Rants and Raves

[NiteTimer]

The police or FBI might care, if you were a big enough fish to land on their radar. But "Uncle at Meade" doesn't give a shit about anyone on this forum, we're way too mundane to be interesting to them.

Actually that's incorrect. The boys in blue & suits do use the information used on sites like this as a source of information.

[Noobalicious]

Gents lets talk about ESI or electronically stored information.

... be smart about it because boys at Meade are cataloging and filling UTah database like you would not believe, and you never know where that data will end up. Think about it! If amazon can track you across the web, and know your shoes size, what can Uncle do at Meade? ...

The police or FBI might care, if you were a big enough fish to land on their radar. But "Uncle at Meade" doesn't give a shit about anyone on this forum, we're way too mundane to be interesting to them.

[Sirgela]

Gents lets talk about ESI or electronically stored information.

I understand that some of you want to share your hunt photos, and videos and so on. BUT please clean the damn files before posting online. Every picture (unless taken on old school Polaroid camera) has lots of metadata info. This includes GPS info, device info, and in some cases even account info. There are lots of ways and software to "clean' the ESI and simple google search will teach you how to clean ESI from metadata. I received number of pictures from members in inbox that basically told me who they were, where they drive, and etc. Now if I can do that so can uncle and guys and I am not even an IT pro. Thus, no matter what you share, clean the damn thing or you might as well post your drivers license and Ady on here. Same thing with forum photos, most of them have that metadata intact. I am not saying not to share, but be smart about it because boys at Meade are cataloging and filling UTah database like you would not believe, and you never know where that data will end up. Think about it! If amazon can track you across the web, and know your shoes size, what can Uncle do at Meade?

Rant over, but seriously know what you are doing or don't put your self out there like that. Remember metadata was what got DPR caught, and it was not even his doing, some guy he was associated with dropped a ball, and then they followed the ESI trail until they caught him with his laptop open in the library. Heck another member on this forum was speaking to me about this and he is a lawyer and ran this data through E-Discovery tools (soft lawyers use to process huge amounts of data in ESI discovery phase of litigation and filter it down to relevant things) his firm uses and you would not believe types of info he got out of it. Granted he will never do anything with it, but somebody else might.

That's not how DPR was discovered. Ulbricht was spamming sites before Silk Road was popular trying to drive traffic there. This doofus from the FBI used google to find some of the earliest references to Silk Road on the web (google indexes everything) and then was able to tie this altoid guy doing the spamming, to an email Ulbricht used to do freelance programming which he was still using for non-silk road stuff. Then when they busted him (laptop open) he had all the data in the world they needed on his laptop, which he was using in a public space, to convict him.

A2

[Shune]

Et tu Shune

Or a simple case of geriatric folly.

A word of advise to anyone asking for information on this forum. Be polite as you would anywhere else in life, and don't act as if you are entitled. Like the old saying goes "you get more with sugar, then you would with vinegar. ".

With that being said, however, there are sociopaths out there that are beyond any hope of redemption. They lurk, and they troll like a diseased varmint.

At best, these sociopaths propagate aggravation to forum members with their irrational and childlike open posts, then sends privet messages laden with cowardly tantrums. But that's nothing compared to the physical harm these diseased varmints can potentially inflict on the girls they meet.

So be warned, and do not share any information with theses worthless trolls.

[EasyLuvr]

I wonder if any of those pebbles had burst inside of her, if she would have caught a buzz that way, orally it works, but inside of a Kitty, that would be a first, LOL.

No lie! Wonder if I would have gotten a buzz as well?

[Indigo456]

Spied her in front of the church at Millington and Wilkens and with none of my regulars out, I scooped her and headed to the rent a bed. We got naked and I noticed while she had a nice body, she had a thatch that hadn't been trimmed for quite a while. Not letting that stop the little guy, I covered her and proceeded to stuff her. I noticed that it was hard to get inside and she said "hold up", rolling out from under me. She removed her stash from her cooch and put it in her purse! First time that a SW has ever tried to fuck me with her rocks inside too! She crawled back onto the bed and guided me back in. She got wet immediately and got into it. Didn't take long for me to bust a nut in her, cleaning up and dropping her back in the same area. No digits and standard tuition.

I wonder if any of those pebbles had burst inside of her, if she would have caught a buzz that way, orally it works, but inside of a Kitty, that would be a first, LOL.

[Member #5503]

Once again, RTFF. There are many pictures from me, some as recently as a couple of months ago. There are also recent pictures from others. I don't find the most recent picture from BolloBellgrande to be blurry at all.

You happen to repost the same photos from a year ago, and then claim that they were only taken a couple months ago? I've noticed you've done this same trick time and again with other girls with photos that are years old. Of course this is not always the case, and you must have an impressive collection of SWs, but please don't tell me year old photos are recent by only a couple of months.

[Mongerel]

So in your world, you would purposely go out looking for girls who've gone way downhill, when they were previously at the top of the game? Does that make sense to anyone, as I thought the purpose of the forum was to help mongers find the decent looking SWs, not the ones that look like they could be from the set of a zombie movie?

How hard is it to understand that these guys are NOT purposely looking for girls who've gone downhill, rather they are merely stating how far she has gone. This isn't the "Still Hot Streetwalker Reports" forum, kind sir, it covers them all. And showing that she used to be a looker and how far she's deteriorated is, believe it or not, USEFUL information to some.

[Cls9637]

I do RTFF and the only single recent photo of hers, which was not from you in any case, is so blurry that details are hard to make out. Being the grand pornographer that you are, do you have any pics that are not more than a year old?

Once again, RTFF. There are many pictures from me, some as recently as a couple of months ago. There are also recent pictures from others. I don't find the most recent picture from BolloBellgrande to be blurry at all.

[Cls9637]

I remember her first coming onto the scene around November, 2015 and she looked like these photos. What a drastic downhill change. There should be before and after photos for comparison to show what a toll a year and a half on Wilkens can take.

So in your world, you would purposely go out looking for girls who've gone way downhill, when they were previously at the top of the game? Does that make sense to anyone, as I thought the purpose of the forum was to help mongers find the decent looking SWs, not the ones that look like they could be from the set of a zombie movie?

You recommended "before and after photos for comparison to show what a toll a year and a half on Wilkens can take." Then you berate OldChineseGuy for explaining to you that that's exactly what we are doing. Curious!

[HcLine]

New guy chuckles was getting on my nerves! Not at all argumentative.

[Barraquda22]

Be careful parking there in the big lot across from the row houses to do your business. One or more of the neighbors is shooting out windows of fellow Mongers cars.

Find out who and shoot back I say.

BQ22.

[DoorOne]

DoorOne: Look up "Streisand Effect".

Many here feel for you and others don't. You did though bring the attention you did not want and outed your wife. This would be a tactic for someone who is not her husband to make her life difficult by telling everyone that this ten year old pic is this person and that she spent time as a SW.

If your mission is as you say, you did more harm than good. Look at all of the attention your post and those pics got. A number of guys probably downloaded them just for the novelty of it.

On the other hand if you are not her husband and wanted to bring shame and attention: Congratulations. You did a splendid job.

Yeah, I'm her Husband and I'm a damn idiot. All I really wanted was the pictures removed. But, all I did was start a bunch of crap. For those that care, for those that don't FY. This my last post ever.

[Ebdawgg]

DoorOne: Look up "Streisand Effect".

Many here feel for you and others don't. You did though bring the attention you did not want and outed your wife. This would be a tactic for someone who is not her husband to make her life difficult by telling everyone that this ten year old pic is this person and that she spent time as a SW.

If your mission is as you say, you did more harm than good. Look at all of the attention your post and those pics got. A number of guys probably downloaded them just for the novelty of it.

On the other hand if you are not her husband and wanted to bring shame and attention: Congratulations. You did a splendid job.

[AceKing88]

In your effort to erase your wife's past you managed to reply to a nearly six month old post and bring everyone's attention to it, well done. I'm legit glad your wife made it out and is clean now, but let's cut the crap.

You're trying to make it sound like she was some innocent babe in the woods and everyone who slept with her was some monster and now she's been traumatized by it. Ok, she may have been.

At the end of the day, no one made her do what she did. She made a choice to sleep with guys to get high. And transferring blame enough to call them monsters is hilarious. Addicts make utterly shit decisions and manipulate and blame other people in order to dodge responsibility and carry on with their bullshit. At some point every addict has to take responsibility for their actions. If you throw chum in the ocean, see fins and then jump in, do you really blame the shark for taking a nibble?

And before you say you don't understand what she went through or what led her to addiction, yes, yes I do. I'm the product of addict parents, was raised in a violently abusive household and went through more shit in my teens and early 20's that led me to fighting addiction well into my 30's. At every step of the way I had options available to me to stop using, the same your wife did. With no money, no job and no insurance, you can be in a treatment program within one to two days in Baltimore and then in recovery houses where you will be basically relearn how to get through the day without shooting dope. And there isn't just one option for this, I can think of about ten programs off the top of my head for this. This doesn't include methadone or Suboxone programs, higher class places if you have insurance or ones that your family could send you to. Every time she got high there was a branch she could have grasped to get herself out. Calling the men she slept with monsters is questionable at best. If we are monsters for funding the addiction, understand an addict will do anything to get high. If she wasn't sucking dicks, she would have been stealing. If you're saying all the men that slept with her were abusive, you're also painting with a pretty broad brush, and it sort of makes her look worse because once again she had every way to get out and chose to associate with the monsters.

I applaud your wife for making a change and I hope she stays clean, but take it from an addict who's also dated plenty of recovering addicts: Don't do her the disservice of absolving her from her own responsibility in the matter. Learning to be accountable for my actions and their consequences had to be drilled into me, and it's the reason I haven't picked back up...

Again dude your dead on folks create there own nightmares. So to blame anyone but themselves is just pointing the finger at someone else for the downfalls. There are tons of women drug addicts that don't trick for dough. Yes I repeat that don't sell there bodies for drugs. you have functional addicts who would never sell there bodies for there habit they would rather be I'll before they do that. these chicks that trick do it because they choose to. Yes they choose to, not because a monger is out trying to give her nightmares she needs to face her own nightmares because at the end of the day, she created the monsters, she can't have it both ways because she loved every minute of it. When you pray for rain you have to deal with the mud as well.