Escort Reports

**Ambidextrous** · 07-27-15 18:35

Browsing through reviews on anoThER site, I came across favorable ones for this provider. Caucasian, 22, looked super sexy in agency website pics. (Incidentally this agency's providers all seem to be Caucasian.) Passed screening (thanks to my regular K-agencies) and set it up. Toll was steep -- $3. 2/ h but WTF, at that price point the service should be good. Also this agency website seemed to project a high-end image.

Arrived early at Tysons Corner hotel location but she wasn't ready. By the time I got to the room it was 10 minutes past the hour, but she said she had a full hour and thankfully as things progressed she did not seem to watch the clock at all. She was attractive and looked 22 but somehow not as hot as on the website.

After some initial chatting and kissing, I gave her a massage which led to DATO and extended DATY during which she allowed a little FITO. She moaned but I could not get her to climax so after about 15 minutes I gave up. Some women take a long time, others seem to need more stimulation than I can do with just tongue and fingers.

Rachel informed me that she does not do CIM or on body. Disappointing considering the steep toll but I made the best of it. She gave BBBJ, then put on the cover and we did several positions. Finished with more BBBJ, her technique was pretty good but she needed to use her hand to complete, avoiding getting splashed on at the critical moment.

Rachel was good natured, open and communicative which made for a pleasant experience if lacking romance. In fact there was a sizable age gap between us and her youthful "upspeak" gave me the disconcerting feeling I was chatting with a friend's adolescent daughter who just happened to be naked.

Maybe I watch too much porn where enthusiastic females seem only too happy to get a mouthful (or a faceful), but that is what I always hope to find. At $2/ h I would have been satisfied with this level of service. At $3. 2/ h it was overpriced.

F7 B7 A8 S6.

**LoveDemAzn** · 07-14-15 14:34

Originally Posted by NovaCane [View Original Post]

Just PM me with an questions if ya need. Movie follows a typical K Agency script but I can fill in any questions about looks (although pictures are accurate) or skills (maybe the oThER site takes care of that one). I'd go see her again in a heart beat. I wish I wasn't so busy at work now. I'll try to see her again this weekend. I doubt she's around much longer than that.

They usually stay for 2-3 weeks. They don't like being review on site that free. It's going to be hard for some to even get into the action cause K agencies are careful of who they accept in. Most of these these girl choose what state they want to go to so if you treat them right, they will return.

**NovaCane** · 07-13-15 22:19

Originally Posted by YoyoSpa [View Original Post]

I recognize no ban on posting about these girls. (Ambidextrous used to review them periodically.) But I guess I'm as guilty of others in that I haven't really done it much (at all)? There are oThER forums where these girls are very systematically reviewed so there doesn't seem much upside to repeating things here. Julia's on my radar too. If I pass the screening. I'd be interesting in hearing your take on her.

Just PM me with an questions if ya need. Movie follows a typical K Agency script but I can fill in any questions about looks (although pictures are accurate) or skills (maybe the oThER site takes care of that one). I'd go see her again in a heart beat. I wish I wasn't so busy at work now. I'll try to see her again this weekend. I doubt she's around much longer than that.

**Yoyo Spa** · 07-13-15 15:55

Originally Posted by NovaCane [View Original Post]

Is there any protocol regarding leaving reviews for girls at the K Agencies? I rarely ever see reviews for girls at these Agencies so I'm not sure if people just don't because they aren't around very long or there is some unwritten rule I'm unaware of? I'd be happy to leave a review if one of the well established Sr's want to give me a little background so I don't cause any issues for the Agencies or break some rules here.

Until then. Julia is incredible. Incredible. My experience with them is limited but amazing. I'm sure if read soon anyone familiar with the Agencies can find her based on name alone and pictures are accurate. Maybe even better in person. Until I get a response and get to leave a review I will give details to friends and well established / trusted seniors.

I recognize no ban on posting about these girls. (Ambidextrous used to review them periodically.) But I guess I'm as guilty of others in that I haven't really done it much (at all)? There are oThER forums where these girls are very systematically reviewed so there doesn't seem much upside to repeating things here. Julia's on my radar too. If I pass the screening. I'd be interesting in hearing your take on her.

**NovaCane** · 07-13-15 01:04

Is there any protocol regarding leaving reviews for girls at the K Agencies? I rarely ever see reviews for girls at these Agencies so I'm not sure if people just don't because they aren't around very long or there is some unwritten rule I'm unaware of? I'd be happy to leave a review if one of the well established Sr's want to give me a little background so I don't cause any issues for the Agencies or break some rules here.

Until then. Julia is incredible. Incredible. My experience with them is limited but amazing. I'm sure if read soon anyone familiar with the Agencies can find her based on name alone and pictures are accurate. Maybe even better in person. Until I get a response and get to leave a review I will give details to friends and well established / trusted seniors.

**Pilot Aviator** · 06-29-15 23:22

(long prelude) / Behavior between consenting adults that harms no one is the premise of those localities that legalized professional sex workers (or at least leave them and their clients alone).

I came to that conclusion early (I was only a sophomore in college when I made my first visit to Copenhagen and the Red Canal. And our tour guide for the trip was a tiny British lady (very nice tour guide, 40-ish), who wanted to be sure our (all-college men) group stayed out of trouble by showing us where the authorized "safe locations" were, and what the rules were (how to negotiate price and services) and where to avoid. Her stated attitude was "you go to a restaurant for food, sex is simply another appetite. ".

As my travels continued over the subsequent 30+ years, I met some very nice women -- some of whom were professional sex workers (their profession did not change my opinion that they were nice ladies / women (and FWIW, the friendliest professionals I found were in Brazil and Australia). / prelude ends.

I've been actively engaged in the hobby for some time. I've met some very nice ladies in the DMV-area -- I like my appointments with them.

The only truly objectionable experience I've had in this region was with a younger than expected (mid-20's+) provider who spoke little English. Her lack of experience was obvious to me, and her demeanor was such that I became uncomfortable. Because she spoke little English, there was no way I could be sure she actually consented to the line of work at which she was employed. Because of her age, I was not sure she actually chose this line of work for herself. I did not know her circumstances, so I terminated the session early and departed. That location closed a few years ago (a victim of area redevelopment).

Just a thought: I am not trying to stir the pot. I truly believe consenting adults should be left alone (and they should not be stigmatized). Perhaps many of you speak the languages of people who speak little English (good for you --regrettably I do not). To ensure consent, I prefer the experience, demenor, looks and language skills of the the over-30's to over 50's -- these are independent business women who made adult decisions related to their choice of work (and yes I recognize not all choices are good choices).

Enjoy the hobby (If you do not know me, read my reviews / other posts, you'll see I enjoy the hobby). Be careful, be generous, and always be nice to the ladies.

PA.

**SxNine** · 06-29-15 11:54

GORGEO║ US ║9553; ASIAN ║ STUNNER ║9553;9553;.

The pictures are not accurate although the physical description at 5'4", 106,36 D is approximate and her face is cute. Meena speaks little or no English, so your wishes have to be demonstrated instead of spoken. The menu is $. 2 hh or $. 6 fh. At this point there is no specific reason to run, she is cute and the description is approximately correct. The LE check and undress is normal, but that's where normal ends. The back massage was two elbows applied so forcefully that they could have left bruises. The immediate flip was defensive to end the pain. She assumed the cg position and things were looking up with a nice pair of the headlights. However, it was hands only. No nursing. Then, on goes the cover and a good CBJ follows but then she tries to finish by hand. Pulling away, the positions change to cg, reverse cg, mish and back to finish in cg. Multiple attempts to finger home base were pushed away. The session was energetic and satisfying, but disappointing with the limits she set. Better service elsewhere. XXX-495-2632.

http://nova.backpage.com/FemaleEscor...unner/17039910

**NovaCane** · 06-28-15 14:25

Originally Posted by JmSuttr [View Original Post]

First, a search of her number turns up nothing other than the single hit on the gfemonkey site. Since it's not associated with any other ad that means it's either brand new or she's changed her number. IME, good providers rarely need to change their numbers and if she's new then of course she has no track record.

Second, and more troubling, are the fake pics. See this link http://bit.ly/1IlH7ix for the search results from one of her pics.

Third, combining #1 and #2: no intel + no reviews + fake pics + high price = too many red flags.

Three strikes on this one, IMHO.

Ahhhh thanks I searched most of the pictures and nothing came up so I either missed that one or did something wrong but usually I'm able to find out whose pictures they really are. The other things were definitely strikes but not finding stolen pictures (when I searched) gave me a little hope. But without some kind of review I couldn't justify risking that much coin. It's a damn shame because the real girl is gorgeous and I'd probably spend that for an hour with that beauty.

Thanks for your help bud.

**JmSuttr** · 06-28-15 13:12

Originally Posted by NovaCane [View Original Post]

Has anyone ever visited or tried to visit this little blonde minx? I google searched all of her images and didn't find anything then I searched her phone and email and still didn't find any reviews. Closest I found was the website below which says she has a 3. 5 of 5 stars by 33 users.

https://www.gfemonkey.com/profiles/k...1e5305008b459a

She is very pricey so I don't think I can pull the trigger unless I can find some reviews of her out there first or if someone here has ever seen her.

First, a search of her number turns up nothing other than the single hit on the gfemonkey site. Since it's not associated with any other ad that means it's either brand new or she's changed her number. IME, good providers rarely need to change their numbers and if she's new then of course she has no track record.

Second, and more troubling, are the fake pics. See this link http://bit.ly/1IlH7ix for the search results from one of her pics.

Third, combining #1 and #2: no intel + no reviews + fake pics + high price = too many red flags.

Three strikes on this one, IMHO.

**NovaCane** · 06-28-15 11:05

Has anyone ever visited or tried to visit this little blonde minx? I google searched all of her images and didn't find anything then I searched her phone and email and still didn't find any reviews. Closest I found was the website below which says she has a 3. 5 of 5 stars by 33 users.

https://www.gfemonkey.com/profiles/k...1e5305008b459a

She is very pricey so I don't think I can pull the trigger unless I can find some reviews of her out there first or if someone here has ever seen her.

**LearJet9** · 04-26-15 08:41

Originally Posted by Grafenberg [View Original Post]

Looks kinda like it's Elina Morgan on Ave-X who was formerly HotAngelina http://hotangelina.escortfiles.com/about.

Wow thanks for the link. Hot Angelina is hot. But Morgan is not her. I'd say the body is similar, both have a great rack. Hot Angelina seems a bit thicker as well in the hips and legs. Morgan is truly on the slim side. Face is totally different, both are very appealing though Morgan hasnt had any work there. Importantly, Morgan's rates are 30% off HA's (only for now I will predict) and she can do Dom as well. FWIW.

**Grafenberg** · 04-25-15 16:03

Originally Posted by BunkerBuster [View Original Post]

She's new and UTR here, but used to be an agency girl (Private Viewings).

http://www.escorthistory.com/202-748-1834/

You can look her up on USASG as LPG99, or Google reviews for Rachel Dawson on several oThER sites.

Her reviews look good across the board.

Looks kinda like it's Elina Morgan on Ave-X who was formerly HotAngelina http://hotangelina.escortfiles.com/about.

**LearJet9** · 04-21-15 16:35

Greetings. First off a sincere thanks to those members who have contacted Morgan. She is settling into the area and wanted you to know she now has an in call thanks to the generosity / biz savvy of one of our own. Apparently the interest is high to see her but was an issue for most without a decent incall. I for one can relate to that.

So, not sure how long she will have it but she is there now. Thanks again to the member who made it happen. You know who you are.

**Pilot Aviator** · 04-20-15 22:06

In the past two days, Morgan has received significant by name, detailed postings here.

By definition -- that is NOT being UTR.

She may not have (yet) posted a local CL or BP advert (or local URL), but I am certain those that pay attention have made note of the arrival.

FWIW.

Always be nice to the ladies (especially very nice ladies like Morgan).

PA.

**Bunker Buster** · 04-20-15 18:35

Originally Posted by LearJet9 [View Original Post]

Guys, a friend of mine just moved from Daytona to F'burg. She's working on getting a site up, and an ad posted here but is UTR for the time being trying to get on her feet. She's absolutely not doing BP. About a dozen members helped her in Daytona a few weeks ago and you can read her rave reviews there, she goes by Morgan. Look for a post by DinerJim for some sweet pics. Until she gathers some funds, she will probably do outcall local to F'burg, hopes to see only caucasion guys and wants to stay low-volume. I can tell you, and so can they. Absolutely a cut-above. Body to kill and absolute GFE. PM me for details and treat her right. She's ready to roll.

She's new and UTR here, but used to be an agency girl (Private Viewings).

http://www.escorthistory.com/202-748-1834/

You can look her up on USASG as LPG99, or Google reviews for Rachel Dawson on several oThER sites.

Her reviews look good across the board.