BBFS Reports

**Jabroni307** · 08-31-17 18:09

Ad is down, got a number or mirror?

Originally Posted by LongDStyle [View Original Post]

http://chicago.backpage.com/MenSeekW...stasy/75478538

I know she does BBFS from experience, saw her in June and definitely wanted to repeat. I saw her on in outcall which she rarely does. When she did the outcall she was with a lady friend. Very small upcharge for BBFS, cip allowed. No stink, no smell very nice body. She disappeared for awhile but texted me out the blue 2 days ago saying she was available. BBFS still on the menu confirmed. She doesn't look as good in the video in the ad as when I saw her as I see a mark on her face. Strange thing is when I did an outcall I gave her the wrong address which was a couple doors down and she still somehow showed up directly in front of my place. Dream was perfect.

**Jabroni307** · 08-31-17 18:04

All those girls are great but never got to see Scarlett. We set up a date and time but she no showed. Guess I'll try hitting her up again.

Originally Posted by Rusty6562 [View Original Post]

My first post so bear with me. I've seen Scarlett through the backpage ads you were mentioning. She provided BBFS CIP. I had a great time with her. I would definitely recommend her. The only thing that would give me hesitation is that her hands where visibly swollen.

I have also seen Stacey and Jessica and would concur with MoneyT. Although I would personally not repeat with Stacey but maybe repeat with Jessica.

**LongDStyle** · 08-31-17 16:52

http://chicago.backpage.com/MenSeekW...stasy/75478538

I know she does BBFS from experience, saw her in June and definitely wanted to repeat. I saw her on in outcall which she rarely does. When she did the outcall she was with a lady friend. Very small upcharge for BBFS, cip allowed. No stink, no smell very nice body. She disappeared for awhile but texted me out the blue 2 days ago saying she was available. BBFS still on the menu confirmed. She doesn't look as good in the video in the ad as when I saw her as I see a mark on her face. Strange thing is when I did an outcall I gave her the wrong address which was a couple doors down and she still somehow showed up directly in front of my place. Dream was perfect.

**LongDStyle** · 08-31-17 16:14

Got an email response from this ad. If you look at the email they contact you from, the guy's name comes up on Facebook as a currently active account. Could be the pimp or scam.

http://chicago.backpage.com/WomenSee...-come/75389998

**LongDStyle** · 08-31-17 16:11

https://cheeposlist.com.chicago.hoxn...post/22720230/

Did a review of her earlier this year at an incall in Oak Forest. It might be farther down here or in the backpage post. But I originally saw her in May and said was wasn't interested in repeating. Anyway I came across a recent ad of hers but had no clue it was her, it had different pictures. We made an arrangement this time for an outcall. She showed up quick and on time but with two other guys in something that looked like a tow truck. They didn't say anything and she got out, as soon as she did she noticed I looked familiar. I didn't realize who she was until she reminded me of the last dream. Maybe she doesn't see that many guys if she could remember.

We get inside and started the session. CIP allowed, I guess since I saw her already it wasn't a total let down, I knew what to expect. Oral skills good, kitty was very average. No upcharge for bb, reasonable rates. She told me she use to do incalls from Lansing but she stopped because a lot of girls (a few dozen from what she said) got busted by the county working over there so she left. I have noticed a drop in girls working from over there. After seeing her this time I still doubt I repeat but for some reason I'm more likely to this time then last.

**LongDStyle** · 08-31-17 15:56

Originally Posted by GodMann [View Original Post]

How reasonable?

.75 for FS and $ for BBFS.

**Rusty 6562** · 08-31-17 11:49

Originally Posted by PghTraveler [View Original Post]

Ads with identical wording have been popping up for at least a couple of years, starting with a girl named Elise. I can't tell if it's an agency or just a loose collection of girls who help each other out, but they all have liberal menus. Natalia / Scarlett, formerly of Wet & Wild, has also advertised using similar wording. (T*E*are 218912) I have no reason to believe Scarlett offers anything other than what's in her reviews, though.

My first post so bear with me. I've seen Scarlett through the backpage ads you were mentioning. She provided BBFS CIP. I had a great time with her. I would definitely recommend her. The only thing that would give me hesitation is that her hands where visibly swollen.

I have also seen Stacey and Jessica and would concur with MoneyT. Although I would personally not repeat with Stacey but maybe repeat with Jessica.

**PghTraveler** · 08-31-17 02:16

Ads with identical wording have been popping up for at least a couple of years, starting with a girl named Elise. I can't tell if it's an agency or just a loose collection of girls who help each other out, but they all have liberal menus. Natalia / Scarlett, formerly of Wet & Wild, has also advertised using similar wording. (T*E*are 218912) I have no reason to believe Scarlett offers anything other than what's in her reviews, though.

Originally Posted by MoneyT [View Original Post]

I have always suspected these girls as being part of an agency. I have seen the following 3:

http://chicago.backpage.com/WomenSee...il-me/69597898

http://chicago.backpage.com/WomenSee...place/60727048

http://chicago.backpage.com/WomenSee...il-me/71918163

Stacey by far was the more attractive of the three. Performance was good. No CIP but I have heard from others she allows CIM (spits). Didn't rush the action but after the first pop, she was out the door. Definitely didn't get the full hour.

Jessica is a true GFE. Decent BBBJ skills. Allows CIP. Definitely not a clock watcher (actually think we went overtime).

Katy has fake boobs that have no feeling. Her BBBJ skills are sub par. Kitty is real tight. She can't handle gerth nor deep strokes. Only played missionary as she couldn't handle much more. No CIP. Again, left before the hour was over.

Stacey is going back to school soon. Jessica stated that she was moving out of state in September. Not sure what the deal is with Katy. I'd probably repeat with Stacey; we'd need to have a discussion about the time deal. Katy I def wouldn't repeat. And Jessica is definitely worth another visit.

**MoneyT** · 08-31-17 01:00

I have always suspected these girls as being part of an agency. I have seen the following 3:

http://chicago.backpage.com/WomenSee...il-me/69597898

http://chicago.backpage.com/WomenSee...place/60727048

http://chicago.backpage.com/WomenSee...il-me/71918163

Stacey by far was the more attractive of the three. Performance was good. No CIP but I have heard from others she allows CIM (spits). Didn't rush the action but after the first pop, she was out the door. Definitely didn't get the full hour.

Jessica is a true GFE. Decent BBBJ skills. Allows CIP. Definitely not a clock watcher (actually think we went overtime).

Katy has fake boobs that have no feeling. Her BBBJ skills are sub par. Kitty is real tight. She can't handle gerth nor deep strokes. Only played missionary as she couldn't handle much more. No CIP. Again, left before the hour was over.

Stacey is going back to school soon. Jessica stated that she was moving out of state in September. Not sure what the deal is with Katy. I'd probably repeat with Stacey; we'd need to have a discussion about the time deal. Katy I def wouldn't repeat. And Jessica is definitely worth another visit.