaints with the looks of the girl or the half hour I got. My complaint was I thought I was getting an hour.

Haha, so you're the one that got rid of her. She was on the schedule for one day. I was going to book with her on Friday and she was gone.

You'll notice that I mentioned the same problem before you mentioned her name. For me, she did come around with a little bit of convincing though.

Anyway, here's the major problem with this EEC agency. You have a monger that got shorted his time, complained and the girl was retired. However, the monger did not get any type of credit or redo of his session.

It's pretty obvious that this was the issue that led to her getting removed. She was on the schedule for one day so this happened on that one day she was on and when he complained they took her off.

At the very least they should have given him his next session for half off.

**DMichaels69** · 01-19-18 09:00

The only way to combat this is not to use this agency, no excuses for bad service for that kind of money.

Originally Posted by EricLex [View Original Post]

There are no half hour rates with the agency, and there is no reason why any one of us should tolerate 325 for 30 minutes unless the price and allotted time is advertised as such. We know all too well that YMMV with any provider, but there is no reason why you should be shorted for your time specially at these rates.

Email the booker about the experience. You may hopefully get some sort of credit, and if not, simply walk away and thank them for their business but make it clear you will no longer be a patron.

I have been lucky to have amazing experiences with eec ladies (full GFE, msog, etc), except for one instance where the girl in the pictures looked way different than who I thought I was going to meet. Good experience but felt like I was jipped. Thankfully, I received a credit for my troubles. This kept me happy because it really showed me that the agency really cares for my business.

If I had the same experience as you, I would definitely consider never using them again if I felt like the agency didn't care about me enough to make it right.

**Beast42** · 01-19-18 07:11

Originally Posted by Vern2020 [View Original Post]

Cate, the cute spinner. No complaints with the looks of the girl or the half hour I got. My complaint was I thought I was getting an hour.

Thats probably why she's no longer working for that agency. They don't put up with a lot of shit and don't hesitate to let them go if they become a liability with the customers.