Like Beef Lolo?

[Punanilicr]

Really glad to see this. "Punanilicr" and "papa san" are two more aliases that are obvious Happiness shills.

That statement couldn't be more wrong, but you believe what you want. Happy New Year!!

[ClintonPortis]

As you can see in the last sentence written by Admin2, this "Golden-Badfoot" has already been exposed for having many aliases. Such a coincidence that he only writes reviews for Happiness.

Really glad to see this. "Punanilicr" and "papa san" are two more aliases that are obvious Happiness shills.

[SlamDunkChamp]

Speaking of assholes, this punk moderates the Happiness thread and now he has started deleting all or most of the positive postings, just because he doesn't like them! Seems to me that he is trying to destroy her business! I don't understand why the administration lets him get away with it! Pisses me off that he deleted my first post for no reason!

Don't be a dick, become a senior and make a second happiness thread. Then you will be able to delete reports from that one as well. If you're less of an asshole then guys will post in yours and not his and eventually his will get deleted.

Considering how many aliases you have that's a pretty long shot though.

A2

As you can see in the last sentence written by Admin2, this "Golden-Badfoot" has already been exposed for having many aliases. Such a coincidence that he only writes reviews for Happiness.

[SlamDunkChamp]

I think everyone overrates senior status. There's a crapload of senior mongers on the Happiness thread that are absolute SHILLS for Happiness. Nutmaker and Mondo Badfoot are two of the biggest shills on this site. There are probably other mongers in that thread that NEVER have negative reports whose reports should not be believed as well.

I'd much rather trust reviews by a monger that has visited 5+ AMPs and given an equal amount of positive and negative reports.

Hey Mondo Badfoot! Look some other guy who reviews Happiness a lot stole your nickname for his cock! See below. What a coincidence?

Mondo Badfoot's freudian slip posing as his alias Golden Butcher that he created to shill for Happiness. Are you kidding me. Who else would refer to their own cocks as "little Mondo" except for Mondo Badfoot and of course Golden Butcher.

[CardSource52]

I agree that there are shill senior members for certain AMP. Also everyone has different taste in women and preference. So it takes some time but you have to take advice with someone that has the same taste in women and preferences. As for me I prefer looks over service. Don't like them too old or too young. 30's and early 40's. Also I'm a covered guy so doesn't really repeat if I find out she is bfs. I prefer cute over pretty. I'm very picky on looks and never gave out a 10 on looks yet. I find people giving out 10's too easily. To find the right senior members to get advice is to look at their previous post and if you agree with his opinion on a girl you are familiar with than you may have the same taste. But I know I can't trust some senior members since most of their post is to promote a particular AMP. So ovious. They write few reports on other post to cover up but so different when they post for their AMP. Just my opinion and suggestion.

[ProfessorGun69]

Perhaps three key words should be added to that last sentence: "The only problem is that in my opinion some times the reviews are better than the girl".

Without those three words or some similar qualifier, the sentence seems to imply that one or more of the sentence writer's own superior qualities (such as intellect, perceptiveness, honesty, etc.) makes the writer a superior judge of providers than the other guy.

Of course, like movie reviews and book reviews, provider reviews are highly subjective. Intelligent, experienced and truthful mongers can easily have significantly different perspectives on a provider.

Happy New Year Red, I just wanted to say that I enjoy reading all your reports. You sir are one of the very few senior members that I trust for information. I also appreciate all your knowledge that you contribute to this community of monger world. I also enjoy the voice style and humor that you infuse into your writing. Look forward to more of your reports. Big Mahalo to you.

[UlanFan]

She instantly picks up on said monger's unspoken negative judgement of her, and as a result she isn't as pleasant, friendly or entertaining with that guy as she'd been with Red. So, ironically, the other monger's unsatisfying experience was probably brought on by his own judgements and demeanor; stuff he himself walked into the room with.

You are 100% correct which is why I always great the provider with a big smile and a compliment. However, if I find her unattractive, I get my massage, take the HE rather than FS, tip accordingly and she is none the wiser.

That said, can you blame a guy for being disappointed when her thought he was going to get a hottie? I'm not even talking about reports at this point, as I said I take reports with a grain of salt. If these places did not use fake photos, dated photos or engage in bait and switch you'd have a lot less negative reviews. If a guy is expecting a 20-something goddess and in walks a 40-something provider even if she still looks good for her age, it's disappointing. Some guys just can't hide it.

[SimpleK]

I think everyone overrates senior status. There's a crapload of senior mongers on the Happiness thread that are absolute SHILLS for Happiness. Nutmaker and Mondo Badfoot are two of the biggest shills on this site. There are probably other mongers in that thread that NEVER have negative reports whose reports should not be believed as well.

I'd much rather trust reviews by a monger that has visited 5+ AMPs and given an equal amount of positive and negative reports.

Also goser.

[H Mobius]

She instantly picks up on said monger's unspoken negative judgement of her, and as a result she isn't as pleasant, friendly or entertaining with that guy as she'd been with Red. So, ironically, the other monger's unsatisfying experience was probably brought on by his own judgements and demeanor; stuff he himself walked into the room with.

Agree with you; I'm a big believer in that. Red is quite the gentleman, and THAT is always noteworthy to a woman.

"90 percent of whatcha sayin', ain't comin' outta ya mouth". ~ Hitch

[ClintonPortis]

I tend to listen to the senior members with hundreds of post. Why? Because a lot of the MPs have people writing reviews for their girls and that's a fact. Some are obvious but others are subtle so you have to read between the lines. But. When a senior members like these guys post a review I take it pretty much as a review I can count on. Happy new year guys and happy mongering to all of us in 2017.

I think everyone overrates senior status. There's a crapload of senior mongers on the Happiness thread that are absolute SHILLS for Happiness. Nutmaker and Mondo Badfoot are two of the biggest shills on this site. There are probably other mongers in that thread that NEVER have negative reports whose reports should not be believed as well.

I'd much rather trust reviews by a monger that has visited 5+ AMPs and given an equal amount of positive and negative reports.

[Cosmic Kid]

You're right. It is just so important that the reader knows that I am not expressing the opinion of another monger.

My post was a compliment to you. You write fantastic reviews. Perhaps I should have stated that IN MY OPINION Red does the best reviews. In my direct experience, however, some of your reviews are better than the girls themselves. I am not alone in my opinion.

FWIW, here's my speculation on Redneck's reviews. My impression is Red tends to value attitude and service over looks. Plus he has a more relaxed appreciation than a lotta mongers do about what constitutes attractiveness in a woman. The provider enters the room and pretty quickly intuits where Red is coming from and his general open and positive attitude towards her. As a result she feels instantly accepted by Red and that's why he will often post a glowing review of a good time he had with a provider. Meanwhile, some other monger will go to the same woman but upon laying eyes on her for the first time decide, due to his own narrow concept of what a hot woman is supposed to look like, that he doesn't find this provider particularly attractive. Well, guess what: She instantly picks up on said monger's unspoken negative judgement of her, and as a result she isn't as pleasant, friendly or entertaining with that guy as she'd been with Red. So, ironically, the other monger's unsatisfying experience was probably brought on by his own judgements and demeanor; stuff he himself walked into the room with.

[UlanFan]

Perhaps three key words should be added to that last sentence: "The only problem is that in my opinion some times the reviews are better than the girl".

Without those three words or some similar qualifier, the sentence seems to imply that one or more of the sentence writer's own superior qualities (such as intellect, perceptiveness, honesty, etc.) makes the writer a superior judge of providers than the other guy.

Of course, like movie reviews and book reviews, provider reviews are highly subjective. Intelligent, experienced and truthful mongers can easily have significantly different perspectives on a provider.

I take all reviews with a grain of salt and as Red stated it's all IMO and YMMV. I've read about guaranteed BBBJ but I went to the girl and got CBJ. I read HE only no FS and was offer FS from the girl. I heard about girls shorting on time but I was not shorted, also, I've read that a girl never rushes and have been booted to the shower with 15 minutes left.

Every experience is unique. I think the reports just serve to inform us about a mongers own personal experience they are not a guarantee that any of us will receive the same level of service or lack of, if that is the case.

Catch a girl on a good day and you'll have the time of your life, catch her on a bad day and you'll be disappointed.

[Goser]

Perhaps three key words should be added to that last sentence: "The only problem is that in my opinion some times the reviews are better than the girl".

Without those three words or some similar qualifier, the sentence seems to imply that one or more of the sentence writer's own superior qualities (such as intellect, perceptiveness, honesty, etc.) makes the writer a superior judge of providers than the other guy.

Of course, like movie reviews and book reviews, provider reviews are highly subjective. Intelligent, experienced and truthful mongers can easily have significantly different perspectives on a provider.

You're right. It is just so important that the reader knows that I am not expressing the opinion of another monger.

My post was a compliment to you. You write fantastic reviews. Perhaps I should have stated that IN MY OPINION Red does the best reviews. In my direct experience, however, some of your reviews are better than the girls themselves. I am not alone in my opinion.

[BotoMoco]

Perhaps three key words should be added to that last sentence: "The only problem is that in my opinion some times the reviews are better than the girl".

Without those three words or some similar qualifier, the sentence seems to imply that one or more of the sentence writer's own superior qualities (such as intellect, perceptiveness, honesty, etc.) makes the writer a superior judge of providers than the other guy.

Of course, like movie reviews and book reviews, provider reviews are highly subjective. Intelligent, experienced and truthful mongers can easily have significantly different perspectives on a provider.

I tend to listen to the senior members with hundreds of post. Why? Because a lot of the MPs have people writing reviews for their girls and that's a fact. Some are obvious but others are subtle so you have to read between the lines. But. When a senior members like these guys post a review I take it pretty much as a review I can count on. Happy new year guys and happy mongering to all of us in 2017.

[Happy Seeker 8]

RE: Kid farien post on BP review forum. "Weird experience with Hapa and Joon".

You state (out of the blue) Joon says "go f** that ho' Hapa then" in your text convo with her, and then say you don't know why- must be because they chat?

Come on now! Whether they chat, know, see, hate or like each other, this will not be said "out of the blue". I for one would say, you probably made some kind of "comparison pitch" to Joon to make her say something like this. Like, Hapa does BB-why don't you or Hapa does "this" why don't you etc. If all of us who know these 2 ask them about this it might be interpreted wrong and turn them 2 into enemies.