Thread: Bareback Providers
+
Add Report
Results 26,071 to 26,085 of 27219
-
07-04-17 17:43 #1149Senior Member

Posts: 113Josies pussy cat strikes me as a hooker with golden pussy syndrome. I politely asked her to vouch for me on TNA and she freaking jumped down my throat because I missed her friend request on the board. I am surprised that she allows BBFS.
Originally Posted by Aegean45
[View Original Post]
-
07-04-17 16:53 #1148Senior Member

Posts: 282Kathleen
My memory of Kathleen was she was lots fun, loved toy play but not BBFS. At a 400 donation, seemed a bit steep. Can you confirm BBFS?
Originally Posted by PnwPooner
[View Original Post]
-
07-04-17 16:38 #1147Senior Member

Posts: 112JosiesPussy. Cat
What was the up-charge for that one, and how did you approach that? I was talking to her and was very interested in her fisting fetish, when I brought it up over text messages (away from the board, etc.) making sure we were on the same page and to see if that was extra or not, she flipped, saying how disrespectful it was to bring up such a thing. Her post said "ask me about my favorite fetish."
Originally Posted by BarebackOnly1
[View Original Post]
-
07-04-17 15:44 #1146Regular Member

Posts: 3Cc
I just use a prepaid card. They can't charge me if it doesn't have a balance.
Originally Posted by Michael1967
[View Original Post]
-
07-04-17 13:48 #1145Regular Member

Posts: 1If you have a Citibank credit card, you can use their "virtual account number" app to generate a number that is only good for a single charge. You can also set a limit for it too. You can either download an app after logging in, or use their website to generate the number. I use this if I ever sign up for anything I'm worried may be a pain to cancel. If the merchant tries to charge a second time, it's denied. I'm not sure if other card companies have a similar feature, but might be worth looking into.
Originally Posted by PnwPooner
[View Original Post]
-
07-04-17 13:38 #1144Senior Member

Posts: 268A little surprised to see sofina206 on that list since she lists NO BBBJ and BBFS on her list. LOL.
Originally Posted by BarebackOnly1
[View Original Post]
-
07-04-17 12:38 #1143Senior Member

Posts: 26Early on, but no longer.
Yes, it was a YMMV thing back in the day, but she no longer offers it (at least with me).
Originally Posted by Saffrole
[View Original Post]
-
07-04-17 05:29 #1142Senior Member

Posts: 38That sucks!!
Damn dude!! That absolutely sucks!
Originally Posted by Michael1967
[View Original Post]
I can't say I experience the same thing though. SA has been a pretty solid resource when I'm looking for something specific in a girl and a non-pro (errr at least not openly advertising anywhere).
-
07-04-17 05:26 #1141Senior Member

Posts: 38Aaahhhh Kathleen
I forgot about Kathleen. She was definitely a premium rate, but the first few times were absolutely amazing.
Originally Posted by BarebackOnly1
[View Original Post]
I can't remember exactly why I haven't seen her in a good while, but I remember those first few times. Damn.
-
07-04-17 01:51 #1140Senior Member

Posts: 138This confirms all my suspicions. Any sex site requiring a paid membership is suspect to me, especially if they require CC info. I'm sorry you got scammed, but hopefully others will learn from your experience.
Originally Posted by Michael1967
[View Original Post]
-
07-04-17 01:24 #1139Senior Member

Posts: 1544Just a warning to all of you out there. These sites will rob you blind if you let them. I have found my credit card charged large amounts months after I have cancelled their service (because in general these services suck and most people move on after a month of wasting their money). I tried Seeking Arrangements several months ago and was given a "3-day" trial and after 3 days, I was supposed to be charged $39.95/ month unless I cancel. I figured I would try it out. I went to 3 screens that told me my card would not be charged until after the 3 day trial ended. My card was immediately charged $9. 99. I thought they would refund the money when I cancelled after the trial, so I didn't complain. The next day my card was charged 6 times for $39.95. I contacted customer support and got no response. I then contacted my credit card company and said it was fraud and had my card cancelled and reissued. 3 months later, Seeking Arrangements still has never responded to my dozen e-mails about the charges.
Originally Posted by BarebackOnly1
[View Original Post]
Seriously, I have tried at least one of these hook up sites every year and EVERY ONE of them has tried to charge me more than they stated. Several have waited until six months after I canceled and then started charging me again. This one was the worst and most blatant. Be careful and use a credit (not a debit) card.
-
07-03-17 23:17 #1138Senior Member

Posts: 62Shari of tacoma
The best bbbjcims was shari, she use to massage out of her home, and for the he, was a BJ, wow for an hour she would massage, suck some, masage some, suck some more, it was great, nice and slow and deep, then fast, knew how to beat it off in her mouth. Been looking for her, its been a while any one have any info on her.
-
07-03-17 22:31 #1137Senior Member

Posts: 135Any word on Nixon?
-
07-03-17 15:07 #1136Regular Member

Posts: 3I use Seeking Arrangement for this
I use Seeking Arrangement for BBFS. I have posted in the non pro's thread.
Miss J Wylde was a favorite for me to see. She seems to have moved on.
I saw Nuttin' Nice once. I doubt I would ever repeat.
Busty Bonnie was another one. She was a little too big for my liking.
JosiesPussyCat was one of my favorites. Then she went kinda crazy on me.
Another lady would bareback me until I paid for her boob job. She became so much drama that I refuse to even name her.
Kathleen.
Sofina206.
Kammi_Kay.
The TNA women always seemed to upcharge more or went crazy on me.
I would still see a few, but they seemed to get really attached after BBFS.
Now I stick with SA.
-
07-03-17 13:33 #1135Senior Member

Posts: 282Cost / Benefit vs Risk / Reward
Too often we, as consumers of these services, do a cost / benefit calculation. That's fine. But we really should expand that calculation to a larger one of risk / reward.
Originally Posted by Penis
[View Original Post]










Reply With Quote



