Find Your New Baby
High Class Companions
Live Escorts
The Velvet Rooms
This forum thread is moderated by Admin
  1. #5076

    Correctg

    Quote Originally Posted by Adobe  [View Original Post]
    So while we're talking about hour-long massages for 230 and 180, I have a story to relate:

    Some time ago, a fellow member of this board recommended an UTR lady to me. He pulled no punches about her looks or age or past issues with substances. I decided to go see her because the donation described was very reasonable, and the lady offers services beyond FBSM from time to time.

    When she opened the door, I was not pleasantly surprised, but neither was I greatly disappointed. She was petite with apparent be-cups (actually double-A's, when she later removed her bra), and perhaps a bit more weathered than I expected.

    For maybe five seconds, I debated making an excuse and leaving. But she was friendly, chatty, and I figured that if worse came to worst, I'd spend some time with a nice lady who might even be a decent masseuse.

    Ten minutes later, she was nude, applying an exquisite lube to my sensitive spots and using motions that put her within the top 10% of sensual masseuses I've ever visited. Yes, it's possible that she just happened to know a set of sensual.

    Motions that were just what I like (and even I didn't know I liked them! But I think she's just that good.

    She offered more than massage. Roaming was wide open, for one thing. And she never once rushed me. In fact, I needed to be the one to start leaving her place, when 55 minutes had passed. I think another cup would have been available if I'd indicated a desire to pursue it.

    Donation was half, give or take, of the numbers we've been discussing around here lately. Looks-wise, she's no Ariel and probably no Sara. Truth to tell, however, while I was on my back and she was performing her magic, I wasn't really focusing on her looks.

    At all.

    She's very UTR although on infrequent occasion she advertises on be-page and see-list. I mention this tale just to point out that if we restrict ourselves to ladies who ask 180 for an hour, we will find them and spend 180 for an hour.

    But ladies who accept a lot less and offer a lot more. . . Well, they're out there.

    Good luck to us all!

    Adobe.
    You are absolutely right my friend. (Many) Years ago I met an UTR through someone else also. And yes she was plain with an average body and much older. Basically someone who 99% of the guys on here would either not go to in the first place or walk out when they got there. Well several years and many massages later she rode off on her cycle to the other coast to be with her daughter. It was a chance worth taking and well rewarded. Been looking ever since. SO.

  2. #5075
    Senior Member


    Posts: 787
    Quote Originally Posted by SecretSquirell  [View Original Post]
    I just meant if I am going for an hour FBSM session I expect most of that to be massage.
    Well, if the fluff includes an erotic, highly sensual coed shower, that's not bad at all. But if I've recently showered and the shower is unnecessary and not all that sensual, then personally I view it as something that I'm basically paying for when I'd prefer to have more massage time.

  3. #5074

    No Offense Intended

    I just meant if I am going for an hour FBSM session I expect most of that to be massage.

    Quote Originally Posted by Fluff  [View Original Post]
    Fluff is not such a bad thing.

  4. #5073
    Senior Member


    Posts: 787

    Case in Point. What's the Value of an Hour?

    So while we're talking about hour-long massages for 230 and 180, I have a story to relate:

    Some time ago, a fellow member of this board recommended an UTR lady to me. He pulled no punches about her looks or age or past issues with substances. I decided to go see her because the donation described was very reasonable, and the lady offers services beyond FBSM from time to time.

    When she opened the door, I was not pleasantly surprised, but neither was I greatly disappointed. She was petite with apparent be-cups (actually double-A's, when she later removed her bra), and perhaps a bit more weathered than I expected.

    For maybe five seconds, I debated making an excuse and leaving. But she was friendly, chatty, and I figured that if worse came to worst, I'd spend some time with a nice lady who might even be a decent masseuse.

    Ten minutes later, she was nude, applying an exquisite lube to my sensitive spots and using motions that put her within the top 10% of sensual masseuses I've ever visited. Yes, it's possible that she just happened to know a set of sensual.

    Motions that were just what I like (and even I didn't know I liked them! But I think she's just that good.

    She offered more than massage. Roaming was wide open, for one thing. And she never once rushed me. In fact, I needed to be the one to start leaving her place, when 55 minutes had passed. I think another cup would have been available if I'd indicated a desire to pursue it.

    Donation was half, give or take, of the numbers we've been discussing around here lately. Looks-wise, she's no Ariel and probably no Sara. Truth to tell, however, while I was on my back and she was performing her magic, I wasn't really focusing on her looks.

    At all.

    She's very UTR although on infrequent occasion she advertises on be-page and see-list. I mention this tale just to point out that if we restrict ourselves to ladies who ask 180 for an hour, we will find them and spend 180 for an hour.

    But ladies who accept a lot less and offer a lot more. . . Well, they're out there.

    Good luck to us all!

    Adobe.

  5. #5072
    Long time lurker. Decided to TOFTT for once rather than rely on everyone for reviews.

    Saw Maya in Waltham hoping for a nice FBSM. Came to the room and it wasn't the girl in the pictures, but she wasn't bad looking. 200 for the hr and it started off nice. Chatted for a bit while she did some light teasing in between the rubs. 15 min in came the flip, the HE, and out the door. Not going to repeat, not for this price at least.

  6. #5071

    Christina

    Quote Originally Posted by SirDuke15  [View Original Post]
    Had one scheduled myself and she was a no show after traveling all the way there. Told me she left her phone somewhere.

    Not sure I would re-schedule after that review!
    Time takes its toll and it looks like it is on christina.

  7. #5070
    Senior Member


    Posts: 229

    Fluff?

    Quote Originally Posted by SecretSquirell  [View Original Post]
    Add Natalie (Boston not Worcester) to that list. I usually book the 90 minute that is 230 but the hour is 180 I think. Legit LMT who provides the best mix of a real theraputic massage with enough teasing breaks throughout starting early so you don't forget what's coming. And she's in panties or nude depending on comfort and full roaming except no fiv. Search this forum for her info.

    I also agree there are dozens or more girls on BP you can have an hour or more FS with multi-pops But that's a crapshoot and personally I prefer a FBSM anyway.

    But on the subject of Sarah, she appears to be affiliated with formerly someone who's name I won't say of iSenual who deletes her online presence temporarily any time she is mentioned or reviewed. No idea if that is good or bad. I was actually considering seeing her but I guess I missed the times listed on her options. Once I read the review and saw the short actual massage time I reconsidered. If she is willing to skip the showers (I always arrive recently bathed) and offer close to the hour on the table, I'd pony up and give her a try. But 200 for only 30 minutes actual massage time is way steep. IMHO The rest is fluff. All the ladies listed to my knowledge (some first-hand, some from info here) give you most of your hour on the table.
    Fluff is not such a bad thing.

  8. #5069
    Senior Member


    Posts: 787

    Stephanie. Thumbs Up But. . .

    Quote Originally Posted by MnRoger  [View Original Post]
    Stephanie has been really consistent with her service and attitude all these years.
    I agree: Stephanie is a gem in terms of her warm and very open-minded attitude. Her massage studio is set up very professionally, and a shower is available before and after. She's a very, very nice lady.

    My one reservation: She's a fair amount larger than she looks in the ads she's recently posted on Backpage. The pictures could use some updating, for sure. She's not a SSBBW by any means, but she's also not a petite BBW, either.

    She offers a slow and very sensual massage, and, although YMMV, a few more expanded services as well.

    Would I see her again? Sure. But it really would be for the sensual HJ more than anything else.

    Adobe.

  9. #5068
    Quote Originally Posted by LeFreak  [View Original Post]
    You can add Stephanie in Chelsea at a mere $80/ hr, but you need to like bbws. Not where-the-hell-is-the-hole bbw, but bbw nonetheless.
    Stephanie has been really consistent with her service and attitude all these years.

  10. #5067
    Quote Originally Posted by Bastardale  [View Original Post]
    Please provide a list of independent (no AMP gals) massage providers who will go nude and allow roaming. Here's a start:

    Amara - $225/ hr.

    Christina and her traveling friend Ginger in Quincy - $200/ hr.

    Scarlet Chung in Medford - $200/ hr.

    Betty Love Rite - $200/ hr.

    Authentic Sensual Massage of NE - $200/ hr.

    Suria in Worcester - $200/ hr.

    Dream Girl Sophia - $180/ hr.

    Sonya's Comfort Sensations - $150/ hr.

    Chelsea in Fall River - $150/ hr.

    Any others?
    You can add Stephanie in Chelsea at a mere $80/ hr, but you need to like bbws. Not where-the-hell-is-the-hole bbw, but bbw nonetheless.

  11. #5066
    Quote Originally Posted by Bastardale  [View Original Post]
    Please provide a list of independent (no AMP gals) massage providers who will go nude and allow roaming. Here's a start:

    Amara - $225/ hr.

    Christina and her traveling friend Ginger in Quincy - $200/ hr.

    Scarlet Chung in Medford - $200/ hr.

    Betty Love Rite - $200/ hr.

    Authentic Sensual Massage of NE - $200/ hr.

    Suria in Worcester - $200/ hr.

    Dream Girl Sophia - $180/ hr.

    Sonya's Comfort Sensations - $150/ hr.

    Chelsea in Fall River - $150/ hr.

    Any others?
    Add Natalie (Boston not Worcester) to that list. I usually book the 90 minute that is 230 but the hour is 180 I think. Legit LMT who provides the best mix of a real theraputic massage with enough teasing breaks throughout starting early so you don't forget what's coming. And she's in panties or nude depending on comfort and full roaming except no fiv. Search this forum for her info.

    I also agree there are dozens or more girls on BP you can have an hour or more FS with multi-pops But that's a crapshoot and personally I prefer a FBSM anyway.

    But on the subject of Sarah, she appears to be affiliated with formerly someone who's name I won't say of iSenual who deletes her online presence temporarily any time she is mentioned or reviewed. No idea if that is good or bad. I was actually considering seeing her but I guess I missed the times listed on her options. Once I read the review and saw the short actual massage time I reconsidered. If she is willing to skip the showers (I always arrive recently bathed) and offer close to the hour on the table, I'd pony up and give her a try. But 200 for only 30 minutes actual massage time is way steep. IMHO The rest is fluff. All the ladies listed to my knowledge (some first-hand, some from info here) give you most of your hour on the table.

  12. #5065
    Senior Member


    Posts: 787

    Massage. Non-AMP

    Quote Originally Posted by Bastardale  [View Original Post]
    Please provide a list of independent (no AMP gals) massage providers who will go nude and allow roaming. Here's a start:

    Amara - $225/ hr.

    Christina and her traveling friend Ginger in Quincy - $200/ hr.

    Scarlet Chung in Medford - $200/ hr.

    Betty Love Rite - $200/ hr.

    Authentic Sensual Massage of NE - $200/ hr.

    Suria in Worcester - $200/ hr.

    Dream Girl Sophia - $180/ hr.

    Sonya's Comfort Sensations - $150/ hr.

    Chelsea in Fall River - $150/ hr.

    Any others?
    Suria at 100 is a full half-hour and although YMMV you will get as much in the half-hour with her as in an hour session with the lady you mentioned. In her 20's, cute, great sexy nips.

    Ariel on her website advertises 150 for the half-hour but once she's in town she frequently drops her rate to as low as 80 for a 20-minute sensual session with above-the-waist roaming. She's in her 20's, petite, cute.

    Or consider any of a number of FS ladies who offer a full hour of FS activities for 200 or 180 and who would be thrilled to drop their fee by 25 to 50, and offer unlimited roaming, if all they need to do in return is a bit of rubbing and tugging.

    Again, I do know there are lots of ladies happy to accept 200 for the same friendly service my first girlfriend provided in the backseat of a car. But personally, I work too hard for my money to shell out 200 for the kind of fun I can get for free from in the bathroom from a drunk chick at my local bar.

    Seriously, offer 80, maybe 100, to half of the advertisers working in Providence and you'll get unlimited roaming. FIV and DATY. And, yeah, you might have to bring over your own lube (from CVS, Walgreen's, or Rite-Aid) - but you'll get a nude handy easily.

    My 2 cents.

    Adobe.

  13. #5064

    Ok

    Quote Originally Posted by LeFreak  [View Original Post]
    What he said.
    Please provide a list of independent (no AMP gals) massage providers who will go nude and allow roaming. Here's a start:

    Amara - $225/ hr.

    Christina and her traveling friend Ginger in Quincy - $200/ hr.

    Scarlet Chung in Medford - $200/ hr.

    Betty Love Rite - $200/ hr.

    Authentic Sensual Massage of NE - $200/ hr.

    Suria in Worcester - $200/ hr.

    Dream Girl Sophia - $180/ hr.

    Sonya's Comfort Sensations - $150/ hr.

    Chelsea in Fall River - $150/ hr.

    Any others?

  14. #5063
    Quote Originally Posted by Adobe  [View Original Post]
    This sounds like she's asking way too much for a little too little. I checked out her website, and the actually massage lasts for 30 minutes. The rest of the time is the shower-before and the shower-after. So it's 200 for 55 minutes of the lady's time.

    Okay. Not to be petty. But let's break down her ad:

    She's in her 30's. Hard to tell from the pics, but I'm guessing her late 30's, maybe 40's. Nothing wrong with that. A sexy woman in her 30's is still a sexy woman. But I can't imagine myself handing over 200 to get my pud pulled by a 22-year-old, and much less a lady old enough to be the mother of a 22-year-old.

    And 200 for a handy with "some roaming"? What does "some roaming" even mean? I get to touch her bare ass and breasts? Sure sounds like no FIV.

    Look, nothing personal. I don't know Sara and it sure sounds like she puts a lot of effort into making the session memorable. But this site has reviews of gals offering multiple pops and more roaming for a lot less, and if we all start ponying up 200 for basically a half-hour of limited fun with a cute MILF, what are we going to be paying for a half-hour of all-included fun with a girl in her 20's?

    I mean, the body slide is 400 clams for a 30-minute "Nuru gel" (ooooooooooohhhhhh, special!) body slide. I'm sorry, but for 400 of my clams I'd rather be sliding my hotdog into and inside of a lady's clam for a couple of hours, with a couple of cups of coffee served on top of that.

    Guys, we got to draw the line somewhere! It was bad enough when certain providers visited our area and promised the world, but then all you got was a little above-the-waist touching during a half-hour handy. At least they were in their twenties, and the "massage" fee was only 80 claims.

    This is just my 2 cents. If you've got the dough to drop 200 for a half-hour massage and handy, more power to you.

    Adobe.
    What he said.

  15. #5062
    Senior Member


    Posts: 787

    Too Much for Too Little. Nothing Personal, but. . .

    Quote Originally Posted by Bastardale  [View Original Post]
    http://www.isensualsaraskye.com

    http://boston.backpage.com/Therapeut...uples/30062968

    I visited Sara a few weeks ago. She has a condo in the Waltham area. There was no parking at the condo but I was able to find parking nearby without too much fuss.

    Sara is fairly new to the business. She required some screening which I provided (although I prefer to skip screening altogether). She works out of her home so she was pretty adamant about the screening. Maybe she changed her policy, but be prepared to be screened.

    Sara is the girl in the pictures. She's a pretty blonde woman in her 30's. Her body looks good for her age. I think the pics she uses are real.

    I got the sweet and simple package. We started off in the shower together. She cleaned me and I cleaned her. Then we moved to her bed for the massage and ending (which was by hand).

    The cost for the session was $200, which is about right. The shower is nice and so was the nude massage. It was a fairly sensual session. She encourages some roaming, which is nice. I'd like to return at some point. I think she'd get better with repeat customers.
    This sounds like she's asking way too much for a little too little. I checked out her website, and the actually massage lasts for 30 minutes. The rest of the time is the shower-before and the shower-after. So it's 200 for 55 minutes of the lady's time.

    Okay. Not to be petty. But let's break down her ad:

    She's in her 30's. Hard to tell from the pics, but I'm guessing her late 30's, maybe 40's. Nothing wrong with that. A sexy woman in her 30's is still a sexy woman. But I can't imagine myself handing over 200 to get my pud pulled by a 22-year-old, and much less a lady old enough to be the mother of a 22-year-old.

    And 200 for a handy with "some roaming"? What does "some roaming" even mean? I get to touch her bare ass and breasts? Sure sounds like no FIV.

    Look, nothing personal. I don't know Sara and it sure sounds like she puts a lot of effort into making the session memorable. But this site has reviews of gals offering multiple pops and more roaming for a lot less, and if we all start ponying up 200 for basically a half-hour of limited fun with a cute MILF, what are we going to be paying for a half-hour of all-included fun with a girl in her 20's?

    I mean, the body slide is 400 clams for a 30-minute "Nuru gel" (ooooooooooohhhhhh, special!) body slide. I'm sorry, but for 400 of my clams I'd rather be sliding my hotdog into and inside of a lady's clam for a couple of hours, with a couple of cups of coffee served on top of that.

    Guys, we got to draw the line somewhere! It was bad enough when certain providers visited our area and promised the world, but then all you got was a little above-the-waist touching during a half-hour handy. At least they were in their twenties, and the "massage" fee was only 80 claims.

    This is just my 2 cents. If you've got the dough to drop 200 for a half-hour massage and handy, more power to you.

    Adobe.

Posting Limitations

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
LoveHUB Escorts Directory
Top Tier Escorts
Best Escorts
Top Escorts

Protected by Copyscape