Thread: Bareback Beauties
+
Add Report
Results 12,586 to 12,600 of 18209
-
12-23-16 15:16 #5624Senior Member

Posts: 472Doing CIP with a girl is always a crapshoot, even if she sees 1 guy a day.
Originally Posted by Scanalanalyst
[View Original Post]
-
12-23-16 00:04 #5623Banned Member

Posts: 270Mainly just a vibe I get from certain ads (and my intuitive track record is pretty damn good.) Plus, she looks a bit older, in that somewhat slutty MILFish way. Those types of K-girls are often okay for bare play.
Originally Posted by DaBears
[View Original Post]
Or at least in my sexperiences they've been.
GMD.
-
12-22-16 18:45 #5622Senior Member

Posts: 109I actually never CIP with her or done bare. Not interested as she used to see up to 10 guys a day, to now probably 5 a day. Last time I saw her must have been at the beginning of the year. It's crazy has she has evolved over the years. From being super skinny, then gaining some weight, then getting super fit, to now getting a bit softer again with a strange mouth / teeth surgery. I also think she's improved in her mechanical BBBJ over the years.
Originally Posted by Tirachinitas
[View Original Post]
Would be interesting to see more photos or videos of her in action, surprised there hasn't hasnt been any posted as she probably wouldn't object to it. Any monger want to tag team her and make a video? Haha, I'm sure it would only cost $800 or so for 2 hours.
-
12-22-16 15:27 #5621Regular Member

Posts: 8Only kgals
Literally only seems like posts on kgirl at this point would be dope to find other options I don't have yellow fever LOL.
Been hitting up BP trying to toftt, only getting offered bbj.
Don't hit up those Russians cv, the Brooker will say yes the girl won't deliver and pics are never close most of them ask for 4 bills. I was even really explicit and kept getting yes.
-
12-22-16 10:33 #5620Senior Member

Posts: 62Kgirl BBFS?
Just to understand your thought process, what about her pics makes you think BBFS could be on the table?
Originally Posted by GuyManDude
[View Original Post]
-
12-21-16 18:21 #5619Banned Member

Posts: 270K-girl ad caught my eye
Any Intel on this one boys? Looks like a hot fuck that could be open to the baresies if pics are real as ad claims.
GMD.
http://www.********.com/koreatown/Es...friend/1867671
-
12-21-16 13:33 #5618Senior Member

Posts: 793Sera
Just like every BB case, it's always YMMV.
Because Sera did BB with guy A does NOT mean you'll get BB.
Same for Rebecca, Megan or even Lohan.
-
12-20-16 21:19 #5617Senior Member

Posts: 717What I've Been Saying
I think the replies to my comment underscore precisely what I'm taking about as it relates to the BayArea AAMP SCENE, no sure BB options and the information is almost always subjective and YMMV. LASera has a lot of reviews on TER and not one even hints at BB. Compare that to TER reviews of well known BB ladies in LA like Nana, Yoona, MistressX, or Pepsi which either explicitly state it or hint at it.
-
12-20-16 17:26 #5616Senior Member

Posts: 860Greener, maybe. But I like to direct the session, so as long as I'm fucking bare, and she's not a dead fish, I'm happy; I walk out of the session feeling like it was worth it.
Originally Posted by Pmanhere
[View Original Post]
I think you guys overhype our LA girls. While they may be a little nastier, I wouldn't say they're orders of magnitude better to fuck. They are also not the best looking. I'd rather rawdog prettier girls, and it sounds like the bay area has better looking BBFS girls.
-
12-20-16 16:37 #5615Regular Member

Posts: 10Nana is WAY BETTER THEN Sera! Sera is over hyped.
I also thought Sera was no where the PSE experience of Nana. Sera's reviews were over hyped like Yelp reviews and Sera does not come close to Nana IMHO.
Originally Posted by RubberDuck208
[View Original Post]
-
12-20-16 16:24 #5614Banned Member

Posts: 126Agree. Sera was cool, rim was great, but I didn't get BBFS. YMMV.
Originally Posted by RubberDuck208
[View Original Post]
-
12-20-16 15:50 #5613Regular Member

Posts: 17I have not seen Sera yet since I stopped bringing my own condoms. I have not gotten BBFS from her but I've had other people claim that she does give it up as a big YMMV. Of course this is bad guesswork so I will say Sera does not give BBFS until otherwise (she has been on vacation since I've arrived in the bay area). My original comment was moreso directed that Sera runs a very similar PSE to Nana (at least in my experience). I will definitely report back if I do manage to see Sera during this month long trip. My guess is her $30 premium (bay area girls are now $220 standard) is for her "fame / legend status" as she has been doing it for a while. Frida has also done it and they are both advertised as "LA <NAME " girls, but it is just a guess.
Originally Posted by LAHobbyist2013
[View Original Post]
-
12-20-16 15:04 #5612Senior Member

Posts: 793Sera
When Sera was in LA, I think she was very selective on BBFS.
Originally Posted by LAHobbyist2013
[View Original Post]
-
12-20-16 14:26 #5611Regular Member

Posts: 10NO BBFS from LA Sera
Are you saying Sera DOES or DOES NOT do BBFS? I know my friends and I have not gotten BBFS from Sera and several people tried. Sera does charge $250 in San Mateo compared to the Bay Area average of $200, so we expected BBFS but did NOT get BBFS. Other girls in Viola's previous org gave up BBFS with multiple CIP with no expectations of using a condom at $200.
Originally Posted by YodamaDashi
[View Original Post]
-
12-20-16 14:07 #5610Senior Member

Posts: 41Really agree with your post, it sums up my experiences with the 2 cities exactly. I think that the bay is a great place for k-girls, but the problem is that it has to compete with LA, which of course is no contest. Compared to any other area in the USA for a fob korean girl SF is fantastic.
I wonder if that's why she came up to the bay. To tone down her expectations? My session with Sera was nowhere near what I've done with Nana.
Originally Posted by YodamaDashi
[View Original Post]







Reply With Quote




