Thread: Massage Parlor Reports
+
Add Report
Results 36,286 to 36,300 of 56974
-
03-21-17 18:03 #20689

Posts: 532Chatter vs Tattle
Reading the article, I note that the website 'chatter' was not what led LE to the location. Rather is was the 'tattle' of a proactive report, or complaint, directly to a tipster-hotline type of thing from a complainant that was actually a visitor and offered first hand observations (reportedly). The remarks about the fact that "Agents found a website. . . " have nothing to do with actual probable cause, nor will anything gleaned from that website be admissible anywhere other than media reports. All for the purpose of quieting down that 'chatter' (if you ask me).
Originally Posted by WalSTreet
[View Original Post]
If any competitor, or other nefarious person, is seeking to create problems for the place, whatever would be learned from website reports could possibly contribute to a fictional fabric built for those purposes. Otherwise, seeking to reduce reporting runs counter to the purpose of the board. . . In my humble opinion.
-
03-21-17 17:55 #20688Senior Member

Posts: 812I'm willing to bet they are going to be legit from now on. Maybe be lucky enough to get a handshake.
Originally Posted by Gentleman100
[View Original Post]
-
03-21-17 17:42 #20687Senior Member

Posts: 794Reminder
Reminder: only the therapists were taken into custody. Not the clients (us mongers).
Originally Posted by Magicman20
[View Original Post]
I think their services will remain, but they will need to be more discreet (maybe even start wearing scrubs: with some lingerie underneath). Be safe.
-
03-21-17 17:33 #20686Senior Member

Posts: 362No suprise
No surprise guys. Way too much chatter about this place.
Originally Posted by CrazyHorse666
[View Original Post]
-
03-21-17 17:33 #20685Senior Member

Posts: 812That's what shocked me. If there owned by the same person, why weren't they both done on the same day?
Originally Posted by Magicman20
[View Original Post]
-
03-21-17 17:20 #20684Senior Member

Posts: 48News coverage mentioned bumby??
Watching the coverage they also mentioned another place but no name on Bumby wow! Becareful fellas.
-
03-21-17 16:59 #20683Senior Member

Posts: 234I wonder what website they are referring to? There are multiple to choose from.
Originally Posted by CrazyHorse666
[View Original Post]
-
03-21-17 16:54 #20682Senior Member

Posts: 183Bora bora news story
-
03-21-17 16:27 #20681Senior Member

Posts: 157Looks like her ad from Jenna's place has been taken down now and she has moved over to WP studio. Any positive experiences with her?
Originally Posted by Mj832
[View Original Post]
-
03-21-17 14:29 #20680Senior Member

Posts: 85Why
Why go to either for that matter.
Originally Posted by Mj832
[View Original Post]
-
03-21-17 14:19 #20679Senior Member

Posts: 157Question
Why would one go see this lady at this place for $120.
http://orlando.backpage.com/Therapeu...itland/9458471
When you can see her at this place for $65?.
http://orlando.backpage.com/Therapeu...apists/6274789
-
03-21-17 12:24 #20678Senior Member

Posts: 32Definitely bad timing I guess, the same woman who always picks up was the one I spoke with this morning (called around 9:30 ish). Could just be busy handling the situation regarding the 3 that were booked yesterday, and has her backup taking calls now.
Originally Posted by Gentleman100
[View Original Post]
-
03-21-17 12:19 #20677Senior Member

Posts: 89To each his own.
If you've been going to an AMP long enough, you can tell by just looking at their faces. Many mongers have tried to point this out in the past but it only led to arguments about age. I wish there was a separate thread for BB / CB (tier 1, LOL). It'll make it easier to sieve through the noise when looking for other options.
Originally Posted by SexXes
[View Original Post]
-
03-21-17 12:07 #20676Senior Member

Posts: 794Called BB
I called BB. The normal manager is on vacation (maybe bad timing) and her backup is handling the calls. All seems normal.
Originally Posted by Ds1359
[View Original Post]
-
03-21-17 11:12 #20675

Posts: 532Ages
That last statement is a good point to drill down upon. Age is just a number. When we say that a girl "looked mid-20's", we all have a mental image of what that is, and we generally mean that phrase to speak to level of "hotness". . . Which has ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to do with the date on which she made an exit from her mother's uterus. To focus on that otherwise arbitrary date (as opposed to her actual level of perceived "hotness") is like focusing on whether that uteral exit was vaginal or by cesarian section! THAT REALLY DOESN'T HAVE A BEARING ON WHAT WE WILL EXPERIENCE WITH HER!
Originally Posted by SexXes
[View Original Post]
So, I think it's actually pointless to debate the ACTUAL age of the girls we're seeing and MORE helpful and informative for us to describe how they "look", and if they "look" like mid-20's then we all know what to expect, based on our collective mental image of such a girl! If anything, a girl that LOOKS like she's 25 years old, but has the experience and SKILL of someone with 49 years under her belt (and maybe over 30 years mastering the arts of sensual stimulation), may actually be the IDEAL combination of qualities we're all looking for.
From now on I am making a mental note to phrase my reports accordingly, and will try to keep wording along the lines of "she has the looks of a 25 year old", without actually speculating on real chronological age. Any other typically "age related" features, such as "tightness" of the canal, or "firmness" and "perkiness" of the chest or rear-end, usually get separately described anyway (or they SHOULD).








Reply With Quote



