Thread: Massage Parlor Reports
+
Add Report
Results 34,411 to 34,425 of 58628
-
03-12-17 09:04 #24218Senior Member

Posts: 148What statute is that?
I think you're wrong. What's that code section?
Originally Posted by Niteluvr
[View Original Post]
-
03-11-17 21:20 #24217Senior Member

Posts: 86Ivy
Oriental in Woodstock on 92 about a mile past Home Depot on the right.
-
03-11-17 19:13 #24216Senior Member

Posts: 145Absolutely. But it just demonstrates the insanity of the law. Because no formal negotiation occurred, there was nothing illegal about it.
Originally Posted by Petey1015
[View Original Post]
-
03-11-17 18:21 #24215Senior Member

Posts: 106I think the one you're looking for is Wendy. She will provide much pleasure for regulars.
Originally Posted by Depot
[View Original Post]
-
03-11-17 17:45 #24214Banned Member

Posts: 13634I think the law states that a masseuse can't touch your dick for any reason.
Originally Posted by WalterM
[View Original Post]
-
03-11-17 14:09 #24213Banned Member

Posts: 2410Where could one find Ivy in Woodstock?
Originally Posted by DelaField
[View Original Post]
-
03-11-17 14:04 #24212Banned Member

Posts: 2410So then at the 50 min mark the massage is officially "over" and what you paid for (including the tip) was for the 50 min of massage she provided. What happened after was an exclusive separate event between 2 consenting adults.
Originally Posted by WalterM
[View Original Post]
-
03-11-17 13:41 #24211Senior Member

Posts: 145So a couple of weeks ago, I did just that. I went in for a massage, at the 50 minute mark, she looked at my raging hard-on, covered with a towel and I removed the towel and let her know it was ok to play with it. She did. There was no negotiation or talk of compensation. Just a private act between consenting adults, outside of public view. After completion, I got dressed, paid the house fee and included an extra $40.
Originally Posted by JoneseyJones
[View Original Post]
The extra $40 was not negotiated beforehand and was not a pre-condition for the HJ, and although a tip would be customarily expected, it wasn't explicitly offered or demanded by either party.
I can find no law that was violated.
-
03-11-17 11:29 #24210Senior Member

Posts: 1011Two Asian women on DeKalb county mugshots busted for prostitution.
-
03-11-17 09:38 #24209Senior Member

Posts: 148Let's think about this
This brings up (at least for lawyers) and interesting question: Just how does a customer get arrested at an AMP? Assuming for the sake of argument (arguendo, for you legal types) that masturbation is the crime, let's look at the statute:
Originally Posted by SgtSoros
[View Original Post]
OCGA 16-6-16: Masturbation for Hire.
(a) A person, including a masseur or masseuse, commits the offense of masturbation for hire when he erotically stimulates the genital organs of another, whether resulting in orgasm or not, by manual or other bodily contact exclusive of sexual intercourse or by instrumental manipulation for money or the substantial equivalent thereof.
(b) A person committing the offense of masturbation for hire shall be guilty of a misdemeanor.
Because criminal statutes are strictly construed, they being in derogation of the common law, (evidently, masturbation for hire has been a problem for a long time!) there is NO provision that allows the "massagee" to violate this law, it being limited to (in our case) "a masseur or masseuse". In fact, being the "massagee" is NOT a crime, according to this statute, even if the dastardly cops crashed through the door and caught the participants, in flagrante delicto. Of course, if they crashed through the door, that would be a violation of constitutional proportions, (First and Fourth) and the case would be dismissed on said grounds, and the cop most likely be sued by attorneys like me. (Now, that would be a fun case). So, accordingly, the only person who goes to jail is the masseuse. Ostensibly, (although I don't recommend) you could tell the cop in that case, "Yeah, she was giving me the business," and there's nothing he could do under this statute. I could be missing something, of course, and would like to hear from other attorney's on the list, but I will leave you with this:
I ran a search on any appellate case in the history of Georgia wherein the "massagee" was arrested and there were NONE. Further, I did a google search for any using "man arrested at massage parlor," and found NONE; at least for being the "massagee" or if you like, the "masturbatee".
One last thing of note: There's a case wherein the masseuse appealed her case because the agreement was for a "tip" and not a sum certain. Remember, the statute says it must be for "money or the substantial equivalent thereof. " The court said the agreement was for a "tip" meaning "money," and so she lost her appeal. So, if the masseuse says nothing and just provides the service (ostensibly, for gratis) with no mention of a "tip" or money, there can be no crime. Of course, the massagee leaves the appropriate amount of money and no one is the wiser and no crime committed. What says the lawyers here?
-
03-11-17 02:30 #24208Banned Member

Posts: 2410I think we can make this happen.
If we all move to Utah.
Originally Posted by TaoistMaster
[View Original Post]
-
03-11-17 00:34 #24207Senior Member

Posts: 282Did she want to marry you?
Originally Posted by DelaField
[View Original Post]
If so you're #6.
-
03-11-17 00:31 #24206Senior Member

Posts: 282You're #5. Petey was 4.
Originally Posted by LoveRubs68
[View Original Post]
I was just at the take out point.
-
03-10-17 23:52 #24205Senior Member

Posts: 256Never could get the take out. I'm jealous.
Originally Posted by LoveRubs68
[View Original Post]
-
03-10-17 22:39 #24204Banned Member

Posts: 13634So, is Coco lying low for a while or has she re-surfaced somewhere?
Originally Posted by LoveRubs68
[View Original Post]








Reply With Quote



